Preview

Pricewaterhousecoopers Llp Auditors' Independence Issues & Violations

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1788 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pricewaterhousecoopers Llp Auditors' Independence Issues & Violations
SEC Concerned with Changes in the Public Accounting Profession
The SEC and the former Chairman Arthur Levitt Jr. were extremely concerned that the public accounting firms were violating the auditors independence rules addressed through the Securities Exchange Acts. Auditing firms now had dual citizenship in public companies: (1) they issued opinions on audited financial statements and (2) they participated in various consulting engagements for those same companies. Levitt 's solution was to split auditing and consulting. The former Chairman was concerned that the public would lose confidence in the financial markets …… and the whole system would be jeopardized.

Public Accounting Revenues vs. Consulting Revenues by 1999
By 1976, audit fees accounted for approximately 70% of total revenue earned by any accounting firm in general. According to the Public Accounting Report, an Atlanta newsletter, the auditing and assurance services revenues dropped to 30% and tax services business accounted for 19% of the total revenues earned in 1999. Mathematically speaking, this means management consulting services accounted for approximately 51% of the total revenue being earned in 1999 by public accounting firms.

Fact: According to The Business Journal 's Book of Lists, PwC had $75 million in South Florida billings in 1998 to place third among accounting firms.

SEC Auditors ' Independence Rule
The independence rules require that auditors refrain from investing in companies that they audit, to ensure objective, truthful reporting and opinion. The rule applies to all auditors, their relatives, spouses, dependents, non-dependents, and, in some cases, associates must disclose all holdings.

On the September 25, 2002 issue of BusinessWeekOnline.com, the Accounting Wars Powerful auditor-consultants are the target of Arthur Levitt 's crusade articles defined "Independence to mean, CPAs cannot audit their own or their partners ' work….…..clear and honest



Bibliography: 1. Tampa Bay Business Journal – February 15, 1999: SEC issues auditors new independence guidelines by Carol Cronan: http://tampabay.bizjournals.com/tampabay/stories/1999/02/15/newscolumn2.html 2. CFO Magazine – March Issue 2000 – CFO.com: Policing the Auditors There are rumbles in the industry that more than one Big Five accounting firm will be found in violation of independence regulations by Leslie Schultz: http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/2988508/c_3046533?f=insidecfo 3. Accounting Education.com: Independent Consultants Finds Widespread Independence Violations at PriceWaterhouseCoopers – January 10, 2000 by Andrew Priest: http://www.accountingeducation.com/news/news779.html 4. South Florida The Business Journal – April 7, 2000: SEC keeping close eye on accountants ' independence by Jim Freer: http://www.bizjournals.com/southflorida/stories/2000/04/10/focus3.html?t=printable 5. The CPA Journal: The SEC 's New Auditors Independence Standard by Dan L. Goldwasser Esq. http://nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2001/0400/features/f041801.htm 6. Business Week Online.com – September 30, 2002 – Arthur Levitt 's Crusade http:businessweek.com/print/magazine/content/02_39/b3801097.htm/ 7. The Auditor 's Report Volume 23, No. 2, Winter 2002 – An Update on Auditor Independence by Douglas F. Prawitt, Brigham Young University http://www.accounting.rutgers.edu/raw/aaa/audit/Pubs/Audrep/00winter/item04.htm 8. Business Week Online.com – September 25, 2002 – Accounting Wars Powerful auditor-consultants are the target of Arthur Levitt 's crusade http://businessweek.com/2000/00_39/b3700001.htm?scriptFramed 9. TheStreet.com: Report on PriceWaterhouseCoopers Violations Has Some Critics by Robert Kowaiski and Tracy Byrnes Staff Reporters http://thestreet.com/pf/funds/taxes/856161.html 10. The Motley Fool – Fool.com: Who 's Auditing the Auditors? by Yi-Hsin Chang http://www.fool.com/news/2000/foth000110.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Smackey Dog Food

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages

    When auditing a publicly held company, auditors need to observe principles. The ethical principles of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Code of Professional Conduct are independence, responsibilities, the public interest, integrity, objectivity and independence, due care, and scope and nature of services. More specifically, audit team members are required to be objective and independent with regard to the audit by maintaining objectivity and being free of conflicts of interest in discharging professional responsibilities and by being independent in fact and appearance when providing auditing and other attestation services. Through this one can see how influential the SEC is. Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, auditors have to be objective and independent otherwise legal sanctions can be incurred.…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before and After Enron: CPAs’ Views on Auditor Independence By Deborah L. Lindberg and Frank D. Beck: The CPA Journal…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sarbanes Oxley Act

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Arens, A., Elder, R.J., & Beasley, M. (2010). ACCT 403: Auditing and assurance services: 2010 custom edition (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    A quasi- governmental agency called the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) was created and charged with direct oversight and regulation of the accounting industry (Jahmani et al., 2008). PCAOB works in conjunction with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to provide oversight of all public accounting firms and publically traded companies with the expressed purpose of protecting “ the interests of investors and further the public interest in the preparation of informative, fair and independent audit report” (PCAOB 2002)…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    ---The external auditing profession as a whole has became more concentrated on maintaining auditor independence and it is now one of the cornerstones of quality auditing. One way that independence can be violated is when an auditor shows bias towards an important user of the financial statements. Management, stockholders, bondholders, and taxing and regulatory companies are all important users that the profession has tried to avoid showing bias towards. The SEC has written principles that show independence is impaired when an auditor acts as management or an employer of the audit client or if the auditor is in any position of advocacy for the company. The AICPA also states that there are safeguards in place to avoid independence problems. Some that prevent potential bias are audit partner rotations of every 5 years, not allowing nonaudit work to be done by the external auditor, and rotation of senior engagement personnel. Overall, many things have been done to prevent potential bias towards particular users because it ruins the integrity of auditing.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act have limited a public company’s choice of auditors by placing a strong emphasis on maintaining independence between the auditor and the client. Before the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, accounting firms could provide auditing services as well as other services including consulting services to companies and still, in the eyes of the law, maintain independence. After some big scandals came out in the early 2000’s, including the Enron scandal, there was a strong push for more restrictions on the nonaudit services that auditors could provide to clients. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act put into place restrictions on these services and created the PCAOB which provided oversight on auditing services and has the job of making sure that independence is maintained in all cases. This is a change from the past where it was the auditors responsibility to make sure that independence is maintained between themselves and the client.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If You Need

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This section outlines specific relationships that impair auditor independence. There is a provision for other considerations that defines the reasonable person test for determining if there is a threat to independence.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Boynton, W. C., & Johnson, R. N. (2006). Modern auditing: Assurance services and the integrity of financial reporting (8th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Accounting, Fraud

    • 2038 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Throughout the past several years major corporate scandals have rocked the economy and hurt investor confidence. The largest bankruptcies in history have resulted from greedy executives that “cook the books” to gain the numbers they want. These scandals typically involve complex methods for misusing or misdirecting funds, overstating revenues, understating expenses, overstating the value of assets or underreporting of liabilities, sometimes with the cooperation of officials in other corporations (Medura 1-3). In response to the increasing number of scandals the US government amended the Sarbanes Oxley act of 2002 to mitigate these problems. Sarbanes Oxley has extensive regulations that hold the CEO and top executives responsible for the numbers they report but problems still occur. To ensure proper accounting standards have been used Sarbanes Oxley also requires that public companies be audited by accounting firms (Livingstone). The problem is that the accounting firms are also public companies that also have to look after their bottom line while still remaining objective with the corporations they audit. When an accounting firm is hired the company that hired them has the power in the relationship. When the company has the power they can bully the firm into doing what they tell them to do. The accounting firm then loses its objectivity and independence making their job ineffective and not accomplishing their goal of honest accounting (Gerard). Their have been 379 convictions of fraud to date, and 3 to 6 new cases opening per month. The problem has clearly not been solved (Ulinski).…

    • 2038 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Independence of outside audit firms has been an ongoing issue for a long time in the US corporate world. The fundamental problem arises for the lack of clarity about whom does the audit firm really works for, the shareholders or the client company. According to Anandarajan et all (2008), this lack of clarity has resulted in auditor’s independence being impaired. In the US, the client hires, pays, and fires the auditor and therefore, the culture of the auditors serving at the pleasure of the client still remains. As DeAngelo (1981) explained in his article, an important aspect of the loss of auditor independence is that auditors refrain from reporting detected material misstatements in audited financial statements, thereby failing to perform their duty to warn. Another aspect of the issue relates to the provision of non-audit services by auditors to their clients. As Lai (2003) said, this allegation receives much impetus in recent years because non-audit revenue has out-grown audit revenue to become a much more dominant source of public accounting firms’ total revenue. After the recent financial scandals involving large firms like Enron and Worldcom, concern regarding auditor independence has climbed to a height. This triggered the adoption of the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act which passed into law on July 30, 2002.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Auditor Independence - 3

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    (Bailey & Gramling) To achieve absolute auditor independence the auditor needs to be independent both in fact and in appearance in order for stakeholders to accept the auditor’s opinion on the financial reports of an organization (2004). (Bailey & Gramling) Actual independence, known as independence in fact, requires auditors to complete their work with complete honesty, integrity and objectivity, following all statutory requirements and guidelines set out by AASB regarding auditor conformance (2004). Auditors must also achieve independence in appearance, which comprises of the public view on your audit performance. This requires an auditor to eliminate factors that may present the view that you are influenced, have a relationship with or may have a biased opinion towards the company in which you audit. Justice Owen states that professional independence is a state of mind. He comments on the difficulty in determining a breach of actual independence, noting that it is impossible to enter an auditors mind and determine if there has been any breach regarding evidence collection procedures or inappropriate reporting. This places greater emphasis on the importance of achieving independence in fact and in appearance, for stakeholders to believe your opinion of organisations financial statements as a valid and honest view.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On January 14, 1999, the commission issued an Opinion and Order Pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, In the Matter of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Release No. 40945) (“Order”), which censured PwC for violating auditor independence rules and improper professional conduct. Pursuant to the settlement reached with the commission, PwC agreed to, among other things, complete an internal review by Fardella to identify instances in which the firm’s partners or professionals owned securities of public audit clients of PwC in contravention of applicable rules and regulations concerning independence.…

    • 2324 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the mid 80s, the AICPA lift on the ban on advertising caused revenue generation to become more critical to partner’s compensation. The profit structure of CPA firms changed, and in 1999, revenues for management consulting accounted for more than half of the then-Big Five’s revenue. As a result, the audit function evolved into a loss leader that public accounting firms offered in conjunction with vastly more lucrative consulting engagements. But as public accounting firms competed more aggressively on price for audit engagements, they were forced by cost considerations to reduce the number of procedures performed for each client engagement. This resulted in increased tests of controls and statistical models, and fewer of the basic, time-consuming tests of transactions that increase the likelihood of detecting fraud. In addition, junior auditors were frequently assigned the crucial oversight roles usually filled by senior partners, who were otherwise engaged in marketing activities to prospective clients. This reduced the effectiveness of the instructor-new accountant training process.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    People rely extensively on the advice of experts. Often, these experts face conflicts of interest between their own self-interest and their professional obligation to provide good advice. Conflicts of interest played a central role in the corporate scandals that shook America at the turn of the twenty-first century. Many companies have joined Enron and WorldCom in issuing earnings restatements as a result of inaccuracies in published financial reports. Adelphia, Bristol-Myers Squibb, FastTrack Savings & Loan, Rocky Mountain Electric, Mirant, Global Crossing, Halliburton, Qwest, AOL Time Warner, Tyco, and Xerox are some of the firms that have come under scrutiny for potentially corrupt management and a clear lack of independent financial monitoring. At the root of both this mismanagement and the failure of monitoring systems lie conflicts of interest. For example, stock options give upper management incentives to boost short-term stock prices at the expense of a company’s long-term viability. And auditors charged with independently reviewing a firm’s financial reports have often been found…

    • 14467 Words
    • 58 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Syllabus

    • 1809 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Boynton, W. C., & Johnson, R. N. (2006). Modern auditing (8th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.…

    • 1809 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays