Preview

President Andrew Jackson Vetoes Bank Bill—July 10, 1832

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
957 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
President Andrew Jackson Vetoes Bank Bill—July 10, 1832
Ernesto Hernández Rodríguez
Deacon Orr
Economics
October 9, 2012

President Andrew Jackson Vetoes Bank Bill—July 10, 1832

President Andrew Jackson veto against the bank bill is truly a communication to Congress but it is also like a political manifesto. He states that the privileges possessed by the bank are unauthorized by the Constitution, subversive of the rights of the States, and dangerous to the liberties of the people.

In McCuloch v Maryland, the court turned to the "necessary" and "proper" clause which grants Congress enumerated powers which include the power to regulate collect taxes. President Jackson explains the necessity in regards to the functions that the bank is trying to fulfill: The "degree of its necessity,” involving all the details of a banking institution, is a question exclusively for legislative consideration (Jackson). It is not question for the judicial department. As stated in the Constitution the one that has the job to determine what is "necessary" in cases where the law is not prohibited or really calculated, is the legislative department.

President Jackson gives major points in describing the reason why the bank was not "necessary" and "proper". At first the bank was established by Congress because of the power to determine what was necessary. But in the years 1816 and 1832 Congress proposed and took away from their successors the power of establishing banks for twenty years and then for fifteen years more. This contradiction that Congress did of bartering away or divesting itself from the powers is unconstitutional because of using discretion upon itself; Congress was limiting the discretion of their successors. And the Constitution does not grant Congress the power to inflict this in itself.

The bank affected the rights of the Sates in a subversive way. It gave up, surrendered the right of the States to tax the banking institutions. Under the operation of this act resident stockholders and citizens would be



Cited: Jackson, Andrew. «Miller Center.» 10 de July de 1832. Miller Center. Monday October 2012. <http://millercenter.org/scripps/archive/speeches/detail/3636>. McBride, Alex. «pbs.» s.f. The Supreme Court. Monday October 2012. <http://www.pbs.org/wnet/supremecourt/antebellum/landmark_mcculloch.html>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    RULE: The Constitution of the United States cannot possibly list all the enumerated powers of the branches of government, and thus Congress has the authority to exercise implied powers which fall within the legal bounds of the document. Therefore, according to Article I, Section 8, Clause 18, Congress has the authority to incorporate a bank. The state of Maryland does not have the right to tax this federal institution, as doing so would harm and hinder the operations of the bank. This would be a violation of Article VI, Clause 2, where it is stated that the federal laws are the supreme laws of the land.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Main reason for vetoing the bank was that the bank had too much power given by lawmakers. They practically could control the economy. They had the power to take down businesses by not giving them loans. The wholes system is wrong and not fit for the common men of America. I argued that it was unconstitutional because it will only lead to a monopoly to the investors that own about 80% of the…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    aqndrew jackson

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Because of the unique relationship between it and the government, the Bank was awarded special privileges, among these were its being a storehouse for public funds. The Bank could then use these funds for its own purposes without paying interest. It could issue bank notes and was not required to pay state taxes. It was also understood that Congress was not to charter any comparable financial institution[21]. In return, the Bank was to pay a bonus of one and a half million dollars, public funds were transferred and payments made with no charge and the government was to appoint five of the Bank directors[22].…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1775, the Congress printed “continentals,” a paper note that was printed in massive quantities that led to rapidly accelerating inflation, causing them to go out of commission. Later, in 1791, at the urge of then Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton, the Congress established the First Bank of the United States, which became the largest company in the nation. The political climate was inclining towards the idea of a central bank again in 1816, so by a narrow margin, the Congress managed to charter the Second Bank of the United States. However, later, Andrew Jackson, an anti-central-bank man, was elected in 1828, and he vowed to stop it. From 1836 to 1865, state-chartered banks and uncharted “free banks” roamed the nation, issuing their…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nowhere was the democratic ideal depicted in the body of a man than in President Andrew Jackson. Elected as one of the more popular presidents of the early nineteenth century, the people’s choice of Jackson as a man who appealed to the interests and experiences of a cast majority reflected the democratic process on an honest scale. While its beauty and pure form remained generally housed in elections of the time, the democracy employed by Jackson, particularly in his economic politics, should also be viewed as a contribution to its early development in America. The pinnacle of Jackson’s economic dilemma found spiteful ground on the question of what to do about the Bank of the United States. The national bank itself had been established by somewhat democratic in the battle between sound economic standing Hamiltonians and limited government advocating Jeffersonians of the early 1800’s. Jacksonianism, which could be best characterized as Jefferson’s Republicanism thirty years later also, sought to limit the power of the federal government in hopes to secure more involvement of the states, and this the people, in the political process. Jackson held that the bank was not necessary, and that is was, moreover, not needed in a democratic America. Its operation often favored big business interest and stomped out farmers and westerner to who Jackson appealed. Though…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Born into poverty on the South Carolina frontier in 1767, Andrew Jackson understood all the disadvantages of being poor. Therefore, as the seventh president of the United States, Jackson made sure that his abilities were put to good use. He made sure that the common people had the same opportunities and benefits as the riches. An example of this heroic action is his battle with the Bank of the United States (263). President Jackson saw that the National Bank benefited wealthy eastern depositors at the expense of the smaller state banks, farmers and the hard working common people. In addition, the bank’s president seemed to not be trustworthy. Therefore, Jackson vetoed the recharter bill that his opponent Henry Clay had renewed, and took the…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He only served for two terms, He didn’t believe in permanent political parties, and he only vetoed a bill when it questioned constitutionality. Jackson’s Economic Policy broke one of those warnings and enhanced the development of American democracy for generations to come. Jackson believed, and many of his supporters, that the bank was far too powerful. The bank served mainly to private investors, and not the common people. In 1832 when Henry Clay, one of Jackson's political enemies, proposed an early recharter of the Bank of the United Sates he hoped to get rid of Jackson's wealthy supporters if Jackson vetoed the recharter, and if he passed it then the common man would feel betrayed. Andrew Jackson, immediately vetoed the recharter once it passed through congress. His veto of the recharter bill…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ Jacksonian Democracy

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During Jackson’s time in office (1829-1837) he lead the nation at a very critical period and made many reforms in law to strengthen the nation. From 1816-1826, Americans were starting to obey the law of the land. In Document B, Flint reflected on this particular decade. Around 1816 there was more violence, but by the time Flint stated “I have never experienced anything that resembled insult..,” that was near the end of decade when more people started to respect each other. Jackson presented “general equality of condition among the people” according to Document D. This article indicates that the common men were satisfied with Jackson’s contributions. . In Document A, McCartney stated that Jackson was “the imbodiment of the true spirit”. This demonstrates that the people of American felt Jackson stood for everything America had to the best of his ability. Many wanted to pay tribute to his legacy at his funeral.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Era Of Good Feelings Dbq

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This all resulted in a time period known as the Era of Good Feelings. During the Era of good feelings, the government took a greater role in the economy. Congress established the second Bank of the U.S. in 1816, five years after the first Bank’s charter ran out. It was decided that a second Bank needed to be established because the state banks made too many loans and issued too much money, leading to an increase in spending and rising prices. British dumping into the United States was also a problem for the nation after the War of 1812. To solve this issue, a protective tariff called the Tariff of 1816 was passed, and it put a tax on foreign goods. Despite the fact that these were unconstitutional and non-Republican actions, the people allowed it because they were blinded by the nationalism they gained over the War of 1812. Another effect of the Era of good feelings was the central government gaining more power over the states. In the McCulloch v. Maryland Supreme Court Case, the state of Maryland attempted to tax their branch of national government. The Court’s decision, written by Chief Justice John Marshall, strengthened the central government’s power by ruling that a state has no power to pass a law that violates a federal law. This case, as well as The Gibbons v. Ogden Supreme…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Document B, in 1791, Jefferson’s opinion of the National Bank was a rather negative one. He professed his beliefs that the bank went against the constitution and gave too much power to the federal government. He…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Despite abusing his executive power, Jackson was democratic in his policy towards the Bank of United States. Originally founded during the time of Washington’s presidency with Hamilton’s financial plan, the bank was created in order to tie wealthy investors to the government. Jackson found the second Bank of United States harmful because was founded upon the same principles. By opposing the previous judicial ruling of John Marshall in McCulloch v. Maryland, which declared the bank was constitutional, Andrew Jackson had used his presidential power in order to prevent the second Bank of the United States’ charter from being renewed by vetoing it as well as destroying the bank before its expiration in 1836 by removing all federal deposits from it and placing them into “pet banks.” Furthermore, he passed the Species Circular which meant that all mortgages could only be paid in hard currency, which led to the panic of 1837. These events shockingly gave the executive branch the authority over rulings of the Judiciary Branch as well as the legislative…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1819, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of loose construction in the McCulloch vs. Maryland lawsuit. In this case, the Maryland legislature placed a substantial tax on the operations of the Baltimore branch of the Bank of the United States. The cashier of the Baltimore branch, James McCulloch, issued bank notes without paying the tax. After Maryland state courts ruled against McCulloch for having broken the state law, he appealed to the Supreme Court, and lost. In their decision, the Supreme Court found that congress was constitutionally allowed to establish the Bank of the United States, and that a tax could not be placed upon it by individual states. They felt that such a tax would be "harming and institution," and declared unconstitutional. Therefore, through loose construction, it was decided that congress still had the power to enforce regulations that they thought would be a benefit to that day's…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dual Banking System

    • 4735 Words
    • 19 Pages

    oday, the dual banking system, which has been a hallmark of banking in the United States for nearly 200 years, is under attack, as many states have attempted to assert legislative and enforcement authority over national banks in a way that contradicts constitutional principles that have been well-settled since the early nineteenth century. This paper explains the history and features of the “dual banking system” and discusses the judicial and legislative precedents establishing the constitutional limits on the ability of states…

    • 4735 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Democrats

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the Jacksonian Democrats' attempts to reduce the influence of the rich was by vetoing the charter to the Bank of…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Solution: For much of the 19th century there was no systematic regulation of banking or the money supply. Banks, state-chartered but otherwise largely unsupervised, were free not only to engage in unsound lending practices but to issue banknotes—IOUs against themselves—without restraint. Consequent and frequent bank failures weakened public faith in banks and the money supply, and exacerbated downturns in the normal business cycle. The National Banking and Currency Acts (1862-64) created a new class of federally chartered banks, “National Banks”. These banks could issue banknotes, but they had to have them printed at the U.S. Treasury in standard form and denominations to reduce counterfeits. National bank notes also had to be backed above face value with U.S. government bonds, thus “enlisting” national banks to help finance the Civil War and assuring redemption of any national bank note at face value, even if the bank failed. To encourage circulation of national bank notes, the federal government also taxed state banknotes practically out of existence. Beyond this first systematic effort at a standard national currency, the Acts also represented the first systematic federal regulation of banking: They required that national banks have adequate capital to absorb losses, hold adequate reserves, be examined regularly by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and avoid unsound lending practices.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays