Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978

Better Essays
1316 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978
Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978

The Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 is an amendment to the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It prohibits employers from discriminating against workers based on pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions. It affects only companies that employ 15 or more people. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. Under the act, an employer cannot lawfully refuse to hire a woman if she is pregnant unless her condition makes it impossible for her to perform the major functions of the position. In an interview, it is illegal for an employer to ask a woman if she is pregnant or if she plans to become pregnant or have children.

History of the Law:

Before the Pregnancy Discrimination Act was passed, pregnant women could be forced to take a leave of absence or resign because of their current condition. Employers did not have to provide disability or medical coverage for pregnancy. The Pregnancy Discrimination Act amended the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by stating that pregnancy is a disability and that pregnant employees, in covered organizations, must be treated equally as employees having other medical conditions. Under the law, it is illegal for employees to deny sick leave for morning sickness or related pregnancy illness if sick leave is permitted for other medical conditions such as flu or surgical operations. Specifically, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act affects employee benefit programs including (1) hospitalization and major medical insurance, (2) temporary disability and salary continuation plans, and (3) sick leave policies (Bohlander and Snell, 105). The law prohibits discrimination in the hiring, promotion, or termination of women because of pregnancy. Women must be evaluated on their ability to perform the job, and employers may not set dates for mandatory pregnancy leaves. Leave dates are to be based on the the individual pregnant employee's ability to work (Bohlander and Snell, 105)

Why the law was created:
Discrimination against pregnant employees was becoming more and more common in the work force. By 1977, women made up more than 45 percent of the labor force, but only one-quarter had insurance plans that allowed sick leave for pregnancy-related illness. A 1978 amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibits workplace discrimination on the basis of pregnancy. The momentum for the act was a 1976 Supreme Court decision, General Electric v. Gilbert, in which the Court held that denial of benefits for pregnancy-related disability was not discrimination based on sex. This holding echoed past management decisions by which married women faced job discrimination and pregnant women were routinely fired. Reaction to the Gilbert decision was quick. Women's organizations, feminists, labor and civil rights advocates, and some right-to-life groups formed a coalition known as the Campaign to End Discrimination against Pregnant Workers to seek legislative relief from the Court's decision. Legislation to amend Title VII and overturn Gilbert was introduced in Congress in 1977 and passed, as the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, one year later.

The Pregnancy Discrimination Act prohibits discrimination against pregnant women in all areas of employment, including hiring, firing, seniority rights, job security, and the receipt of fringe benefits. The most controversial parts of the law have been those requiring employers who offer health insurance and temporary disability plans to give coverage to women for pregnancy, childbirth, and related conditions. Although by 1977 many major corporations were already providing such benefits, business associations argued that pregnancy was a "voluntary condition" not an illness, and that the bill would raise insurance costs. The PDA does not, however, require employers who do not offer health insurance or disability benefits at all to adopt such plans, and Title VII applies only to employers with fifteen or more employees. These provisions leave many female workers unprotected by the act.
Although all major feminist organizations supported the 1978 amendment to Title VII, feminists in 2002 remained divided on how to apply the act. At issue was the language in the act that says employers cannot treat pregnancy "more or less" favorably than other disabilities. Some feminists argued that gender equality requires identical treatment of women and men without regard to pregnancy. This "equal treatment" group said that the PDA prohibits treatment of pregnant workers in a way that favors them over workers with other kinds of temporary disabilities. Other feminists argued that the only way to ensure equal opportunity for women is through pregnancy-specific benefits ensuring that pregnant women are not disadvantaged because of real biological difference from men. This "special treatment" group said that the PDA permits justifiably favorable treatment of pregnant employees.
Some states have enacted legislation that gives pregnant women benefits not available to other workers. The Supreme Court upheld one such statute in California Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Guerra (1987). In that case, the Court held that the California statute requiring unpaid maternity leave and guaranteed job reinstatement was not preempted by the PDA, because the purposes of the state law were not inconsistent with those of the PDA or Title VII http://www.answers.com/topic/pregnancy-discrimination-act Why the law was created:

Under this law, employers who have at least 15 workers are not allowed to: o Refuse to hire a woman because of pregnancy o Fire or force a worker to leave because she is pregnant o Take away credit for previous years, accrued retirement benefits, or seniority because of maternity leave o Fire or refuse to hire a woman because she has an abortion

You must be allowed to keep working as long as you are able to do your job. Your boss cannot make a rule about how long you must stay out of work before or after childbirth. If your company does not offer sick leave, then it may be discriminating against pregnant workers. Your employer must treat you at least as well as he/she treats other workers who can't do their jobs for a short time. For example, if your company lets a worker go who had a heart attack or broken leg on paid or unpaid disability leave, you must also have this right if you are unable to work because of pregnancy or childbirth. If your pregnancy stops you from being able to do your job, you have the right to be given easier duties, if other workers who can't do their jobs for a short time get this right.

Many States have equal employment opportunity laws that protect against pregnancy discrimination. In addition, the States of
California, Hawaii, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island, and Puerto
Rico also pay partial wages during time off from work for medical problems, including those of pregnancy. Find out if your State has this law, which is called "temporary disability insurance." Some employers, especially larger companies, also offer this type of insurance. Check your benefits.

HOW MUCH TIME CAN YOU HAVE OFF?

A new law, the Family and Medical Leave Act, gives you added protections. It went into effect on August 5, 1993. If your doctor or health care provider says you are sick and unable to work during your pregnancy, you may be able to get up to 12 weeks off without pay under this new law. You also are allowed time off for childbirth, adoption, and to care for a sick child or family member. If you take time off under this law, you have the right to the same job or a job with equal pay and benefits when you come back to work. Call the
Women's Bureau at 1-800-827-5335 for a copy of our brochure, Family and Medical Leave Act: Know Your Rights.

Some States have their own family leave laws that protect your right to return to your job after time off for pregnancy-related problems or childbirth.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The employee in this situation was out on leave for eleven weeks due to the premature birth of twins to the employee’s spouse. The employee was allowed to return to work in same position and rate of pay. The employee’s request to receive pay for the eleven weeks missed of work was denied. No violation was committed.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lit1 Task 2 Report

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 is one that ties in heavily to the first situation. “The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) provides certain employees with up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave per year” (Solis, N.D.). This leave must be for the birth and care…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Young V. UPS Case Study

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Interpreting the PDA to required employers to offer the same accommodations to pregnant workers as all others with comparable physical limitations regardless of factors would be too broad. Congress did not intent for the Act to grant pregnancy such as unconditional “most-favored-nation status” however, congress clearly intended the Act to do more than define sex discrimination to include pregnancy discriminations. The Court held that the petitioner Peggy Young showed that she faced disparate treatment from her employer. Justice Alito wrote a concurrence that mention the language of the PDA makes employers liable for discriminatory conduct. He argued that treatment of pregnant employees should be compared to the treatment of non-pregnant employees in similar abilities and inabilities to…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If I was a senior manager of this company to avoid this issue in the future I personally would not discriminate against pregnant women. If a woman becomes pregnant they would have to train a temporary replacement. She would be given a certain amount of maternity leave based on doctor’s orders. If the maternity leave needs to be extended it can be with a doctor’s note explaining why. Once maternity leave is up she would have a job to come back too. During her pregnancy she would receive certain relax in policy. For example, if sever morning sickness coming in to work late will be over looked, early leave time to make doctor appointments, and reduced work load so as to not put the pregnancy in…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    a

    • 716 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Unemployment Compensation Law of New Mexico states “An individual shall be disqualified for and shall not be eligible to receive benefits: if it is determined by division that the individual left employment voluntarily without good cause in connection with the employment. However, a person shall not be denied benefits under this paragraph: (a) solely on the basis of pregnancy; (b) because of domestic abuse evidenced my medical documentation, legal documentation or sworn statement from the claimant; or (c) if…

    • 716 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1993, The state of Oregon passed The Oregon Family Leave Act. This act requires to provide eligible workers with protected leave to care for themselves or family members in cases such as death, illness, injury, childbirth, adoption, or foster placement. () There are certain specific requirements an employee must meet in order to receive time off from work. The fundamental purpose of the act is to ensure employees have the choice to withdraw from work under special circumstances without worrying about losing their job and/or seniority. * The Oregon Family Leave Act is a great safety net for those who are employed with big companies, and have been at with their companies for an extended period of time.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Fmla

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The policy in question is the Federal Medical Leave Act (FMLA). The Federal Medical Leave act was originally enacted over twenty years ago but has not been revised and expanded to include payment while time is taken off. FMLA is currently the closest thing the United States has to a parental leave policy, as it allows for some working women and me to take time off from their job while they have a child or care for their family; this leave from work however, is not paid. The idea for the FMLA originated in 1984 in California when a court in California ruled that the Pregnancy Discrimination amendments in 1978 was discriminatory towards men based on their sex.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Issue: Parental leave (either parent being able to take 12 weeks off work unpaid after their children are born).…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Though the Act was signed into action in 1993, there has been a long history of unfair labor practices concerning family and/or medical leave since the early 1900s. Although not common knowledge, family medical leave has been an issue in this country for the past 100 years. The most significant recent development regarding this issue is The Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Because there is an immense amount of information on Family Medical Leave, this paper will be focusing on the enactment of The Family Medical Leave Act.…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 2014).” Employment opportunity laws, frequently reviews the conditions of employment involving promotions, compensation, and termination. The policy is commonly located in the “Code of Conduct” section of the employee handbook Sarah is unable to perform her job due to preeclampsia. Because preeclampsia is a condition categorized by pregnancy- induced hypertension and protein in the urine, this disability is under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The company would have to treat this nondiscrimination issues with Sarah the same way they would treat any other temporarily disabled…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, The Disability Discrimination Act makes it unlawful for a service provider to discriminate against a disabled person by refusing to provide any service which it provides to members of the public. In November 2013, Arizona USA put a ban on aborting children after 20 weeks due to prenatal disability diagnosis. It urges the opportunity to clarify that there is no right to abort children because they have been diagnosed with a disability. Studies show the alarming rate at which children prenatally diagnosed with disability are aborted; and highlights the interest in granting equal treatment to unborn children, whether or not they have a disability. This shows that the equality act is working because it is ensuring that everybody gets treated equally, with a disability or not, even before they have been…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pregnancy Discrimination Act is an amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits using pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions to discriminate in hiring, promotion, suspension, or discharge, or in any term or condition of employment. If an employer offers disability coverage as a benefit, then they must treat pregnancy and childbirth like any other disability. There have been many employers sued over this act and there will be many more (Equal Opportunity and the Law). An employer cannot refuse to hire a woman because of her pregnancy related condition as long as she is able to perform the major functions of her job. If an employee is temporarily unable to perform her job due to pregnancy, the employer must treat…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Family legislation acts may be passed but it still doesn’t change the discrimination towards women. The Family and Medical Leave Act is an act that was passed in the year 1993 during President Clinton’s term of presidency. This act was brought by strict guidelines to protect one’s right as an employee to take a medical leave absence from their jobs without the fear of being demoted, receiving lower payer, and even termination. This reform has widely helped American Workers to be able to both balance their career and personal lives knowing that there won’t be any consequences. Bill Clinton claims that this legislation being passed has had a major impact on his presidency “There are few greater joys for me as a private citizen than seeing the impact the FMLA has had on hardworking Americans over the last 20 years” (Clinton). This legislation seems to really focus on expected mothers because some women kept working till they were almost due because they knew their job was not guaranteed once they delivered their baby. Bill Clinton passing this legislation has really helped many women and men are able to take care of their health issues and even have a family. This legislation can be related to the class reading Split Dreams by Sharlene Nagy Hesse-Biber by the terms of the glass ceiling of women and men finally being able to have freedom to their personal issues and working women and their families.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Family Medical Leave Act

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As “Kelly (2010) states “The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) requires that U.S. workplaces with at least 50 employees provide 12 weeks of unpaid job-protected parental leave, as well as unpaid leaves for employees with serious illnesses and those caring for seriously ill relatives” (para. 2). It is up the the employer to determine what falls under a serious illnesses, as well as how they keep tract of an employee's time off. There are many issues that can arise if an employer is not educated and organized when it comes to this act and this can in turn affect the employee taking the leave. One big debate is that FMLA is an unpaid leave and employees are unable to afford taking leave if it is unpaid.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1976 in the case of General Electric Co. v. Gilbert, Gilbert is discriminated because she’s pregnant. The General Electric Company believes that they didn’t discriminate against women nor did they violate the women’s rights because there wasn’t any sexual discrimination. Although Gilbert claims that the disability plan from Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts was violated.GE Co. says that pregnancy is a physical condition and the verdict also claims that the disability benefits plan does not violate Title VII because it fails to cover pregnancy. Pregnancy was seen as a non-occupational sickness and accident disability…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays