Preview

Pre-Socratic Philosophers

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
411 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pre-Socratic Philosophers
Some of the Pre-Socratic philosophers were rational and some were not. When Thales determined that the main principle element was water, he rationalized from his observance that the main ‘nutriment’ in all things is moist and that water is the origin of moisture. He rationalizes that heat itself is generated from moisture which he was most likely referring to humidity in the air. He observes that even our very breath contains moisture. Another point he ties together is that the world is held up by water and ‘quakes’ happen because of the water’s movement.

We know today that water is the basis in all living things on earth. Therefore, his rationale was not off on this point. Water is heated by the sun and the air becomes moist and warm.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pre-Socratic Philosophers: Heraclitus
    • 289 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pre-Socratic Philosophers: Heraclitus

    Heraclitus believed that fire is the basic element of the universe because of its ever-changing nature and that the reality of all mirrors this idea. According to Moore and Bruder (2008, p. 26,) “There is no reality, save the reality of change: permanence is an illusion.” He viewed change not as a random occurrence, but a determination by the harmonious balance of opposites through a cosmic order called the logos (Moore & Bruder, 2008, p. 26.)…

    • 289 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Democritus: A Greek Philosopher
    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Democritus: A Greek Philosopher

    Democritus was a Greek Philosopher born 460 B.C. in the city of Abdera, and died 370 B.C. He was born into a wealthy family and traveled the world extensively. He was known as the “laughing” philosopher, or the “happy” philosopher because he would constantly mock people, and laugh incessantly about his own jibes. Throughout his life he wrote over 70 books, however very few pages have survived the years. Some have said that Democritus blinded himself to better understand his own mind,however, because he had over 70 writings these conceptions of Democritus have been discredited. Democritus studied natural philosophy under his mentor Leucippus, who had a huge affect on Democritus's writings and publications as they were very similar to Leucippus own theories. It is difficult to distinguish whose theories belonged to who because very few documents have survived. However Democritus has been credited with most of them. His major contributions to science is his atomic theory,which was the basis on which modern atomic theory was developed.(http://www.iep.utm.edu/democrit/)…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Crucible Socratic Seminar
    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Crucible Socratic Seminar

    John’s decides to confess in Act IV because he does not want his children to grow up without a father, and he does not want Elizabeth to live without a supporting husband. His personal integrity causes him to renounce his confession. He does not want to blacken his name any more than it already has been. And after seeing Rebecca Nurse, he realizes that he would rather die an honest man than live…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Which Of The Pre-Socratic Philosopher Had The Most Compelling's Idea
    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Which Of The Pre-Socratic Philosopher Had The Most Compelling's Idea

    I believe that for their time, all held compelling ideas as to how things are in existence; the pre-Socratic philosophers that “stuck out” most to me were The Atomist. By far, The Atomist was the closets philosophers to what we the human race holds as true.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Classical Era Beliefs
    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Classical Era Beliefs

    The classical era was a time of great advancement in Europe. There were many different sets of values and beliefs in that time. One of the ways to organize these beliefs is with PERSIA, which stands for political, economical, religious, social, intelligence, and art/area. Three values and beliefs of the classical era are religion, intelligence, and geography.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hellenistic Philosophies
    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hellenistic Philosophies

    The Hellenistic Period is said to have begun in 323 B.C. with the death of Alexander, it ended at around 30-31 B.C. with the conquest of the last Hellenistic kingdom by the Roman Empire. The division caused by the death of Alexander sparked the Hellenistic period; his Empire divided among his four generals: Cassander, Ptolemy, Antigonus, and Seleucus. Through the Hellenistic period, many advances came about in different fields such as engineering, mathematics, and medicine. New philosophies and religions emerged as well. There were various types of philosophies during the Hellenistic period, these include Cynicism, Stoicism, Epicureanism, and Skepticism.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Socrates In Plato's Republic
    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates In Plato's Republic

    “The most intriguing people you will encounter in this life are the people who had insights about you, that you didn't know about yourself” (Alder). This quote can be used to show why the great Greek philosopher, Socrates is deemed as being so intriguing. During his time, Socrates was seen as a great threat because he tended to break free from the normal way of thinking and inevitably, people became afraid of him. Socrates was eventually put to death on account of “corrupting the youth” and being an “atheist,” which were false claims against him to cover up the fact that his accusers simply didn’t like him or his ways. When reading Plato’s Republic, Socrates is shown as being very intriguing because of: his humble ways, his Socratic method,…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Socratic Dialouge
    • 1449 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socratic Dialouge

    Identify and analyse the key components of collaboration and Socratic Dialogue and contrast with previous practise.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato, Machiavelli
    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plato, Machiavelli

    Machiavelli says the prince only has to seem good, not be good. Plato insists that seeming is bad, being is good.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Polis: Some Important Characteristics
    • 4852 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Socrates Polis: Some Important Characteristics

    A polis is a Greek city-state. Instead of having a united country, the Greeks were divided into large, independent cities with their own governments and people. Some of the more famous poleis are Athens, Sparta, Corinth, Thebes, and Argos.…

    • 4852 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Socrates
    • 839 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates

    Question 2) In Book I of Republic, Thrasymachos’s states that unjust people are stronger and more powerful than just people. Thrasymachos believes that being just is not virtuous nor wise but that men act just only because they afraid of having injustices happening to them so they obey. Those who have power and control are those people who act unjust-they make laws and rules that benefit themselves, not the rest of the people. Socrates proves Thrasymachos otherwise by arguing that being just is virtuous, wise and profitable and being unjust does not make people stronger nor more powerful. Those in power or rulers make laws that are just for themselves but Thrasymachos agrees that sometimes rulers make mistakes and make laws that are unjust to them, therefore, making them just or advantageous for the people they rule. Therefore, unjust people would not be more powerful in this case. Additionally, Socrates goes on to reason with Thrasymachos that the individual in power commands advantages for his or her subject rather than their own personal advantage. Socrates makes a comparison to a doctor and a patient as well as a pilot and a sailor, where the doctor and pilot are commanding advantages for their subjects, the patient and sailor respectively. Thrasymachos argues that a just man will pay taxes on his estate and an unjust man will pay less taxes on the same size property, etc. Therefore, being unjust serves a greater purpose than being just. Socrates goes on to argue that no one chooses willingly to rule but they do so in exchange for wages because the ruler does not expect to make other gains in simply doing what is advantageous for the people being ruled. Work performed by people in power and in control is considered an art form that without being rewarded with wages solely serves that subject, or weaker person, receiving the benefit of the art. For example, a doctor practices the art of making others healthy. There are no advantages the doctor gains in…

    • 839 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    socrates
    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages

    socrates

    himself, yet in reality he was not. So I then tried to show him that he thought…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Socrates
    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socrates

    The Euthyphro dialogue is essentially a conversation between Socrates and Euthyphro each of who attempt to argue their point of justification about why they are in court or should not be there, which in turn a question develops about the gods and holiness.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Empedocles Analysis
    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Empedocles Analysis

    Empedocles asserts that fire, air, water and earth “are all equal and of the same age, but each rules in its own province and possesses its own character, but they dominate in their turn as time revolves” (Lines 27-29). These four elements are always used and when one of them is the main factor…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    socrates
    • 965 Words
    • 3 Pages

    socrates

    Wisdom means being wise, intellectual, or all-knowing. It is associated with a certain calmness, and a willingness to look at all the facts and make a well-informed decision. In Oedipus the King by Sophocles and Apology by Socrates we see how wisdom isn’t in all entirety a positive thing to have. ‘’alas how terrible is wisdom when it brings no profit to the man that’s wise ‘’ – Oedipus, in this quote we see how Oedipus feels as if he has this wonderful wisdom but doesn’t know how to use it , he feels as if he is the wisest of them all but doesn’t know exactly what that means. Oedipus uses his supposed wisdom and reason to calculate his decisions such as whom to question or who to accuse. However, his calculations are not always correct. Oedipus seems to deviate from his reason at times.…

    • 965 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics