Preview

Pragmatism vs. Idealism (a Man

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2317 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pragmatism vs. Idealism (a Man
Morality is often overpowered by materialistic pursuits. In "A Man for All Seasons",Robert Bolt shows the corruption of those who put self interest above all other values. His use of such characters as Thomas Cromwell, Richard Rich, Chapuys and Wolsey help convey this corruption. There is yet another character who is a pragmatist that Bolt successfully represents. Thomas More is an idealist as well as a pragmatist, for he is prepared to give up everything for his beliefs and takes all precautions possible to make his case "watertight". It is through this pragmatism and idealism that Robert Bolt shows the corruption of the times. Thomas More believed in his ideals to such an extent that he was prepared to sacrifice his life for them, if the need arrived. He was a firm believer in the separation of Church and State. When the King tried to start the reformation of England and the Church by a simple Act of Parliament called the Act of Supremacy, Thomas refused to sign it. He believed that the indictment of the King was "grounded in an Act of Parliament which is directly repugnant to law of God. The King in Parliament cannot bestow he Supremacy of the Church because it is a Spiritual Supremacy! And more to this the immunity of the Church is promised both in Magna Carta and the Kings own Coronation Oath!"(Bolt, p. 92) The marriage was yet another reason why More refused to sign the Act. He knew that if he signed it then he would accept the King as the Supreme Head of Church and thus give the King the power to "dispense with the dispensation" which to him was against his morals and religion. Of course the marriage was associated with other things -attack on the abbeys, the whole Reformation policy-to which More was violently opposed. When told by Norfolk that his parish attire is a disrespect to the King and his office. More replies that "the service of God is not a dishonor to any office"(Bolt, p.26) Even though he loves the King to death as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the beginning of the reign, in 1625, when Charles was 25 years old, he married a French Catholic princess, Henrietta Maria, without consulting the Parliament. Moreover in the 17th century a King could not rule the country without Parliament’s help and recommendation. The members of Parliament were hostile at Charles as he was not advised by them. The other reason was that the King married a French princess who was a Catholic and the Parliament feared that Charles’s intention was to make England a Catholic country. In result the Parliament was beginning to grow suspicious and lose their trust towards the King.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Other than dealing with the elitist society, the story also displays many features of modern literature. The main character’s obsession for material items and desire to gain wealth was another aspect of the story that made it very modernist. At a young age, he thought he was too young to work as a caddy and strived to obtain greater wealth. This was one of the main qualities of characters in the Modernism time.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Source N Peter Ackroyd tells about J. Foxe’s “Book of Martyrs”. According to this book, “he tied heretics to a tree in his Chelsea garden and whipped them”. This, if it’s true, undoubtedly demonstrates More’s cruelty and shows him as a sadist. The quote from the book also says: “he watched as newe men were put upon the rack in the Tower and tortured until they confessed” and “he was personally responsible for the burning of several of the brethren in Smithfield”. If we agree to his words that he never tortured people, but only imprisoned heretics in his house, we still can say that he was not a cruel man himself. Even if we accept that he was guilty in burning heretics, it was not an uncommon thing those times. Heretics were being burnt all the time obeying to the word of the Church. Moreover, by burning heretics More was still carrying King’s and again Churche’s tasks. Therefore we can say that Thomas More stood up as a cruel man, but served his King loyally. When Henry couldn't get the divorce he wanted, he simply created his own church with himself as the supreme religious figure, but one which an entire country chose to…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Duddy Kravitz

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The second person in the novel that shows he cares more about financial success rather than having clear morals is…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. King Jr. is telling his fellow clergymen although he is not one for breaking or disobeying the law, he…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Elizabethan Church Settlement formed the foundations of the Church of England in the years 1559-1563. During Elizabeth’s reign, Elizabeth’s aim was to find a suitable settlement, but one that most people could accept that it was their legal and patriotic duty to attend the established church. She wanted a church over which she had control through the bishops. One of the many religious changes that were made was The Act of Supremacy, May 1559. Unlike her father, Elizabeth was not proclaimed ‘supreme head’. Instead she became ‘supreme governor’. This was aimed to please both Catholics and more extreme Protestants who disliked the idea of a woman taking on such an important religious position. This gave the opportunity to remove Catholic clergy who refused to the oath recognising her Royal Supremacy over the Church. The Act, also required a tour of the church nationwide, to administer the Oath of Supremacy and to deliver the new Royal Injunctions on Religion. For this purpose a commission of clergy and laymen were created and was used to prosecute people with Catholic sympathies.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘Flawed characters are always more memorable than any moral lessons that literature seeks to draw from them’…

    • 272 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Elizabeth I took the crown in 1558 she was faced with many dilemmas - England was a country in religious turmoil; not only had it just been ruled by three monarchs in under a decade, but it had been ruled by different religions. After the death of Henry VII, who had created the Act of Supremacy declaring the Monarch the sole Head of the Church of England and therefore undermining the power of the Pope, Edward VI took the crown and England was converted into a Protestant country. There were rebellions during Edward’s reign dividing the nation, and after his death Edward’s eldest sister Mary I became Queen. Being a strict Catholic, England was converted back to Catholicism and it seemed the masses were welcoming this religion back. However, groups of Protestants were unhappy and Mary took strong actions; burning heretics and martyrs. So, when Elizabeth (who is believed to be Protestant) took the thrown, she had a divided nation, with the welfare of her subjects in the balance.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As chancellor, Thomas More defended the Church teachings from heretics and also denied and put down the teachings of the Protestant Reformation. When a decree came from King Henry stating that he was the supreme head of the Church, More resigned his position at chancellorship. For a long while Saint Thomas More lived life in seclusion writing to defend the Church teachings and devoting his time to controversial texts. Thomas More was brought before a council and questioned to as why he did not support Henry's anti-papal action and Thomas answered he had expressed his views personally with the king and had not incurred his…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    "In a country well governed, poverty is something to be ashamed of. In a country badly governed, wealth is something to be ashamed of" (Confucius). In England during the 1500’s almost everyone was catholic. Until 1534 when King Henry VIII wanted to get a divorce from his wife Catherine, because she was not able to give him a son to carry on his legacy. When the Pope denied Henry’s request for an annulment the King needed to figure out another was to be able to get his divorce. At this point the King did not know what else to do, so he turned to his friend Sir Thomas More and when More also disagreed with Henry wanting a divorce he had hit a brick wall. He figured the only way he would be able to do this was to completely break away from the…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When More is placed on trial, everything is smooth sailing until Richard Rich, a man searching for a place to be wanted and liked, lies on the stand while under oath. Rich claims that More openly contested the king's supremacy over the Church in conversation, ultimately, sealing More’s fate, death. More forgave those who disapproved of his silence and cleared himself of whatever sins he was carrying on his shoulders. More’s last words were, “Friend, be not afraid of your office. You send me to God (p.162).”before being executed by beheading in…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    St. Thomas More was killed for not obeying King Henry VIII’s choice to divorce his wife and, whist that was happening King Henry VIII announced that he would be the head of the Church in England. Thomas More was against this double divorce, and paid very deeply for it; as for he was killed on July 6, 1535. Thomas More was well known for his book Utopia and for his unfortunate death in 1535, after rejecting to admit King Henry VIII as the head of the Church of England, his last words were “I die the king 's faithful servant, but God 's first.”…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A man for all seaons

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sir Thomas More: he is the main character. His refusal to affirm the Act of Supremacy making King Henry VIII the supreme head of the Church of England. The play focuses on Sir Thomas More inability to sacrifice his moral conscience to save his life. His conscience is more important to him than life itself. He is more existential than he is religious. He is not eager to be a martyr; he tries not to become one by refusing to speak out against the Act of Supremacy.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bossuet Reading

    • 1639 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It appears from all this that the person of the king is sacred, and that to attack him in any way is sacrilege. God has the kings anointed by his prophets with the holy unction in like manner as he has bishops and altars anointed. But even without the external application in thus being anointed, they are by their very office the representatives of the divine majesty deputed by Providence for the execution of his purposes. Accordingly…

    • 1639 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The point of view can be seen to follow both in my opinion can be seen to follow both the fall of Sir Thomas More and the rise of Richard Rich. I believe that Bolt did this to…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays