Pragmatics And Rhetoric
Pragmatics and Rhetoric for Discourse Analysis: Some conceptual remarks
Jesus M. Larrazabal and Kepa Korta*
{ylplaanj, kkorta}@sc.ehu.es
Institute for Logic, Cognition, Language and Information (ILCLI)
The University of the Basque Country
Avda. Jose Elosegi 275
20015 Donostia – San Sebastián
Spain
Longas são as estradas da
Galileia e curta a piedade dos homens. (Eça de Queiróz, O suave milagre.) Abstract:
This paper focuses on discourse analysis, particularly persuasive discourse, using pragmatics and rhetoric in a new combined way, called by us Pragma-Rhetoric. It can be said that this is a cognitive approach to both pragmatics and rhetoric. Pragmatics is essentially Gricean, Rhetoric comes from a new reading of Aristotle’s Rhetoric, extending his notion of discourse to meso- and micro-discourses. Two kinds of intentions have to be considered: first, communicative intention, and, then, persuasive intention. The fulfilment of those intentions is achieved by a successful persuasivecommunicative action. The psychological, philosophical and logical aspects derived from the pragma-rhetorical perspective are crucial in view of its applications in several practical domains.
Keywords: Discourse, pragmatics, rhetoric, communication, intention, persuasion.
0. Introduction
Let us begin this paper with our recognition to a philosopher of action, language and communication, Marcelo Dascal, a Leibnizian particularly interested in semantics and pragmatics, who has contributed so much to the development of philosophy in the last
30 years. The aim of this paper is to propose a pragmatic and rhetorical view in discourse analysis, combining both disciplines in order to explain the intentional
*
This work has been partially supported by a research project of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology (PB98-0250) and another one of the University of the
Basque Country (UE01/A10).
1
phenomena that occur in most communicative uses of language, namely, the communicative intention
Jesus M. Larrazabal and Kepa Korta*
{ylplaanj, kkorta}@sc.ehu.es
Institute for Logic, Cognition, Language and Information (ILCLI)
The University of the Basque Country
Avda. Jose Elosegi 275
20015 Donostia – San Sebastián
Spain
Longas são as estradas da
Galileia e curta a piedade dos homens. (Eça de Queiróz, O suave milagre.) Abstract:
This paper focuses on discourse analysis, particularly persuasive discourse, using pragmatics and rhetoric in a new combined way, called by us Pragma-Rhetoric. It can be said that this is a cognitive approach to both pragmatics and rhetoric. Pragmatics is essentially Gricean, Rhetoric comes from a new reading of Aristotle’s Rhetoric, extending his notion of discourse to meso- and micro-discourses. Two kinds of intentions have to be considered: first, communicative intention, and, then, persuasive intention. The fulfilment of those intentions is achieved by a successful persuasivecommunicative action. The psychological, philosophical and logical aspects derived from the pragma-rhetorical perspective are crucial in view of its applications in several practical domains.
Keywords: Discourse, pragmatics, rhetoric, communication, intention, persuasion.
0. Introduction
Let us begin this paper with our recognition to a philosopher of action, language and communication, Marcelo Dascal, a Leibnizian particularly interested in semantics and pragmatics, who has contributed so much to the development of philosophy in the last
30 years. The aim of this paper is to propose a pragmatic and rhetorical view in discourse analysis, combining both disciplines in order to explain the intentional
*
This work has been partially supported by a research project of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology (PB98-0250) and another one of the University of the
Basque Country (UE01/A10).
1
phenomena that occur in most communicative uses of language, namely, the communicative intention
References: Apostel, L. (1971), Assertion logic and a theory of argumentation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 4, 92-110. Bar-Hillel, Y. (1971), Out of the pragmatic waste-basket, Linguistic Inquiry 2, 401-407. Berger, P. and Th. Luckmann (1966), The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday. Bourdieu, P. (1984), Questions de Sociologie. Paris: Minuit. Campbell, G. (1776), The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Re-edited in 1936, Southern Illinois University Press. Conley, Th. M. (1990), Rhetoric in the European tradition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Dascal, M. and A. G. Gross (1999), The marriage of pragmatics and rhetoric. Eemeren, F.H. van (ed.) (2001), Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2001. Eemeren, F.H. van, and R. Grootendorst (1984), Speech acts in argumentative discussions Foucault, M. (1966), Les Mots et les Choses. Paris: Gallimard. Garfinkel, H. (1967), Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall. Goffman, E. (1981), Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Grice, H. P. (1957), Meaning, Philosophical Review 66, 377-388. Reprinted in H. P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989, pp Harvard University Press, 1989, pp. 86-116. Morris, C. (1938), Foundations of the theory of signs. In O. Neurath, R. Carnap and C. Perelman, Ch. and L. Olbrecht-Tyteca (1958), Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique Reboul, O. (1991), Introduction à la rhétorique. Paris: P.U.F. Rescher, N. (1968), Topics in Philosophical Logic. Dordrecht: Reidel. Sacks, H. (1992), Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell. Sacks, H., E. A. Schegloff and G. Jefferson (1974), A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation, Language 50, 696-735. Schiffrin, D. (1994), Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell. Searle, J. (1969), Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Searle, J. (1983), Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Strawson, P. F. (1964), Intention and Convention in Speech Acts. Philosophical Review 73, 439-60. Walton, D.N. (1989), Informal logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Watzlawick, P., J. Helmick Beavin, and D. Jackson Don (1972), Une logique de la communication Whately, R. (1828), Elements of Rhetoric. Reprinted in 1857 in London: Parker & son.