Preview

Powhatan, “Speech to Captain John Smith,” The World Turned Upside Down. Boston: Bedford, 1994.

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
451 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Powhatan, “Speech to Captain John Smith,” The World Turned Upside Down. Boston: Bedford, 1994.
Rio Hondo College
Speech to Captain John Smith

William Ashby
10-14-13

Powhatan, “Speech to Captain John Smith,” The World Turned Upside Down. Boston: Bedford, 1994. The message that Powhatan delivered to John Smith in his speech was one of peace. Powhatan told John Smith that he has seen three generations of his people die. The Chief told John Smith that he has seen many years of war and peace. Powhatan explained that he was getting old and tired. He was concerned that his successors did not have the experience or wisdom to deal with the relationships between the Indians and the European settlers. His hope was that the relationship would be built on love and respect. However, he felt that this reality was not possible, due to the current circumstances at the time. Powhatan pleaded with John Smith, explaining to him that his people were afraid due to what they heard from the Nandsamund tribe. Powhatan could not understand why the Settlers wanted to disarm them and leave them defenseless when they were feeding them. He told John Smith that he was wise enough to understand that a mutually beneficial relationship would be best for everyone. Powhatan went on to say that the alternative to peace would be starvation, sleepless nights, and the anxiety of not knowing when they would be attacked. The European Settlers would fall to the same fate because of their selfishness and lack of cooperation with Powhatan’s people. Finally, Powhatan told John Smith that it is his responsibility to influence the settlers to engage in peaceful trade with the Indians. The consequence of tyranny from the settlers would result in both sides losing. Powhatan’s speech to John Smith was about change through peace. Powhatan was really concerned that the settlers did not intend to engage in peaceful trade with the Indian peoples. Powhatan warns John Smith not to take advantage of the hospitality, which has been extended to the settlers from the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 1607 King James of England issued a royal charter to colonize America. They built a fort around the Chesapeake Bay and named it Jamestown in honor of their king. The region of the Chesapeake they were settling on was already home to over 20,000 Algonquian Indians. Their leader, Powhatan, immediately confronted the new English settlers asking them to establish an alliance. Powhatan believed that he could stat a valuable trade with the English and also help support them as they begin to settle. The Jamestown colony began to go down hill, they started to rely so much on the Algonquians for supply’s that they became unable to support themselves. Jamestown became so dependent on the Algonquian stores that John Smith and his men went out and attacked and raided other surrounding Indian villages for food and other supply’s. Powhatan realized that al the English came for was to invade and take their land, not to trade with them. So Powhatan decided to starve the colonists. During the winter 1609-1610 large amounts of colonists in the Jamestown settlement starved and a number of them resorted to cannibalism. Out of the 900 colonists that had been sent to Virginia to settle it, only 60 remained. The English however were determined to keep the colony going. The Virginia company sent more men, women, children, and livestock to the Jamestown colony. This time they were prepared to fight Powhatan and his tribe. Because the new colonists were prepared to fight and to help themselves with farming and trading they turned the colony’s failure to success. In 1613 the colonists had firm control over the areas between the James and York rivers. The Algonquin Indians were so rundown from all the warfare and disease, they became forced to sign a peace treaty with the English. The English now started to grow bigger and bigger. They introduced tobacco production. This became a very merchantable commodity. The English started out relying on the Indians to do everything for them, and they…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richter eagerly debunks the myths surrounding these three individuals and urges the reader to consider their perspectives in dealing with Europeans. , Richter demonstrates the common historical landscape they inhabited and highlight the similar pressures they confronted and the paths they chose. In chapter 4, Richter reproduces Indian texts from New England Indians' conversion narratives and the political speech of a Mohawk Iroquois orator as represented in the Albany meeting of 1679 between the Iroquois and British colonial leaders. Richter finds Indians asking their European counterparts to unite across the cultural barrier using the power of the spoken word to articulate a distinctive vision of “cultural coexistence on Indian terms” in the interest of a mutually-beneficial collaboration.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The goal of 105 colonists who settled in Jamestown in 1605 was to seek gold and establish possible trade routes into the Pacific Coast, modern United States’ West Coast. However, they faced incredible hostility from the local Indian tribes led by Chief Powhatan, a warrior who had great influence over his people. Another challenge faced by colonists included new diseases that killed a good number of colonists. The little medical understanding was not helpful in helping overcome this challenge. However, it was hunger that really forced colonists to think of changing their mission of looking for gold and looking for routes to the west.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1980 Dbq

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages

    "In examining the question how the disturbances on the frontiers are to be quieted, two modes present themselves, by which the object might perhaps be effected; the first of which is by raising an army, and (destroying the resisting] tribes entirely, or 2ndly by forming treaties of peace with them, in which their rights and limits should be explicitly defined, and the treaties observed on the part of the United States with the most rigid justice, by punishing the whites, who should violate the same. In considering the first mode, an inquiry would arise, whether, under the existing circumstances of affairs, the United States have a clear right, consistently with the principles of justice and the laws of nature, to proceed to the destruction or expulsion of the savages.... The Indians being the prior occupants, possess the right of the soil. It cannot be taken from them unless by their free consent, or by the right of conquest in case of a. just war. To dispossess them on any other principle, would be a gross violation of the fundamental laws of nature, and of that distributive justice which is the glory of a nation. But if it should be decided, on an abstract view of the situation, to remove by force the ... Indians from the territory they occupy, the finances of the United States would not at present…

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arriving to North America, the Indians grew worried of the growing population of European settlers and colonists coming in and taking their lands. Though both Penn and Winthrop sought to gain lands for colonization, Penn had a more peaceful approach to the Indians. Penn would create good relations with the natives and the Quakers would negotiate over the lands in a just manner. Penn encouraged the Indian culture to come into the Quaker communities while Winthrop wanted to exclude the Indians out the Puritan communities. The Puritans in turn would just take lands from the Indians and force the Indians to fall back into the backcountry. Winthrop believed that the Indians “inclose no land, neither they have any settled habitation, nor any tame Cattle to improve the land by...we may lawfully take the [land].”…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I guess this just shows us that the Native Americans were upset for everything the white settlers did to them and their land. When they captured Rowlandson and the rest of the people the indians knew they were not going to kill them they just wanted to give the white settlers a little scare. They even wrote settlers to the white settlers letting them know that if provoked they will respond back. Some of the Native Americans learned to read and write in english to communicate with the white settlers. According to one of the primary sources two indians wrote a letter to Rowlandson husband in english. The letter talked about how the husbands family is doing good but one that died (Sam ET Al, letter to John Leverett 133). Before the Native Americans sent that leader the white settlers sent a letter to them that they are willing to negotiate as long as they get their people free (Letter to “Indian sagamore”). Basically this letter is showing us that the indians are trying to intimidate the english settlers so that the Native americans can have what they want by using white settlers as captives. When the the Native Americans raiding Lancaster they left the place destroyed. Many people were injured and some dead. House…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believes the settlers were unsuccessful not because they could not let go of their British identity and culture, but because they were egotistical and believed they were better than the Natives. England was in its prime was one of the strongest parts in the world so the settlers felt as if they were more prominent and superior to everyone else. This definitely affected their relationship with the Indians because by thinking they were superior, they were closed minded about approaching them for help with harvest among other things. Also with prominence came disloyalty. Morgan talks a lot about how the settlers kept creating ‘fuzzy boundaries’, also called agreements, with the Indians to ensure they were no evading each other's space. However, on many occasions the settlers broke these agreements leading to attacks from the Indians which almost destroyed the…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In both Columbus’s and Smith’s writings, over stating how plentiful the land is common. For example, they name countless types of small and large game as well as mention how often they can go fishing. The two also emphasis how fertile the ground is with endless types of grain, seeds, fruit, flowers, berries and anything you plant will grow. They both mention how easy the Indians can be handled as well. Columbus and Smith do not forget to include the main points for colonization either. Water access, God, and land are the main advantages people look for when colonizing or relocating even today. They assure the people land and food to live, but also touch on converting these savages to God. They almost guilt trip the people in England by…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Document 4 in Kirsch, explains in detail how John Smith had to deal with keeping the settlement in Jamestown from dying out. He says “there was no talk, no hope, and no work”, without the help the natives John admits he wouldn’t have been able to survive. He states that “ Now every once in four or five days, Pocahontas and her attendants brought him so much provision, that saved many of their lives, that else for all this had starved with hunger”. The agreement Smith made with the natives is the reason his life was…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Native American group in the Chesapeake Bay region was known collectively as the Powhatan Federation of Indians. Powhatan also refers to the Algonquin Indian chief that lived and ruled in the region around the early 17th century. The Algonquians were a deeply religious group of people subsisted primarily through agriculture. The natives referred to the area as Tsenacommacah. Powhatan was the weroance, or chief ruler of Tsenacommacah and 25 other Algonquin villages. Powhatan would play a significant role with the 104 men from the Virginia company that made up the settlement of Jamestown. Powhatan agreed to an alliance with the settlers, Powhatan would provide the colonists with foodstuffs in exchange for guns, hatchets, and swords. Powhatan hoped this alliance would make him technologically superior over his people’s enemies. The following is a quote from Powhatan recorded by John smith in 1609; “I am not so simple as not to know it is better to eat good meat, sleep comfortably, live quietly with my women and children, laugh and be merry with the English, and being their friend, trade for their copper and hatchets, than to run away from them.” (Smithsonian source, 2012)…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In John Smiths’ The General History of Virginia, he illustrates his firsthand account of what he experienced with the Native American group the Calusas, in the New World. He called them a “backwards” tribe. He portrayed the Calusas as “barbaric” and “dangerous”. In Smith’s observation of the Indians in the New World, he saw…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Asfd

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By 1621 the colonists’ relationship with the Native Americans was good according The Soldier and the King. However, this relationship would slowly be derailed as the seventeenth century dragged on. By 1674 the relationship between the Native Americans and the Massachusetts colonists went horrible when a Native American Christian by the name of John Sassamon was found dead under a frozen pond in Middleboro, Massachusetts. By June of 1675 three Native Americans were tried and convicted for the murder of John Sassamon with little evidence of them ever committing the crime. This angered Wampanoag tribe leader Metacom, also known as King Philip, who ordered Wampanoag warriors to burn colonist’s livestock but wait for the “colonists to spill first blood” (McCue, pg.47). The colonists did retaliate by shooting an Indian and this would be the start of King Philips war with the colonists. By the end of the short 2-year war, King Philip would be found and killed and his tribe had lost the war to the colonists. “Philip’s head was taken to Plymouth and mounted on a pole for 20 years” (McCue, pg. 50). This presented a warning to all Indian tribes who wanted to threaten and attack the colonists. After this war the colonists viewed the Indians as pure savages. “The overwhelming consensus among whites was that Indian culture was inferior and despicable” (McDermott,…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hollitz Chapter 1

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although often viewed as inferior, savage and helpless, many historians are starting to discover the intelligence and wisdom the Indians had and shared with the colonists that came to America so long ago. As the settlers slowly began to create a new world on the already inhabited North America, they were plagued with starvation due to a severe drought in the area. Due to the dry lands and the settlers expectations to “rely on Indians for food and tribute,” (Norton 17) they were disappointed to find that the Indians were not so keen to handing out food and help to the strangers that have just come onto their land and begun to settle in such a time of severe weather and starvation. As time goes on, both the Indians and the Englishmen realize they both have what the other needs; tools from the white men and crops, land and knowledge from the Indians. As a result, the chief of Tsenacomoco, Powhatan, and colonist, Captain John Smith on an ideally peaceful, mutualistic relationship to ensure the survival of both civilizations. This agreement will leave the groups in cahoots for 100 of years leading to some disastrous scenarios and betrayals.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, it is clearly obvious that the author is strongly biased towards the Powhatan people. The way Camille Townsend describes the Indians as far more intelligent, sophisticated and remarkably superior than the colonists is extremely evident. “Without question, the Algonkians knew about and actively discussed the Europeans’ advantages. At present the strangers were few in number, unable to feed themselves. What the Indians needed to know was exactly how great the technological advantages ultimately were. In all their interactions with the newcomers, the Indians sought information; Powhatan and his advisers spoke in council. The women working in the fields and in the village and at the riverside talked as they labored.” (Townsend 65)…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the start of the seventeenth century, Native Americans greeted European settlers with much excitement. They regarded settlers as strange, but were interested to learn about the new tools and weapons Europeans brought with them. The native people were more than accommodating to the settlers, but as time passed, Europeans took advantage of their generosity. “Once these newcomers disembarked and began to feel their way across the continent, they forever altered the course and pace of native development.” Native Americans and Europeans faced many conflicts due to their vast differences in language, religion and culture. European settlers’ inability to understand and respect Native Americans lead to many struggles that would eventually erupt into violent warfare.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays