Preview

Power on the Presidents

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
563 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Power on the Presidents
How Much Power Does The President Have?
John C. Yoo and Michael Cairo both have different opinions about the president having unilateral powers towards war. John C. Yoo believes the President does have power while Michael Cario disagrees that he doesn’t. They both argue that during a time of war that the President has different amount of power. John C. Yoo’s view he believes that the President of the United States does have unilateral power during war. He argues that in a speedy action the President does have the power to declare war. In the Constitution Article 2, Section 2 states that the “ President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and or the Militia of the Several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States.” The President has powers from the broad constitutional authority to use military force to a threat of the United States being in danger. There can be a Militia sent to an area by the President, but he can’t make the decision to declare. Congress can declare war not the President. It states in the constitution that congress in foreign affairs that congress can say yes or no. The President, who is Commander in Chief, does have the power to declare war. For example on September 11th, 2001 the president was able to declare war on Iraq because they attacked the United States putting citizens in danger. John C. Yoo view is really that the President has the power to declare war depending on the situation. Michael Cairo believes that the President of the United States doesn’t have unilateral power during a war. Michael believes that the president does not have authority of having powers during a war. He believes the only way the president can do any actions is by having evidence and must meet the obligations under international law. For example during both Clinton and Bush Administration, they both relied on legal authority so that they can pursue a military force. Michael Cario believes that if the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It equips Congress with constitutional power over the president, and prohibits any one person from plunging the nation into war. In conclusion, the War Powers Resolution works well within the constitutional authority of Congress and strengthens the balance of powers among the branches of our government. In this scenario, the President violated the due process of issuing military action without the consent of Congress, and as a result, this case would be weighed in favor of…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the constitution the President has military, legislative, appointment, and diplomatic power. Our framers of the constitution wanted a strong military but not complete seizure of the government. Diplomatic powers and appointment powers are also under senate’s approval. The President’s legislative power can be over ridden by congress so by far this is not one of the power points of presidency. The President has sole powers of pardons granted. Under circumstances of war and terrorism the president engages in the most power.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When he is elected to be the president of the United States of America he then controls the Army, Navy and Militia. That means if the president wants a threat eliminated he could command his military to eliminate it.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truman Vs Framer

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The main general argument that Yoo makes in The Power of War and Peace: The Constitution and Foreign Affairs After 9/11, is that the President has the right to declare war. In regard to war making, the Framers went to different authorities such as John Locke for advice…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My initial reaction would be to side with Congress. The War Powers Resolution allows the president to engage in an act of war without the consent of congress only in the case of an attack on the United States, or by “statutory authorization”. Based on this, the legislative branch seems to be in the right in this situation. I would ask the president questions pertaining to the goals of the US forces in the region, and questions to Congress such as to their opposition to the presidents actions.…

    • 88 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are two perspectives on presidential power. The two perspectives are presidential power by persuasion and presidential without persuasion or unilateral. The first perspective where presidential power is persuasive means that the president needs help in order to achieve an outcome. The president tries to convince other branches of government or other high-ranking officials to implement an idea of his. This all depends on the president’s ability to bargain with other branches or even his own branch to influence policy. The Unilateral perspective means that the president can act alone when making policy decisions. The unilateral perspective forces the judiciary to react.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although only Congress has the right to authorise the use of the armed forces, if the president acts there is little Congress can do to restrain him.This is a power given to the President domestically, executing the power on an international scale gives the President a powerful image that asserts his/her dominance. An example would be Franklin Roosevelt. Roosevelt's four terms as president were marked by two of the largest threats to America; the Great Depression and World War II. The role President Roosevelt played during World War II showed complete dominance at an international scale, he can be seen to be one of the most influential Presidents that America has ever had. Franklin D Roosevelt was given the power to be Commander-In-Chief, as all Presidents do and had became an international figure because of…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carter quotes,” In his original veto message, President Nixon asserted that he had no choice but to reject the Resolution because it was "clearly unconstitutional.””. President Nixon has a point in which he says that he shouldn’t even be following the resolution if the constitution already provides enough power through all this. Limiting the the presidents power is not necessary one bit, the position of President wouldn’t be needed or it would just become obsolete if they didn’t have the power to perform whatever they wanted that they believed would help. Even chairman Tom Connaly disagrees,"Do you think I'll have to ask Congress for a declaration of war if I decide to send American forces into Korea?" the President asked?"If a burglar breaks into your house," I said, "you can shoot at him without going down to the police station and getting permission. . . . You have the right to do it as commander-in-chief and under the UN Charter.". [25](fed-soc.org) The point that Conally was trying to bring across is that as a president, the ability to wage in combat should be under their choice, they are the ones voted for to provide for whats best for the citizens either way.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Section 2, Article 2, “The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States” This reserves the President the right to make military decisions without the knowledge of Congress as long as Congress has approved the war.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Power Dbq Essay

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The president, throughout history, has always been a symbol of the country and has had powers for their title. However, there are only limited things the President can do, while they are in power. For the most part the President has to go through the congress, which might not accept the president’s request. The president should have the power to go beyond the bounds of the Constitution when the country is dealing with war or rebellion, and to take action if the lives of US citizens are in danger or to keep international peace in foreign countries.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War powers between the legislative and the executive branch is an important and complex issue in American national politics because there are multiple interpretations of what constitutes the appropriate relationship between the legislative and the executive branch in regard to war powers. Both Louis Fisher in his book, Presidential War Power and John Yoo in his book, The Power of War and Peace: The Constitution and Foreign Affairs After 9/11 focus on what is the appropriate sharing of war powers between the legislative and executive branch? Fisher and Yoo are both scholars in this area of study but have different opinions on what constitutes as sharing of war powers between the legislative and the executive branch. This paper will focus on…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Adler, David. “The Constitution and Presidential War-making.” The Constitution and the Conduct of American Foreign Policy. University Press of Kansas, 1996 183-226.…

    • 2492 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The legality of Bush’s M.O. immediately became the subject of debate upon its publication. For example, the president argues that he is fully authorized to enforce the use of military tribunals based on the historical precedents set in place by former presidents. He also argues that he is permitted to establish tribunals based on his declaration of “a national emergency on September 14, 2001.” The M.O. order states that “this emergency constitutes an urgent and compelling government interest, and that issuance of this order is necessary to meet the emergency.” By declaring a state of national emergency, Bush suggests that tribunals are now a matter of “military necessity.” Those subject to the order are defined in subsection 2(a)(1) as someone who “is or was a member of the organization known as al Qaeda,” as well as someone who meets the following criteria:…

    • 14798 Words
    • 60 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the United States our President has many powers that are granted to him when they are elected into office. They have the ability to change the budget, to either cut back on spending, or implement new programs to help their citizens. They can veto a bill that they think is not ready to be made law yet and send it back to congress for further evaluation. They can appoint Supreme Court Justices. They also are the Commander in Chief of all U.S. armies, and they even have the power to send troops over to foreign nations in times of hostility in some circumstances. There are many who believe that the powers of the president are sometimes abused, especially as the Commander in Chief. There have been several instances in our Nation’s history in which the President has been able to wiggle their way around the constitutional limitations that are given of the Commander in Chief. Even though the president is unable to actually declare war he can use his powers to advance a conflict. The article Congressional War Powers, The Commander in Chief and Senator John Mccain describes how this is achieved by stating “Technically only congress has the power to declare war but the President can act unilaterally to repel sudden attacks made on U.S. Soil” (Bowling, 2008, p. 1). Presidents use these executive powers to engage in a conflict that they believe needs to be settled in times of crisis. The Constitution has a system within-it that tries to grant separate but equal powers to all branches of government called checks and balances. Although this system of checks and balances is supposed to be followed, there are ways which certain branches of government can gain more power than others. Often the President is the one who abuses the system, and uses their executive powers for their own advantages. These powers granted to the President have been abused more and more throughout our Nation’s recent history and it needs to…

    • 2425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution clearly gives that power to Congress only. Yet recent presidents have been able to fight wars without Congressional approval. Many people believe that we should go back to the days when the president and congress were more or less equal in power. The President’s veto power is also a powerful weapon. The role of the President is described vaguely in the Constitution, but the executive veto power he possesses is precisely defined in the same document. The President cannot write legislation, he can only sign a bill into law or veto it. When the President veto’s a bill, it is completely done. He doesn’t have line item veto power. Congress gets bills passed if it is preferred by the President. As president, Barack Obama has made a habit of bypassing or ignoring constitutional limitations on his power. A lawsuit has been filed against President Obama over his alleged abuse of executive power. It will focus on how Obama has carried out his health care overhaul. Republicans say the lawsuit is necessary to keep the president in check, after he allegedly exceeded his authority with unilateral changes to the Affordable Care Act. In the U.S., health and social care makes up 8% of the economy so this has made a huge impact on the economy and the lives of Americans. President Obama was heard saying, “That’s the good thing about being president: I can do anything I want.” Although said as a joke, it…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays