Preview

Power Elite

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1379 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Power Elite
The Power Elite In the modern world, most of the countries have democratic government, which means that decisions are made by the people, who rule and govern the state. However, there is not a single state that practices perfect democracy due to different reasons. Governments are too big, which makes it very complex for every citizen to have a voice in decisions. Or, governments are claimed to be democratic, but in practice they can be close to authoritarian or even totalitarian regimes where one person has a power to make and enforce laws. Political power is not allocated evenly among all members of society, so, in this or that way, governments tend to fall in the hands of the few, whom we can call the elite or the power elite. Power can be defined as the ability to effect and control the behavior of others. Elite, is a relatively small dominant group in a big society that usually made up from the upper class members of society.[1] The theory of power elite claims that power is concentrated in the hands of a few and composed of people who occupy the top positions in society and have access to political power. In other words this theory claims that a single elite group decides “who gets what and how”.[2] I will try to argue that political power belongs to a single elite group and show that the principle of power elite theory exists and works in many societies and try to contrast it to the pluralist view. Due to the complexity and impracticality of participatory democracy in large modern societies, governments fall into the hands of a few, or the minority who control the government. Italian Political scientist, Gaetano Mosca, argued that in all societies – from the least developed to the most advanced and powerful, there are two classes of people: the class that rules and the class that is ruled. The class that rules is less numerous and carries out the function of making political, economic and social decisions. And the vast majority is under the


Bibliography: 5. C. Wright Mills, the Power Elite (New York: Oxford University Press, 1956 6 [2] Political Science: an introduction/ Michael G. Roskin…[et al.], p.84 [3] Gaetano Mosca, The Ruling Class (New York: McGraw Hill, 1939), p [4] C. Wright Mills, the Power Elite (New York: Oxford University Press, 1956, p. 8 [5] C

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Our attitude toward these types of ruling bodies, institutional direction and governing frameworks helps adopt our trend to maintain the established systems or work to “fight the power”.…

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Power Elite was written by sociologist C. Wright Mills in 1956. In this inscription, Mills has directed the attention of readers towards intermingled interests of the leaders of the military. Moreover, it also includes corporate and political components of society, which suggests that an ordinary citizen is a comparatively immobilized subject of manipulation by such entities.…

    • 773 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Zinn Chapter 11 Analysis

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Manifest Destiny gave reason to go to the West for opportunists. The more common name for these opportunistic Americans were industrialists. These people came on the rise as Robber Barons. What would become household names were simply paving their ways towards success in these days. This brand of people became a part of American culture, forever changing it and embellishing their names within it, such as Rockefeller, Standford, Gould, Morgan, and Carnegie. These people carved out industrialization in the name of America through their immense fortunes in banking, coal, and oil. This would be the era of the establishment of the multinational corporation.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is much easier to contrast the four contemporary theories of American democracy than to compare them, as pluralist, hyperpluralist, elite and class, and traditional theory each highlights the competitive foundation of politics. Each contemporary theory investigates the underlying question "Who governs our nation" yielding significantly different conclusions. While the pluralist theory emphasizes that politics is merely a competition among groups - a competition overwhelmingly controlled by the wealthy according to elite and class theory - hyperpluralism contends that these groups weaken the political backbone rather than support it. Pluralism and hyperpluralism are similar in that both agree that groups indelibly impact society and therefore the government by pressing their concerns through organized efforts, however they differ as to whether the impact is positive or negative, respectively. Hyperpluralism also contrasts with elite and class theory stating that many groups - not just the elite ones - are so strong that the government is unable to act. It asserts that there are too many ways for groups to control policy, regardless of their organization, topic, or funding. Traditional democratic theory is composed of key principles that an ideal democratic process should consist of: voting must be representative, a population must participate, civic understanding, citizen control of agenda, and inclusion. The majority rule - in which the will of over half the voters is followed - guarantees equality, control, and inclusion, guaranteeing rights to those subject to the laws that follow the policy making process. A key aspect to the theory is equal representation from each citizen, which under hyperpluralist and elite and class theory is thought of as endangered or nullified by the power of groups and the wealthy, respectively. Pluralism suggests that democratic theory is successful because…

    • 364 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pluralist democracy works with numerous organised groups who all have some political power in the decision-making setting. It assumes that it’s ‘neutral’ government who listens to, and acts on the outcomes of these competing interests. Thus the large number and operation of pressure groups is considered to be a vital element in the promotion of pluralist democracy.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soon after the Reconstruction period, an era known as the Gilded Age erupted. During the 1870's - 1890's, America took a drastic leap into industrialization. Immigrants swarmed into the United States with the distinct hope of opportunity. Big business was soon in effect with a newly acquired demand for raw material. Shortly, monopolies emerged. These industrial leaders, whom were ingenious to the game, established their wealth from the suffrage of factory workers, oblivious farmers and displaced American Indians. These leaders can not be considered anything less than malicious robber barons.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is power? For generations many political leaders have gained and lost power. In the book Lord of the flies, children of the island gain power through fear, whereas in the novel Farewell to Manzanar, power lied in the U.S army keeping japanese americans captive. French revolutionist Maximilien Robespierre, struck fear into the hearts of many during the reign of terror, and the Estates system held power in different classes. the first and Second estates were the higher class, while the third estate was the “working poor”. As shown, there are many forms of power, yet are all based around the same idea, control.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Acquisition of power by leaders via competitive elections (representative democracy or elitist theory of democracy)0…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bicameral Senate Power

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dye and Zeigler’s Elite Theory claims that representative democracy is not really based on the will of the people, but a small elite class that governs the masses. “Only one branch of the new government, the House of Representatives, was to be elected by popular vote. The other three controlling bodies-the president, the Senate, and the Supreme Court–were removed from direct voter participation” (2009). According to Dye and Zeigler none of the delegates showed any enthusiasm for mass participation in democracy. The two chamber split appears to support Dye and Zeigler’s argument on Elite Theory…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ideally, a working and trustworthy democracy requires a general public composed of good and educated citizens that will act and vote on what is best for the society as a collective whole. This concept is rather too idealistic, for class and social divisions profoundly beget and affect individual interests. In effect, determining what the objectives and priorities should be in empire building can be difficult in the realm of a democracy, given the vast number of people who are entitled to participate. This complexity that lies in the determining of the “general will” consequently inhibits effective solutions in government.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    C.) The Elitism theory is a theory that accepts group’s concerns and grievances but the power is given more to the elite (superior). This theory promotes democracy by letting individuals form groups based on common interests, but it limits them because elite’s opinions and concerns matter the most and that which is an unbalanced share of democracy. Though the participation is evident, the representation is unfair, going against ideal democracy which is for the people of the people by the people.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States there are many different power relations. Many people argue that one of these political theories are better than the other one. In politics political participation, political institutions and public policy is a big part in politics. The political theories that are presented are Pluralism, State Autonomy, Elite Theory, Marxism, and Class Domination. Pluralism Theory is a center of how power is distributed between many groups. In State Autonomy there are two clear opposition sides between the states and they act in their own interests. Elite Theory is the theory of the states who describe the power relationships in the economy. Marxism Theory is the transition from capitalist to socialism. Class Domination…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Introduction: To analyse the compatibility of democracy with elitism it is first important to define both the terms democracy and elitism. Democracy is in its simplest form is the rule for the people by politicians etc, and elitism is most simply known as ‘a class that rules and a class that is ruled’. This therefore opens up the question, do those in higher positions effectively rule those lower down, democracy within elitism, and the effects if elitism was not around. ‘a minority which monopolises the effective exercise of power’. P69, schwarzmantel.…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The belief that competition among all affected interests shaps public policy. ii. Pluralists believe that political tools such as money, prestige, expertise, and access to the mass media are too widely scattered fora single elite to monopolize on them. iii. Pluralists acknowledge that big businesses, cozy elites, or career bureaucrats may dominate on some issues, but not all. V. Is Democracy driven by Self-Interest?A. Some actions are independent of self interest, but others aren’t.i. Dependent on individual’s ideals, morals, and ethics. ii. A policy may be good or bad regardless of the motive behind it. B. The belief that people will usually act on the basis of their self-interest, narrowly defined, is a theory to be tested, not an assumption to be made.i. Some people act out of purely self interest while others do not. Most people lay somewhere in between. VI. What Explains Political Change?A. Many forces drive political changei. Economic interestsii. Powerful elitesiii. Entrenched bureaucratsiv. Competing pressure groupsv. Morally impassioned individuals vi. WarsB. Many historical things have happened in U.S history causing political changei. The Great Depressionii. The development of the federal government VII. The Nature of Politics A. The Importance of Power in Politicsi. Conjures up deals, bribes, power plays, and arm twisting. ii. Shared understanding, common friendships, communal or organizational loyalties can shape…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    10. Pluralist Theory - An analysis of politics emphasizing the role of diverse and competing interest groups in preventing too much power being accumulated in the hands of political and economic elites.…

    • 5943 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays