poverty
PATALINGHUG
Competition Policy, Technology Policy, and Philippine Industrial Competitiveness
Epictetus E. Patalinghug
Abstract
The disappointing performance of the Philippine industrial sector in the past five decades has been attributed to several factors such as the lack of a stable macroeconomic environment, poor infrastructure, low productivity, low savings rate, and an overvalued currency.
This paper attempts to summarize the link between competition policy, technology policy, and industrial policy, and suggests direction for future industrial policy. It gives a brief discussion on recent
Philippine industrial development; analyzes the scope and elements of competition policy; and gives an assessment of industrial policy in the Philippines.
Introduction
The disappointing performance of the Philippine industrial sector in the past five decades has been attributed to several factors such as the lack of a stable macroeconomic environment, poor infrastructure, low labor productivity, low savings rate, and an overvalued exchange rate. Export, investment, and growth performance of the sector have likewise failed very poorly relative to its ASEAN neighbors.
The Philippine industrial structure used to be highly protected and its capital-intensive bias led to absorption of only a small fraction of the labor force, while
SOCIAL SCIENCE DILIMAN (January-June 2000) 1:1, pp. 31-59
31
COMPETITION POLICY, TECHNOLOGY POLICY, AND PHILIPPINE INDUSTRIAL COMPETITIVENESS
the agriculture and services sectors absorbed the bulk of the labor force.
This traditional industrial structure was directly responsible for the absence of a strong export growth in non-traditional manufactures.
In the past, several studies had identified the adverse effects of the import-substitution strategy that was anchored on high tariff, quantitative restriction, and overvalued exchange rate. No structural change took place and a high degree of
Competition Policy, Technology Policy, and Philippine Industrial Competitiveness
Epictetus E. Patalinghug
Abstract
The disappointing performance of the Philippine industrial sector in the past five decades has been attributed to several factors such as the lack of a stable macroeconomic environment, poor infrastructure, low productivity, low savings rate, and an overvalued currency.
This paper attempts to summarize the link between competition policy, technology policy, and industrial policy, and suggests direction for future industrial policy. It gives a brief discussion on recent
Philippine industrial development; analyzes the scope and elements of competition policy; and gives an assessment of industrial policy in the Philippines.
Introduction
The disappointing performance of the Philippine industrial sector in the past five decades has been attributed to several factors such as the lack of a stable macroeconomic environment, poor infrastructure, low labor productivity, low savings rate, and an overvalued exchange rate. Export, investment, and growth performance of the sector have likewise failed very poorly relative to its ASEAN neighbors.
The Philippine industrial structure used to be highly protected and its capital-intensive bias led to absorption of only a small fraction of the labor force, while
SOCIAL SCIENCE DILIMAN (January-June 2000) 1:1, pp. 31-59
31
COMPETITION POLICY, TECHNOLOGY POLICY, AND PHILIPPINE INDUSTRIAL COMPETITIVENESS
the agriculture and services sectors absorbed the bulk of the labor force.
This traditional industrial structure was directly responsible for the absence of a strong export growth in non-traditional manufactures.
In the past, several studies had identified the adverse effects of the import-substitution strategy that was anchored on high tariff, quantitative restriction, and overvalued exchange rate. No structural change took place and a high degree of
References: Abenoja, Z., & Lapid, D. (1991, December). Barriers to entry, market concentration, and wages in the Philippine manufacturing sector, 1987 Amsden, A. (1989). Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Balisacan, A. (1990). An Analysis of the Philippine Inter-Island Shipping Industry Department of Science and Technology. (1990). Science and technology master plan. ________. (1993). Philippines 2000: The national technology agenda: 19931998. Dertouzos, M., Lester, R. & Solow, R. (1989). Made in America: Regaining the productive edge Fabella, R. (1993). Efficiency and competitiveness: The role of the exchange rate. Free Trade Asia Consulting. (1996). Setting the agenda for competition policy in the Philippines Freeman, C. (1994). Technological revolutions and catching-up: ICT and the NICs Hooley, R. (1985). Productivity and growth in Philippine manufacturing: Retrospect and future prospects Intal, P (1991). Taking the flying geese to heart: Economic policy and industrial . Kirkpatrick, C., Lee, N., & Nixson, F. (1984). Industrial structure and policy in less developed countries Krugman, P. (1984). The U.S. response to foreign industrial targeting. In Brookings papers on economic activity (pp ________ (1994). Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73 (2), 28-44. Medalla, E., et al. (1995). Catching up with Asia’s tigers, vol. I. Manila: Philippine Institute for Development Studies. National Economic and Development Authority. (1993). Medium-term Philippine development plan: 1993-1998. National Development Summit. (1997). Pole-vaulting strategy for the 21st century. Nelson, R. (1981). Research on productivity growth and productivity differences: Dead ends and new departures Patalinghug, E. (1991). Investment incentives, private initiative and industrial policy ________ (1992). Industrial policy in export-oriented economies: Lessons from the experience of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan ________ (1996). The retail trade industry: Structure, issues, and public policy August 22-24, 1996. ________ (1997). Current conditions and future prospects of competition policy in the Philippines Policy for APEC Member Economies, Bangkok, March 18-21, 1997. Saldana, C. (1990). Rent-seeking public policies and corporate conduct in the Philippine flour milling industry Sanchez, A. (1990). The textile industry in the Philippines and Thailand: A comparison Santos, G. (1995). Competition regulation: The Philippine experience. Paper presented to the Asian Law and Policy Studies Colloquium on Competition Regulation Serafica, R. (1996). Tests of efficient industry structure in telephone service provision: Revealing the past and potential direction of Philippine telecommunications. SGV Consulting. (1992). Barriers to entry study: Final report, volume II. Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization World Bank. (1993). The East Asian miracle: Economic growth and public policy