Preview

Post Soviet Privatization

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1165 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Post Soviet Privatization
Nicky Kassab
Mr. Van Meter
Post-Soviet Eurasia
13 November 2012

Privatization of Russia On midnight of December 31st 1991, the Soviet Union collapsed, along with the communist ideals that it followed. The former the soviet union were forced to transition from a communism to a private government literally overnight, which is why it was referred to as spontaneous privatization. This abrupt economic reform cause problems with the people, as the government struggled to devise an efficient and fair way to distribute the wealth. The government wanted to take a democratic approach to mending the economy, so the plans they proposed promoted free market economy where the distribution of wealth is left up to the people, with a low amount of government interference. For people to distribute the wealth they must first obtain it, making this the first step in privatizing the former union. There were three schools of thought about what should be instated during the post soviet era and the beginning of privatization. The government had difficulty in choosing which would be the best, as each would have a complex effect on the economy of the former union. The first school of thought promoted the transfer of ownership to employees so that they could trade and sell their assets to attain a greater amount of wealth. Each worker would get an amount of stocks that would be proportional to the length of their employment at their company[1]. The most common use for these shares would be to sell them for discount, giving many people shares in the company. This made this a very lucrative choice as it increased the spending budget and reduced liquidity greatly, as well as giving more power to the ruble[2]. The second possibility was a voucher based free market, in which the government would distribute vouchers as well as stock in companies to give everyone an equal opportunity to become wealthy as well as a safety net should they fail to do so. The issues in this theory

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Minimum Wage Changes

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For starters, economic growth will increase opportunity and decrease poverty. Puzder writes how history has proven the free enterprise system can produce enough economic growth to accommodate for opportunities and poverty. This would be ideal for growing companies to compete for workers in a successful economy. In addition, the voucher system would provide unemployed with jobs. Harris believes that the unemployed and low income jobs, specifically young people would gain the valuable work experience along with wages. With this in mind, there are creative solutions that already exist that need to be encouraged. Lastly, the current voucher system strengthens the economy by supporting businesses. Harris declares “fragile businesses could thrive and new companies would start up.” As has been noted, people would profit from the subsidies that increased production while lowering product prices. In brief, there are many solutions too poverty in…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The break up and dissolution of the Soviet Union on the 25th December 1991 heralded the end of the Cold War. It ushered in what had been termed 'the new world order ', furthermore, it was suggested by Francis Fukuyama to have signalled the end of history and the battle of ideas which had dominated much of the twentieth century (Huntington, 1996; 31). The 'clash of civilizations ' had already seen the demise of fascism as a credible force in 1945, the close of 1991 would see the end of communism in Europe. The relatively sudden collapse of the USSR has compelled thinkers and analysts to seek answers as to why the world’s second superpower could collapse so quickly…

    • 2282 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchev was a politician who led the Soviet Union during part of the Cold War. Around 1954-55 in the power struggle triggered by Stalin’s death in 1953, Khrushchev emerged as number one. In 1956, Khrushchev gives a “secret speech” where he discussed Stalin’s crimes for the first time, starting a process called “de-Stalinization.” Khrushchev believes that the Soviet system has become too bureaucratic. He wanted decentralization. He abolished the tractor station, which were the centralizing mechanisms that gave the party/state control over the collected farms because the collected farms did not own their own machinery. It was a control mechanism. Ultimately, most of Khrushchev’s reforms had very bad, unintended consequences.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The introduction of collectivization and industrialization by Stalin were both supposed to end ideological compromise and come closer to Marxist theory. However, many historians have made it clear that these policies created a socialist Soviet Economy which was the opposite of Marx’s theory. State control of the economy was a key feature of Stalin’s totalitarian rule.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1957, Khrushchev attempted to decrease the amount of power the central government had and instead give power to regional governments. In turn, the economy was severely impacted. It was very hard to restructure the USSR without having a strong central authority. Additionally, the Soviet economy was full of imbalances especially in consumer industries. The USSR tried to produce only what was necessary in order to eliminate waste, however they usually did not produce enough which caused a shortage of goods. Furthermore, the Soviets did not have much money to invest elsewhere as they spent a good portion of their GDP on their military and their various space programs. Finally, Khrushchev spread the investments he could make to widely which, consequently, did not result in anything efficient being done due to the lack of…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    governments of U.S. and Soviet Union?: US: Capitalism, private citizens controlled almost all economic activity.…

    • 1854 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    From Revolution to Ruin: Unraveling the Complex Forces Behind the Soviet Union's Dissolution The collapse of the Soviet Union, a transformative event marking the end of a geopolitical era, was primarily driven by a combination of internal economic inefficiencies, failed political reforms such as Gorbachev's Perestroika and Glasnost, and the exacerbating effect of external pressures including the arms race and global shifts towards neoliberal policies. These factors, compounded by the rise of nationalist movements within its republics, not only highlighted the systemic flaws inherent in the Soviet economic and political structure but also significantly undermined the legitimacy of the Soviet state, leading to its eventual dissolution in 1991. Economic…

    • 2661 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The economy of the Soviet Union was based on a system of state ownership of the means of production, collective farming, industrial manufacturing and centralized administrative planning. Starting in 1924, with Stalin rising to power, the period of the centralized economy made the central government of Russia formulate all economic decisions. The command economy was one of the key features of the Soviet society, however, it came with benefits and setbacks. For example, an advantage would be low levels of employment and a disadvantage would be lack of competition. A major strength was an enormous supply of oil and gas.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Soviet Economy has been termed a ‘command economy’. Do you feel this is an appropriate and adequate characterisation?…

    • 2174 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, when Gorbachev tried to reform communism, it created political unrest. The Soviet Union was losing strength because it couldn’t handle its own reforms. Gorbachev’s main contribution to why the Soviet Union collapsed was “glasnost”, or free press. He also had perestroika, the economic reforms. The reason why glasnost was the one that lead to the USSR’s failure is because in China, only perestroika was introduced and China withstood collapse. However, perestroika…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been many different opinions on why the once powerful Soviet Union fell including a stagnant economy, new reform policies, or general dismissal of communist ideology. Many of the issues that were either unresolved or worsened stem from Mikhail Gorbachev reign as General Secretary from 1985 until the collapse in 1991. While there were a plethora of issues surrounding the Soviet Union, Gorbachev seemed to be the focal point of where things went from bad to worse. Though Gorbachev had the Soviet…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When he came to power, political and economic problems were serious, so he came up with a two-tiered policy of reform. On the one hand, Gorbachev gave people freedom to speak in public; on the other hand, he started a program to reform the economy of the nation called “perestroika”, which means “rebuilding”. After Gorbachev gave people freedom to speak in public, the people were extremely angry because their feelings have been inhibited for such a long time. Also, Gorbachev's economic reform didn't show an immediate result, so people all over the country blamed him. The Soviet Union started to collapse on the outside, which was the non-Russians.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Soviet Union was looking to expand their way of life and basically take away liberty, slowly but surely. It may not have seemed so at first, and it is apparent because of the actions of presidents Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter. With their choices to deny containment in the spirit of trade and relations,…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Soviets had a command economy, an economy where the government decides what goods will be produced, how much is produced, and the pricing of the goods. At first there was a very long period of rapid growth from 1950-1973. The Soviet economy posted an estimated annual growth rate in gross national product of 5.7% from 1950 to 1960, and 5.2% from 1960 to 1970(JOHNSTON, Paragraph 6). Because the Soviet Union’s economy was so underdeveloped and controlled, it could easily adapt to and imitate the newest western technology. While this strategy was very effective short-term, The forced industrialization at the expense of personal consumption led to the country being unable to innovate in its economy.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What in your view is the short-term impact of collectivisation on Soviet society at the time?…

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays