Preview

Position Paper- Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty in Russia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1037 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Position Paper- Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty in Russia
Position Paper

COMMITTEE: General Assembly

COUNTRY: Russia

TOPIC: The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)

The Russian Federation confirms its position of principle in support of the efforts undertaken by the international community, including the UN, Conference on Disarmament and IAEA to fight terrorism and proliferation.
Russia clearly understands that under today's conditions the spread of nuclear weapons, together with missile vehicles of their' delivery, would be fraught with generating strategic turmoil, Increased risk of regional conflicts and use of nuclear weapons. Quite naturally, it is urgent to counteract such a course of events. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is the main factor allowing the community to hold back such a development of events, providing at the same time for the development of international cooperation in the sphere of peaceful use of nuclear energy. That is why Russia attaches great importance to the comprehensive and impartial consideration of the NPT functioning.
Russia has completely fulfilled her obligations under the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty of unlimited duration (the INF Treaty), which entered into force on 1 June 1988. As a result, ground-based missiles of two classes - medium range (from 1,000 to 5,500 km) and shorter-range (from 500 to 1,000 km) missiles have been eliminated. Inspection activity under that Treaty was completed in May 2001.
At the same time also Russia continues reducing strategic offensive weapons. The period of reduction of strategic offensive weapons foreseen under the START I ended on December 5, 2001. According to the Treaty, the parties committed themselves to reduce the number of their strategic delivery systems seven years after its entry into force down to 1,600 units, and the re-entry vehicles [warheads] counted with them down to the level of 6,000 units to each of the parties. Russia completely and ahead of the time-schedule fulfilled her obligations under the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Nike System Effectiveness

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A development that could have been preventable through possible disarmament negotiations after the war, had the US not underestimated the USSR. Considering the aftermath of World War II, the USSR had lost an estimate of 22 million lives and had large decimated areas of land. The US couldn’t possibly see the USSR as a military threat due to the heavy casualties the nation had sustained. In all likeliness, the US may have thought that “nuclear diplomacy” would be enough to quell the USSR if the need arose. A decade later the USSR had displayed its very own jet-bomber called the Mya-4 “Bison”. In 1955, an American air force attache, had observed twice the number of Bisons that were estimated to have been made. This jet-bomber was far more capable of inflicting injury upon the US than the Tu-4, and to further the anxiety of the US, the USSR had detonated its first thermonuclear weapon in…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first critical piece of foreign policy done by the Carter administration was the passing of the SALT II treaty later in the administration. It was the first treaty that successfully passed after these talks, and it stated, “Declaring their intention to undertake in the near future negotiations further to limit and further to reduce strategic offensive arms.” (The Government of the United States) The treaty was explicit in demanding the reduction of all aspects of the Soviet Union and United States’ nuclear capability. In addition, it was the result of mutual understanding, which is contained in the full title of the treaty resulting from both nations comprehending the dangers of large nuclear arsenals. Continuing,…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Second World War, the United States and the Soviet Union emerged as superpowers and subsequently a period of tension and hostility arose, known as the Cold War. During this time, a new possibility of complete nuclear destruction that would claim the lives of many emerged, therefore “the easing or relaxing of tensions” on both sides was needed, this period would be known as detente. Both countries had been guaranteed mutually assured destruction as they had both managed to stay ahead in the development of nuclear arsenals. By the late 1960s the Soviets had surpassed the United States in intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM) by 1,300 to 1,054. Although the U.S was still ahead in various categories, it no longer enjoyed the immense nuclear advantage as before. However, neither side was prepared for the risk of a full scale war. Apart from the possibility of a disastrous nuclear war, factors in both the U.S and the Soviet Union also motivated the need for a relaxation of tensions.Both countries were in severe economic crisis due to the arms race and needed to diverge the funds to rebuild the economy. In the United States public opinion in America indicated that the Cold War was 'unjustifiable both economically and morally' due to the ongoing war in Vietnam. All these factors would eventually lead to the establishment of detente.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    USSR sent two messages: They’ll move missiles if America won’t invade; afterwards insisted that American missiles need to move from Turkey as part of the deal. We ended up agreeing and both sides moved their missiles…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The scene in 1991 brought slowly-approaching breakdown of the Communist government. Before the complete failure of communism, the Berlin Wall in Germany fell down causing the Soviet Union to sign many agreements with the United States to signify the end of the Cold War. The same year, the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I) was signed in order to reduce the Soviets supplies of long-range nuclear…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It states that if any one of our allied forces get attacked or feels threatened we will protect and help them. Russia knows if they tried to enter into our sphere of influence that we would have to do something so I believe that Russia wanted to see how far they could push it like, a kid and get into trouble they need to see where and when the adults will draw the line.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    U.S World History 05.06

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Despite the fall of the Soviet Union 19 years ago in 1991, the issue of nuclear arms, besides terrorism, remains one of the chief security concerns in the contemporary world. Accordingly, the following issues concerning nuclear arms remained unresolved security concerns.Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These events not only brought about the surrender of the Japan and an end to World War II, but they also helped shaped the nature of international politics for the next six decades.The atomic bomb is the crudest form of a series of powerful nuclear weapons to be eventually developed and come into existence. Both superpowers, the United States of America and the Soviet Union, eventually built massive stockpiles of nuclear weapons during the Cold War. This escalation of nuclear arms possession led to…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scare

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since the 1980’s, the two superpowers have reduced their nuclear weapons by almost 70%. Today, we still have more nuclear weapons than any military purpose could justify. Unfortunately, the command and control system in Russia has deteriorated further.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The advent of nuclear weapons dawned a new and terrifying era in human history. The destructive power of the atomic bomb, demonstrated at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, ushered in a global climate of fear. Emerging from the rubble of the Second World War, the U.S. and Soviet Union became the two most dominant economic, political, and military superpowers in the global arena. Upholding fundamental ideological differences, the U.S. and Soviet Union became entrenched in their respective camps of capitalism and communism. Having acquired nuclear weapons, and illustrated their ability to use them, the U.S challenged the Soviet Union’s military might. The Soviet Union promptly accepted this challenge by successfully acquiring nuclear capabilities on par with the U.S. In effect, a nuclear arms race ensued and the Cold War began. Fear of nuclear annihilation ultimately swept across the globe and into the homes of American citizens.…

    • 2478 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tonight, consistent with our obligations of the ABM treaty and recognizing the need for closer consultation with our allies, I'm taking an important first step. I am directing a comprehensive and intensive effort to define a long-term research and development program to begin to achieve our ultimate goal of eliminating the threat posed by strategic nuclear missiles. This could pave the way for arms control measures to eliminate the weapons themselves. We seek neither military superiority nor political advantage. Our only purpose--one all people share--is to search for ways to reduce the danger of nuclear…

    • 5226 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia did give up some of its nuclear weapons from the Soviet controlled states of Ukraine and Kazakhstan, but the country has still continued to maintain its much larger arsenal of nuclear warheads. Likewise, the United States has done nothing to reduce their arsenal of warheads but has instead invested billions to modernize these weapons. NATO, the organization created for the sole purpose of preventing Soviet invasion, has done nothing about the territorial ambitions of now Russian president Vladimir Putin. Putin’s annexation of Crimea and invasion of Ukraine has been met only with Western leaders denouncing his actions, but doing nothing to combat them. This is the same response that the Soviet Union’s actions were met with throughout the Cold War. Public denouncing of their actions was the response from both sides when the other did something they did not approve of. The reason why is the same reason why it’s the case today as well. The fear of nuclear destruction is still present, maybe even more so now then 25 years ago. We like to believe that since the collapse of the Soviet Union the threat of nuclear warfare just magically went away, but the reality is that it has stayed in play with no end in…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lettow, Paul Vorbeck. 2010 Strengthening the nuclear nonproliferation regime. New York Council on forgein Relations. Print…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fundamental component of the proliferation debate revolves around the perceived or alleged efficiency of nuclear deterrence. Proliferation optimists argue that, “more may be better” because nuclear weapons increase the cost of nuclear conflict, ultimately deterring states from engaging in nuclear warfare with a nuclear-armed state (Suzuki 2015). Optimists argue that nuclear deterrence works reliably, thus there seemingly less to be feared from nuclear proliferation and beneficial to a state to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cold War in 1980s

    • 3497 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Since Cold War began at the end of World War in the late 1940s, the two superpowers, the United States and the Soviet Union, were racing their power to get their dominance over another. Each side feared the other’s superior weapons, such as the United States had nuclear weapon and the USSR had their mighty Red Army. The Cold War spread through decades and seemed to be indefinite. Two superpowers with the race of weapon not only weakened their economy but also threaten each other with their massive arsenals. Two sides negotiated to reduce half the numbers of nuclear weapon on each side as they worried that if the war started, it would be the third World War, and the destruction of the third war would be tremendous and severe. 1980s turned out to be the most important decade with many events which lead the Soviet Union to dissolved officially and breaking up into fifteen separate nations on December 31, 1991.…

    • 3497 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Through the triumph of the Geneva Summit, Gorbachev displayed lots of readiness to work with President Reagan thus showing the doctrine’s usefulness in producing world peace (Farnham, 2001). Also, the doctrine which can be credited with helping to cement the way for Gorbachev’s rise to power as Russian Leader. In the Reykjavik summit, Gorbachev exhibited added enthusiasm to introduce arms control initiatives amongst both the Soviet Union (Farnham, 2001) and the United States. Such willingness was a noticeable deviation from established Russian armed conflict policies. Furthermore, Soviet foreign policies saw a changing of the nation’s actions and thoughts, in general, which are said to be attributed the Reagan Doctrine and it’s…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays