Preview

Popular Music Under Siege

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
859 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Popular Music Under Siege
POPULAR MUSIC UNDER SIEGE

Beginning in the 1980s, religious fundamentalists and some parents' groups have waged a persistent campaign to limit the variety of cultural messages available to American youth by attacking the content of some of the music industry's creative products. These attacks have taken numerous forms, including a call by the Parents' Music Resource Center (PMRC) for the labeling of recordings whose themes or imagery relate to sexuality, violence, drug or alcohol use, suicide or the "occult," and prosecutions of record companies and storeowners for producing or selling albums that contain controversial songs.
After years of pressure from the PMRC and a series of Senate hearings in 1985, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) introduced, in 1990, a uniform labeling system using the logo, "Parental Advisory - Explicit Lyrics." The RIAA initiated this system without providing record companies with any standards, criteria or guidelines for determining what albums should be labeled. That decision is left completely up to the companies, which have chosen to label only selected rock and rap albums and not recordings of country music, opera or musical comedy that may also contain controversial material.
Dissatisfied with the RIAA's labels, many would-be censors have demanded even more limits on the sale of music with controversial lyrics. As a result, legislators have introduced bills in more than 20 states in recent years that would require warning labels far more detailed than the RIAA's. Some proposed laws would go beyond mandatory labeling and actually ban the sale to minors of music deemed to be objectionable.
Until 1992, none of this legislation had passed, although in 1991 a bill in Louisiana failed by only one vote. In 1992, however, the state of Washington passed a law that required storeowners to place "adults only" labels on recordings a judge had found to be "erotic"; the law also criminalized the sale of any labeled CD

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Ml 3534 Research Paper

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bleep!: censoring rock and rap music, 1999. Edited by Betty Houchin Winfield and Sandra Davisdon.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eberstadt presents the parental agenda’s question regarding the influence of today’s popular music on teenagers. She states that recent studies and articles have invested time and concern in connecting contemporary music to possible violence, citing an incident in 2000 where multiple associations teamed up to present a statement on violent entertainment and its affect on children to Congress. She then turns the question around to ask her own for society. Eberstadt wants to know why American teenagers are attracted to the music of today and what it says about them. She uses rapper Eminem to find the answer.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frl 301

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The NYSLA’s ban on Bad Frog’s labels lacks a “reasonable fit” with the interest in shielding minors from vulgarity. The court found that NYSLA’s decision of denying the label was under-inclusive in protecting children from vulgarity, because banning labels for beer would not significantly reduce children’s exposure to vulgarity. The court ruled that the interest of the label was substantial. Yet there are many different ways for vulgar displays throughout the society, banning labels from alcoholic beverages cannot realistically be expected to reduce the chance of exposure to children in any ways. Moreover, NYSLA’s concern about chances of harmful exposure of the Bad Frog labels…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    But that music is considered art in the musicians’ eyes. Also the artists are exercising their freedom of speech by singing these lyrics. Also, why do they not just let the music industry regulate this songs and albums, since they know the artists better than the PMRC…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout the years many methods have been utilized in making a macroscopic analysis of the youth of America. Traditionally, when using music to make this analysis, the overall influence of pop music on adolescents and children would be examined. Mary Eberstadt flips this logic around and asks the question: "What is it about today's music, violent and disgusting though it may be, that resonates with so many American kids?" By answering this question, Eberstadt hopes to not to learn what music "does" to adolescents, but rather what music can "tell" about them. Is it possible that today's pop music can be used as a lens to glimpse into the lives of today's youth? Eberstadt finds her evidence through examining many of the lyrics…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kidz Bop Research Paper

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The music industry is one of the most lucrative forms of entertainment today. Music is the one thing that is universal, it overrides any language, and is accessible to everyone all over the world. Pop, Rap, Hip-Hop, Classical, any genre can bring a whole range of emotions to any individual, music is powerful. It is when people start to mess with the message and idea of music for a quick buck, does a problem arise. The greedy have taken advantage of a market, that can not fight back, and does not know any better, children. One music company has used the youth of today to rip-off, and ruin some of music’s current radio hits, and they still have power because they advertise to children, so that they beg their parents to buy these albums for them. That company is Kidz Bop. Kidz Bop’s covers of songs are redundant to the original artist’s version of the songs.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PMRC Controversy

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Obscenity is not protected by the amendment and that is where a lot of controversy was caused. The line between what is obscene and what isn't obscene is hard to determine. Many proposals were made throughout the hearing, after all the debates, witnesses, and testimonials the case was finally settled. Even before the trial was complete the PMRC and RIAA had made a compromise. "Following the Hearing, on November 1 of 1985, the PMRC, and its ally the National Parents and Teachers Association, reached an agreement with the RIAA on the voluntary record label. The agreement stipulated that the printing of lyrics remained optional and, because of space limitations, cassettes were exempted, bearing only the imprint "see LP for lyrics". Since then, different record companies designed their own label containing the words "Parental Guidance - Explicit Lyrics" or some variation thereof"…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever wondered if letting children listen to whatever music they wanted to would ever have a bad influence on them? Parents today try and control what their kids listen to, but they sometimes end up failing. Since teens and young adults have the largest influence on music, they are the ones who will decide what will be the most popular music genre in pop culture. Some parents believe that letting their children listen to “gangster rap” or any other form of harmful and vulgar music will turn them into a psychopathic cop killer. With the this being true in some cases, it can be a cause for concern. The problem that most parents actually have with these types of harmful music is that it changes the way their children act and speak towards…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So parents feel that their kids will listen to this songs with inappropriate lyrics and be encourage to have sex, drink alcohol, and smoke…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boris Opening Statement- Censorship in music is a topic that has brought about much controversy in the past two decades. There have been many different arguments on the topic, however the question still remains as if it should be censored or it should not be censored. Before you can form an opinion on this, you must hear both sides of the argument on this much-debated topic. Some people believe that music should be censored so all audiences can hear it without it containing any controversial lyrics. Others believe it should not be censored and musical artists should be able to speak, sing, rap, or rhyme freely without anyone censoring them. Preventing speech is a clear violation of the First Amendment. When you really think about it, it is a violation of the First Amendment, which says: "Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech or of the press". The First Amendment guarantees the right to freedom of speech, and censorship is violating peoples' rights to say whatever they…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secular humanism is the number one belief held by the popular media. Instead of freedom of religion, there are organizations seeking freedom from religion. Prayer is no longer allowed in schools, and if someone is a Christian, they are now considered a minority. Music from the present time is the antithesis of the music that started our nation. Lyrics today are filled with profanity and the “clean” versions of some songs by popular artists could more accurately be named an “instrumental” version. Beyond the actual profanities, the overall message of today’s popular songs has shifted even further away from God. The majority of music is now centered around sex in a way that sex outside of marriage is not only accepted, but it is glorified. Women are objectified in many modern songs and are not described how one should describe a person created in the image of God. Americans have shifted away from God and their culture has followed suit. This shift in ideology has created the demand for songs with content that is being produced today. If the culture did not demand it, the music would not be…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ever since music became a big thing in teen’s lives, there has been controversy around the idea that kids should not be exposed to some lyrics because of how it influences them. From rock and roll and metal, to pop, rap, and hip hop, there are, and always will be lyrics out there that are not always appropriate or anything that children should be listening to.There has been an issue with song lyrics being blamed for causing teen’s rebellious, or irresponsible actions, but there has never been anything that can strongly support the idea.…

    • 3245 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rock Music

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1.Some of the music in the 1960s was used to protest social and political issues. Is music still used as a form of protest? Why or why not? Songs todays arent no longer used to protest but they do touch their listeners.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although there is a fair share of people that are offended by some of today’s music, the First Amendment rights shouldn’t be taken away. Some alternatives that could be considered are disclaimers. Disclaimers could be presented at the beginning of each song or video so the listener would have the opportunity to change the song or channel.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pornography is the internet 's number one income generator. With such an abundance of pornography available, children have increased access to view it than in days before the internet. Most Americans are alarmed by this, with 73% of Americans who believe that "the government should do something about" children 's access to pornography (Rourke 56). In addition, "94% of respondents agree ‘it should be illegal for adults to use the Internet to make pornographic material available to children under the age of 18 '" (Rourke 56). As a response to this, Congress introduced the Child Online Protection Act (COPA) of 1998, which would make it a crime for "commercial Web sites to post material ‘harmful to minors ' unless the site has made a good faith effort to screen out those under the age 17" (Rourke 57). COPA would require that pornographic material be placed behind "screens" that adults could easily bypass. Those opposed to this act initiated a "legal challenge on First Amendment groups" (Rourke 57), which is the foundation of this debate. The Act ultimately was struck down in the Supreme Court with a 5 to 4 vote. But it is likely that legislators will attempt to again pass a similar legislation due to the close loss.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays