Preview

Polygraph and Scientific Evidence

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
333 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Polygraph and Scientific Evidence
1. Discuss the underlying reasons for the rapid growth of crime laboratories in the United States since the 1960’s. supreme court decisions are what made police put a great emphasis on securing scientifically evaluated evidence so much in fact that the confession is almost no longer a recent investigation tool. 2. Describe the criteria for admissibility of scientific evidence as laid out in Frye v. United States.
The criteria for admissibility of scientific evidence as laid out in Frye v. united states was the systolic blood pressure deception test also known today as the polygraph or lie detector test.

3. What document offers an alternative to the Frye standard that some courts believe espouses a more flexible standard for admitting scientific evidence?
This would be called the Daubert standard which is when the judge becomes the “gatekeeper” on determining whether or not is a liable expert witness threw a serious of different questionable theories and such. 4. In its decision in Daubert V. Merall Dow pharmaceuticals, Inc who did the U.S. Supreme Court charge with ensuring that an experts testimony rests on a reliable foundation and is relevant to the case?
They charged the judge with the decision this is known as the Daubert standard. 5. What is the main difference between the testimony given by an expert witness and that given by a lay witness? The difference in a expert witness and a lay witness is that an expert witness has thory and tests and experience to back up and prove that what he is saying is true and a lay witness is basically just stating somewhat of an opinion. 6. Describe the advantages of incorporating an evidence collection unit into the organizational structure of the crime laboratory. A couple of advantages of putting an evidence collection unit in crime laboratories is that unit will be able to recognize collect and package the evidence correctly and also

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. Why is evidence important in forensic science? What evidence was important in the episodes? Why?…

    • 292 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    a. What issue was address in the US Supreme Court cases of Baker v. Carr and Reynolds v. Sims and what phrase did they use to justify their decision? (523-24)…

    • 1007 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Describe three ways that a crime scene can be recorded. What is a benefit of each?…

    • 786 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psy/201 Quiz

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    | | |(13). |Which of the following would be appropriate for a court to consider in determining whether to publish an opinion? |…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    9. What distinction does the Court make between the cases of Tinker v. Des Moines and Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier?…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Give a brief description of the order in which evidence should be documented, collected, and preserved. Your answer should include the role of potential contamination in your decision-making process.…

    • 673 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pt1420 Assignment 1

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Does the evidence meet the criteria listed on pages 512-513? Explain. Yes, the evidence met the criteria listed on pages 512-513. The author used the accuracy, the adequacy,…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Washington Case Law Case

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Staton, 58 Wash. 2d 879, 886 (1961) (citations omitted). In addition, this “expert testimony must be based on facts in the case, not speculation or conjecture.” Melville v. State, 115 Wash. 2d 34, 41 (1990). For example, in Miller v. Station, the Washington Supreme Court held that the plaintiff failed to establish the element of causation because the expert’s general statements regarding plaintiff’s injuries had “not been related by the expert witness to the instant case.” Id. at 886. The expert witness in Miller merely stated that, in general, nervousness is one of the contributing factors to a stomach ulcer, but the expert failed to tie plaintiff’s alleged nervousness to her stomach ulcer.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    QCF Level 5 507

    • 6609 Words
    • 19 Pages

    There are several different theories and frameworks relating to child development, these are as follows:…

    • 6609 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Forensic science has been increasingly used by the criminal justice system because of its growing accessibility. Technological advances over the last hundred years have made methods such as finger printing, blood and DNA analysis, and other forms of identification much easier for forensic scientists to perform, thus paving the way for the development of this field. Similarly, there has been an increased popularity for…

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Daubert Challenge

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Daubert Challenge or Standard is simply when an opposing counsel questions the opposing side expert’s testimony. The admissibility and validity of an expert’s testimony is challenged during a hearing where said expert is brought before a judge. The expert or counsel who is relying on said expert is required to prove that his or her reasoning and methodology is both scientifically valid and applicable to the case in question. The Daubert Standard allows the court to be the gatekeeper for the court room when it comes to expert testimony. Although it can be difficult to deal with when an attorney needs an expert’s testimony to prove a case, the standard does serve a worthwhile purpose, that being to prevent unscientific and out-there testimony from being used to convict a person of a crime.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic Science 1

    • 314 Words
    • 1 Page

    1. Describe the crime that you are investigating in this activity. The crime that I am investigating in this activity is who from the band Sassy Snips stole the boy band, Crucial Cuts, hair products. A hair was found in their dressing room so they needed to examine it to figure out who stole the hair products.…

    • 314 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Managing Safely

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3.4 Summarise the types of risks that may be involved in assessment in own area of responsibility…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The difference between a fact witness and an expert witness is that a fact witness only provides…

    • 661 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic Science

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. There are several different criteria that are used to determine if someone is able to serve as an expert witness. Courts typically take into consideration a person’s education degrees, the number of years of experience that the person has in the field, any professional organizations that the person is a member of, and any books or other publications that the person has authorized.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays