Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

POL 201 Complete Class All DQs Quizzes and Final Paper

Good Essays
3109 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
POL 201 Complete Class All DQs Quizzes and Final Paper
POL 201 Complete Class / Entire DQs, Quizzes and Final Paper (American National Government) Click Link Below To Download Complete Class: http://myhomeworkspot.com/POL-201-Entire-Class-All-DQs-Quizzes-and-Final-Paper-America-693.htm?categoryId=-1 POL 201 Week 1 DQ 1 Separation of Powers Checks and Balances

For much of 2011 and 2012, public dissatisfaction with Congress rose to all time highs, with 70-80% expressing disapproval with how Congress does its job. Many commentators note that Americans are fed up with Washington "grid-lock" that makes government apparently unable to address important problems. Other observers believe that the national government is acting according to its design, based on separation of powers and checks and balances.
In your initial post of at least 200-250 words, analyze how the U.S. Constitution implements separation of powers and checks and balances. Briefly explain why the constitutional framers based the new government on these ideas. Evaluate how separation of powers and checks and balances are working out in practice, today, justifying your assessment with persuasive reasoning and examples.
Fully respond to all parts of the question. Write in your own words. Support your position with APA citations to two or more different resources required for this discussion.

POL 201 Week 1 DQ 2 Amending the U.S. Constitution The U.S. Constitution is considered a “living document” because it can be amended as new issues arise or public opinions change. Using the Internet, identify a constitutional amendment currently being proposed by a member of Congress. Identify the Congressmen, the proposed amendment, why it is being proposed and what you believe are the chances that it will be passed.

POL 201 Week 1 Quiz

1. Question : In republicanism, the state is viewed as a
2. Question : Under John Stuart Mill’s “harm principle,” government may regulate private activities
3. Question : Locke’s use of the term “property”
4. Question : Schattschneider’s “mobilization of bias” is characterized by all except:
5. Question : Samuel P. Huntington defined “creedal passion periods” as periods when Americans
6. Question : Which of the following distinguished the New Jersey Plan from the Virginia Plan?
7. Question : The purpose of the Constitutional Convention was to
8. Question : Impeachment can be characterized as a
9. Question : In creating a new government, the Framers sought to 10. Question : The basis in the Constitution for expansive congressional authority is
POL 201 Week 2 DQ 1 Policy-making in the Federal System

In your initial post of at least 200-250 words, briefly summarize the national government's education policies. Explain the main pros and cons in the debate about these policies. Evaluate them from two perspectives:
a. The policies’ effectiveness in improving the quality of U.S. elementary and secondary education. (Justify your assessment by clearly explaining your definition of "effectiveness" and how it should be measured or determined.)
b. Their consistency with the constitutional framework of federalism. (Justify your assessment by clearly explaining your interpretation of American federalism's constitutional framework and why federal education policies are or are not consistent with it.)

POL 201 Week 2 DQ 2 Meet Your Representative

Go to the United States House of Representatives website and research for your Congressional representative by entering your zip code in the "Find Your Representatives" block. Select your Congressman and then visit your Congressman's official website. Identify those issues your Congressman emphasizes on his or her website. Explain why you believe those issues are given priority on your Congressman's website based on what you have learned from your study of the U.S. Congress and as a constituent of your Congressman's district.

POL 201 Week 2 Quiz

1. Question : Dual Federalism is characterized by
2. Question : Under a Home Rule Charter, local authority is
3. Question : When states or localities receive categorical grants-in-aid from th 4. Question : General Revenue Sharing offers states and localities even greater flexibility than block grants because they
5. Question : With unfunded mandates, the national government
6. Question : An earmark is
7. Question : According to David Mayhew’s “electoral connection” thesis, the primary purpose of members of Congress is to
8. Question : Congressional staff have an important role in Congress because staff.
9. Question : Representation in Congress works through
10. Question : Technology is important in congressional representation because it allows for

POL 201 Week 3 DQ 1 Presidential Leadership and the Electoral College

Briefly summarize how the Electoral College works. Explain some of the main pros and cons in the debate about whether to keep or abolish the current Electoral College process. Also explain one proposal to change how the system works without formally abolishing it. Evaluate the various arguments and the proposal. Include at least two perspectives in your assessment:
a. Your judgment about the relevance of the Electoral College's underlying rationale to contemporary America.
b. Your judgment about its impact on presidential leadership capacity.

POL 201 Week 3 DQ 2 Defense Spending and the Military-Industrial Complex

Explain the iron triangle model of policy-making involving Congress, the bureaucracy, and interest groups. Analyze information about relationships among Congress, the military bureaucracies, and defense industries. Draw your own conclusion, and support it with facts and with persuasive reasoning, about the impact of these relationships on defense spending. Evaluate the accuracy of the iron triangle model as a basis for understanding the process of making defense spending policy.

POL 201 Week 3 Quiz

1. Question : The nerve center of the American Presidency is
2. Question : Given the standard of “High Crimes and Misdemeanors,” a President who uses military force 3. Question : The standard of “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” for Impeachment generally refers to
4. Question : Thomas Jefferson justified the Louisiana Purchase on the grounds
5. Question : A President who has a political mandate has
6. Question : The federal bureaucracy effectively makes public policy by
7. Question : An iron triangle is
8. Question : Which functions are not performed by the American federal bureaucracy?
9. Question : The American bureaucracy conjures up the following images except
10. Question : A president who appoints a careerist to his cabinet wants

POL 201 Week 4 DQ 1 The Supreme Court and Judicial Review

a. What judicial philosophy should guide the Supreme Court's exercise of judicial review?
b. Should the Supreme Court's power of judicial review be strictly limited by a constitutional amendment?

POL 201 Week 4 DQ 2 Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror

Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror. Soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Bush administration developed a plan for holding and interrogating prisoners captured during the conflict. They were sent to a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay on land leased from the government of Cuba. Since 2002, over 700 men have been detained at "GITMO." Most have been released without charges or turned over to other governments. In 2011, Congress specifically prohibited the expenditure of funds to transfer GITMO prisoners to detention facilities in the continental United States, making it virtually impossible to try them in civilian courts. As of April 2012, 169 remained in detention at GITMO (Sutton, 2012). An assumption made by the Bush administration in selecting this location was that it was beyond the jurisdiction of U.S. courts. The administration wanted to avoid any judicial oversight of how it handled detainees, characterized as "enemy combatants." A possible legal challenge to indefinite detention with no formal charges or judicial proceedings might arise from the habeas corpus provision of the Constitution.

POL 201 Week 4 Quiz 1. Question : Which case established the precedent of the U.S. Supreme Court being able to strike down

2. Question : When the Supreme Court hands down a decision, it is
3. Question : The professional qualifications model in the selection of judges holds that
4. Question : In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court held that
5. Question : McCulloch v Maryland is an important case because it was one of the cases whereby the

6. Question : Under the precedence of Plessy v. Ferguson, a state would be able to
7. Question : Civil rights in the United States evolved from
8. Question : The Privileges and Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment means
9. Question : Overall, we learn that civil liberties in the United States mean that
10. Question : To be treated equally under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment means

POL 201 Week 5 DQ 1 Party Platforms and Winning Elections Political parties mobilize voters to win elections and implement policy goals. Parties use their stated policy goals (i.e., their platforms) as a way to mobilize voter support. Generally, in order to be successful in a two-party system, parties must have policy goals across a broad range of issue areas to appeal to a broad range of voters.
For this discussion, you will identify one issue area that you want investigate. Use the resources required for this discussion to gather information about the goals and proposals, in that issue area, of three political parties – the Democratic and Republican parties and a third party.

POL 201 Week 5 DQ 2 Voting and Turnout Voting and Turnout. The U.S. has one of the lowest voter turnout rates among modern democratic political systems. One study ranks the U.S. 120th on a list of 169 nations compared on voter turnout (Pintor, Gratschew, & Sullivan, 2002). While during the last decade many initiatives have been undertaken to increase voter participation, concerns about the possibility of election fraud have also increased. Additionally, some political interests feel threatened by the increase in turnout among some traditionally low-turnout ethnic minorities.
Several states have recently passed legislation imposing new registration and identification requirements. This has sparked debate about whether these are tactics intended to suppress turnout or to prevent fraud.
Soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Bush administration developed a plan for holding and interrogating captured prisoners. They were sent to a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, on land leased from the government of Cuba. Since 2002, over 700 men have been detained at "GITMO." Most have been released without charges or turned over to other governments. In 2011, Congress specifically prohibited the expenditure of funds to transfer GITMO prisoners to detention facilities in the continental United States, making it virtually impossible to try them in civilian courts. As of April 2012, 169 remained in detention at GITMO (Sutton, 2012).
An assumption made by the Bush administration in selecting this location was that it was beyond the jurisdiction of U.S. courts. The administration wanted to avoid any judicial oversight of how it handled detainees, characterized as "enemy combatants." A possible legal challenge to indefinite detention with no formal charges or judicial proceedings might arise from the habeas corpus provision of the Constitution.

POL 201 Week 5 Final Paper Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror The final assignment for this course is a Final Paper. The purpose of the Final Paper is to give you an opportunity to apply much of what you have learned about American national government to an examination of civil liberties in the context of the war on terror. The Final Paper represents 20% of the overall course grade.

Soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Bush administration developed a plan for holding and interrogating captured prisoners. They were sent to a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, on land leased from the government of Cuba. Since 2002, over 700 men have been detained at "GITMO." Most have been released without charges or turned over to other governments. In 2011, Congress specifically prohibited the expenditure of funds to transfer GITMO prisoners to detention facilities in the continental United States, making it virtually impossible to try them in civilian courts. As of April 2012, 169 remained in detention at GITMO (Sutton, 2012).

An assumption made by the Bush administration in selecting this location was that it was beyond the jurisdiction of U.S. courts. The administration wanted to avoid any judicial oversight of how it handled detainees, characterized as "enemy combatants." A possible legal challenge to indefinite detention with no formal charges or judicial proceedings might arise from the habeas corpus provision of the Constitution.

Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution states, "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it." Under this provision, persons detained by the government are entitled to a judicial hearing to determine if there is any legal basis for their detention. Some legal commentators refer to the right of habeas corpus as the "great writ of liberty" because it is a prisoner's ultimate recourse to an impartial judge who can review the possibility that he is being held illegally by the executive (e.g., the police or the military). In nations that do not honor habeas corpus, people simply disappear into prisons without ever having their day in court.

Several controversial Supreme Court cases have come out of GITMO. One fundamental question that has been debated, but not clearly resolved, is to what extent the war on terror justifies the President's indefinite detention of "enemy combatants" without the possibility of the minimal judicial review protected by habeas corpus? Another issue in the debate is to what extent Congress must clearly authorize the President to conduct extra-judicial detentions in order for them to be legal? In 2008, the Supreme Court’s decision in Boumediene v. Bush offered some answers to these questions. However, the deeply divided 5-4 Court and the likelihood of the protracted nature of the war on terror suggest that debate around these important questions will continue. Writing the Final Paper in this course will prepare you to participate intelligently as a citizen in this ongoing debate.

Write an essay about the right of habeas corpus in the context of the war on terror. Your essay should address the following subtopics:
The general meaning of the right of habeas corpus in the U.S. Constitution and its relationship to the protection of other civil liberties. The historical evolution of habeas corpus, including its English and American traditions. Examples from U.S. history of the "suspension" of habeas corpus and their applicability to the present. The relevance of habeas corpus to the contemporary U.S. situation during the war on terror, especially with respect to persons characterized by the President as "enemy combatants" or "illegal combatants." The U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation of the right of habeas corpus with respect to "enemy combatants" or "illegal combatants" (i.e., the views of the five justices making up the majority inBoumediene v. Bush as well as the views of the four dissenting justices). Your evaluation of various perspectives on this topic expressed by justices of the Supreme Court, leaders in other branches of government, and commentators in both the academic and popular media. Your assessment should consider several perspectives on this topic, including : The role of the President as commander-in-chief. The role of Congress in determining when habeas corpus can be "suspended." The role of the Supreme Court in protecting civil liberties, including the judicial philosophy which should guide the Court in this role, and Your personal philosophy, values or ideology about the balance between civil liberties and national security in the context of an unending war on terror.
Follow these requirements when writing the Final Paper:
The body of the paper (excluding the title page and reference page) must be at least 1,500 words long. The paper must start with a short introductory paragraph which includes a clear thesis statement. The thesis statement must tell readers what the essay will demonstrate. The paper must end with a short paragraph that states a conclusion. The conclusion and thesis must be consistent. The paper must logically develop the thesis in a way that leads to the conclusion, and that development must be supported by facts, fully explained concepts and assertions, and persuasive reasoning. The paper must address all subtopics outlined above. At least 20% of the essay must focus on subtopic 6, above (your evaluation of arguments about the topic). Your paper must cite at least three academic articles (excluding the course textbook) and at least four other kinds of sources (e.g., Supreme Court opinions, magazine or newspaper articles, the course textbook, and reliable websites or videos). Use your own words. While brief quotes from sources may be used, altogether the total amount of quoted text must be less than five percent of the body of your paper. When you use someone else's words, they must be enclosed in quotation marks followed by an APA in-text short citation – (Author, Year, page) – to your source. The in-text citation must correspond to a full APA citation for the source on the reference page at the end of the essay. When you express in your own words someone else's ideas, arguments or facts, your statement must be followed by an APA in-text short citation – (Author, Year, page) – to your source. The in-text citation must correspond to a full APA citation for the source in the reference page. The form of the title page, the body pages, and the reference page must comply with APA style. Additionally, the title page must include the course number and name, the instructor's name, and the date submitted. The paper must use logical paragraph and sentence transitions, complete and clear sentences, and correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
For this paper you need to do research in peer-reviewed journals or other sources that are considered to have reliable information. In addition to your required course text, you need at least seven professional scholarly sources, three of which must be peer reviewed journal articles from the Ashford Online Library.

Academic research papers must meet university level standards of quality. What constitutes quality, academic research?
Primary sources written by experts in the field of study Secondary sources supported by research in primary sources Credible sources (experts in the area of study) Relevant research (materials are pertinent to the area of study) Peer-reviewed journal articles (journal articles reviewed by recognized experts in the relevant field of study). Educational and Government websites (those ending with a web URL suffix of .edu or .gov) may be appropriate in some cases but should be evaluated carefully.
Please visit the Academic Research section on your course homepage (accessible through the Student Responsibilities and Policies tab on the left navigation toolbar) to review what types of materials are not acceptable for academic, university level research.

The paper must be at least 1500 words in length and formatted according to APA style. Cite your sources within the text of your paper and on the reference page.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Think about how the U.S. Constitution outlines and details the responsibilities and powers associated with each of the branches of the U.S. government and how power is balanced between these branches. Using that analysis, answer the following.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The system of checks and balances is an important part of the United States Constitution. The three branches of the government representing the separation of powers – executive, legislative, and judicial – each hold specific responsibilities. Checks and balances is a method set in place so that no branch of the government can become to powerful by allowing each branch to limit the powers of the others. This is accomplished by each branch checking the powers of the other branches to ensure the balance between all three. “The rationale of the separation of powers is often elided with the rationale of checks and balances and with the rationale of the dispersal of power generally in a constitutional system” (Waldron).…

    • 799 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psy/270 Assignment 1

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The concepts of separation of powers and checks and balances were originally articulated by the French philosopher, Montesquieu. They then became a cornerstone in the political thinking of the English philosopher, John Locke. Locke in turn had a major impact on the writers of the US Constitution, who incorporated his ideas into that document. a. What is the key principle of the separation of powers? What value does it serve in the governance of democracies? b. What is the meaning of the concept of checks and balances? How do checks and balances help prevent tyrannical…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    HCA 415 Week 3 DQ 2

    • 496 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Provide concrete examples to support your discussion. Your initial post should be a minimum of 250-300 words and utilize at least two scholarly sources, cited in APA format.…

    • 496 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A. Using evidence from the article, outline a rationale in support of this position. Be sure to discuss the…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POL 201 Final Paper

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be deliberate on the history of Habeas Corpus and how it has matured over the years. I will describe the beginning of the Habeas Corpus and the position it takes part in the U.S. and what recent act is being used. The United States Constitution must be more effectively unified into the Guantanamo methods to give equal civil rights to inmates despite what their nationality maybe, but to also have more cordial ways of reviewing obstructive servicemen to absolutely verify if they really should be treated as extremists that we should fear.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Checks and Balances within the U.S Government. (n.d.). Retrieved from free online research papers: www.freeonlineresearchpapers.com…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation Of Powers Dbq

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The theory of the Separation of Powers keeps the government in check and ensures that one branch doesn’t become too powerful or else the government would be a monarchy or dictatorship. In document one, it talks about how there are three branches of government: the Legislative Branch, the Executive Branch, and the Judicial Branch. The powers of the government are separated between these three branches, sort of like the system of checks and balances, because they didn’t want one branch becoming too powerful and taking over the other branches. In document five it shows how each branch has one main power or job. For example the main power of the Legislative Branch is to make the laws. The Executive Branch has the President and the branch is responsible for carrying out and enforcing the laws. The Judicial Branch has the courts and their main power is to interpret the laws and punish those who have broken the law. The Separation of Powers limit the power of the federal government by making sure one branch does not become too…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All powers, legislative, executive, judicial, are separate branches (Doc B). This is so one person or group cannot accumulate all of these powers and become an absolute ruler. The three separate branches can check on each other (Doc C). Since they are separate, they have different powers that can act against each other, assuring that one branch can’t always get their way. One branch can make a decision but might need another branch to approve it. For example, only Congress can make laws, but the president must approve them, in order for them to actually become a law. Separation of powers helps guard against tyranny, by making sure one group or individual can’t obtain enough power to become a supreme…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    1)Discuss the theory of "checks and balances" as outlined by the framers of the Constitution in your assigned text. Analyze the concept of power in politics and why the Federalists were correct in diffusing the power of government in order to keep one branch or entity from becoming too powerful. How does this concept help us as a viable democracy?…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 our founding fathers gathered in the Pennsylvania State House in Philadelphia, in the exact same room our Declaration of Independence had been signed a few years prior. This group of men was faced with the immense task of drafting the Constitution of the United States of America. Our founding fathers showed such brilliant foresight in how they structured this foundational document by recognizing the need for a Constitution designed to keep our government regulated. We will be exploring different facets within the structure of the Constitution, looking closely at some of those regulations such as Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances. Through this exploration we will come to understand the importance of these aspects, why they are so…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ever wonder how our government works? The government was divided into three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial. What were the reasons our forefathers divided the government into these branches? Each branch works together as a whole by a system of checks and balances in order for the government to be run properly and no one branch ends up having the power. How are the three branches of U.S. Government supposed to interact? Are the branches balanced in power? Why or why not? This paper will discuss these reasons.…

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787, fifty five men met in Philadelphia to help form the great country we live in today, called America. The United States of America is the only country to be created based solely on the advancement of individual freedom. In order to gain freedom, the people had to have their own rights, and the rights given to the people were written on the constitution which was created by the fifty men that met in Philadelphia. The constitution allowed individuals in America to have their own rights as well as limit government power. It was important that the government had limited powers, because with limited power it allowed American citizens to have more freedom. A few doctrines to help reduce the power of the American government are the bill of rights, separation of powers, and checks and balances. The bill of rights, are the first ten amendments in the constitution that allow American citizens certain rights that the government cannot take away. Separation of powers splits the government into three branches and gives them specific powers, these three branches are the legislative branch, executive branch, and judicial branch. While separation of powers separates government into three branches, checks and balances limit the three branches powers so that no branch is stronger than one another. These three doctrines are a few key reasons on how the American government power is limited.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This results in Mill’s claim that a Government’s sole responsibility is to represent the interests of its people: “Those interests, I contend, authorize the subjection of individual spontaneity to external control only in respect to those actions of each which concern the interest of other people” (On Liberty 139). He claims that there are certain situations where it is better to have legal remedies than condemning people morally. In these instances he believes Government to be beneficial to society as it promotes the higher good of freedom. Furthermore, he asserts that laws should be made to protect people from engaging in actions that have been tried since the beginning of time and have proven to be harmful (On Liberty 141).…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    you and me

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Your response to the assignment must be prepared according to standard college writing practices, using MLA format. Fragmented sentences and spelling errors are not acceptable, so please be sure to spell check your essay. Please make sure you write a minimum of three pages. Your response should not be a list of answers, but rather a reflective response to each question written in an essay. Devote at least a paragraph to each question.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays