Preview

Plea Bargain: Why It Violates The Six Amendment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
493 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plea Bargain: Why It Violates The Six Amendment
The main fault that I see with a plea bargain is that it violates the six amendment. The reason why the sixth amendment is in violation is that plea bargaining goes against what it stands for. The sixth amendment states that everyone has the right to a fair trial; however, most cases are not even analyzed in front of a judge or jury because of a plea bargain. The main reason a plea bargain is put into play is to push a case through the system faster and resolve it quicker. Furthermore, everyone knows that when situations are rushed that information is likely to be missed. For example, there are many situations where defendants take a plea bargain to stray away from more intense punishment. However, many individuals who take this bargain are …show more content…
Many defendants who have cases that are correspondingly situated are tried unequally. In my opinion, there are many outside factors that are discussed far too excessively when trying an individual. Unjust resolutions of cases are produced because crime, prior history and race of the defendant are sometimes taken into more consideration rather than the exact context of each specific case being tried. For example, there was a case where four teenage boys committed the same crime but received drastically different punishments. Four boys all around the same age ransacked a home in Tampa Florida. After a few weeks, all boys were arrested. The boys faced the exact same charges: burglary and theft. Two out of the four boys were able to escape from harsh punishment. They were charged as juveniles and put on probation. Out of the four boys, two were Hispanic; the Hispanic boys are serving four-year sentences. All the boys in the cases were minors. This ruling of this case is unjust. This case proves that outside factors that are not involved in a case are playing roles in the sentencing. I believe that sentencing laws need to be more strict in order to maintain
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Is Plea Bargaining Ethical?
    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page

    What Is Plea Bargaining Ethical?

    Using the fairness and justice decision-making process it made me decide that the use of plea bargaining was unethical; due to the fact that it was not fair that criminals who have committed unlawful acts like rape, robbery, and numerous horrendous crimes were given leniency just because they are acknowledging they executed the offense. Stating your guilty doesn’t mean they reflected upon their actions and are ready to start a new leaf. They have instigated the felony and it is only right that they get the full consequence of their atrocity. Furthermore, what’s worse is that because of the pressure and fear of being convicted, the innocent plead guilty and the immoral run free and continue to disrupt the peace of the community. In conclusion, there is no fairness and justice when there is plea bargaining.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargains
    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargains

    Yet, all these are reasons are unfair and can be bias towards an individual, especially the three one, because most of the times, a person is being forced to accepted the plea bargain either by threat (take the 3-5yr sentence, or get a 15-20yr sentence), or the defendant has to accept the plea because of financial hardships. This is way I feel we should get rid of plea bargains, because it is not doing what’s it is designed to do. Also, we are having more innocent individuals pleaded guilties, which the Innocent Project helped, proved that the plea bargains are bias and flawed. Plea bargains should only be accepted, if the defendant either caught red-hand, or after court cases, such as being find guilty, but decides to giving information to…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining
    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    Plea Bargaining has become a major factor in our criminal justice system. Like all controversial topics there are many pros and cons that make it hard to decide what is right and wrong about the situation. I personally feel that plea bargaining should be abolished. Plea bargains are creating harm to our criminal justice system. Due to plea bargains the criminal justice system is being undermined and losing control of what is happening to criminals.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Role Of Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System
    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Role Of Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System

    By not producing results that correlate with the outcome, plea bargaining weakens the validity of the criminal justice system. Validity or legitimacy is a very important characteristic of the legal system’s effectiveness. The view of the legal system is determined considerably on whether or not the system operates in harmony with basic rules of procedural fairness, for example treating cases alike or allowing parties an opportunity to be heard. Nevertheless, a system that fails to function under such rules will lose their…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cjus 200 Ref. Paper 3
    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cjus 200 Ref. Paper 3

    Morally, plea bargains are not always acceptable because they apply different standards to different people. Two separate individuals could have committed the same crime, yet one could receive a harsher punishment than the other due to both being offered and accepting different plea bargains.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Two Forms Of Plea Bargaining
    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two Forms Of Plea Bargaining

    I do not agree with plea-bargaining, especially in the cases PBS presented, but I do not think that the court would strike it down on their own accord. As the PBS movie suggested, there’s a general understanding that plea-bargaining is a “necessary component “ of the court system. Without the ability to move a case away from trial and still obtain a conviction, a possibility of criminals walking free becomes evident. On the other hand, plea bargains convict innocent people because of the aforementioned pressures or reasons answered in question one. In a sense, I think that plea-bargaining serves as a useful tool for the prosecution to obtain larger criminals via the cooperation of someone taking a plea, but at the same time there are outstanding drawbacks.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Role Of Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System
    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Role Of Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System

    As Nataskie stated above, there is a place and a need for plea bargaining in our criminal justice system. Although it is true that plea bargaining gives a guilty person the opportunity to admit to their crime and accept the punishment for it, they are likely more motivated by the fact that plea bargaining involves the perpetrator receiving a reduced sentence of some sort. Another reason for continuing with plea bargaining, as a tool in the criminal justice system, is because often it affords the prosecutor the means necessary to get a lesser criminal to testify against a more significant criminal who otherwise might go free. Plea bargaining should maintain an active role in all justice systems regardless of whether they are local, state,…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Advantages Of Plea Bargaining
    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page

    Advantages Of Plea Bargaining

    Some of the disadvantages are: plea bargains can make investigators to become complacent, be lazy thinking that the plea bargain will be done, they can make a person admit that they are guilty even when they are not and if you are the victim or victims family can feel slighted…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Plea Bargaining Cases
    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Plea Bargaining Cases

    The United States court system runs smoothly due to plea bargaining because they push cases through without trial. Trials can take weeks and even months before they have a verdict. With ninety percent of cases being plea bargained it keeps court cases moving along. The United States court system is like a conveyer belt and plea bargaining is what keeps the conveyer belt moving so thing do not get backed up. Plea bargaining also benefits defendants by giving them a choice to plead guilty and take a lesser charge by giving up their right to a trial (Alschuler, 1968, p. 4). For those who the evidence clearly shows they are guilty they can chose a plea bargaining and get less time without wasting the court's time. Defendants who have families they need to support and are guilty of a crime can take a plea bargaining and can serve less time so they can get back to supporting their families sooner. Individuals can also give up their right to a trial by their peers in exchange for a guilty plea of a less serious offense or lesser charges making their criminal record better. They are minor first offenses where people can go without hiring a lawyer and instead accept a plea bargain and avoid going trial and paying for a lawyer. Many people make mistakes early in their life and plea bargains give those people a chance to reduce time served or charges by admitting to what they…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is Plea Bargaining In Criminal Justice
    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page

    What Is Plea Bargaining In Criminal Justice

    I agree with you. Some crimes can be handled differently depending how the offense is classified “Many states encourage diversion programs that remove less serious criminal matters from the full” (How Courts Work, n.d., para. 4) Plea bargaining can be accepted for reasons like, defendants avoiding the time in court. Also, the prosecutor can dedicate time to other cases. A valid approach is the agreement of both part on the case “obviously both sides have to agree before one comes to pass”. (How Courts Work, n.d., para. 2) As you mention, that should not be applied in the major…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Role Of Plea Bargains In Criminal Justice
    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Role Of Plea Bargains In Criminal Justice

    Plea bargains are favorable in Herbert Packer’s crime control model of the criminal justice system, which resembles an assembly line (Roach 676-677). The least amount of time possible is spent on each of the accused in order to keep the constant stream of offenders flowing through the system. Instead of starting with a presumption of innocence, in a way there is a presumption of guilt that the offender has to address before reaching the position of a presumption of innocence. Of course it is impractical to just do away with plea bargaining and have a jury trial for every single person accused of a crime; there simply isn’t enough labor force and resources to support such an initiative (Devers 3). However, with 90 to 95 percent of people pleading guilty, prosecutors should stop using plea deals as a go to for every case that is brought to them (Devers 1). A starting point would be, at the very least, trying to restrict plea deals to defendants that can provide information or testimony that would lead to the conviction of a criminal. Or plea deals can be restricted with guidelines and only used for specific crimes (Devers 4). Another option would be to take a portion of discretionary power away from the prosecution. Some research has shown that prosecutors will push for harsher punishment if the defendant did not accept their plea deal (Devers 2). This works as a scare tactic and against anyone that is accused of a crime be they guilty or innocent. It is ridiculous that a defendant would be penalized for exercising their constitutional rights, simply because the prosecution wants them to accept the established presumption of guilt. It is possible that involving the judge and defense attorney or even a separate entity into the process would make it more of an equitable system (Devers 4). Taking any one of these measures would move…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargains
    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plea Bargains

    To the accused, the word plea bargain means a freedom of choice. To the prosecutor, it means a lesser workload. To the Judge, it means saving his time and the courts time, and to the state, a plea bargain means saving money. In my perception, the word plea bargain means a failure of the American trial system. The Constitution grants us, the citizens of this country, a right to speedy trial by jury of our peers. Where exactly do you see that right, which is rightfully ours, in plea bargains? How can our trial and court system not bestow the punishment that fits the crime? When we give the accused freedom of choice, isn’t that an oxymoron?…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System
    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System

    I do believe that there are instances where plea bargaining can be an effective tool in the criminal justice system, however, as it stands, the overuse of the plea bargain by prosecutors has diminished it’s potential worth as a true bargaining tool by their flagrant daily misuse. While it is understood that the case load for the courts is overwhelmed and an alternative method of securing some form of justice is needed to alleviate the overrun system, the use of the plea bargain to alleviate the overcrowded courts is not completely acceptable.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargaining Advantages
    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plea Bargaining Advantages

    “Without question, plea bargains benefit many defendants who have committed crimes and receive lighter sentences than they might after trial. It also limits cases that require considerable time and expense in court.” (Oppel, 2011) Victims feel as though this gives them less jail time which in turn means that they will be back out on the streets sooner to resume committing these crimes again. Victims fear for their lives and the lives of their family as well because they feel as though there may be some retaliation brought to them because they file charges against…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Plea Bargaining
    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Plea Bargaining

    Plea bargaining has been defined in a more general sense as, “the defendant’s agreement to plead guilty to a criminal charge with the reasonable expectation of receiving some consideration from the state.”…

    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More