Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Plato's Argument Against Democracy

Better Essays
1043 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plato's Argument Against Democracy
jeremy Calderoni
Plato’s Argument Against Democracy
Term Paper In Western culture, democracy is deemed as the most appropriate and efficient government to run and manage a state. Citizens of a state like to feel as though they are making some sort of contribution to how they are being governed, and because of this, very few bother to inquire about its effectiveness and whether or not it is really the most adequate system of government. A dictatorship, or the system of guardianship that Plato proposed, is greatly frowned upon by many and is often overlooked. Plato, being an anti-democratic, has challenged democracy and has suggested that a democracy would not be the best government for a state. One way he proves this is through the notion of craft analogy. This is a very simple idea that speaks volumes about the default of democracy. In order to be successful at an occupation “a special training is necessary, and not everyone is naturally capable even of acquiring the skill” (Wolff 68). In other words, it takes expertise, training and credentials to be qualified for any job, and governing a state is no exception. The same way a construction worker is not a reliable source for medical advice, ordinary people are not dependable candidates to be political leaders. Plato uses the example of crew members on a ship. The ship cannot reach the intended destination without a captain who can navigate. No one else on the ship was taught to navigate and therefore is not qualified to do so. Nobody knew that “the true navigator must study the season of the year, the sky, the stars, the winds, and all the other subjects appropriate to his profession” (Wolff 66). Plato believes that a state can only progress if trained professionals are behind its development, and not ignorant, ill educated people.
Although Plato brings up a valid point, there are counter arguments that can be made to contradict him. The primary focus of any political entity should be to appeal to the precise needs of the people. A government is responsible for making the decisions that will produce the most happiness and the most progress. Seeing as how a democracy is a government that is a direct product of the people, it would seem most appropriate. One of the most basic of all human rights is everyone’s freedom of expression, which is recognized as “the right to say or print anything one wishes” (Qualter 64). Democracy is a result of human expression, therefore to deny this means to strip the people of their most fundamental liberties. On a grander scale, without the right to speak out, “no other claim can be asserted…and if any other right or claim is denied, no protest can be made” (Qualter 64). Any specific demands of the people would fall upon deaf ears in the absence of free speech. According to Plato, a state ruled by philosopher kings, functions in accordance to the common good. However, it is the government, in this case, that establishes what the common good is. Philosopher kings are expected to know what is best for the people. If the people are not satisfied with the decisions made by the government, regardless of whether or not they were made with the best intentions, the entire system could potentially collapse and descend into anarchy because, with despotism, the people have no other way of expressing their disproval. In essence, democracy is arguably the more sufficing form of government because it is effective in generating the overall utility of the people.
In support of Plato’s anti-democratic position, democracy is a very deceiving and easily corruptible form of government. There are several reasons for this. One of the most evident problems with democracy is that it segregates the population into a minority and majority. Democratic foundation is based upon the votes of people who, in reality, are to ignorant and lack credentials and education for their voice to be the contributing factor that it is. These are the people who make up the majority of voters, and this can prove to be extremely detrimental to the progression and development of a state. Majority voters tend to vote based upon own interest, without fully analysing what is best, and usually vote for the most popular candidate. Democracy, although is believed to be a government of equality, is bias towards the minority, which usually comprise of the people who actually have the knowledge to know what to vote for. The minority must succumb to the will of the majority solely because of power in numbers. Government leaders are aware of this so, because of these reasons, candidates can easily manipulate the people to vote in their favor. “Those who know only one point of view, who never receive any counter-information, are easily persuaded of the rightness of their established ideas” (Qualter 134). Using rhetoric and propaganda, government candidates can fabricate an image that is nothing more than a fallacy, but because they tell citizens what they want to hear and teach them to suppress or neglect any opposing ideas, people are easily deceived. The general public is simply incapable of seeing past the veil of duplicity because of sheer ignorance. That is how a corrupt government is born. Humanity is no stranger to these events occurring. The best example of this happening is during World War II and Adolf Hitler’s reign of tyranny. Hitler committed arguably one of the most atrocious crimes in human history, orchestrating the mass genocide of millions. In the aftermath of his rule, the world began to question why they would give such a cruel man absolute power over the state. What many people fail to realize is that Hitler did not use hostile methods to get to power; he was elected by the people. He used manipulation tactics, as previously mentioned, to create a false image. He used lies to elude what his true intentions were and showed people the leader they wanted, and when he was elected into power, overtime he revealed his true intentions. The primary concept of democracy and majority vote led to the Holocaust, and this clearly proves that democracy is potentially one of the most dysfunctional forms of government.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The ideas set out in Plato’s The Republic are still relevant in today’s democratic world, even though not embraced fully; components of its ideas are relevant to our society. Contrary to The Republic being too totalitarian as perceived by many, he is indeed democracies’ best friend. Plato emphasises the total opposite of democratic ideals, challenging it to justify itself and in the process contributing to the improvement of democracy. He challenges the very notion of democracy and exposes its limits and weaknesses. Plato’s idea of an elaborate system of controls ensures society from drowning in too much democracy and ideals of freedom. However, to strictly adhere to his ideas would give the opposite effect of extreme totalitarianism. His idea of limiting some desires ensures that certain aspects of practising democratic freedom does…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato believed that the Democratic state degenerates into anarchy and that paves the way for the Tyrant to come in and rule over the weak. He believed this largely because he thought that in Democracy every man would arrange his own life to suit his pleasure, and if anything this seems like an early attack upon moral relativism because of the anger towards men just doing whatever they wished. He remarks that the life of a democrat is: “Subject to no order or restraint, and he has no wish to change an existence which he calls pleasant, free, and happy”. Plato thought that the insatiable desire for this good would lead to the neglect of everything else and would “transform” a democracy and make it lead to a demand for despotism. He foresaw that all of this would lead to citizens becoming so sensitive that they reject even the slightest application of control and would call it “tyranny” which would simply lead to a disregard of the Law. This would be total anarchy which would only lead to a Tyrant coming in and taking the power for himself, something that Plato utterly hated the thought of.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Democracy provides the most just and efficient form of political rule” Asses whether Plato has shown his claim to be false.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    We must learn, from both today’s world and Plato, what the right amount of privilege the individual can have without it causing too much of a negative impact on society. I do not believe that we will ever have a clear, definite, answer of whether Plato’s concept on freedom would actually work within the society we have today. Nonetheless, we can take his values and try to adapt them to mold to our society’s ways. Freedom can go one of two ways, good or bad, and this all depends on how we use it within our world. The end goal of the Republic was to reach justice within civilizations and Plato did come up with a sensible plan. This plan may not work perfectly with each generation, but there in lies our jobs as individuals. We, as society’s both past and future, are responsible for figuring out justice within our cultures. Every generation is different in their own way, so if we take Plato’s values and attempt to mold it into our own lives, hopefully we will find our own forms of justice and freedom within our…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato believes that education is the surest way to an ideal society. In today’s society education is atopic brought up in debates quite frequently because it is important that the youth are educated so they can fill in jobs and run the country when they are older. This does not mean everyone gets an education, for there are many countries where education can not be afforded or is not the best. Yet in today’s school system students are not treated for their full potential.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another paradox discussed in Plato 's The Republic is authority and liberty. Plato strongly favors authority. He has little faith in…

    • 2775 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The source of Socrates’ suspicion of the democracy stems from the argument that the general public is ignorant and therefore lacks the knowledge or truth to make the best decision for government. The foundation of democracy is based on majority rule, however because the majority is unaware of what truly is good for them, by virtue of their ignorance, the masses are not capable of electing a leader fit to run the state or government. Socrates contends that due to mass ignorance, the majority will vote in favor of what is more pursuable rather than what is logical (459b). Therefore, the consequence of democracy is inherent corruption in the governing structure due to ignorance.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Gorgias1, Socrates says, “I think that I am the only or almost the only Athenian living who practices the true art of politics; I am the only politician of my time”, while in the Apology2, he claims that “he who will really fight for the right, if he would live even for a little while, must have a private station and not a public one.” As we know, Socrates did manage to live for over 70 years, and did indeed confine himself to a private stance; but how can one be a politician without being a public figure? Or was Socrates not a true champion of justice, as he maintained to be?…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the most influential minds in western philosophy is of Plato. Plato lived from 422-347 B.C, was born into an aristocratic family in the city of Athens. He was a student of Socrates and a teacher of Aristotle. Plato followed the basic ideas of Socrates, in which no laws are to be broken despite their relevance. He makes clear why laws should be followed and why disobedience to the law is rarely justified. Plato is considered a very essential figure in the contribution of philosophy and an essential figure to western tradition. He was the prime founder of the Academy in Athens, the first institution of higher learning within the Western World. Plato has a range of teachings that have been used to instruct a wide spread of subjects. Some…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay will contend that the source of Socrates’ suspicion of democracy derives from the process by which the dissemination of knowledge or the lack of knowledge to the public is conducted. Secondly, it will evaluate one strength and weakness in Socrates’ method at arriving at truth and therefore the best way to govern.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Plato, “Using the written word to give a distorted image of the nature of the gods and heroes, completely fails to capture the likeness of the original,” (Book II, p46). An author or poet cannot simply say whatever he or she likes, rather there needs to be truth in what they are writing. In order to understand why Plato takes this stand, it’s important to have an idea of the time in history he was in. At this time many of the strong leaders were apt on building strong intelligent soldiers who would be able to conquer other nations and empires. To fill the minds of the future generation with fantastical stories of hero’s and distraught God’s, in Plato’s mind, only served to weaken the minds of the people. Stories that filled the minds of people with fear, sadness, or excessive pleasure indulged a part of the mind that did not need to be indulged…“If the young men of our community hear this kind of thing and take it seriously, rather than regarding it as despicable and absurd, they’re hardly going to regard such behavior as despicable in human beings like themselves and feel remorse when they also find themselves saying or doing these or similar things,” (Book III, p54).…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Democracy vs Plato

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages

    I believe that although the population votes to bring about change, ultimately the decisions of the people are diminished by a higher power. It is not until the people are given control of the outcome will there be a change. I believe Plato's philosophy of life and theory of knowledge is the basis for the democracy of today. It is in Plato’s ideals that there is a belief that the higher powers are bestowed the wisdom to make the decisions. Unfortunately, by voter process decisions that are made by a knowledgeable working class are stifled by opposing groups. Plato viewed the character of government and the rule of law in many distinctive and necessary ways. Plato saw democracy as a form of governance as not only the same as the rule of law, but also the most efficient in implementing the law itself. Additionally, the law is subject to all persons, whether part of the population as a citizen or…

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato's Ideal Polis

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The freedom that is to be cultivated in the citizens of Plato 's ideal polis, and in the polis itself is supposed to be a free and just place. The freedom that Plato describes is the kind of freedom to live within a republic and be able to live in accordance to their abilities. The freedom he describes allows people to do things that, "are apt for the accomplishment of different jobs" meaning that a person is allowed to either transcend the "class" they were born in to or to even be "demoted" from whatever class they were in (379b).…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Was Plato a totalitarian

    • 1486 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plato was a totalitarian judging from The Republic. With the definition of totalitarianism in mind, Plato illustrates features of authoritarianism and ideology in his political worldview, which entails a strict division of classes, the dependency of the fate of the state on the ruling class as well as the superiority of the interests of the ruling class over the subservient and inferior classes. Furthermore, the uncompromising rules for breeding and educating this class combined with the strict supervision and collectivisation of the interests of its members create a close enough representation of the totalitarianism depicted in the definition. Firstly, in addressing the issue, which Plato begins with in The Republic of what justice is Plato, asserts that justice is that which is in the interest of the…

    • 1486 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Nothing in this realm changes. Its contents are accessible only to “the eye of the soul.” If this “eye of the soul” dismisses auditory and visual aids, through which of the senses does it perceive what truly is? How can a seeing, hearing human being blatantly disregard the very senses that characterize his entire conscious existence? Something can be entirely unchanging only if it is hypothetical. This implies that the specific realm of objects in their purest forms is conceptual; it is the perfection of these concepts rather than the actual itselves that is or should be “the highest object of the philosopher 's contemplation,” yet even this is fundamentally unachievable.…

    • 2216 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays