Preview

Plato

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1502 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plato
427-347 BC

Updated, 10/3/07

The Republic is one of Plato’s longer works (more than 450 pages in length).
It is written in dialogue form (as are most of Plato’s books), & it addresses major issues in almost all of the branches of philosophy.

The central theme in the book seems to be the nature of justice, a topic in political philosophy, but Plato also has his characters explore issues in


philosophical cosmology,  philosophical theology,  philosophical anthropology,


ethics,  aesthetics, and  epistemology.

The parts of the Republic that are contained in our text
(pp. 107-123) focus on Plato’s idea (ideal?) of the Philosopher Ruler.

According to Plato,
 the

best possible political system (state)  will be ruled (governed)  by PHILOSOPHERS!

(Is he kidding?)

Our reading selection contains the following themes/sections:
 

Introduction on the unifying of philosophy & politics (107) Why "true philosophers" would make the best rulers (108-12)
• What is "true philosophy"? (108-11)
• Love of wisdom (108) • Knowledge of true reality (108-9) • The distinctions between knowledge, ignorance and opinion (109-11)

• How is a "true philosopher" different from a "lover of opinion"? (111-12) • Who is best suited to rule the state – lovers of opinion or "true philosophers"? (112)
 

Political leadership and knowledge of the Good (112-13) The ascent of the mind to knowledge of the Good (113-123)
• The analogy between the Good and the sun (113-15) • The image of the divided line (115-18) • The allegory of the cave (118-123)

The selection in the text begins at a point in the Republic after Socrates, Glaucon, & other characters have been discussing the nature of justice and the marks of a just political system for some time. So we are coming into the middle of the conversation where Glaucon is pressing Socrates to state whether it is possible for a really just political system to come into existence. Before answering

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It can be difficult to give a definition for the word ‘good’ especially in the context of an individual’s behavior. Through the analysis of three readings entitled “Allegory of the Cave” by Plato, “Civil Disobedience” by Thoreau, and “A Letter from Birmingham Jail” by King, the reader can conclude that the main idea of the nature of good revolves around personal morals and open-mindedness rather than civil law or majority rule in the face of justice.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ● Upon request Mr. Green will help you obtain a credible summary of “Plato’s Allegory of…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is justice is a question that has plagued philosophers since the time of Plato when he wrote The Republic to present day. In the book, Plato uses the dialectic, between Socrates and other Athenians like Polemarchus, Cephalus, and Glacuon, to try and find the definition of justice. Through the voice of Glaucon, Plato defines justice as a compromise of sorts between advantage and fear, and injustice as the things that we wouldn’t…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy is referred to as a set of beliefs, concepts and attitudes held by an individual or a group of people. It is the study of problems in general and the prescription of solutions to problems based on critical and systemic analyses and the employment of rational argument. Philosophy through the lens of Political Science does so as mentioned above in terms of the state, the governance of the state the ethics of an individual in possession of political power. Political philosophers focus on the issues relating to the state, such as political action that need or need not be taken and the general behavior of a given individual involved in politics. With the focus set on just the state, political action and violence, two philosophers have critically analyzed politics through the three concepts listed above: Niccolo Machiavelli and Max Weber. They each have their own views, opinions and suggestions that both have similarities and differences considering the cultural and temporal inconsistency between the both of them. The fact that some of their ideas intersect is fascinating.…

    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes took an extreme skeptical position by asking, “What is impossible to doubt, even when trying to believe that everything is false?” His answer was: "I think, therefore I am"; which is Descartes ' most famous one-liner and is the one that explains his understanding of the dualism argument. The term ‘dualism’ has a variety of uses in the history of thought. In general, the idea is that, for some particular domain, there are two fundamental kinds or categories of things or principles. In the philosophy of mind, dualism is the theory that the mental and the physical or mind and body are, in some sense, radically different kinds of thing. The main discussion about dualism tends to start from the assumption of the reality of a physical world, and then ways of considering arguments for why the mind cannot be treated as simply part of that physical world. According to substance dualism, our minds and our bodies are two distinct substances capable of existing apart. Descartes substance dualism was based in the belief that the universe consisted of two different kinds of substances that he called res extensa (physical things) and res cogitans (thinking things). In other words, the essence of mind is thought while the essence of body is extension. This belief also leads to his assumption that Free Will is self-evident. In other words, if one is capable of doubting the existence of things learned through experience even when some of these may be true, then it is obvious that we have the freedom to disbelieve, thus free will.…

    • 1952 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to reconcile these two seemingly contradictory claims, we must first understand who, according to Socrates, can be considered a true champion of justice, and what he considers to be ‘the true art of politics’.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato and Immigration

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cited: Ferrari, G.R. F., ed. Plato: The Republic. Trans. Tom Griffith. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2009. Print.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Philosophy this far, we’ve covered many topics. In highlighting Philosophy, Wisdom, and the quote, “ The Unexamined Life is Not Worth Living”, I will express the knowledge and insight I’ve taken away from Unit 1. This embodies one of the many examples of the concepts I will explain: “Too often, we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of the thought” (JFK).…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At first glance, Plato’s The Republic seems a tedious exercise in trying to follow one man’s irrational effort to construct a city when he was tasked simply with explaining a single word. However, the republic created by Socrates throughout the duration of the dialogue and the points that come from it are not as unnecessary or superfluous as they initially seem. The Republic is clearly a specifically worded dialogue about philosophy, but not necessarily only for philosophers. The seemingly excessive examples throughout the text are in fact a blueprint allowing for the general public to understand and assume Plato’s logic, ultimately bringing them not just to Socrates’ conclusion about justice as a…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout modern history societies have debated as to which is the ideal form of government rule. All the major philosophers have put forth their thoughts and ideas on politics as described in their published works, yet these philosophers could not agree on the single ideal form of government. In some instances philosophers even disagreed with themselves as described in the different texts that they wrote. For example, the political thinker/philosopher Niccolo Machiavelli, described two radically different views of government in his two works Prince and Discourses. In the Prince he argues that a monarchy is the ideal rule where as in Discourses he believes that a republic is the most appropriate form. They differ in argument based on how they analyze the ideal state, either through its ruler as the head of its people or through a realistic overall view of government, religion, the influence from the world and the fundamental ideas of each text.…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes vs Machiavelli

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Philosophy is an academic practice that dives into the study of the nature of things including knowledge, and existence. Its context of the norms of society and the reasons behind these norms are studied by philosophers whom include Thomas Hobbes and Nicolas Machiavelli. These two recognized philosophical minds have delved into the concept of a ruling government body, including governments and royalty. Hobbes penned the famous Leviathan while Machiavelli wrote the controversial The Prince. Both of these books include a deep look into powerful people and their ways of keeping peace and functionality in their given societies. Since the two came to their conclusions through different means, it is easy to see where the two would disagree; one wrote based on a logical standpoint of what should help a society run smoothly, and the other wrote based on what he actually observed and situations he studied. However, even though there are differences of writing between these two philosophers, there are both similarities and differences between their observations and conclusions about governors and the governed. While both Hobbes and Machiavelli believe in a very pessimistic view of society as a whole, their opinions differ in relation to the rulers’ treatment of their people.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An ongoing question in the world today is what is the best and most effective form of government to help guide a nation to prosperity? Is it a monarchy, democracy, republic or could it even be a dictatorship? Since this question is not only relevant to politicians but to society as a whole, many people have offered their opinion on the subject, including religious leaders such as the Buddha. But can a man dedicated to religion share similar ideals to a man dedicated to politics? In order to answer these questions as well as the question of what is the best form of government, this paper will examine the Buddha’s political philosophy and compare it with the French enlightenment thinker Baron de Montesquieu and his view on how a government should operate.…

    • 4626 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Was Plato a totalitarian

    • 1486 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plato was a totalitarian judging from The Republic. With the definition of totalitarianism in mind, Plato illustrates features of authoritarianism and ideology in his political worldview, which entails a strict division of classes, the dependency of the fate of the state on the ruling class as well as the superiority of the interests of the ruling class over the subservient and inferior classes. Furthermore, the uncompromising rules for breeding and educating this class combined with the strict supervision and collectivisation of the interests of its members create a close enough representation of the totalitarianism depicted in the definition. Firstly, in addressing the issue, which Plato begins with in The Republic of what justice is Plato, asserts that justice is that which is in the interest of the…

    • 1486 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stoicism Vs Confucianism

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This paper is a comparison between two major schools of thought from two different areas of the world and their intrinsic similarities through their approach to political philosophy. Each work chosen for comparison represent a different philosophy from different areas yet hold striking similarities. The two source documents for this paper are “Meditations” by Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius and “Analects” by Chinese philosopher Confucius, both of which represent Stoicism and Confucianism respectively. These two works were chosen for this paper due to their similarities concerning subjects such as self-improvement thought self-judgment and parallels of what a good person is in order to rule as good leader. Aurelius was trained as a Stoic, a philosophy…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Plato wrote mostly in the form of dialogue. His dialogues have been used to teach a range of subjects, including philosophy, logic, ethics, rhetoric, religion and mathematics. Plato absorbed the learning of his times, - Philolaus, Timaeus, Heraclitus, Parmenides, and then his master, Socrates, which entitles him to stand as the representative of philosophy.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics