The evidence used by the Court to support its majority opinion came from the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Court's majority opinion raised the issue of whether the student's First amendment rights, had been violated by the school boards officials. The removal of books due to the social, political, and moral beliefs of officials were a violation of the first amendment, because this practice denied the students their rights. Their discretionary power is secondary to the transcendent imperatives of the First amendment. Allowing the school board to conduct suppressing ideas doesn't teach children to respect the diversity of ideas that is fundamental to the American system. Our Constitution doesn't permit the official suppression of ideas. The Court made it clear that the imposition of ideological discipline was not a proper procedure for school authorities. In several ways the Court has used references related towards prior cases to make their decisive decision. The Board of Education v. Barnette stated that in a variety of academic settings the Court has acknowledged the force of the principle that schools, like other enterprises operated by the State, may not be run in a manner as to "prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion." This refers to justify the majority opinion because state operated schools are not practicing totalitarianism. In the American system it is important that students are not forced into learning only what the State decides to communicate with them.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The court found that the banning of a silent expression of opinion was unconstitutional. The students did not disrupt or intruded on the schools affairs. Furthermore, the court did not express any opinion for the form of relief for the plaintiff. They decided to reverse the ruling and send it back to the lower court for nominal damage ruling.…
- 394 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
On April 26, 1983, Matthew Fraser gave a speech nominating another student for an elected position. The speech was given to about 600 fourteen year olds that chose to attend this assembly. The speech contained sexual innuendo. Before giving the speech Fraser received advise from several teachers that he should change the speech or not give one at all. But he refused to take their advice (2). The next day, he was called in to an administrative office and was suspended for three days and was told he would not be able to give his speech during graduation even though he was at the time the salutatorian. The family of Fraser filed a grievance with the Pierce County school board, but the officer upheld the suspension. In response, to that decision Matthew’s father filed a case against the school district. The District Court ruled that the student’s First Amendment right was infringed upon. The students was awarded a monetary judgment and allowed to give his graduation speech. Later, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court (4). Later, the US Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals in a 7-2 vote to reinstate the suspension, saying that the school district's policy did not violate the First Amendment (3).…
- 663 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I, _______, agree that school officials should be able to remove student publications when they believe material is unsuitable for younger students, or for reasons it could possibly disrupt the educational curriculum. If students are allowed "freedom of speech" other students could be slandered indirectly such as what occured in this case or fights may ensue due to disagreements. Yes, we as Americans have rights to speak our minds freely, but most students are minors and are under the supervision of the school. The school has the right to control what is allowed within its walls and must moniter students' doings in order to ensure the safety and eduaction of all students.…
- 254 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
At the age of 13 the White family was not ready for the ignorance hatred and fear that he would encounter from the residents of Kokomo, Indiana. Ryan wanted to live a normal life just like his peers that included going to public school. Due to their lack of education and awareness The School district of Kokomo voted to have Ryan stay at home fearing that through casual contact he would spread the virus. In 1985 Ryan’s mom files a lawsuit against school authorities for banning her son from Indiana public schools. In that same year White’s parents filed a lawsuit against the school authorities in 1985 and an Indiana Department of Education officer ruled that the school must follow the Indiana Board of Health guidelines and that White must be…
- 215 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
A considerable number of children who were the plaintiffs of African American descent were deprived of access to public schools based on their race. The litigants mainly wanted to contest the segregation doctrine applied to them in southern states and allow them to choose any school of their choice without being discriminated against racial lines.…
- 601 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
By chiefly drawing on legal precedence in four court cases—Brown, Governor of California, et al. v. Entertainment Merchants Association, et al. (Brown v. EMA), Ginsberg v. New York, Case v. Unified School District, and Campbell v. St-Tammany Parish School Board—, this paper endorses the claim that all books which present controversial subject matter should have an informative label on them. Controversial subject matter is stipulated as any content that may cause emotional or mental harm on well-being of persons of any age, such topics include, but are not limited to: any historical contexts that deal with cruel and inhuman social and political conditions (for example, Nazi Germany, or slavery in the United-States), homophobia and transphobia,…
- 1741 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Firstly, Linda Brown was born in 1943, became a part of civil rights history as a third grader in the public schools of Topeka, KS. When Linda, an African American girl was denied admission into a white elementary school, Linda's father, Oliver Brown, challenged Kansas's school segregation laws in the Supreme Court. Linda Brown's case in the Supreme Court was Brown Vs. Board of Education of Topeka.…
- 261 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
At times in schools, there could be disagreements and disputes between the decisions of government and the rights of individuals. Students attend school in order to become well-educated young adults. The schoolteacher’s main objective is to make sure that students are receiving the maximum amount of learning to prepare them for future endeavors. Schools educate students on citizenship and what it means to live in a democracy. Public schools are under the Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment, which gives citizens protection of their individual liberties from governmental interference. Public school officials must obey the demands of the Constitution. The Supreme Court ruled in the 1943 case West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette…
- 1428 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Awareness of one’s history is critical to appreciating and understanding its affects and accomplishments. The Brown v. Board of Education case is landmark in the history of the United States society and the judiciary system (Hartung). It drastically affected the education systems, the civil rights movements, and is known as one of the first cases to acknowledge social science results. The Brown v. Board of Education case took place over sixty years ago, and its affects continue to influence many aspects of today’s society, and more specifically today’s education systems. Although the Brown case had many accomplishments, it is still argued that it failed to successfully accomplish its main goal of desegregating schools.…
- 1105 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division affirmed the denial of the request to suppress evidence. The New Jersey Supreme Court then reversed the decision and ruled that the exclusionary rule of the Fourth Amendment applies to the searches and seizures made by school officials. The case then went to the United States Supreme Court. The first thing the U.S Supreme Court did was ordered to rehear the argument about the question of whether the assistant principal violated the Fourth Amendment in T.L.O’s case. After rehearing the argument the court in a 6-3 decision written by Justice Byron R. White ruled that the search of T.L.O’s purse was reasonable under the circumstances. They stated that even though the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizure also applied to public school officials, they may conduct reasonable searches of students with proper authority and probable…
- 647 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Pico is one of the biggest cases that have come out of censorship. This is one of the biggest cases because they show how the children in a school and the parents go head to head and try to ban a book or to keep the book at the school. This event took place in the public schools in New York in 1975. A group of parents called the Parents of New York United or for short “PONYU”(2001) formed a group to try and get a list of nine books banned from the school’s library. According to the article Island Trees Union Free School District Board of Education v. Pico 1982, some of the books that were banned were Slaughterhouse Five and Best Short Stories of Negro Writers.(2001) The reason why these specific titles were banned is because the books contained graphic descriptions of sexual actions. The student who was going against the parents was Steven A. Pico and some other students.(2001) Pico took the parents to court because he thought that it was going against the first amendment to get rid of the books. When Pico and the group of parents went to court they kept going back and forth on if they should allow the students to read the books or if they should take the books off the shelves. The decision that the court had agreed on is that removing the books from the public schools because of the things that they say or do in the books violated the Freedom of Speech. This decision was decided on June, 25, 1982.(2001) Clearly, this was one of the biggest cases of…
- 970 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Many students and parents questioned the school board’s decisions to remove these books from the library and were backed by a 5-4 vote by the Supreme Court. The Court held that school officials cannot remove books simply because they personally believe that the books are objectionable. The First Amendment protects the right to receive information and ideas and prohibits suppression of material simply because government officials, including school officials, dislike the material. Justice William Brennan states, “The special characteristics of the school library make that environment especially appropriate for the recognition of the First Amendment rights of…
- 1536 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
The US Supreme Court voted 7-2, saying that the school district's policy did not violate the First Amendment.…
- 772 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
"It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." This was the main argument from Justice Abe Fortas that came into play at the Tinker v. Des Moines School District Case of 1969. The case involved a small group of students who silently dissented against the government’s policy during the ongoing Vietnam War by wearing black armbands to school. In response by the school administration, each of those students was suspended from the public schools they attended in Des Moines, Iowa. This case is a prime example of the Constitutionally protected symbolic speech we have rights to, and especially to what extent it is allowed in public schools.…
- 769 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional. Censoring school books in libraries can often lead to censorship of our basic freedoms guaranteed in the First Amendment. In some cases, a minority ends up dictating the majority in censorship cases. To be told what is permissible reading material and what is not is a direct violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution.…
- 1460 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays