Picnic On The Bank Of Kra Analysis

Stepanos Nersisyan was a famous Armenian painter born in 1907 in Yerevan. The artist studied in Etchmiadzin but later he moved to Tbilisi to study at the Theological Seminary of Tbilisi since the capital of Georgia was the cultural and intellectual center of the region at that time. But Nersisyan was expelled from the seminary soon because of his aspiration to get an education at The Russian Academy of Arts in Saint Petersburg. The artist’s desire to study in Saint Petersburg brought about an increased tension between the painter and the Church.
Although Stepanos Nersisyan wanted to get an education in Saint Petersburg’s Academy of Arts, he did not have enough money. So the artist entered into a service with an Italian painter. A few years …show more content…
In this painting the artist combined a landscape and a narrative of everyday life for the first time in the history of Armenian painting. While creating this work of art the main goal of Nersisyan was countering the rich revelers and their servants.
It is known that there are four motivations for creating an artwork: to document history, to express religious visions, to represent expression and feelings, and to present visual realities. The motivation of Stepanos Nersisyan for creating “Picnic on The Bank of Kura” was documenting history: in this painting the artist recorded an event of the day. The viewers can get a notion of how people used to spend their leisure time, and what kind of clothes they used to wear in the ninetieth century.
Moreover, works of art vary according to style and content. Artworks can ether represent something that is a part of the real world or something imaginative, fantastic. Thus, artworks can be ether disegno esterno or disegno interno. Disegno esterno refers to a work of art which has a connection to the physical reality, while disegno interno refers to an artwork which has no connection to the reality. So Stepanos Nersisyan’s “Picnic on The Bank of Kura” is a disegno esterno artwork since the artist captured what he observed in the real world. There is nothing mythical, fantastic in this …show more content…
There are different types of lines in the painting by Nersisyan. The viewers can notice vertical lines in the figures of the people, in the images of trees. The hillside and the slope of the mountain represent diagonal lines. But the most common type of lines in this artwork is organic since the artist painted a landscape. Organic lines can be found in the image of trees (the trunks and the curvy branches). Moreover, the lines used by Nersisyan are analytic. The lines in this artwork are understood and read easily since they define physical