Preview

Philosophy's Just War theory

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
670 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philosophy's Just War theory
(e) “The just war theory makes war fair” Discuss this statement. You should include different, supported points of view and a personal viewpoint. You must refer to Christianity in your answer. [12]

The Just War Theory was put in place by philosophers such as Plato but later on added to by people such as Christian monk, Thomas Aquinas. The aim of the Just War Theory is to provide a kind of framework as to what is the right way to act in a potential conflict situation. Christians have a fairly long history of refusing to take part in war and many of these Christians are pacifists in one way or another ranging in active pacifism, who are heavily involved in political activity to help promote peace, or those who are very difficult to convince that war is justified. One argument for pacifism is based on the idea of ‘What Would Jesus Do?’ Because Jesus had a very pacifist nature, many Christians believe that by following in his footsteps means that they too should have a pacifist nature. Believing this, results in the belief that a war is not and should not be justified. Specifically, Quakers are a Christian group with a total commitment of non-violence and in 1660 the Quakers declared, “…the spirit of Christ which leads us into all truth will never move us to fight and war against any man with outward weapons, neither for the kingdom of Christ, nor for the kingdoms of the world.” Another reason why a Christian may believe that the Just War Theory does not make war fair is by following the Ten Commandments. Within the Ten Commandments (found in the Bible, Exodus 20) it says that ‘you shall not kill’, many Christians follow this as a reason why war is never justified and if the Just War Theory is put in place or not, it does not make it fair to go to war and result in deaths, whether it may be a number of little or many. On the other hand, many people including Christians agree with this statement that the Just War Theory can do so much as to even
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    ap dbq 1
    • 1003 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ap dbq 1

    While some religions, like Christianity and Islam, may have defended war in time of defense, other such as Buddhism condemned war at all accounts, as well as the Daoism. I will now go through some different religious views on war.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Just And Unjust War Analysis
    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Just And Unjust War Analysis

    A review of chapter 2, 'The Crime of War' in Michael Walzer's book, "Just and Unjust Wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations." Allen Lane 1997.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalingrad Just War
    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stalingrad Just War

    There have been many wars come this day and age. They included much bloodshed and death. One of the bloodiest wars in the history of the world was the Battle of Stalingrad. This war was the turning point for the Allies in their fight against Germany, but with nearly 2 Million Civilian/Military Casualties, was this battle justified? The Just War theory provides a basis as to whether a war was just or evil and this will be applied to the Battle of Stalingrad to perceive whether or not this battle meets with the 3 different Jus in Bello / Jus Ad Bellum criteria necessary to be a just war.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Just War In Vietnam
    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Just War In Vietnam

    The focus of this investigation is the theory or concept of just war, and what makes a just war “Just.” This investigation will explore the question: To what extent can the Vietnam War be justified as a just war? Throughout this investigation, the philosophy of a just war will be broken down into its fundamental components. The purpose of this is to identify the extent of which…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Just War Theory In Vietnam
    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Just War Theory In Vietnam

    The part of the just war theory is called jus ad bellum. There must be a just cause, right authority, proportionality, the goal of peace, with war as a last resort. A country cannot attack another country for more wealth or for more respect. They must attack on behalf of an innocent third country or group. Right authority means that war must be declared by the proper authorities and not by private companies. Proportionality means that the potential war must be assessed regarding the cost of the war and the benefits from the war. The country must also decide whether or not the potential gains outweigh the loss of human lives and the cost of the war. Next, “will the destructiveness of the proposed conflict outweigh any enhancement of other human values?” That means will the war any enhance aspects of the human life more than the violence that will occur during the war. The purpose of the war must be for peace, not solely to win glory. Finally, the war must be a last resort, meaning that all other methods for peace must be attempted before resorting to…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Outline the concepts of just war and pacifism
    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Outline the concepts of just war and pacifism

    The Just war theory maintains that war may be justified if fought only in certain circumstances, and only if certain restrictions are applied to the way in which war is fought. The theory that was first propounded by St Augustine of Hippo and St Ambrose of Milan ( 4th and 5th centuries AD) attempts to clarify two fundamental questions: ‘when is it right to fight?’ and ‘How should war be fought?’. Whereas Pacifists are people mainly Christians who reject the use of violence and the deliberate killing of civilians but claims that peace is intrinsically good and ought to be upheld either as a duty and that war can never be justifiable. However, Realists agree that, due to the nature of humans, force is a necessary action to be used to maintain a just and ordered society. Therefore, since the Second World War, people have turned their attention to Just War again establishing rules that can serve as guidelines to a just war- the Hague and Geneva conventions.…

    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Compatible Are Just War and Pacifism?
    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Compatible Are Just War and Pacifism?

    The Just War theory tries to judge whether it is ‘just’ to go to war and how the war should be fought. It tries to reconcile three things; taking a human life is seriously wrong. That states have a duty to defend their citizens and defend justice and thirdly protecting innocent human life and defending important moral values.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Just And Unjust Wars Analysis
    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Just And Unjust Wars Analysis

    Compared to the early 20th century, the wars of today are vastly different. The reasons for fighting, the styles of fighting, and who is fighting are all very different. However, in an age that is far removed from the past, a few things regarding war have remained the unchanged. One of the ideas that has remained unchanged in a time that is every changing, are the rules of war, as described by Michael Walzer in his book, Just and Unjust Wars. Naturally, in a time where so much has changed, there are starting to be a few objections to Walzer’s claims on the rules of war. Even though the wars of today are far different from those of the past, the moral equality of soldiers remains the same regardless if they are associated with being on an unjust…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Five Categories Of A Just War
    • 61 Words
    • 1 Page

    Five Categories Of A Just War

    Although the conflict uses conventional warfare, it is not categorized as just war because it does not fit into all of the five categories that define when war is just. First of all, it is a preventive war rather than a last resort or preemptive war. Second, it also is not a last resort and does not have a just cause.…

    • 61 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Just And Unjust War Analysis
    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Just And Unjust War Analysis

    A large sector of just war theory references several moral and legal implications that must be evaluated prior to engaging in attack. The legalist paradigm, as expressed by theorist and author Michael Walzer in his book Just and Unjust Wars1, evaluates the conditions that constitute just war, and elaborates on several of the key circumstances that are required to impose just war on others. Despite its strengths, this paradigm is often evaluated as being a “strawman”, and provides only a foundation for which several other nuanced views can expand on. One fundamental idea expressed in his claims though, is the idea that “nothing but aggression can justify war”1. Through this, Walzer establishes the only moral precedent for which a counter-attack…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Just War Pacifism
    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Just War Pacifism

    Human beings have been fighting with each other since prehistoric times, and people have been discussing the rights and wrongs of it. The Ethics of War begins by assuming that war is a bad thing, and should be avoided if possible, but there can be situations when war may be catastrophic. War is a bad thing because it involves deliberately killing or injuring people, and this is a fundamental wrong. The purpose of war ethics is to help decide what is right or wrong, both for individuals and countries, and to contribute to debates on public policy, and ultimately to government and individual action.…

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: The Just War Theory
    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: The Just War Theory

    This article “Just War Tradition” also refer to as Just War Theory is related to war because it explains the principles and morals behind on taking war as a last resort solution only if the options don't meet the requirements. Also, in the case of war was to happen they discussed on when and where warfare is appropriate to be taken place. Including that, the Just War Tradition was originally discovered by the Christians and their based it on their philosophy. Then theorist Saint Augustine made who made other factions to their philosophy for a better outcome. As years passed another theorist named Michael Walzer stepped in but this time around modernize the principles. The government must apply two principles the first principle is Jus ad Bellum…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Just War Theory
    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Just War Theory

    What justifies war? Who justifies it? Why as human beings do we feel the need to fight, harm, and kill others to achieve certain goals? These questions have been pertinent to our society since the beginning of time and continue to challenge us to better understand the human psyche, and code of ethics that give Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Coast Guardsmen, and Marines credence to kill in the name of the United States of America. These ethics of war lay the foundation for that code of understanding and righteousness for when it is justifiable to pull the trigger and take the life of another, or commit an act of war.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    War Can Be Justified Analysis
    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages

    War Can Be Justified Analysis

    Living by this moral principle can cause a greater harm by turning the other cheek than by using force to deminish a greater threat. There is always going to be people seeking out power or people who have different beliefs and morals because it is engraved within ourselves through generation after generation. Jan Narveson directly states a pacifists view, "His belief is not only that violence is evil but also that it is morally wrong to use force to resist, punish, or prevent violence. We are aggressive and greedy people and to change the thinking of the entire world with out the threat of force seems nearly impossible. Hypathetically, if pacifism was put into law, the use of any type of force will be breaking the law and the sentence is life in prison. Now imagine if a man breaks into a house of a young lady and rapes this lady and then pulls a gun out to shoot her. If the woman grabs the gun and shoots the man, she would also be sent to prison for life because any use of force is labelled as unacceptable. In our society today, violence is happening everyday even though we have laws in place to minimize them. Violence is not only a thing of the past but it is a thing of the future and without a proper punishment, violence will increase drastically. Narveson communicates a second version of pacifism where " one might argue that pacifism is desirable as a tactic: that as a matter of fact, some good end, such as the reduction of violence itself , is to be achieved by 'turning the other cheek'. " This again is a good theory, but if it was put into action, the consequences would be great. A human has the right to defend themselves, or help a person that is in need. In war it is the same thing but instead of one person needing help, it is a population worth of needed help. A person claiming they are a pure hearted pacifist by " turning the other cheek" does not necessarily make it the best…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pacifism: Nonviolence and Br
    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pacifism: Nonviolence and Br

    <br>Many Christians are pacifists and many pacifists are Christian. They believe that, as stated in Mathew 5, "happy are those who work for peace; God will call them His children". They claim that Christ's teachings are very clear on the matter. "Do not take revenge on someone who wrongs you", "love your enemies".…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics