Preview

Philosophy Sections 7.1 & 7.2

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
339 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philosophy Sections 7.1 & 7.2
1. What are the requirements for knowledge?
4. What is Plato’s allegory of the cave supposed to demonstrate? Plato’s allegory of the cave is supposed to demonstrate not only the human situation in general but Socrates’ life in particular. Socrates glimpsed the true nature of reality and tried to convince the inhabitants of Athens that they didn’t know what they thought they knew. The objects that cast shadows on the wall represent what Plato considers to be the truly real objects: the forms.
5. What is Descartes’ dream argument? Descartes’ dream argument is as followed: 1) We can’t be certain that we’re not dreaming. 2) If we can’t be certain that we’re not dreaming, we can’t be certain that what we sense is real. 3) If we can’t be certain that what we sense is real, we can’t acquire knowledge through sense experience. 4) Therefore, we can’t acquire knowledge through sense experience.
According to Descartes, you can’t rule out the possibility that you’re dreaming so you’re senses can’t give you knowledge of the external world. 8. Why do empiricists believe that there are no synthetic a priori truths? Empiricists believe that there are no synthetic a priori truths because they believe that sense experience is our only source of knowledge of the external world. 9. How does Kant explain the possibility of synthetic a priori truths? Kant explained the possibility of synthetic a priori truths by examining the method of inquiry used by mathematicians. Kant found that what makes it possible for mathematicians to discover such truths is that they study the principles the mind uses to construct mathematical objects.

Section 7.2 (3 and 4) 3. What is representative realism? Representative realism is the doctrine that sensations are caused by external objects and that our sensations represent these objects. 4. What is the distinction between primary and secondary qualities? The distinction between primary and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In book 7, in Plato’s Republic, Plato illustrates a metaphor dealing with education and knowledge. This, metaphor is known as the Allegory of the Cave. In the cave there are men chained up facing the end of the cave. They can’t turn their heads either side and behind them are puppeteers statue like in front of the fire. Shadows are made by this and are pictured in front of the prisoners. They speak about the shadows as we do of our world. They call the shadows different names that we would call dogs, man, and horses. After a man breaks from his chain and turns around, bothered by the light of the fire can’t seem to tell what the statues are. After adjusting, he can see that the objects are more real than the shadows he accustomed to. Thus,…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    a. Some previous conceptions were built on false opinions, or potentially false opinions and are therefore uncertain.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Most of us, Socrates says, are like prisoners chained before a wall in a cave, unable to turn our heads. What we call reality is actually a mere shadow play on the wall, projected from behind our backs by persons carrying statues of humans and animals and carved likenesses of other ordinary objects before a fire that is behind them." (Rice, pp. 79) This allegory is attempting to simplify the ideas of forms and the reality of what is perceived as real. The prisoners in the cave are those people who have not achieved a philosophical understanding of forms, so they remain affixed by the shadows. The shadows are representing worldly objects, which we see with our senses. The prisoners see the shadows and believe that they are real, and they communicate with each other concerning these shadows because they do not know the truth. The statues carried in front of the fire are the true forms Plato speaks of. The forms are understood by philosophers who realize that worldly matter is simply a reflection of true…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order for a people to seek the truth behind the life they live, they must journey from the ignorance they have known and turn it into knowledge. The importance of this inner change reflects within for only the person willing to change, can seek the truth. Socrates suggests this personal dedication to see the truth by presenting a theory of The Allegory of the Cave. The theoretical cave has prisoners chained for their whole lives. He questions what really is to be real around us by asking asking Glaucon “how can they see anything but the shadows if they were never allowed to move their heads?” (Allegory 1). The shadows seen on the wall serve as illusions for the prisoners to believe in, even though they are merely distractions from the truth of there being an outside to the cave. Since prisoners are chained and can only see the shadows before them, they are physically not able to see around anything but the delusions. Socrates is proving that, the journey from ignorance to knowledge must seen, and not said. The prisoners need to turn their heads and see outside the cave, for just being told so will never satisfy their curiosity. Therefore, they will never believe the truth if they can not see it…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, let us examine the argument more closely. Descartes says in his readings that the knowledge that we have of this world could be all just an illusion due to the fact that we can never really be sure that we are not sleeping – that is the main point of the dream argument. We have all had dreams that have certainly seemed and felt real, so how can we be sure that we are not sleeping and dreaming this very moment? The arguments against it would include the pinch test, the EEG, which measures brain activity while one is asleep, and one that says that if we can remember how or why we got to where we are, if we can trace our steps, then surely we must not be sleeping. All good arguments, but none of them disproves the argument for dreaming as I will prove in the subsequent paragraphs.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3a. For each of your experiences, you can’t tell whether your experience is a dream or not. (You can’t tell which of your dreams is a waking experience or a dreaming experience).…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In dreams, although the general things could be imaginary, certain other things which are even more simple and universal are true and exist. (Conclusion from 2 and 6)…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes says that the most basic set of knowledge we have is our senses. He continues that the senses give us false information. For example, when we look at the sun, we cannot tell how big it is. The same is true for dreams. Senses appear to be real in dreams, but how can one tell whether or not we are dreaming or not. So if we can never determine we are dreaming or awake then we can't rely on our senses.…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea I found most interesting in the first meditation was the argument about dreams Descartes uses to explain why senses are not entirely reliable. He mentions, and I agree, that things we do when we are awake, like extend our hand consciously and deliberated “would not be so distinct for someone who is asleep.” Is not unusual for me to wake up sweating and screaming because of a bad dream that feels so real. I then imagine how would I know I’m having a dream if it feels so real and palpable? In Descartes words: “I see so plainly that there are no definitive signs by which to distinguish being awake from being asleep.”…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We are prone to believing that what we see, taste, touch, smell, and hear is what is real, yet we are cognitively able to use these senses in our dreams. How do we recognize what reality is and what is just perception? The authors wanted people to be able to question everything that we are taught because there is a possibility that most of the “common sense” that we are taught is wrong. The author also wanted to show that knowledge is power, and knowledge can be gained only the individual who is not afraid to search. People who are still “plugged” into conformity and popular beliefs are those whose minds will remain in bondage. On the contrary, an anomaly will be the individuals who will have true freedom from society norms. This fact is what they…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why does the world exist?

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Realism is the philosophical school of thought that suggests the existence of an objective reality with which we communally interact. Within realism there are different perspectives that can be argued that deal with varying degrees of correlation between our perception of reality and the true objective form of reality. These different branches of realism stem from different fundamental beliefs regarding the nature of this relationship. So-called “naïve realism” , also known as direct realism, is the belief that our senses accurately detect mind-independent reality therefore our perceptions of reality correlate directly with the form of the objective reality. Another form of realism known as “scientific realism” takes a different approach by assuming that the universe exists in a way that can be described by science (the ability to describe an object through science verifies its existence) and that scientific objects and knowledge exist independently of the mind. On the opposite side of the spectrum we have “anti-realism” which challenges the existence of an objective existence or reality. Anti-realists with respect to objective…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Truth Essay

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In “The Allegory of the Cave” Plato uses the theme of appearance versus reality to portray his perspective on truth. In this piece of literature men lay restrained underground in a cave with no way out. In their cave reality is “nothing but the shadows of those artificial objects.” The man’s life, his reality, his truth, is based among shadows cast on the walls by the fire burning behind them. They know nothing else to be true. Therefore, it may appear that the truth for these men is very simple and pure, staring them right in the face, the shadows. When one man is freed from his shackles and forced to look into the light for the first time, what he thought was reality was fictitious now. He has become enlightened in a way and breaks away from using his five scenes that he used in the physical world of the cave. The man starts to have faith, believing in something even if you can’t see it, and he looks inside to his immortal soul. He starts to reach this higher level of existence that no one in the cave is experiencing because they are trapped in a false reality guided by scenes and not by intuition. What was once pure is now tainted with his true beliefs. He realizes that physical objects aren’t real at all. Only the idea of that object is…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dispute between rationalism and empiricism takes place within epistemology, the branch of philosophy devoted to studying the nature, sources and limits of knowledge. The defining questions of epistemology include the following.…

    • 9792 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    no country for old men

    • 1590 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plato’s “The Allegory of The Cave” is a metaphorical portrayal of his abstract vision and his…

    • 1590 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays