Philippine Rh (Reproductive Health) Bill: a Matter of Public Opinion
RH Bill: A Matter of Public Opinion
Which of these four arguments is the most ethical argument? (10 pts)
The most ethical argument among Lagman, Santiago, Villegas and Garcia is Garcia's. Although she presented her stands on the issue using her personal view as a mother, she was able to convey her consequentialist stand. According to her, “right to reproductive health” does not just boil down to the contraceptives and other artificial family planning devices that the government would distribute when the RH Bill would be passed. Also, she mentioned using an anecdote about her friend that making contraceptive pills that can enhance a woman’s skin and such promotes a mentality of “coolness” in the youth. This means that although the RH Bill does not promote to the youth the use of these pills, this exactly becomes the case. Another argument she presented was the meaning of “right to freedom of choice.” Freedom is still subjective to the consequences or the effects of our actions, and, thus, should not be exploited. She cited the RH Bill’s goal of “protecting women’s rights.” The rights promoted by the RH Bill are not the same rights that are more important for more women which could bring a more “fruitful love.” The highlight of her arguments was the one about contraceptives and how they do more harm than help. She also addresses the issue of sex education through saying that it is the duty of the parents to educate and guide their children about the matter. All in all, Garcia has presented her premises against the RH Bill through discussing the unethical consequences if the bill was ever to become a law.
Do you think people should just leave it to the hands of our policy leaders namely Lagman and Santiago the decision to approve and implement this bill Hobbes suggested that the citizens should not argue against their leaders? Why or why not? (10 pts)
As an essential part of a democratic country, Filipinos should have a say in
Which of these four arguments is the most ethical argument? (10 pts)
The most ethical argument among Lagman, Santiago, Villegas and Garcia is Garcia's. Although she presented her stands on the issue using her personal view as a mother, she was able to convey her consequentialist stand. According to her, “right to reproductive health” does not just boil down to the contraceptives and other artificial family planning devices that the government would distribute when the RH Bill would be passed. Also, she mentioned using an anecdote about her friend that making contraceptive pills that can enhance a woman’s skin and such promotes a mentality of “coolness” in the youth. This means that although the RH Bill does not promote to the youth the use of these pills, this exactly becomes the case. Another argument she presented was the meaning of “right to freedom of choice.” Freedom is still subjective to the consequences or the effects of our actions, and, thus, should not be exploited. She cited the RH Bill’s goal of “protecting women’s rights.” The rights promoted by the RH Bill are not the same rights that are more important for more women which could bring a more “fruitful love.” The highlight of her arguments was the one about contraceptives and how they do more harm than help. She also addresses the issue of sex education through saying that it is the duty of the parents to educate and guide their children about the matter. All in all, Garcia has presented her premises against the RH Bill through discussing the unethical consequences if the bill was ever to become a law.
Do you think people should just leave it to the hands of our policy leaders namely Lagman and Santiago the decision to approve and implement this bill Hobbes suggested that the citizens should not argue against their leaders? Why or why not? (10 pts)
As an essential part of a democratic country, Filipinos should have a say in