Preview

Phil 1112 Death Penalty

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1930 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Phil 1112 Death Penalty
Phil 1112: Death Penalty Essay “An eye for an eye,” right? As fair as America tries to be, sometimes we also have to remember that an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. Many people rave about how the death penalty is an unjust punishment and that we can do without it; the idea of killing someone so that the punishment fits the crime is what shows how our world and societies are just as cruel as the criminals in it. The death penalty debate is a dispute that is learning to become more immoral and becoming a less used tactic when penalizing criminals. This problem has decreased significantly over the last couple decades but the controversy is still up in the air nearly everywhere. Additionally, much of the controversy has a heavy influence on biomedical research due to the fact that lethal injection is highly used for execution purposes. Currently many professionals are looking for other forms of punishment, yet there are still many people who believe that this is a fair and equal punishment. Regardless of which side one is on, both perspectives offer good reasoning to why or why not the death penalty should continue to stay in effect. Althought I do not agree with the death many and it’s many consequences, I understand the reason for it being so controversial. The dictionary defines the death penalty as punishment for someone convicted of a capital crime. Dating back to centuries ago, any capital crime such as murder, rape, drug trafficking were not tolerated by any means and were immediately sentenced to death. “An eye for an eye” was the typical argument that defended the side that the punishment should equal the crime. In an article written by Louis Pojman, he defends the death penalty with his own “eye for an eye” theory. His reasoning is that he believes humans are logical creatures who make the logical choice to commit a muder, therefore giving up their right to live. Pojman argues that the death penalty is a good deterrent for potential


Bibliography: " 'Barbaric Practice ' or 'Desired Alternative '?; Readers Sound Off as Legislators Consider Life Without Parole in Lieu of Capital Punishment." The Washington Post 15 Mar. 2007, Every Edition ed., EXTRAS: GZ05. Print. "Illinois and Capital Punishment." The New York Times 14 Jan. 2011, Late Edition-Final ed., sec. A: 1. Print. Pojman, Louis. "A Defense of the Death Penalty." Issues in Applied Ethics: n. pag. Contemporary Issues in Applied Ethics ebook. Web. 11 Apr. 2011. Roberts-Cady, Sarah. "Against Retributive Justifications Of The Death Penalty." Journal Of Social Philosophy 41.2 (2010): 185-193. Academic Search Premier. Web. 11 July 2012. Sangiorgio, Chiara. "The Death Penalty And Public Information On Its Use." International Review Of Law, Computers & Technology 25.1/2 (2011): 33-41. Academic Search Premier. Web. 20 July 2012. Urbina, Ian. "In Push to End Death Penalty, Some States Cite Cost-Cutting." The New York Times 25 Feb. 2009, Late Edition-Final ed., sec. A: 1. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Certain states still allow the death penalty as an option for punishing criminals. This eye for an eye punishment has been a controversy for many years. Deciding whether or not it is morally right to take a person’s life because they took another’s life is the main issue still up for debate. The death penalty is a punishment that the court is unable to take back. In the event that the jury and judge were wrong in their decision, deciding to take falsely accused individual’s life by giving such an extreme punishment can cause a huge controversy across the nation. Therefore, the death penalty should not be an option for deciding how to accurately punish an individual.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently there has been a major controversy about whether to keep the death penalty or to dispose of it. A portion of the world’s population supports the death penalty, while others frown upon it. The death penalty helps the government prevent deaths, costs taxpayers less, and provides assistance to those who do not wish to live through their rough feelings. Though keeping the penalty does have its consequences, the lengthy list of pros overpowers the cons.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is a controversial topic that has existed since the beginning of civilization. The death penalty, and capital punishment are interchangeable terms that provide legalized murders at the hands of the government. This form of killing is permitted in approximately 38 states (Capital Punishment, 2011). The death penalty has been a way for humans to control one another throughout history. The death penalty is a chancy way of instilling justice. In addition, there is no guarantee that the person sentenced to death is completely innocent. For many years, the death penalty has been the cause of many innocent and untimely deaths. The death penalty is a final decision to a possible mistake. Also, the death penalty infringes on…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gavrila, Adina Nicoleta. "Should the death penalty be abolished? Arguments for and against the centuries old punishment." Journal for Communication and Culture. 01.02 (2011): 82-98. Print.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Texas and the Death Penalty

    • 5887 Words
    • 24 Pages

    In the American context, when the topic of the death penalty arises, a word that might come to mind is “Texas”. Texas is probably the most popular state in the U.S. when it comes to this legal sanction because of its notorious history of carrying out over four hundred executions since 1974 and executing more offenders than any other death penalty retentionist jurisdiction. This reputation is what fueled the idea for our group paper. This paper intends to discuss the socio-economic effects, political and deterrent effects of capital punishment in Texas and how it…

    • 5887 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty is a legal process whereby a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime. The death penalties are usually carried out for retribution of a heinous murder committed, such as aggravated murder, felony killing or contract killing. Every state handles what method they want to use to put a person to death according to their state laws. The death penalty is given by lethal injection, electrocution; gas chamber firing squad and hanging are some of the ways that certain states may carry out their death penalty procedures. I will present some views and personal opinion dealing with the pros and cons of the death penalty. The death penalty is such a life altering subject that affects all parties’ lives that are involved in the death penalty process. I personally have mixed feeling about the death penalty. I don’t know really if I would be a person that would support the death penalty or not. I do feel that murdering someone is wrong, and since no one really close to me has never been murdered. I don’t know if my feeling would change as being a supporter for the death penalty or not. I can only pray that God will help this county to make the right choices when comes to life or death.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Zimring, F. (2003). The contradictions of American capital punishment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press 6 Apr. 2010.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    ProCon.Org. (2009, January 1). Should the death penalty be used for retribution? Retrieved October 24, 2011, from http://deathpenatly.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=001004: http://deathpenatly.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=001004…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment has been used around the world for many thousands of years as a way of enforcing justice when someone has done wrong by what standards that the cultures have. Over the past few centuries capital punishment has started to be questioned by many people in Europe and in the United States. Many people who support the death penalty cite reasons such as deterrence and not wanting to spend money a person who will never be a productive member of society again. Many who are in opposition to the death penalty say that the death penalty is killing innocent people and is actually not saving any money at all and that it is in fact costing too much and that it is wrong to simply kill someone who commits a crime. There are also questions to the fairness of the death penalty and many who question if it is being applied fairly. Both sides of the debate over the morality and legitimacy of capital punishment will be presented in this paper with this author taking one side. While the thought of having someone put to death is not something that anyone would like, the death penalty is the only way for ultimate justice to be administered for victims provided that it is fairly administered.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Bronczar, Thomas P. "Capital Punishment, 2003. U.S. Department of Justice. 10 November 2004. 20 May 2005. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/cp03.htm…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Haag, Ernest, and John Phillips Conrad. The Death Penalty: A Debate. New York: Plenum Press, 1983.…

    • 3258 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Has anyone asked your views on capital punishment? The words lethal injection, electrocution, and gas chamber are synonymous with the death penalty. Even in today’s society of die-hard liberals, right-winged republicans, and middle of the road democrats the capital punishment argument is still a squeamish topic that incites strong emotional debate from abolitionists and supporters.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This article provides applicable information from many sources such as a Governors, Political Science Professors, the Executive Director of the Death Penalty Information Center as well as the President of the United States, providing legitimacy to the…

    • 2185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Eddelman, T., Ten Anti-Death Penalty Fallacies. (2002, June 3). The New American. Retrieved November 1, 2004, from EBSCO database http://…

    • 1455 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays