Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Phil 103 Final

Good Essays
1037 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Phil 103 Final
Samantha Teem
010104520
Phil 103
Final Exam
1A. According to Kant, good will is the only thing that is absolutely good without qualification. Good will is the only thing that is unconditionally good. Good will is what makes all other good things truly good. Things can be good, but not without qualification. The will is good because the intention itself is good, rather than a desired result or some outside reasoning. All in all it is the honest and unselfish intention of a will.
1B. Aristotle believed that the chief good is in reaching a life of virtue that is created by doing what is purely right. He describes these in two categories, the ethical virtues and the intellectual virtues.
1C. The Kingdom of Ends is what we as individuals create when we learn to act in accordance to the categorical imperative. This existence is composed of rational beings who all act with good will and never treat each other as means to an end. Kant hoped that we as a society would one day be able to accomplish this as a whole
1D. The state of nature is Hobbes’ description of what human beings lived like prior to the existence of a state or civilized society. In this existence, all humans were equal in that they all wanted to achieve their ultimate end and they all had the right to do what they thought necessary for survival
1E. The inside of the cave is where we live a life of comfort and familiarity. We choose to live a mundane life in which we accept and follow the social norms of our society rather than questioning what is accepted as knowledge. The outside of the cave is the real world in which real knowledge exists only by an individual learning things on their own through nature. The outside of the cave is a world of learning in which society cannot manipulate or control learning.
1F. The idea of existence preceding essence of Sartre is the basic principle of existentialism. This means that a personality is not built over a previously designed model or a precise purpose, because it is the human being who chooses it’s personality.
1G. Jen is what makes humans unique. It is translated as ‘human-heartedness’ and envelopes feeling and thinking; thus it is the foundation of human relationships. This is significant because it shows that Confucianism emphasizes the importance of the heart rather than the mind. To live without Jen is not a life worth living.
1I. The First Noble Truth that of suffering. The Pali word dukkha also refers to anything that is temporary, conditional, or compounded of other things. Even something precious and enjoyable is dukkha, because it will end. The Second Noble Truth teaches that the cause of suffering is craving. We continually search for something outside ourselves to make us happy. But no matter how successful we are, we never remain satisfied. The third noble truth is that the complete cessation of dukkha is possible, and the fourth noble truth identifies a path to this cessation.
2A. According to Plato, the really real world is the other world where the forms give essence to the things in this world. The Things in this world are only copies of the forms in the other world.
2B. Happiness cannot consist in pleasure, money, or fame because it depends on the cultivation of virtue. Happiness is only achieved through both physical and mental well-being. Aristotle saw happiness as a central purpose in human life.
2C. Socrates believed that wisdom did not lie in what a person knows or thinks they know, rather it is about knowing that you do not know something. A truly wise individual can admit and recognize that they do not know or completely understand something.
2D. According to Hobbes in the state of nature, we get an overall idea of anarchy. This is because people are constantly moving against each other in the pursuit of their own survival. This pursuit is so desperate that humans tend to disregard the needs and treatment of others.
2E. According to Aristotle we do not have innate ideas because we are all born with a mind that is like a blank slate or tabula rasa. This means that when you are born you have no ideas or knowledge already in your mind. Rather, you develop ideas and knowledge through experience throughout your life.
2F. Human beings experience anguish because when we decide what we are going to do, we are making that choice for everyone. When you decided something, you are essentially saying that this is how anyone should behave in the same circumstance. If you do not feel anguish it is simply because you are forgetting about your responsibility to yourself as an individual.
2G. Hobbes saw people as not being sociable by nature because we are basically egotistical and are not concerned with others or their lives. We are too caught up in our own pursuit of self-preservation that we cannot be bothered to socialize with others who are trying to accomplish the same thing independently.
2H. According to Kant, if you are acting only out of duty and respect for the law, or because you have to it has no moral worth because we did not choose to do so simply because it is the right thing to do. If we do something because of an outside force rather than because it is the morally right thing to do, then it has no moral value.
2I. Kant believed that the maxim of making a false promise cannot be universalized because it is something that we choose to do only because there is no other alternative. It cannot be universalized because it is only in these SPECIFIC circumstances that we have been forced to do this. In other situations circumstances will be different, which means there is an alternative option.
2J. The only thing that is good without qualification is good will because it is the only thing that is good because it has a pure intention. It is not good because there is a goal or accomplishment in mind. It is simply good because its intention was.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After analyzing how Locke and Hobbes understand the state of nature it is evident that they share many ideas but they also show essential differences in their ideas. Hobbes regards the state of nature as a state of war, in which natural law is established only after a process of reasoning. This process leads men to the conclusion that they must somehow find…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil 1101 Final

    • 2064 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Is the mind separate from the body? In answering this question, carefully explain Descartes’ Dualism and at least one argument for that that position. Defend your view against objections.…

    • 2064 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first being the state of nature as defined by Thomas Hobbes is that of a pre-societal state. In general terms this means there would be no government or any form of laws, leading citizens towards a constant state of war. As a result of this, people would be motivated solely by self interest, and would not have any regards towards others needs. This relates to a lecture on Zombies and Sociology given by Dr. Peters. Dr. Peter’s pointed out the fact that society begins to fail as a whole when its institutions breakdown. Government, the economy, religion, education, media and family are all institutions of society. In a Hobbesian state of nature it is likely that very few of these intuitions would continue to stand, the first to go being government and economy. It is also worth noting that in a Hobbesian state of nature, individuals are motivated to act out of fear, which Professor Gillard mentioned in his lecture. This explains why people act only to meet their personal needs, they are so blinded by fear that they fail to rationalize the needs of others. Locke takes a different approach when it comes to defining the state of nature, which places more emphasis on…

    • 2405 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The view Locke had on the state of nature is conceptually different. Locke's view of the state of nature says that humans have limits as to what we should or should not do, but he believed that humans are generally nice to one another, and we will not bother one another. Therefore, in Locke's state of nature, humans are peaceful. Hobbes, however, believes that humans live in a state of war and fight with each other constantly.…

    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil 3033

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Kant, the good will is the only thing that is good in itself.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sartre's Existentialism

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sartre believes that in order for anything to have a function, its existence must come prior. For example, the function of a knife, which is to stab and cut, did not come before the existence of the knife. The saying “existence precedes essence” is Sartre’s answer for the objection saying that Existentialism is pessimism. Sartre says no, existence is not pessimistic but instead it is optimistic. An individual does have action and choice to how they want to live their life and that there can be meaning. Existence can be described as biological, while essence can be known as a social form that an individual picks up through interaction. Even though an individual cannot choose who they are biological…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good Will: A will by which we desire to live upright and honorable lives to attain the highest wisdom…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Epictetus Imperfection

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aristotle begins his argument by defining two types of virtues: intellectual virtue and moral virtue (pg. 69). Intellectual virtue owes its hu man beings to teaching and moral virtue to habits. Virtuous habits, therefore, leads a man to continually experience moral virtue, eventually leading to the development of the individual’s…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Immanuel Kant states that the only thing in this world that is “good without qualification” is the good will. He states the attributes of character such as intelligence, wit, and judgment are considered good but can be used for the wrong reasons. Kant also states that the attributes of good fortune such as health, power, riches, honor, that provide one happiness can also be used in the wrong way (7). In order to understand Kant’s view of moral rightness, one must understand that only a good will is unambiguously good without qualification, it is “good in itself”. To clarify, Kant states that “a good will is good not because of what it effects or accomplishes, nor because of its fitness to attain some proposed end; it is good only through its willing, i.e. it is good in itself” (7). To Kant, a good will is the only thing that gives action moral worth. Human beings were granted with reason not only to attain self-preservation and a state of happiness, but “its true function must be to produce a will which is not merely good as a mean to some further end, but it good in itself” (9). Human beings are called to exercise reason through duty to bring a universal good to all. This duty, living according to our highest reason, must be exercised through action that is beneficial and non-contradictory to all. Duty has three major qualifications for Kant. One must recognize that duty is good in itself when an action is performed out of the need of the completion of the duty itself, such as one who abstains from supporting a large restaurant corporation that inhumanely raise cattle or poultry, because he or she recognizes that it is a duty to not perpetuate unethical practice. Or one who carefully recycles their waste not because of the pleasure of being an enlightened “green” individual, but because of the recognition that it is “good in itself” to reuse products. The second…

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Utilitarianism

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Kant, he believes that the only thing unconditionally good is good will. Good will is the idea of people having to do ones moral duty. Kant’s ethical theories are based off of the categorical imperatives. Categorical imperatives, as stated during class, act only on those rules that you can rationally will to be universal. In response to Kant’s theory, I believe that good will is not the only thing that is unconditionally good. I believe this because there will be many instances in life where having a good will can lead to tragic situations.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle believes that virtues are traits that can be used to flourish your intended functions and to fulfill your particular purpose. One of the intended functions of humans that aids us the pursuit of human excellence is rational activity. Humans have the capability to reason, and this characteristic separates us from other living and nonliving things (Williams & Arrigo, 2012). Utilizing and expressing our rational potential in our choices or actions is the characteristic that allows humans pursue to excellence or…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant's Groundwork

    • 2358 Words
    • 10 Pages

    To start off, a brief explanation of the ‘will’ seems important to understand the concept of a ‘good will’ that is first presented by Kant. A will carries intention to perform an action. When the will is free, it is free to act without regards to inclinations. When the will is good, a ‘good will,’ it makes a commitment to do what is right in any case, free from inclinations, in accordance with duty (duty will be discussed later). Kant starts off Section I of the Groundwork saying, ‘There is nothing that is possible to think of anywhere in the world, indeed even outside it, that can be held to be good without restriction except a good will.’ Here, Kant introduces the ‘good will’ and starts the foundation upon where the rest of Section I will follow. This statement suggests that anything seen as good,…

    • 2358 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He describes the state of nature as a condition without government. According to Hobbes, in the state of nature there are no rights nor are there any obligations and duties. In this state every man has power over their neighbor. Thomas Hobbes, in Leviathan and his earlier work On the Citizen, he argues that all human are by nature equal in faculties of body and mind. That is, no natural inequalities are so great as to give anyone an inclusive benefit.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hobbes

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are two objections that interrelated to verify Hobbe’s assertions to be inaccurate. The first objection would be that the specific mechanism that initiates Hobbes’s assertion of the state of nature is actually not egoism, but rather, the idea of “uncertainty”. The second objection would be that the state of nature does not necessarily mean lack of government. Conflict, violence, and war are still very prevalent in today’s society although we have authority such as the government. The idea of uncertainty means that not everyone is motivated to kill for personal gain however; it may be the uncertainty of someone else’s actions that forces them to choose the side of conflict.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the statement by Sartre “Existence comes before essence”, the meaning is quiet clear and self explanatory. We exist first and then we are defined. Although, truly understanding this theory and believing in it, takes a person to look deeper and into many different areas of life, to have a clear and knowledgeable view-to enable you to create your own decision. I had to go to many lengths to fully understand and agree with Sartre’s doctrine. This theory represents Atheistic existentialism. “There is no human nature because there is no God to have a conception of it. Man is nothing else but what he makes of himself”, Sartre p.28. God must be abandoned; we are what we make of ourselves through freedom of choice. Very importantly, by having freedom of choice, we must take responsibility and own our own choices. Freedom, choices, values, morality and truth are all part of our essence and in taking an in depth look at the true meaning, the essence must be understood. This will all be discussed to gain what Sartre and I believe.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays