Preview

Phengz

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
9851 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Phengz
9
THE NATURE OF INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION
A Message-Centered Approach
Brant R. Burleson

T

he first edition of the Handbook of Communication Science included a chapter that focused on definitions and fundamental questions about interpersonal communication (Cappella, 1987). In this handbook’s second edition, I continue this tradition. In the sciences, definitions of central concepts (and the models these imply) are core theoretical equipment. Differences in opinion about definitions crop up even in mature sciences, and these disagreements may be healthy, serving as the harbinger of significant conceptual advances. However, a radical lack of consensus about fundamental conceptual matters undermines coherence in research areas, creating confusion and discord. At present, little consensus exists about the meaning of interpersonal communication. This is not a good situation—scientifically, pedagogically, or politically. To address this situation, I propose a new definition grounded in the idea that interpersonal communication fundamentally involves an exchange of messages. Although this notion hardly seems novel, some of the most influential definitions of interpersonal communication
N

145

146–– N–– PART 3: Fundamental Processes – – downplay or even exclude this necessary feature. To make the case for the new definition, I begin by describing the current state of dissensus about the fundamental nature of interpersonal communication and detail the undesirable consequences that follow from this. Next, I review and critique three popular definitions of interpersonal communication. I then present my message-centered definition and explicate its key terms. A subsequent section demonstrates how the conceptual model implied by this definition can serve as an organizing framework for theory and research on communication processes, structures, functions, and contexts. Finally, I comment on several potential objections to the proposed definition and consider



References: Applegate, J. L., & Delia, J. G. (1980). Personcentered speech, psychological development, and the contexts of language usage. In R. S. Clair & H. Giles (Eds.), The social and psychological contexts of language usage (pp. 245–282). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Bavelas, J. B. (1991). Some problems with linking goals to discourse. In K. Tracy (Ed.), The Nature of Interpersonal Communication–– N–– – –161 C. Hendrick & S. S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 244–258). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Cappella, J. N. (1987). Interpersonal communication: Definition and fundamental questions. In C. R. Berger & S. H. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (pp. 184–238). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Clark, H. H., & Bly, B. (1995). Pragmatics and discourse. In J. L. Miller & P. D. Eimas (Eds.), Speech, language, and communication (pp. 371–410). San Diego: Academic Press. Courtright, J. A. (2007). Relational communication: As viewed from the pragmatic perspective. In B. B. Whaley & W. Samter (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 311–332). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Cronen, V. E. (1998). Communication theory for the twenty-first century: Cleaning up the wreckage of the psychology project. In J. S. Trent (Ed.), Communication: Views from the helm for the 21st century (pp. 18–38). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Daly, J. A., & Wiemann, J. M. (Eds.). (1994). Strategic interpersonal communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Deetz, S. A. (1994). Future of the discipline: The challenges, the research, and the social contribution. In S. A. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook 17 (pp. 565–600). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Delia, J. G. (1987). Communication research: A history. In C. R. Berger & S. H. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (pp. 20–98). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Delia, J. G., O’Keefe, B. J., & O’Keefe, D. J. (1982). The constructivist approach to communication. In F. E. X. Dance (Ed.), Human communication theory: Comparative essays (pp. 147–191). New York: Harper & Row. Dillard, J. P. (2003). Persuasion as a social skill. In J. O. Greene & B. R. Burleson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 479–514). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Dillard, J. P. (2008). Goals-plan-action theory of message production. In L. A. Baxter & D. O. Braithwaite (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 65–76). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Dindia, K., & Timmerman, L. (2003). Accomplishing romantic relationships. In J. O. Greene & B. R. Burleson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 685–722). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Fay, B., & Moon, J. D. (1977). What would an adequate philosophy of social science look like? Philosophy of Social Science, 7, 209–227. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2007). Social cognition: From brains to culture. Boston: McGraw-Hill. Giles, H., & Ogay, T. (2007). Communication accommodation theory. In B. B. Whaley & W. Samter (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 293–310). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Greene, J. O. (2007). Formulating and producing verbal and nonverbal messages: An action assembly theory. In B. B. Whaley & W. Samter (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 165–180). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Guerrero, L. A., Andersen, P. A., & Afifi, W. A. (2007). Close encounters: Communication in relationships (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Hallsten, J. (2004). Theories of interpersonal communication. In J. R. Baldwin, S. D. Perry, & M. A. Moffitt (Eds.), Communication theories for everyday life (pp. 106–121). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Hewes, D. E. (1995). Cognitive processing of problematic messages: Reinterpreting to “unbias” texts. In D. E. Hewes (Ed.), The cognitive bases of interpersonal communication (pp. 113–138). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Kellermann, K. (1992). Communication: Inherently strategic and primarily automatic. Communication Monographs, 59, 288–300. Knapp, M. L., & Daly, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Knapp, M. L., Daly, J. A., Fudge, K. A., & Miller, G. R. (2002). Background and current trends in the study of interpersonal communication. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 3–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Mandelbaum, J. (2008). Conversation analysis theory. In L. A. Baxter & D. O. Braithwaite 162–– N–– PART 3: Fundamental Processes – – (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 175–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J. L. (1978). Identities and interactions: An examination of human associations in everyday life (Rev. ed.). New York: Free Press. McCornack, S. A. (2008). Information manipulation theory. In L. A. Baxter & D. O. Braithwaite (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 215–226). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Metts, S., & Grohskopf, E. (2003). Impression management: Goals, strategies, and skills. In J. O. Greene & B. R. Burleson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 357–399). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Miller, G. R. (Ed.). (1976a). Explorations in interpersonal communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Miller, G. R. (1976b). Foreword. In G. R. Miller (Ed.), Explorations in interpersonal communication (pp. 9–16). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Miller, G. R. (1978). The current status of theory and research in interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 4, 164–178. Miller, G. R. (1990). Interpersonal communication. In G. L. Dahnke & G. W. Clatterbuck (Eds.), Human communication: Theory and research (pp. 91–122). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Miller, G. R., & Steinberg, M. (1975). Between people: A new analysis of interpersonal communication. Chicago: Science Research Associates. Motley, M. T. (1990). On whether one can(not) not communicate: An examination via traditional communication postulates. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54, 1–20. O’Keefe, B. J. (1988). The logic of message design: Individual differences in reasoning about communication. Communication Monographs, 55, 80–103. Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper & Row. Rawlins, W. K. (1985). Stalking interpersonal communication effectiveness: Social, individual, or situational integration? In T. W. Benson (Ed.), Speech communication in the 20th century (pp. 109–129). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. Robinson, W. P. (2001). Language in communication: Frames of reference. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 3–32). Chichester, England: Wiley. Roloff, M. E., & Anastasiou, L. (2001). Interpersonal communication research: An overview. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication yearbook 24 (pp. 51–71). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Roloff, M. E., & Miller, G. R. (Eds.). (1987). Interpersonal processes: New directions in communication research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Rowan, K. E. (2003). Informing and explaining skills: Theory and research on informative communication. In J. O. Greene & B. R. Burleson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 403–438). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Saarni, C. (2000). Emotional competence: A developmental perspective. In R. Bar-On & J. D. A. Parker (Eds.), The handbook of emotional intelligence (pp. 68–91). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Seibold, D. R., & Myers, K. K. (2006). Communication as structuring. In G. J. Shepherd, J. St. John, & T. Striphas (Eds.), Communication as . . . : Perspectives on theory (pp. 143–152). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Sillars, A. L., & Vangelisti, A. L. (2006). Communication: Basic properties and their relevance to relationship research. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 331–352). New York: Cambridge University Press. Slugoski, B. R., & Hilton, D. J. (2001). Conversation. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 193–220). Chichester, England: Wiley. Smith, S. W., & Wilson, S. R. (Eds.). (2009). New directions in interpersonal communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Stewart, J. (1973). Introduction: Bridges not walls. In J. Stewart (Ed.), Bridges not walls: A book about interpersonal communication (pp. 2–26). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. The Nature of Interpersonal Communication–– N–– – –163 Swanson, D. L., & Delia, J. G. (1976). The nature of human communication. Chicago: Science Research Associates. Tracy, K. (2002). Everyday talk: Building and reflecting identities. New York: Guilford. Trenholm, S. (1986). Human communication theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Trenholm, S., & Jensen, A. (2008). Interpersonal communication (6th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. New York: John Wiley. White, C. H. (2008). Expectancy violations theory and interaction adaptation theory: From expectations to adaptation. In L. A. Baxter & D. O. Braithwaite (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 189–202). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Wyer, R. S., Jr., & Adaval, R. (2003). Message reception skills in social communication. In J. O. Greene & B. R. Burleson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 291–355). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Interpersonal Communication many times is a very difficult process due to the uniqueness of a person and the individualism we all poses. It involves verbal and non-verbal attempts to assist the other person to understand the argument or point that we are trying to communicate. Despite the strategies and paraphrasing and summarizing of information people will still have trouble in understanding our point of view or knowledge that we are trying to teach. Communication occurs on a daily basis in our lives. Many times we communicate our emotions without even thinking. All our daily activities require for us to communicate in one form or another. It is important to communicate in order to pass on information to people that we interact with.…

    • 881 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Beebe, S.A., Beebe, S.J., & Redmond, R.V. (2011). Interpersonal communication: Relating to others (6th ed.). Retrieved from The University of Phoenix eBook Collection.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Small Team and Group Paper

    • 1291 Words
    • 4 Pages

    EBOOK COLLECTION: Beebe, S. A., Beebe, S. J., & Ivy, D. K. (2009). Communication: Principles for a lifetime. Volume 2: Interpersonal communication. Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn and Bacon.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When Harry Met Sally

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages

    DeVito, Joseph A. The Interpersonal Communication Book. 12th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon, 2009. Print.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Quizlet (2013). Interpersonal Communications Final Exam Study Guide. [online] Retrieved from: http://quizlet.com/23025238/new [Accessed: 11 Oct 2013].…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    21 Communication Analysis

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: DeVito, J.A. (2009). The interpersonal communication book (12th Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reflective Journal Week 3

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    References: Stewart, J. (2012). Bridges not walls: A book about interpersonal communication (11th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Interpersonal Communication

    • 2317 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Interpersonal communication is a form of communication that involves sending and receiving of messages between two or more people. Interpersonal communication can involve all elements of communication like listening, asserting, persuading and non-verbal communication among others. A basic model of interpersonal communication concentrative on acts of communication where there are few people involved unlike other kinds of communication that involve many people in the communication (West and Turner, 2007). In interpersonal communication, there are various areas that can be investigated. For the purpose of this paper, the principles and misconceptions in effective interpersonal communications, the barriers to effective interpersonal interactions and emotional intelligence and its role in effective interpersonal relationships will be discussed.…

    • 2317 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Analysis of Forgiveness

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Forgiveness is a relational process whereby harmful conduct is acknowledged by one or both partners; the harmed partner extends undeserved mercy to the perceived transgressor; one or both partners experience a transformation from negative to positive psychological states, and the meaning of the relationship is renegotiated, with the possibility of reconciliation” (Waldron & Kelley 2008). There is no doubt that forgiveness is an extremely important topic for those of us who study personal relationships. Almost every relationship experiences dialectical tensions (conflicts between two important but opposing needs or desires) or some type of strain on a relationship (Floyd 2009). A time in which someone needs forgiveness arises from some sort of behavior harming a valued relationship, and if a person does not know how to forgive or refuses to forgive, then that has the potential to harm a friendship for forever. Through Waldron & Kelley’s book “Communicating Forgiveness”, they give an in-depth history of forgiveness, conceptualize forgiveness as communication, and offer path-breaking theory development, all through a Christian perspective.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Interpersonal Communication

    • 2315 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Meaning is not only in words (other elements such as tone of voice, face expression, etc.) (also in understanding them).…

    • 2315 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A desire to understand how to improve relationships has fueled the study of interpersonal communication. People assume that if they better understand the processes of interpersonal communication, they can explain how relationship grow, remain static or deteriorate (Knapp, in Robert, 2000). Ever since scholars demonstrated that people grow personally and relationally through communication, scholars have been sensitive to the importance of interpersonal interaction. According to Robert (2000), interpersonal communication research and theory address a wide array of topics, especially five major themes that is co-created during interaction, quality of relationships, social conflict, accuracy of people’s understanding of one another, communication planning and competence.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sole, K. (2011).Making connections: Understanding interpersonal communication. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc. Retrieved September 11th, 2011, from https://content.ashford.edu…

    • 2434 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Knapp, M. L., Vangelisti, A. L. (2005). Interpersonal Communication and HumanRelationships. (5th ed.) Boston: Pearson.…

    • 1562 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Interpersonal communication has a great deal of definitions. It is defined as an interactive face-to-face process between two people, in which one’s personal characteristics, relationship with another and social status can be reflected (Hartley, 1993). However, on the other hand, some experts express interpersonal communication as a process, which gives everyone an equal opportunity to influence one another, under the situation that everyone endeavors to sway the others (Emmert, 1984).…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Communication Essay

    • 2475 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Interpersonal communication is the most important form of communication and is the most used. People cannot avoid this type of communication, and their social relation depends on their ability to engage in a conversation with others...…

    • 2475 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics