Preview

Phelps v. Snyder

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2816 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Phelps v. Snyder
“God hates you.” “You’re going to hell.” Could you imagine having to bury your child that returned to American soil, dead, after fighting a war, listening and seeing these kinds of statements? When burying a loved one, a person should not have to deal with people picketing at a private funeral. That person is in enough pain and emotional loss for having to bury a family member. This is not more of an inappropriate or inconsiderable time than ever to be causing a negative scene and displaying a strong sense of hatred on someone who just recently lost their life fighting for this country. Albert Snyder, father of the late Matthew Snyder, has every right in his power to be suing Fred Phelps, pastor and founder of Westboro Baptist Church and the congregation, in seeking redemption for Matthew on numerous grounds. I, personally, have the right to be buried and laid in peace as does everyone else. A family should have the right to bury their loved one with no interference from others. Burying a person is part of life and to invade one’s personal right is unlawful. Westboro Baptist Church did not have the right to be present at Matthew Snyder’s funeral and in doing so I believe the decision made by the United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit should be reversed by the United States Supreme Court. A fallen hero returned to his homeland from Iraq, while on active military duty, where he was killed on the warfront. His name is Lance Corporal, Matthew Snyder, who was pronounced dead on March 3, 2006. His family held a funeral seven days later on March 10, 2006 in Westminster, Maryland. On the day of the funeral, members of Westboro Baptist Church protested at the funeral and posted an essay on its website called “The Burden of Marine Lance Cpl. Matthew A. Snyder” all because of the question of his sexuality. Whether or not he was homosexual, people can think what they want to, but Westboro Baptist Church made it apparent of their anti-American, anti-Catholic, and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Morrison v. Olsen, the issue of the Independent Counsel Provision in the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 was challenged and the court decided that it was not unconstitutional because it did not violate the separation of powers by taking power from the Executive and giving more to the Judicial or Legislative branches. Alexia Morrison had been appointed as the independent counsel to investigate Morrison to see if he had violated federal law; he sued her arguing that the Independent Counsel had taken away powers from the executive. The majority held that Morrison was an “inferior officer” due to the ability of the Attorney General to remove her for “good cause”, she can only perform certain limited duties, she is limited in jurisdiction, and…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Branzburg v. Hayes was the only ever supreme court case to deal with reporter’s privilege. The ruling of this case was that reporter’s had no right to hide their sources in a court case. The chief justice at the time,Warren Burger, made a point that reporters, “like other citizens, [must] respond to relevant questions put to them in the course of a valid grand jury investigation or criminal trial (Fargo,2010).” With a decision that was five for and four against, this case was not an open and shut many thought it to be. Calling into play a look at the first amendment and what it really means when it says the freedom of speech. Interpreting a document that is more than two hundred years old is not an easy task to accomplish, having to combine…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1960 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Tuskegee city officials redrew the cities boundaries unconstitutionally so that the white candidates in the cities political race could win and the blacks’ votes would not count. This case laid the framework for the passage of the 1965 voters rights act which outlawed discrimination in voting. The case was named after a Tuskegee university professor Charlie A. Gomillion who was the plaintiff and the defendant was the mayor of Tuskegee Phillip M. Lightfoot. Gomillion tried to make it easier for black voters to vote but when he heard that white citizens in his community was trying to redraw the voters boundary line and proposed a bill to the legislature to redraw the boundary line so that the white officials…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case District of Columbia ( DC ) vs Heller an officer for DC got declined for the permit to have a gun in his home for the year. After this he decided that this was unfair and took it to court. He pointed out that he was a police officer and he carries a firearm with him at all times for the protection of others and himself, but the court denied him the right to have a firearm for the protection of him and his family. The constitutional issue with this case is the fact that it’s how DC wanted gun owners to break down their guns, have a trigger lock on it, and keep the ammo away from the firearm even though the gun is broken down without the trigger lock.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri v McNeely

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Missouri police officer stopped Tyler McNeely after observing it exceeding the posted speed limit and repeatedly crossing the center line. The officer noticed McNeely’s bloodshot eyes, his slurred speech, and a smell of alcohol on his breath. McNeely performed poorly on a battery of field sobriety tests, and he declined to take a Breathalyzer test. When McNeely indicated he refuse a breath sample for testing, the officer took him to a nearby hospital for blood alcohol test. The officer explained to McNeely that under Missouri’s implied consent law, refusal to submit voluntarily to the blood test would lead to an immediate one-year suspension of his driver’s license and could be used against him in any future prosecution. The testing of the blood indicated that the blood alcohol level was significantly above the legal limit. McNeely had challenged the blood test evidence claiming that there should have been a search warrant before ordering a blood sample.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooper V. Austin

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philip J. Cooper v. Charles Austin 837 S. W. 2d 606 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992)…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aarons V. Peterson

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ISSUE Is the defendant negligent and liable for injuries to the plaintiff? RULES In negligence, a plaintiff must prove: duty; breach duty; causation; and actual injury. Cite A person owes a heightened duty of care where children may be present.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Both Conservatives and Liberals strongly believe in freedom of speech, but it is Liberals that are more likely to take the realm of expressing themselves publically. Liberals take pride in the idea of the “political left”, which basically outlines their devotion to America’s First Amendment the right to free speech. Although it is usually Liberals that we see voicing their opinion publically, the Westboro Church is overall a Conservative group because of what they stand for. Most people including the media portray and proclaim that the Westboro Church is a Liberal party but when you dig deeper you start to notice that isn’t really the case. The Westboro Church has many things in common with those that claim to be Conservative; “both are against marriage equality, both are for the replacement of constitutional government with religious dogma of their particular form of Christianity, both are for the reduction of the rights of minorities and women, and both are for getting rid of reproductive rights and family…

    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    William Henry Furman was was attempting a burglary in a home when he was discovered by the residents. He attempted to flee, and in doing so, he tripped and fell. His firearm discharged and killed a resident of the household. In the police report, he had said that he had turned and blindly fired while fleeing. Regardless of which of the two are true, Furman was found guilty of murder and was eligible for the death penalty under the-extant state law.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mcculloch V. Maryland

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In many ways, the opinion in this case represents a final step in the creation of…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott vs Sanford was a very important political case and was one of the first case towards equal rights for everybody. Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri and he sued the state of Missouri for his freedom. In this time Missouri was a free state and therefore he stated that he could be free from slavery. Although he was free, the state of Missouri considered him property and could not be taken away from his owner. Not to mention Minorities in this time we're not considered citizens and couldn't have freedom if they were a slave.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Morse V. Frederick

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Personally as a Supreme Court judge and after taking a fairly through look at the cases, I’d have to rule in favor of Frederick. While the banner that Mr. Frederick had up during the school event does make a reference to drugs, the message is pretty vague as even I can’t really interpret the true absolute definition of the banner. Judge Steven even states “Justice John Paul Stevens took the position that the school 's interest in protecting students from speech that can be reasonably regarded as promoting drug use does not justify Frederick 's punishment for his attempt to make an ambiguous statement simply because it refers to drugs.” ( n/a, 2012). Another important reason why I am following this ruling is because while yes Mr. Frederick had a 14 foot banner held high it didn’t exactly disrupt the school event itself and it was the principals own interpretation of the message that caused a disruption that escalated into Frederick’s unjustified punishment. This statement from the ACLU even states that Fredericks actions were done off school campus, “As the ACLU and Mertz noted, the sign caused no disruption, was displayed at the Olympic Torch Relay - a public event on public streets - and Frederick had not yet arrived at school for the day.” (N/a, 2007 ). Just by this alone I believe that the principal had no justification in asking to take the banner down because of the cryptic message let alone punish Mr. Frederick just because of her own intrepertation.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Armarcion D. Henderson v. The United States of America, 11-9307 (2011) Retrieved from sblog.s3.amaxonaws.com Academic database < http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/11-9307-Henderson-v.-U.S.-Petition.pdf>…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Laramie Project

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “How could this happen? I-I think a lot of people just don’t understand, and even I don’t really understand, how someone can do something like that. We have one of the most vocal populations of gay people in the State… And it’s pretty much: Live and let live.” The murder of Matthew Shepard, a homosexual college student, stunned the isolated town of Laramie and started a national uprising against hate crimes. Moíses Kaufman explores the murder in depth and tires to uncover the motives for which this heinous crime was committed. Laramie was described through the interviews that were conducted by the Tectonic Theater Project as a community where everybody was familiar with each other, and minded their own business. For this reason, the murder came as a shock and changed the “Gem of the Midwest”, into a town known for this terrible tragedy. Laramie seemed to be the melting pot of Wyoming, a place where diversity can live in peace. Moíses Kaufman’s point of the Laramie Project was that Matthew Shepard’s murder was an isolated incident, and could have happened anywhere because Laramie was a community with the “Live and let live” mentality, along with being tolerant with religious, sexual, and social diversity. The people Laramie and Patrick Buchannan appear to have the same view on acceptance, which is an open mind to a diverse society. In his essay “To Reunite a Nation”, he explores the obstacles that many immigrants needed to overcome to build the nation we have today, and how everybody should appreciate and have tolerance. Buchannan’s argument and Laramie’s views complement each other, which illustrates how the murder of Matthew Shepard’s murder was such a rare occurrence.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Roe vs. Wade

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many topics brought about controversy in the feminist movement, but none brought about as much controversy as the right to an abortion. There were no federal laws on abortion in 1960, but many states enforced laws stating that women could not have an abortion unless it was for the own health of the mother. Although there was always controversy about this specific topic, a federal case for abortion did not begin until 1970 and was finally decided in 1973. The right to an abortion was definitely not the most important decision ever made by the Supreme Court, but it was and still remains the most recognized and debated topic to this day.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays