Preview

Phaedo: Soul and Body

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2302 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Phaedo: Soul and Body
Jordan Parker
Philosophy 251- 503
February 14, 2014
Phaedo: Soul & Body As one may see throughout their life, people have different points of view. Plato and I share the same views on the Argument from Affinity up until a certain point. I believe that while you are alive, even before you are alive, your soul is a part of you and that that soul will be only yours, and once your life ends here on Earth, your soul goes to Heaven, Hell, or Purgatory, meaning that I do believe the soul is both imperishable and immortal. While those are my beliefs and the first one I will explore, I will still explore other beliefs throughout my paper, as well. The second view I will explore is Socrates’ view; he says that the soul is immortal and imperishable, while the body is mortal and perishable. He says that the soul will long to return to the flesh, meaning that it will find another body to inhabit when the body that it was previously residing in is gone, and that this cycle continues on for a good while, because he believes that you can’t achieve your full greatness from just one life/body. The third and final view I will explore is Cebes’ view; he says that the soul and body are separate, and that the soul is immortal and imperishable, while the body is not, but that they don’t go to a higher place. He believes that they both eventually dissipate once we perish, until they are both no longer existent. Throughout my life, I’ve been raised Catholic. I’ve gone to church almost every Sunday since I was little, I’ve been taught certain things my whole life, and therefore, firmly believe these things. It is what I know and where I am comfortable, making it difficult (more times than not) to step out of my comfort zone and explore different beliefs. However, I hope to conquer that downfall of mine throughout this paper. One of the things I’ve been taught and firmly believe, for example, is that when we die, our souls go to Heaven, Hell, or Purgatory. I believe that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Frank Jacob, in his article titled “They Eat Your Ash to Save Your Soul – Yanomami Death Culture”, compares this theory of the unsaved soul to “the catholic belief in purgatory, where Christians who have committed suicide are captured until they have served a sentence for their sins”…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A nonphysical, the soul, is in its most true and simple form, and is much less apt to “break” or be destroyed. Whereas physical, visible things consisting of many parts are susceptible to forms of break down and mutilation such as decay and corruption. Due to the visibility of the physical being or body it is subject to go through decomposition, whereas the soul is invisible, and never has to go through such a physical process. Invisible things are durable things, and this allows the soul to outlast the body and not go through the same physical processes. The philosophical soul is thought to take on a form–like configuration, allowing it to be immortal and survive the death of the…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Plato’s Phaedo, socrates tells us his theories of the soul before and after death. He shows us that the body and soul are separate and the soul stays after death and lives before being born.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    -Aquinas: Soul is body, there is no body without the soul, sould makes it exist as a body…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Plato’s Republic, Socrates formulates an argument that is cohesive with the notion that one’s soul consists of three parts. He begins this argument by alluding to the fact that we need to determine whether or not the parts of our soul are similar, or different. “The same thing will not be willing to do or undergo opposites in the same part of itself, in relation to the same thing, at the same time,” this statement is an effective premise in his argument due to its unified applicability within the confines of ones soul. If ones…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Agape: Soul Eva Herr

    • 47083 Words
    • 189 Pages

    . I’m Not Special . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .80 . Questions and Answers About the Afterlife . . . .8 8. The Origin and Existence of the Soul . . . . . . . .88 9. Population Growth and Young Souls. . . . . . . . .9 0. The Origination of a Soul . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 . Free Will and The Role of Archangels . . . . . . . .9 . Karma, Motive and Intent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 . The Difference Between Karma and Life Lessons 0 4. Suicide, There is No Escape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .04 . Reincarnation of Souls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0…

    • 47083 Words
    • 189 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s “Phaedo” is a dialogue between Socrates and his friends, Cebes and Simmias. These two men have asked Socrates to prove to them that the soul survives after death due to its immortality. Socrates gives them several arguments, which ultimately lead to his conclusion that proves the soul’s immortality and furthermore its perishability. Socrates proves that soul lives despite the body’s death by showing that if an entity has a certain characteristic, it will not accept the characteristic that is the opposite to its own. Socrates believes that the soul and the body are two entirely different things; the body is created to disappear after death and the soul is created to exist forever after death.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lucretius states that the soul is comprised of four distinct types of atoms: breath, heat, air, and an unnamed fourth, that is more mobile than the other three (3.231). Because these senses may occur at any point on the surface of or inside of the body, it may be argued that the soul must be spread evenly throughout the physical body. Atomism says that no atoms are ever created or destroyed, but rather disassemble and move on to other organisms after the host dies. It can be assumed that the soul undergoes the same process. By stating “that what existed before has perished and what exists now was created now” (3.676), Lucretius justifies that the soul as a unit is as impermanent as the body and after death, both will dissolve into individual atoms.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final Paper PHL Kloke

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato considered the soul ‘to be the immortal essence of the person’ and to house three individual parts- Reason, Emotion, and Desire (Jowett, 2007). While the soul…

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    By simply observing the title we can infer that the soul never dies. The soul separates what is living and what is not living. The things that are able to do things on their own are called “alive, besouled and/or animated”. These things are distinguished from the things that are inanimate, such as rocks. The rock cannot act on its own which shows its lack of soul. The understanding of what is alive and what is not is seen everyday of our lives so we don’t spend much time thinking on it. Even young children know the difference between a real bear or a toy bear. The early man thought that things were alive because of the lack of information about the subject. He saw that water and fire was animated so he thought these things were alive. The soul is an integral part of the whole, united with other parts to form one being. “If the soul were a separate being added onto the body of an organism making it alive, the organism would not be one thing but two things combined together.” In a substantial change something stays and something changes. When people die the corpse has a new form, and does not have the old form (which is what made it alive) but the soul remains. A physical human body can be broken down into a corpse because of its physical composition but because the soul does not have a physical structure it can not break down. “Since the subsistence soul can neither decompose in itself nor cease to exist because of the corruption or decomposition of something else, and since these are the only ways in which something might cease to be, the soul cannot stop being.” So through this we understand that the soul is always…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The argument that is most convincing for the immortality of the soul is the “opposites” argument. I have found this one to be the most convincing considering the fact that I do believe that something that has an opposite had to had been generated from that opposite and reverse. Like for example, something being tall would of had to been smaller at first and the other way around. Tall could be generated from its opposite small, whereas it could be the other way around where small could be generated from its opposite tall. These are the ideas that I agree with as explained by Socrates in the Phaedo dialogue where he is soon to be executed. [71a] (Soc)it must have been greater and then have become smaller?”…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analyzing Aristotle

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1) The soul and the body are different forms. While the body is visible and mortal, the soul is invisible and immortal. He suggests that although the body dies and decays, the soul continues to exist. I do believe there is life after death, everyone must eventually die, and it cannot be avoided. However, even though death is a fact of life, it is a topic that many people prefer not to talk about. This avoidance of discussion is usually due to the denial of one’s own death and the denial is usually due to fear. The fear is, for many people, a fear of the unknown. In my opinion i believe that when humans die, the body and the brain dies, but the mind still exists and it creates our afterlife according to our own beliefs and expectations. If a person believes there in nothing after death then there will not be a dream, it will be as if the person is asleep forever without dreaming.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of the soul varies widely in religious tradition. While these variations exist, its basic definition is unvarying. The soul can be described as the ultimate internal principle by which we think, feel, and will, and by which our bodies are animated. The soul is seen as the core principle of life or as the essence of a being 1. Views on the permanence of the soul vary throughout religious tradition as well. While some view it as a mortal entity in flux others believe the soul is an immortal and permanent unit. These interpretations vary from time period to time period and between religions. These characteristics of the soul are interpreted differently through an Eastern or Western perspective. In general, Eastern and Western Religions, with the exception of Buddhism, consider the soul to be a permanent entity, which is either reborn or sentenced to a permanent heaven or hell.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato Vs Buddhism Essay

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Lastly, I am going to look at Plato’s view of dualism Plato believes in the connection between the body and the mind which is referred to as dualism. “Plato believed that the true substances are not physical bodies, which are ephemeral, but the eternal Forms of which bodies are imperfect copies.” (Dualism Stanford). This means that it is what is inside of us that makes us who we are which is the mind. It is hard to explain Plato’s dualistic views because it is described on a metaphysical level. Plato does not specify how the soul binds with the body but believes there is a strong continuity between the…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life after death

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Death is the end of the functions of one’s body, but is death the end? Dualists, who are those that believe the body and soul are separate entities, believe that there is life after death, however materialists and monists, those who believe human beings are made up of one entity: the body, believe that death is the cessation of life. Moreover, life after death may be disembodied (separate from the body) as Plato argued, leaving the body to corrupt on earth, or life continues in some bodily form for the dead. Is the claim that there can be no disembodied existence after death a valid one?…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics