Preview

Peter Singer Logic

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1339 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Peter Singer Logic
Logic: Peter Singer
NAME
PHI 103, Information Logic
Instructor: NAME
DATE

Logic: Peter Singer
An Evaluation of Singer Peter Singer questions our conception of equality as it relates to the human species and other animal species. He fundamentally argues that, “The principle of the equality of human beings is not a description of an alleged actual equality among humans: it is a prescription of how we should treat humans.” The statement, revealing Singer’s essential argument, also comprises two approaches we might take towards establishing equality among living things. Let’s trace Singer’s claims surrounding these two approaches and finally consider his fundamental, philosophical assumption. One approach to equality stems from philosophers, who determine a base-line set of attributes or functions that constitute human beings. Typical treatises attribute humans with rational, linguistic, or emotional capacities that differentiate them from “brutes.” However, Singer culls evidence from the medical field, not research but simple observations of medical disabilities, where a human with born defects actually functions at a lower level than certain animal species.
For example, someone with severe cognitive paralysis may be less rational or “able” than a normal-functioning dolphin. Thus, Singer points out that if we wish to establish equality based upon attributes, we have a hard time excluding many species of non-humans. As a corollary, the standard of equality by a typical set of characteristics must be set lower and lower to encompass all humans when we consider those with severe disabilities. In other words, writes Singer, “the philosopher comes up against the catch that any such set of characteristics which covers all humans will not be possessed only by humans.”
In support, Singer confronts those who attach human equality to genetic distinction. He claims that genetic evidence remains inconclusive at this point, and that we cannot determine

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In his work Speciesism and Moral Status, Peter Singer compares the behaviors of humans with cognitive disabilities to the behaviors of nonhuman animals. He argues that all human beings do not have cognitive abilities that exceed that of all nonhuman animals. In fact, many nonhuman animals have cognitive abilities that surpass the cognitive abilities of human beings with severe mental retardation. Through his argument, he questions the ethical significance of the idea that all human beings have a certain kind of moral status. Singer explores the issue of moral status through religious, speciesist and cognitive grounds in order to propose that human beings must…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Diana Moon

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Equality is a great idea that the world should extend and embrace; however, absolute equality is another issue in which too much of a good thing may cause matters to go wrong. In a world of absolute equality, each human being would never be looked upon as anything more or less than the person beside him or her. Unfortunately, this advantage may only go so far. For example, how can an intelligent being be…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Defining the Moral Status

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The theory bases human properties as possessing intelligence, reasoning and planning, the ability to make moral decisions, and speaking. This would mean all humans, fetus, embryos, or adults in coma state would have a higher status than animals, regardless of the animal's functioning levels. The theory is too general and even though certain animals could possess better human properties than an adult with low level cognitive functions, all of this is not taken into account. A more specific guideline would help us come up with a better method in determining moral status.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In one of Peter Singer’s arguments defending animals rights he counter argues against Thomas Taylor a philosopher who wrote A Vindication of the Rights of Brutes which was a counterargument against Mary Wollstonecraft (Singer, 1). In Singer’s reply to Taylor he says that one might reply by saying the case for equality between men and women cannot be given to non-human animals (Singer, 2). To summarize this argument, Singer says that women are just as intelligent and capable of voting as men so they are extended this right, while dogs are not mentally capable of recognizing and understanding the significance of voting so they are not given this right (Singer, 2). He then goes onto say that men and women resemble each other closely therefore…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Advocating for animal welfare, Singer coins the term "specism" to describe discriminatory practices, which people express in their relations to the non-humans animals. Singer builds his case for promoting equality among all living species by offering an analogy between the "oppression" of animal rights and the historical accounts of the fight for justice and equal rights for women and people of color. He refers to the utilitarian principles expressed by Sidgwick, which holds that "the good of any one individual is of no more importance than the good of any other." Analyzing the complexity of perceived hierarchy in the human relations, Singer arrives at the conclusion that equality does not depend on intelligence, moral capacity, or…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Steinbock Vs Singer

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He dismisses the claim that the prospect of human wellbeing resulting from such experiments supercedes pain and suffering, which are inflicted to the animals. Instead he bluntly suggests that if we to consider ourselves more valuable only based on our intelligence, then those members of society, who by the virtue of their mental capacity stand on the lower scale of the intellegence abilities, would be less entitled to the fulfillment of their basic human rights. Singer points out that if our value was measured only in amount of our intelligence, then a person with lower IQ would have similar, or even lower, value with an animal, who hold some intellegence abilities. Therefore, he claims, it would be equally justifiable to use mentally challenged or animals in the research projects. Evidently, Singer dismisses the simple factual difference between the two examples. A random healthy adult person, an infant, who is orphan, or a mentally incapacitated, share the same certain privileges just by a sheer reason of belonging to the same group - human race, and are superior to a representative of a non-human animal world, no matter how intelligent in some sense it would…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The church believes that every human life is a person with absolute and equal value, but Peter Singer’s use of speciesism and moral status to define personhood; as an individual with a substantial amount of cognitive ability, is a greater argument when taken into account our secular society with human and non-human…

    • 53 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "All Animals Are Equal"

    • 981 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Singer brings up the issue of sexism and racism. No matter how we may try to look at it, not all humans are equal. He argues, "...a person's sex is no guide to his or her abilities, and this is why it is unjustifiable to discriminate on the basis of sex" (LaFollette, 109), and the same goes for racism - basing a person's…

    • 981 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his essay, Marvizon points out a clear statement, “Speciesism is unavoidable”. He conveys that treating different species of animals differently is also unavoidable. The ironic equation he provides, “A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy.” reminds me of Singer’s disagreement on “We object to cruelty to dogs while consuming the produce of cruelty to pigs”. Even though we all know that we should never say a dog is superior to a pig, we cannot stop naturally thinking and behaving in this way. If we want to give all kinds of animals and human the same rights, can we really treat a person, a dog and a rat equally? Moreover, Marvizon quotes an interesting question to prove his opinion asked by philosopher Gary Francione “My dog has ticks, what do I do?” According to moral obligation, killing ticks is wrong. However, if we choose not to kill the ticks, then it would be harmful to the dog. In some way, curing dogs turns into the assumption that the dog is superior to ticks, which is exactly the practice of speciesism. Therefore, there is not a perfect to balance the equal right between different animals since they are “different”. They are playing different roles in our society that cannot be easily taken places. For example, most of people require eating meats to gain protein and energy. Contradictorily, It seems that the best way to totally…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Singer believes that we privileged humans because that is what we know and what we are comfortable with. Many humans are more biased to our species then others. So many humans would not take the right to animals fairly. We do many things to animals that are not fair such as: animal testing, using their skin or furs for clothes, and just eating them overall. Singer believes that this is not fair because animals cannot speak for themselves and defend their feelings. With this being known who is it to defend them in this situation? This situation is unfortunate for them just because they cannot voice how they feel.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In “All Animals are Equal*” Peter Singer argues that by eating animals and performing experiments on them we are violating their basic principles of equality and the equality of consideration. In the article Singer goes on to say how animals should have the same rights as humans because by not doing so we are practicing speciesism, and most humans do. When we practice speciesism we are more interested in the members of our own species over those of other species. Singer supports his claims by using the example of racism and sexism and how they violate equality principles because one races or genders interest is favored over that of another’s. We all know that racism and sexism is morally wrong, but he claims that if we replace the issue with that of the animal rights issue it should be just as wrong in our eyes. He claims that the equality issue is that of a moral issue and cites Introduction to the principles of Morals and Legislation where Jeremy Bentham goes on to state that equality rights should extend farther then to just humans because of basic moral principles. They should also extend to animals because they can suffer and suffering is a characteristic that gives a being the right to equal consideration. In order to stop speciesism and the suffering of animals he wants us to stop eating meat and instead incorporate our diet with one that replaces animal flesh with “soy beans, or soy bean products derived from soy beans, and other high-protein vegetable products.”, and eliminating biases in using animals for experimentation over that of our own species.…

    • 272 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The mistreatment of animals by humans have brought worldwide attention and disgust. Neglect and starvation towards animals have been seen as immoral and considered as selfish behaviors by humans. In the views of Singer “where the interests of animals and humans conflict, the special properties of being human such as rationality, autonomy, and self-consciousness accord higher consideration to the interests of human beings”. This statement reflects on the rationality and self-interest of human beings due to their indifferences of properties. However, animals are creatures who breathe and eat just like humans; therefore…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Singer, nonhuman animals as well as humans have the principle of equal consideration of interests because both are capable of feeling pain. If nonhuman animals share equal moral status with human beings, then we are all equally entitled to our human rights without discrimination. It can be argued that everyone should do their part and help ensure that we are all equally permitted to our human rights without discrimination and animals share equal moral status with human…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roger Scruton and Peter Singer are two philosophers who have very different theories on animal rights and the relationships we have with them. I found points in both Scruton and Singer’s opinion that I agreed with, yet neither of them felt completely true to me. Singer speaks of an overall equality between beings based on their potential to feel and suffer, rather than cognitive ability. This theory prohibits any slaughter or consumption of animals. Scruton offers the notion of the many different mental capacities of beings, and the relationships we have with animals as basis for how we are all treated; he also suggests that we are all distinguished by these differences. I found my own belief concerning animal rights and equality to fall…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anacely Gallardo HUM 190 DeCoster 15 December 2014 Peter Singer, a well know philosopher, notes that “A liberation movement demands an expansion of our moral horizons and an extension or reinterpretation of the basic moral principle of equality.” We, humans, think that we are superior to others, not only to other humans, but to other species as well. As the superior race we think we are, we tend to use and manipulate animals to our convenience. We play with them and we use them as the subjects in experiments.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays