Preview

Persuasive Essay On Why People Should Be Killed

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
787 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Persuasive Essay On Why People Should Be Killed
Do you think people should be rescued from something they got themselves into? Well, I don’t think they should because other people shouldn’t have to put their own life at risk for someone who knew better. If someone tells you not to do something really dangerous then you really shouldn’t do it. If someone died trying to save you for something that you shouldn’t have done it would be your fault because you shouldn’t have done it in the first place. To begin with, if a person is going to do something risky they at least need to be prepared for it. Source 2 states,” Not everyone manages to complete the climb, and some of these people pay with their lives.” On Mt. Everest there have been over 230 deaths of people who failed to complete the climb. …show more content…
Doing something that you are constantly warned about is just a choice that you should never make. Source 3 states, “Nick Hall is a climbing ranger at Mount Rainier Natural Park fell 3,700 feet to his death Thursday afternoon, after helping rescue two climbers that have fallen into a crevasse. The climbers that found Nick reached him three hours later and confirmed that he was dead. If something bad happens to someone while they are trying to save you then you should feel guilty about it. The people that Nick tried to rescue are alive, but don’t you think that they should feel bad for what happened. People do some very risky things and whenever they do those things that they know could get them hurt, it’s their fault for doing it in the first place. Doing dangerous things that could get yourself or anyone else hurt is a bad choice to make and you shouldn’t even consider doing …show more content…
One day when I was about three, my aunt Judy and I went walking over to my papaw Randy’s house because he lived a little up the road and I wanted to visit. When we were walking up the road everything was fine until there was just a little bridge we had to walk across, only about six feet from the water. So while we were on the bridge me being the little nosey child I was, I wanted to throw some rocks off the bridge into the water. Whenever I threw the rock I guess I didn’t let go and I almost fell off the bridge. She tried to grab my arm and pull me up. Whenever I was back up and safe the ground below her fell through and she fell off the bridge. After that I ran up to my papaw because he was outside in his garage and I told him that Judy fell in the creek. He ran down to the bridge and told him wife to call the ambulance. They got her out of the creek, but she fell head first onto a really big rock and died.
I’ll always have to deal with the fact that my Aunt died of a brain aneurysm and it wouldn’t have happened if I didn’t want to throw rocks. To conclude this argument, I do not think that rescue services should have to save people that put their own life at risk. Because if someone choices to do something the cause of what happens afterward should be on them. Accidents happen and that a different story, but if people know that there is a big risk in what

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    By these actions, you will be ready and confident when the call comes to you to save a life, whether that victim is someone you love and a part of your family, or you are saving a complete stranger.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moreover, it is not difficult to minimally act in a situation, for it could end up saving a life. In an article called “The Duty to Rescue: A Reexamination and Proposal” Jay Silver explains how easily a bystander could help save a life stating, “For example, a child drowning in shallow water could not wait for help to be summoned, but might be saved by the immediate efforts of a bystander.” In this scenario a bystander could help save a drowning child's life by just providing basic personal assistance. Additionally, an article by Drive Safely named “Legislating Morality: Good Samaritan and Duty to Rescue Laws” depicts a story of a man who perished when others could have intervened and states, “Some wonder how Duty to Rescue laws would have changed the situation for a man who was recently killed as dozens of people watched him helplessly stuck on subway tracks for a full 22 seconds before…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Considerations to remember are the specific concerns of the parties involved and how those concerns progress. In the case of the families, initial concerns will be of the condition of their loved ones. Unfortunately, in this particular case, the condition of the trapped workers was unknown for more than two weeks. Regardless, the nature of the news would necessitate the presence of some sort of a counselor. Historically, with accidents of this nature, rescue was not an option. Yang (2010) reports that, “Half a century ago, trapped miners were considered lost causes. A caved-in mine would simply be sealed off and crosses would be hammered into the ground. Shortly after the Mina San Jose collapse on Thursday, Aug. 5, miners in the area were already placing wooden crosses outside its entrance, some hung with helmets and miners’ lamps” (paras. 6 & 7). Initial concerns of condition would give way to concerns of the livelihood of the family following potential death of the family member and then, in the case of surviving the accident, the safety of the family member upon return to the workplace. Potential needs of the family will include grief support, continued counseling, and, perhaps, monetary compensation for lost time, wages, etc.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Humans have performed dangerous stunts since the beginning of time. These daredevils, deemed as either utterly insane or as possessing death wishes, are usually viewed by society as mere lunatics: people who do not value their lives. On the surface they are laughed at, but underneath the public condescension and jeering they are viewed with a kind of horrified admiration. Why is this? It is because these individuals are doing what they love without holding back and with no reservations. They are fully aware that they are risking their lives and that death is staring them in the face, but they do not care because they are achieving their dreams. These daredevils set themselves apart from the crowd by acting on their desires when most of the…

    • 2609 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Where Is Rikki Alike

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Would you have risked your life to save a friend? Rikki thought to himself, “If I don’t break his back at the first jump he can still fight; and if he fights—O Rikki!” As we say “The most important things in life aren't things” - Anthony J. D’Angelo…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chris McCandless

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Have you ever heard the phrase, “better safe than sorry”? This idiom’s truthfulness is proven in Jon Krakauer’s book, Into the Wild. In the book, Christopher McCandless, a young man who follows his dreams, learns to never overestimate oneself, for arrogance can lead to bad decisions and therefore bad consequences.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the wars essay hero

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    - he dangerously put himself at risk; doing what others won’t - never give up on any difficult situations.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Under the "danger invites rescue" doctrine, a person who tries to rescue another individual from harm is liable for any injuries to the individual.…

    • 4685 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    All of the following are considered exceptions to the general rule that there is no duty to rescue except:…

    • 3242 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, people should be required by law to offer assistance to victims in need. Assisting people is part of human nature, and our laws should reflect on our human character. Human beings have a duty to assist people in need, but they must remember to put their needs above the needs of others. Albeit the arguments of many people in need, Good Samaritans were present from the beginning of mankind, continued until the Bibilical times, and still continue to this…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Untitled Document

    • 271 Words
    • 1 Page

    danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss it, but that it is too low…

    • 271 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first reason people do not have the right to Rescue Services when they put themselves at risk is because the people didn't care about the risks. Source # two titled ‘’why everest?’’ that everyone is aware of risks and it makes it more of a test. As stated by Guy Moreau ‘’It makes it…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although saving others may seem like a priority, trying to save them all along with yourself will most likely add to the fatalities. People do not suddenly possess superhuman strength or invincibility when faced with a tragedy. In fact, many feel the opposite, as if they’re being stripped of all power they hold over themselves and whoever they are responsible for. In life or death situations, the only sensible thing to do is to save yourself. Though many may oppose, that contradictory ideology is shared…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While it is true that there are many disasters where an “act of nature” occurs but, we believe most of accidents can be caused by human error. Same as “Avalanche at Tunnel Creek”. In perspective of “blinders’ decision”, they failed to see/seek/use information. It was obvious the group at Tunnel Creek were well-trained and knowledgeable skiers but they didn’t prepare equipment that was necessary and wasn’t trained on how to get down safely beforehand. The group talked about how to manage the run instead. Also, skiing in Tunnel Creek was a common occurrence that most experienced skiers had strong belief in their expert and underestimated the risk involved. Experts often do not seek for help or support of a team or group because they believe they are skilled enough to pursue the goal themselves. Even if they were informed about the unstable avalanche status, they chose to go anyway since they were over-confident from their past experience. They ignored the uncertainty and based their decisions on emotions. We think that core causes are based on risk of group decision-making/thinking: Presumption that experts can play in…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    St Helens Earthquake

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It was a normal day for my grandma, but when she turns on the news it became very far from normal. She see’s that Mt. St Helens erupts. After that, she looks outside, but doesn’t see any ash yet. She then tells my grandpa about this. He was just outside working in his shop and is not surprised about this because of what he had heard before on the radio. He then goes outside and then finally starts to see the ash in the distance. He then gets my aunt who was only 7 at the time, and shows her the ash in the sky. They get inside quickly before the ash gets to their house.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays