Preview

Persuasive Essay On Stop And Frisk

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
649 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Persuasive Essay On Stop And Frisk
Thomas Jefferson once said, “A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both, and deserve neither.” Some communities constantly face complications such as being illegally searched by the police. As citizens, the fourth Amendment gives us the right as people to be secure in our persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable search. But it seems as if the Fourth Amendment has lost its authority when it comes to Stop and Frisk programs. People think that it prevents crimes, but these searches are often unsuccessful at catching criminals. It’s a violation of rights and I believe that no police department should be able to do it. The police are supposed to serve and protect us. Instead, people no longer feel safe around police. In fact many have come to fear them. The idea of Stop and Frisk has created many problems in today’s society. There are debates over NYC about the policy of stop and frisk. Some people think it’s good for us, but there are others who don’t really appreciate it. People who are against it think that the police are invading their personal space, and even …show more content…
They believe that Stop and Frisk policy keeps communities safe and prevents crimes from taking place. But these searches done by police are not just unconstitutional, it is an invasion of privacy. This program is obviously not preventing crimes from happening. Statistics show that this program is ineffective. Based on data provided by NYPD, 179,063 were stopped and searched by police in 2013. Out of those people, 89% were completely innocent. Which means that they have found something on only 11% of the people. More than half of the time, there is no probable cause for them to stop and search these people, but they do it anyway. This just proves that theses searches do not effectively find criminals and instead violates the rights of innocent
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Supreme Court Issues: The Mapp V. Ohio Case
    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Supreme Court Issues: The Mapp V. Ohio Case

    “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,” Mapp V. Ohio (1961) dealt with that very sentence of the constitution. Were the officers at fault or Mapp? This complex question has a complex answer one that puzzled the Supreme Court and led to a change in criminal procedure. The verdict was a strict interpretation of the constitution. The fourth amendment was relevant because the fourteenth amendment grunted due process. It was a very good decision, it protected the black minority who at the time were being routinely harassed and convicted for no reasons. This decision certainly did not stop that but it made it harder…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stop Frisk Case Study
    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stop Frisk Case Study

    I want to speak and elaborate on stop frisk on both parties perception. Both parties I mean as is the police and also the people, I am going to explain the pros, cons and factual and how this could be effective plus how it could be a hassle as well.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stop And Frisk Case Study
    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Stop And Frisk Case Study

    “Stop, question, and frisk” is a controversial practice that was used by the New York City Police Department, where a police officer would stop any person acting suspicious, the police officer would question them and if they felt that it rose to the level of reasonable suspicion; they would frisk them for weapons and other contraband. In other states it is known as the Terry stop. Stop-and-frisk was a useful tactic for the NYPD because statistics show that violent crime dropped while this procedure was in place.…

    • 2011 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Fourth Amendment
    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Fourth Amendment

    Having people live in fear of the police because they might get searched for no reason is not living freely. Then of course there’s the fear that would come along with not needing a warrant. People would be afraid to walk by policemen/policewoman because they might get searched. A policemen could basically walk up to a random citizen and say “I’m going to search you.” and the person would have to get searched without their consent. It’s definitely a good thing that we have the fourth amendment, but there are some modifications that can be made to it to make it more reliable. Being able to search a person because they blatantly have drugs is on modification that should be added. If the policeman finds something, then they did their job. If they don’t they could be punished for falsely accusing the suspect. However, this is only the idea of a thirteen-year-old boy. The fourth amendment does keep people from fearing the police around them now though. Maybe I’m just weird for having negative feelings towards the fourth amendment, but I just have a different way of thinking about…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling Summary
    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Racial Profiling Summary

    One could also argue that the president of the U.S, Donald Trump, claimed that the use of stop and frisk reduced crime in NYC. However, what Johnson and Trump fail to realize is that the data they are referring to is all inaccurate because it was based on racial profiling. The use of stop and frisk proved that officers focus more on skin color rather than the behavior of an individual, proving that criminological data will mostly always be inaccurate. According to the accurate data presented by Christopher Mathias, nearly 80% of stops were blacks and Latinos and 13% of them were whites yet, “a weapon was found in only 1.8 percent of blacks and Latinos frisked, as compared to a weapon being found in 3.8 percent of whites frisked.” Over 70% of the stops were blacks and Latinos and still whites had a higher percentage of carrying a weapon, which is over 50% of the cause for…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    stop and frisk policy
    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    stop and frisk policy

    These practices prompted angry reactions among minority citizens that widened the breach between different racial/ethnic groups in their trust in the police (Lundman and Kaufman 2003; Tyler and Huo 2003;Weitzer and Tuch 2002), provoking a crisis of legitimacy with legal, moral, and political dimensions (see Wang 2001; Russell 2002; Harris 2002). In an era of declining crime rates, policy debates on policing strategies often pivot on the evaluation of New York City’s policing strategy during the 1990s, a strategy involving aggressive stops and searches of pedestrians for a wide range of crimes (Eck and Maguire 2000; Skogan and Frydl 2004). The policy was based on the lawful practice of “temporarily detaining, questioning, and, at times, searching civilians on the street” (Spitzer 1999). The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled police stopand- frisk procedures to be constitutional under certain restrictions (Terry v. Ohio 1968).…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The concept of stop and frisk
    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The concept of stop and frisk

    In an effort to maximize an individuals rights during search and seizures along with stop-and-frisks, the United States government has developed numerous laws and amendments. The Fourth Amendment states, The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched , and the persons or things to be seized (U.S. Constitution). This amendment was first used in the court system in the case of Terry vs. Ohio (1968). This case was the case that shaped the stop-and-frisk laws that are found in our country today. In 1942 legislators started to authorize stops-and-frisks on less than probable cause under the Uniform Arrest Act. This act gave an officer the right stop a person in public based upon reasonable ground to suspect that the person is committing has committed, or is about to commit a crime, and then search him for a dangerous weapon if the officer has reasonable ground to believe that he is in danger (Whitebread, 2000). In 1968 the Supreme Court addressed the issue in terry v. ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889. In Terry an experienced plainclothes officer observed three men acting suspiciously; they were walking back and forth on a street and peering into a particular store window. The officer concluded that the men were preparing to rob a nearby store and approached them. He identified himself as a police officer and asked for their names. Unsatisfied with their responses, he then subjected one of the men to a frisk, which produced a gun for which the suspect…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Stop and Frisk for Law
    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stop and Frisk for Law

    The New York City Police Department (NYPD) is charged with keeping the public safe by responding to more than 100,000 emergency service (911) calls per year. In addition to responding to 911 calls, the NYPD also conduct patrols by foot and car to ensure the public’s safety. Keeping New York City (NYC) safe is a vital mission of the NYPD. Most residents that reside in NYC appreciate the efforts of the NYPD in keeping their neighborhoods safe; however in conjunction with safety the residents of NYC should trust the police that patrol their neighborhoods. This trust is called into question regarding the highly debated stop and frisk program conducted by the NYPD. Throughout the years there has been expressions of contentment and uneasiness regarding the stop and frisk program. NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg along with the NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelly—and some residents of NYC—fully support the stop and frisk program and agree that it is an effective crime fighting tool and deterrent, while many…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stop And Frisk Research Paper
    • 2993 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Stop And Frisk Research Paper

    Police Officers work for many hours and most of those hours are stopping people on the street to see what they carry. Stop and frisk is “One of the most controversial police procedures is the stop and frisk search. This type of limited search occurs when police confront a suspicious person in an effort to prevent a crime from taking place. The police frisk (pat down) the person for weapons and question the person,” (Farlex, 2008, pg. 1). How stop and frisk became the system used by police officers was…

    • 2993 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    stop and frisk
    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    stop and frisk

    Under the U.S constitution, the 4th amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures such as “Stop and Frisk”. The “Stop and Frisk” law allows police officers to stop someone if they have reasonable evidence, but tribunes are abusing that power by stopping individuals based off seeing furtive movements and not on actual evidence which is unconstitutional. In his article “Why Stop and Frisk Matters, Even if You Don’t Live in New York” Andrew Cohen States “One example of poor training is particularly telling. Two officers testified to their understanding of the term ‘furtive movements’. One explained that ‘furtive movements’ is a very broad concept, and could include a person ‘changing direction’…”. This is a shoddy reason to stop an individual based off furtive movements because it is important for police to muster evidence that proves an individual is guilty. In her article “Growing up with Stop and Frisk” Sara Maria Glanowski states “Earlier this week, a federal judge ruled…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Are The Advantages Of The 4th Amendment
    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What Are The Advantages Of The 4th Amendment

    The 4th Amendment to the Constitution was given to us for our own protection, it is a right we have to secure us against something called “unreasonable search and seizures” by the government. It limits and gives certain procedures so that the government cannot abuse their powers. The 4th Amendment makes sure that government officials do their jobs as they should, abiding by certain procedures that are describe on how government officials such as police officer’s or sheriff’s, pretty much all law enforcement can go forth with the search and seizure process (Wrightman ,Nietzel, & Fortune, 1994, p. 59-60).…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Stop And Frisk Pros And Cons
    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stop And Frisk Pros And Cons

    Most Republicans feel it is a effective way of reducing crime, as proven during Rudy Giuliani’s governing of New York City. However, Democrats feel that it is racist and ineffective. Democrats have become overly politically correct in recent years. Currently it is hard to say anything about someone else, that is not considered offensive to Democrats. It is true that in around 85% of stop and frisk situations , the individual has been found to have done nothing wrong. But if using stop and frisk as necessary drops the crime rate as much as it did in New York City, then it is worth using this form of policing. The Republican policies are clearly much better to run a society than Democrat…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    4th Amendment Vs Fourth Amendment
    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4th Amendment Vs Fourth Amendment

    The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects the people of unreasonable searches and seizures, it gives the right to secure their persons, houses and no warrant shall be issue unless they have a probable cause. Is in our bill of rights, and it can’t be taken away form us no matter what the circumstance is. When the police decided to install a GPS tracking devise on the car of Antoine Jones without a warrant they broke Jones right.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Persuasive Essay On Miranda Rights
    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Persuasive Essay On Miranda Rights

    The rights you are read while being placed under arrest are the Miranda rights. They state that what you say will be used against you in court and that you have the right to an attorney. These rights are read to protect your freedom and to inform you of your constitutional rights. It became procedure to state the rights after the Miranda vs. Arizona case. Ernesto Miranda was sentenced to 20-30 years in prison for counts of kidnapping and rape. In court, Miranda argued that he did not know his rights and that they should have been told to him. He is the reason that criminal suspects receive more justice from police officers.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Persuasive Essay On Police Brutality
    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Persuasive Essay On Police Brutality

    This is a country where many unarmed civilians have suffered injuries or been killed at the hands of police officers. Drastic changes are needed to solve the issue of police brutality. Such excessive force by police officers is very disturbing to the community. People around the country are fighting for a country where law enforcement treats all communities with dignity, employs restraint on the power police officers, and only use the necessary force to maintain the community’s safety. Over the years there have many cases involving police brutality such as the cases of Rodney King, Timothy Thomas, and Eric Garner. Many people feel that nothing has changed with the issue of police brutality since juries still acquitted police officers, cops get their jobs back, and brutality happens again. But change has occurred and some things have become better as a result of it being publicized and causing public outrage.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics