Persuasion Identity
A deeper understanding of relationships and identity emerges from pursuing the connections between Persuasion and Age of Innocence. Compare how these texts explore relationships and identity.
Persuasion (Jane Austen 1815) and Age of Innocence (Martin Scorsese 1993) has thoroughly explored relationships and identity in differing contexts that reflect a rigid society. Connections between both texts have demonstrated, through key themes of social consciousness, marriage and passion, a deeper insight to human relationship and pursuit of identity and appearance. Austen’s effective use narrative techniques of intrusive narration and irony, in connection with an equally effective use of filmic devices by Scorsese has enlightened the audience with …show more content…
Persuasion defines one main social division in early 19th century England – landed gentry of the middle upper class. This is represented by Sir Walter who is described as “vanity as beginning and end” of his character by the narrator, in which he is completely dependent on social hierarchy to ensure superiority over lower classes. Hence his obsession over his title, “never took up any book but the baronetage”. Similarly Age of Innocence focuses on the ‘old money’ families of New York late 19th century in which money and possession were the sole determinants of status, in contrast to Persuasion where wealth was manifested as capital and status was earned. This was emphasised in introductory scenes of the film in which close-ups on jewels and items of monetary worth in an opera theatre full of wealthy upperclassmen. The opera itself is a metaphor of society, where the deliberate exaggerated make-up of the heroine …show more content…
The way passion is expressed through characters have modelled different relationships and has indefinitely changed identities. In Persuasion, passion amounts to little more than selfish impulses and stresses the consequences of invulnerability to ‘strong feeling’. Anne was suspicious of Mr Elliot even before she learns the truth of his conduct as he was never ‘open’, “there was never any burst of feeling, any warmth of indignation or delight at the good or evil of others”. Thus the passion or lack thereof, has shaped a “man without heart or conscience, a designing, wary, cold-blooded begin, who only thinks o himself” out of Mr Elliot and his relationships with Anne as a cold, calculating one. The passion in age of innocence, in comparison with Persuasion, is stronger as Scorsese depicts it through close-ups of Archer’s and Olenska’s hands alluding to sexual connotations. While as the only passion shown between Anne and Wentworth was portrayed in a letter, it demonstrates a lesser passion than Scorsese, reflecting a conservative paradigm of their context. However, an existence of passion between the couples in both texts has enhanced the understanding of identity and relationships. Both texts have displayed social constraint on both the couple’s marriages which in turn highlights their passion. Archer from Age of Innocence, like Anne, is aware of the flaws
Persuasion (Jane Austen 1815) and Age of Innocence (Martin Scorsese 1993) has thoroughly explored relationships and identity in differing contexts that reflect a rigid society. Connections between both texts have demonstrated, through key themes of social consciousness, marriage and passion, a deeper insight to human relationship and pursuit of identity and appearance. Austen’s effective use narrative techniques of intrusive narration and irony, in connection with an equally effective use of filmic devices by Scorsese has enlightened the audience with …show more content…
Persuasion defines one main social division in early 19th century England – landed gentry of the middle upper class. This is represented by Sir Walter who is described as “vanity as beginning and end” of his character by the narrator, in which he is completely dependent on social hierarchy to ensure superiority over lower classes. Hence his obsession over his title, “never took up any book but the baronetage”. Similarly Age of Innocence focuses on the ‘old money’ families of New York late 19th century in which money and possession were the sole determinants of status, in contrast to Persuasion where wealth was manifested as capital and status was earned. This was emphasised in introductory scenes of the film in which close-ups on jewels and items of monetary worth in an opera theatre full of wealthy upperclassmen. The opera itself is a metaphor of society, where the deliberate exaggerated make-up of the heroine …show more content…
The way passion is expressed through characters have modelled different relationships and has indefinitely changed identities. In Persuasion, passion amounts to little more than selfish impulses and stresses the consequences of invulnerability to ‘strong feeling’. Anne was suspicious of Mr Elliot even before she learns the truth of his conduct as he was never ‘open’, “there was never any burst of feeling, any warmth of indignation or delight at the good or evil of others”. Thus the passion or lack thereof, has shaped a “man without heart or conscience, a designing, wary, cold-blooded begin, who only thinks o himself” out of Mr Elliot and his relationships with Anne as a cold, calculating one. The passion in age of innocence, in comparison with Persuasion, is stronger as Scorsese depicts it through close-ups of Archer’s and Olenska’s hands alluding to sexual connotations. While as the only passion shown between Anne and Wentworth was portrayed in a letter, it demonstrates a lesser passion than Scorsese, reflecting a conservative paradigm of their context. However, an existence of passion between the couples in both texts has enhanced the understanding of identity and relationships. Both texts have displayed social constraint on both the couple’s marriages which in turn highlights their passion. Archer from Age of Innocence, like Anne, is aware of the flaws