Preview

Personal Troubles Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
467 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Personal Troubles Analysis
In this essay, I will be addressing what Mills means by the terms ‘personal troubles’ and ‘public issues’, I will also be attempting explain how Mills’ work is what underpins McKenzie’s introductory chapter.
Mills defined ‘personal troubles’ as something that “occurs within the character of the individual and within the range of his immediate relations… A trouble is a private matter whereby an individual's cherished values are felt to be threatened.” A ‘public issue’ on the other-hand is defined as “values cherished by some publics that are felt to be threatened.”(p.11)

Mills makes a recurring point throughout the chapter ‘THE PROMISE’ that our personal troubles are derived from social issues. He uses many examples throughout this chapter to illustrate this point. One example being unemployment, as a means to convey his point he says; if 15 million men are unemployed out of a nation of 50 million, we ought to “consider the economic and political institutions of society” as we would not find the answers nor solutions by looking merely at the individuals alone(p.9). In keeping with this problem of unemployment, a person in severe
…show more content…
She says she was taught that they were “the backbone of the country” (p.2) when in reality, they were seen as “the enemy within” (p.2). McKenzie tells us based on her own personal experience how unaware she was that ‘public issues’ and her own ‘personal troubles’ were explicitly linked. Her personal troubles were initially influenced by surrounding public issues and ideologies.
So, it can be seen that McKenzie incorporates some qualities Mills addresses, successfully, through illustrating how public issues and personal troubles are related. Both Mills and McKenzie’s writings reflect heavily on how our social surroundings shape and influence us each

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    It may seem like there are a lot freedoms to be had within choice making processes, but in reality there is very little. The heavy influence of society, family, and friends has made sure that any true, self-made decisions are impossible to be had. The ideals of the environment subconsciously impact the human being as they rely heavily on social acceptance. The need for acceptance makes them susceptible to pick paths that would appease those around them rather than satisfying their own desires. It is uncommon for someone to stray down a path that someone else would dislike. It only gets worse when the fight for limited power arises because then there is a whole new spectrum of things to take into consideration when trying to advance your position within social ranks. Especially when you look at society from Mills’ perspective. The triangle of power influences the populous because there’s no means of escape from its…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Study Guide Chapters 1-4

    • 2553 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Sociological imagination is the use of our minds to understand that many personal troubles are the cause…

    • 2553 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout this paper I discussed Mills view on Nature verses Nurture which is he is belief that we are who we are because of our education and upbringing rather than our nature. I also explained how Mill became a supporter of women’s rights. Next, I explained Mills view of Representative Democracy and how to minimize corruption. After that, I discussed how enlightenment plays a role in Mills views on the tyranny of the majority. The fifth topic that was discussed was about the voucher system and how Mill believes it will lead to higher quality education; followed by Mill’s belief that the middle class should be the backbone of politics. Lastly, I have discussed Mill’s views on inheritance. In conclusion, the views of Mill that have been discussed thus far in class include Mills views on nature verses nurture, women in the Victorian Era, representative democracy, tyranny of the majority, voucher system, middle class and inheritance as well as my opinions on some of these…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduction: the introduction introduces the main character douglas bent jr and describes him as an old man without any living relatives living in one of the last farms in nova scotia. And describes the setting around him such as his old house where he is making tea during his birthday with no one to celebrate. He describes the land around him as barren and striped of all its resources and packed with people living close together in tiny apartments Initiating conflict: the conflict becomes initiated when douglas bent starts discussing his life during the past and how he wishes it was still the same in the present this initiates the conflict where douglas explains why he lives in isolation and starts wondering about how old he…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill vs Dworkin

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "I forego any advantage which could be derived to my argument from the idea of abstract right as a thing independent of utility. I regard utility as the ultimate appeal on all ethical questions; but it must be utility in the largest sense, grounded on the permanent interests of man as a progressive being". Mill does not argue that liberty is a right but rather that giving people liberty has beneficial consequences. Mill thinks that paternalism does not serve the utilitarian purpose (to provide the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people) because the extent that “the most ordinary man or woman” knows about him or herself “immeasurably surpassing” anyone else. Any effort from the state to interfere, even from good intention, tends to lead to “evil” rather than good, since no one knows or cares more about his own interest than himself. As a result, “Mankind are greater gainers by suffering each other to live as seems good to themselves, than by compelling each to live as seems good to the rest”. The state should not interfere at all, except for when the act can harm others (Mill’s Harm Principle).…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stuart Mill Conformity

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the essay Of Individuality, published by Mill in 1869, the theorist asserted that the modern age has the capacity to diminish the individual by shaming them into conformity. Contrarily, regarding human nature, Mill believed in the most good for the largest number of people, ensuring that both actions and opinions are limited. Yet, he insisted on an emphasis of individual liberty as long as it remained balanced with social stability. Therefore, Mill concluded, individuals are necessary to promote progress in society.5…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill’s “Doctrine of Liberty is supported by a view of human happiness which in turn depends on his conception of human nature” (Gray, 190). As an utilitarian, he comprehends happiness as a value maximized by “utility in the largest sense, grounded on the permanent interests of man as a progressive being” (Mill, 31). Human nature therefore is to aim for improvement and advance in order become better in terms of maximizing utility, which then will result in happiness and a fulfilled living.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Stuart Mill’s explanation of “private domain” is a fairly simple concept. In Mill’s words, the basis of “private domain” is: “Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign.” Mill means that individuals should be able to express themselves in any manner without government interference. Society should not influence how a person carries himself, because the individual is the only person living that particular life.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bus Ethics

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Stuart Mill was a Utilitarian who believed that justice was a subset of morality and he claims that “Justice implies something which is not only right to do, and wrong not to do, but which some individual person can claim from us as his moral right”(Gray, 2011). He said that justice is not a moral standard and to determine justice we must look at the overall happiness of that individual. Mills argued that both positive rights and negative rights existed which helped individuals have a greater equality and self well being. Positive rights being education, food, housing and medical support. Negative rights were freedom of speech and to be allowed to follow any religion we desired.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This argumentative essay will discuss whether or not a Millian society, based upon Mill’s writing, would have a governing body that would be able to provide an equal basis for positive and negative freedom for its community members. I will argue that a society built solely upon Mill’s arguments would have a government that would ensure people have negative freedom; however this regime would not provide any significant amount of positive freedoms. I will argue this society and government has mostly negative freedoms with this specific Millian society’s views around: individuality linked to anti-paternalism and self-regarding actions. Although there are other aspects to a Millian society, both individuality and self-regarding actions are highly important in any functioning society. This Millian society’s government would provide its citizens with negative freedoms however in such a society…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I will then explore a potential objection to Mill’s argumentative strategy regarding Mill’s definition of “happiness” and its components, as well as potential responses from Mill or his supporters. Subsequently, I will examine what effect, if any, this contention has on Mill’s argument as a whole for utilitarianism as a moral guideline. Through this discussion of Mill’s hedonistic argument, I will show that although Mill’s broad definition of the components of happiness establishes that happiness or pleasure is the only thing we intrinsically desire, it also weakens utilitarianism’s function as a moral…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill On Liberty Analysis

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This shows a clear division from social authority, giving even the most obscure minority the ability to practice their own liberties despite the majoritarian opinion on a subject. However, it is important to note that in certain instances Mill does allow for an appropriate authority to limit this liberty. Interference is justifiable when an individual is making himself “a nuisance to other people” (pg 119). This section of the text does slightly flaw Mill’s former argument by widening the definition of harm to that which can be controlled by the majority of society and their definition of nuisance behaviour. Therefore, whilst Mill’s theory of freedom of expression is a staple of liberalism, there are ways in which it allows for the interference of authority that undermines it’s core argument for individual…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mill’s central theme in the essay is what he calls the ‘very simple principle’ of liberty. According to the…

    • 2322 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mark P., Moral Philosophy of John Stuart Mill,Longwood Academic 1991. Wakefield, New Hampshire. ISBN 0-89341-681-9.…

    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mill basically argument in his piece ‘On Liberty’ allows for Utilitarian approach. His main idea was to give society and human nature a complete independence to mature and expand in infinite ways and direction. The main idea revolved around the kind of power that can be placed upon the individual by the society, and how that power was wrong unless exercised in self-defense. In particular, minorities were often the ones being oppressed. Mill pointed out that this tyrannical behavior was being supported by the major thinkers of that day. Public opinion followed the opinion of these thinkers and hence ended up doing the same. ‘On Liberty’ sought to diminish the power the society had over an individual’s freedom by giving that individual the freedom of speech. It was identified through the works that most people had precedent and preference which further provoked dissent and thus pressurized people. Mill also noted that there was no way of judging people on their interference into another person’s private affairs.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays