Preview

This is on the period of jacksonian democracy and how they saw themselves as the guardians of the United States Constitution, political democracy, and individual liberty.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
703 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
This is on the period of jacksonian democracy and how they saw themselves as the guardians of the United States Constitution, political democracy, and individual liberty.
Jacksonian Democracy

The Jacksonian democrats saw themselves as the guardians of the United States Constitution, political democracy, individual liberty, and equality of economic opportunity. However, were they really all they claimed to be? They did attempt to increase the power of lower classes while decreasing the influence of the rich and powerful. Economically, they benefited from governing during a time of huge advances in transportation, which boosted commerce and helped the common man. The Jacksonian democrats portrayed themselves as saviors of the common people, but this is a controversial subject. They were unusually wealthy, supported equality between white men only, enacted devastating economic policies, and disregarded the capability of the federal government. The Jacksonians saw themselves as guardians but as for the people, only a select few may have seen that.

During the Jacksonian reign, numerous advancements sped up the growth of the United States. A market revolution occurred as cash-crop agriculture and capitalist manufacturing replaced artisan economy. Despite the prosperity, a split was emerging between the industrializing, urban north, agrarian, rural South, and the expanding West. The Jacksonians passed the Tariff of 1828, which opened opportunity for western agriculture and New England manufacturing, but was damaging to the South. Andrew Jackson believed that the US bank placed too much control into the hands of a wealthy few (Document B). Therefore, Jackson vetoed the bank's re-charter in 1832. In attempt to benefit the lower, working classes, he placed the federal money in "pet" state banks. This attempt weakened the national currency. Like most Jacksonian economic policies, it failed. Jacksonians tried to assist only the whites through economic policies but failed in that also.

Foreign visitors viewed that in America, every man is free and independent (Document D), but there was great division in American attitude. Disturbances and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Dbq

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Jacksonians had a strict interpretation of the constitution and wanted to follow it as much as they could. This is shown in Jackson’s veto of the national bank. Jackson thought that bank was unconstitutional and only made the rich richer. As he says in his veto message “I can perceive none of these modifications…to make it compatible with justice, with sound policy, or with the Constitution of our country”. Rich foreigners held most of the stock in the bank which hurt the country as he says “more than a fourth part of the stock is held by foreigners” making the bank unconstitutional. The Jacksonians were concerned with the common man and the constitution. The national bank only took from the common man and gave more to the rich.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Democrats

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the Jacksonian Democrats' attempts to reduce the influence of the rich was by vetoing the charter to the Bank of…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Essay

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the 1820’s and 1830’s President Andrew Jackson and his followers, Jacksonian Democratics viewed themselves as the guardians of the United States Constitution, political democracy, individual liberty, and equality of economic opportunity. In some ways they succeeded in their goals and were effective guardians of political democracy and equality of economic opportunity. However, in doing so they neglected guardianship of the constitution, and protecting individual liberties. By doing this, the Jacksonian Democrats stressed the importance of the common man, even though by doing this they violate their own principles.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ: Jacksonian Democracy

    • 764 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1820's and 1830's, the Jacksonian Democrats believed they were protecting many aspects of freedom for the American people and I agree with their beliefs to a limited extent. The Jacksonian Democrats were successful in maintaining the political democracy during this time. However, they were completely defeated in their attempt at establishing and preserving individual liberty. While, they were successful in some aspects of guarding the equality of economic opportunity.…

    • 764 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Democracy Dbq

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages

    At the end of the Jeffersonian Era, some members of the disassembled Democratic-Republican Party turned their support to Andrew Jackson and his beliefs. During the 1820’s and 1830’s, the ideology of Jackson and his followers became known as Jacksonian democracy. As America advanced it’s power, Jacksonian Democrats were greatly concerned for the “common man” and making the country better for him. The Jacksonian Democrats were faced with many issues as they faced these concerns regarding political democracy, equality of economic opportunity, and individual liberty. Even the validity and relevance of the Constitution was debated greatly. Jacksonian Democrats successfully guarded political democracy and equality of economic opportunity, moderately…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Democracy Dbq

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Jacksonian democracy of the 1820s-1830s is often associated with an expansion of the political influence, economic opportunities, and social equality available to “the common man,” a concept of the masses which President Andrew Jackson and his newly founded Democratic party came to represent. The new administration certainly saw gains for the majority; namely, public participation in government increased to unprecedented levels, and several economic decisions were made to favor the people over monopolies. Beginning with their exaggerated portrayal of the “corrupt” 1824 election however, the Jacksonian democrats also left a legacy of substantial miscalculations in policies and acts of hypocrisy that conflicted with their claimed intents to promote and protect popular democracy. In particular, the dangerous implications of various political and economic policies, along with the deliberate disregard of social inequality, are aspects of the Jacksonian age that most clearly demonstrate discrepancies between Jacksonian ideals and realities.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though Sellers focused largely on the debate over Jacksonian Democracy, there was no mention in regards to equality and slavery. Luckily, Kenneth Vickery’s “Herrenvolk Democracy and Egalitarianism in South Africa and the U.S. South” provided more insight. According to his thesis, Vickery said that during the Jacksonian era, “where there was progress towards democracy or equality for whites, there was frequently a diminution or limitation of the rights and opportunities of non-whites”. His argument was that when it came to failure and survival, whites relied on racial prejudices to further their own upward mobility. As mentioned in Seller’s work, in the early 1800s, politics was controlled by the egalitarians and local legislatures were…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush- 1990 Dbq

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jackson’s followers wanted to protect the constitution and the ideas it represented. They agreed with Jackson that the bank was a monopoly created to take their money, so naturally they opposed it. They thought it limited them and gave the elites power, and was too full of foreign investment. (Doc B) &(Doc C) The believed in a strict interpretation of the constitution, which would only allow for what was necessary, which the bank didn’t seem to be from their opinions. Jackson used his veto power to destroy the bank. The veto of the bank would later on be detrimental and cause the depression of 1830, once Jackson is out of office. Jackson tried to suppress non slave states from publishing abolishment articles, which he thought was constitutional. (Doc F) Also when the debate over the Constitutionality of the movement of the Native Americans ensued, Jackson refused to listen to the federal court ruling in Worcester vs. Georgia. In a way this was going against the constitution, because in the Constitution it is clear that is the President’s duty to carry out the federal court’s decisions and instead he disobeyed it and forced the Indians to move west. (Doc G) This is one way Jackson’s followers bent their interpretation of the…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike previous presidents, Andrew Jackson represented the common men. He and his followers did not support the aristocrats, but instead favored the interests of farmers and urban workers. When they gained power, the Jacksonian Democrats brought about great advances in creating a more democratic and economically equal society.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is agreeable that the Jacksonian Democrats perceived themselves as strict guardians of the United States Constitution. It is not agreeable with how they went about preserving the political democracy, individual liberty, and equality of economic opportunity they stood for. While trying to create this balance, Jackson used tactics favorable only to his opinion. Jackson's main idea was to rid of aristocracy, giving the power to the poorer classes, standing against rich white men. The flaw in their scheme was that the people who came up with this idea were all rich white men.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to his enemies, Andrew Jackson behaved more like a dictator/king than a democratic president. Jackson and his followers became the basis of the Democratic-Republican party, later known as the Democratic party. He believed in the spoils system, supported the common man, and equality for all people regardless of their social class. Although he had such positive features, he had some negatives as well. Jackson removed Native Americans from their homeland by signing the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which created the “Trail of Tears,” vetoed the National Bank (B.U.S), and was pro-slavery. Although a common man himself, Jackson became successful as president. This was one of his biggest motives to support the common man, rather than the wealthy, whom he believed shouldn’t have all of the power. One of the reasons Jackson removed Native Americans was because he didn’t consider them as American citizens. How democratic was Andrew Jackson? Before we answer this, let’s find out what democracy truly means. By definition, democracy is a form of government made up of the equality and voice of the people. To Jackson, democracy meant the all branches & agencies of government must listen to and follow the wishes of the people. So was Andrew Jackson democratic, undemocratic, or both? Perhaps he was democratic in some ways and undemocratic in others.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between the 1820’s and 1830’s the Jacksonian Democrats played a huge role in shaping the United States, as we know it. During this time Jacksonians viewed themselves, not only as guardians of the Constitution, but also of political democracy, individual liberty, and equality of economic opportunity. From my knowledge of the Jacksonian Democrats, they did just the opposite. Jacksoinan’s viewed themselves very highly in regards to the United States Constitution, but looking back their influence and what they stood for was exactly opposite from what they claimed.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Democrats were not guardians of democrat that they claimed to be but instead were merely guardians of their own sectional interest and Andrew Jackson inflated ego. Jacksonians ere skilled at emotional issues and had the support of the South and the West. Their primary goals were not constitutional justice and individual libery, but instead they strived to suppress New England, the Whig Party, and business interests and to preserve states rights.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Democracy

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Similar to Jacksonians’ political achievements, economic opportunity also flourished. The Jacksonians vetoed the Second Bank of the United States because not only was it held by foreigners and a few rich American citizens, but it also expressed privileged banking, thereby becoming a tool of rich oppression (Document B). This was a huge decision by Jackson and proved to be one of the greatest choices he ever made for America. In addition to the bank, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney supported the construction of the Charles River Bridge, thus portraying the Jacksonians’ belief in eliminating the control of the elite and creating equal economic opportunities for all citizens (Doc H). This case also showed that economic competition was vital because of…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonoian DBQ

    • 866 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jacksonian Democrats thought very highly of themselves because they recognized their responsibility as political leaders in America, to be guardians of the Constitution. The Jacksonian Democrats advocated all the same issues that President Jackson did. A main characteristic of the Jacksonian Democrats was that they fought for the common man and strived to make everyone interested in government affairs. Three things the Jacksonians prided themselves on were political democracy, individual liberty, and equality of economic opportunity, not all three of them, however, were true.…

    • 866 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays