Pediatric and Adolescent Control of Diabetes Type I Matrix Ebt1
Pediatric and Adolescent Control of Diabetes type I
EBT Task 724.8.1-01-06, 8.2-01-06
Author(s) |Source|Publish Date|Type of Research|Size or # of participants |Results of Study|Pertinent data from results|Indications of Study|Thoughts|
Winsett, R.P; Stender, S.R; Gower, G.; Burghen, G. |Pediatric Nursing|Nov.-Dec. 2010 Volume 6 P.293-296|Case Series|81 Adolescents50 female31 male65.5% Caucasian32.5% African American2% Other|Probability of camp having positive influence on adolescents in treating Type I diabetes|No differences detected for gender or mode of insulin delivery for RZ. Significant positive correlations were found for age indicating a developmental process. No differences were detected for gender or mode HgbA1C|Study was done on such a limited basis it was of little value to overall affected population|Adolescent self efficacy and resilience in participants attending a diabetes camp|
Morrison, S.; Dashiff, C.; Hussein, A.; Moreland, E.|Pediatric Nursing|Mar.-Apr. 2012 Volume 38 No.2P.88-95|Pilot Study based on attachment theory|Residents of Alabama, families who had resided together at least 12 months and had adolescents who were diagnosed with TID for longer than 1 year, 16-18 years old without other chronic illness. 124 families were enrolled. 80% of those recruited.|The separation anxiety scale (PSAS) and the Anxiety about Adolescent Distancing Scale (AAD) were used. The scale was modified to detect variation in parental separation anxiety among gender specific parent-adolescent dyads|The longer an adolescent has the disease, the harder it is for them to control glycemic control as they transition to later age|The research failed to find a relationship between a parental separation anxiety and adolescent self management and suggests that it has no direct relevance in thos 16-18 yo. It also suggests that adolescents may not fully have the capabilities to manage disease|It appears that adolescents fare better in long term glycemic control if they
EBT Task 724.8.1-01-06, 8.2-01-06
Author(s) |Source|Publish Date|Type of Research|Size or # of participants |Results of Study|Pertinent data from results|Indications of Study|Thoughts|
Winsett, R.P; Stender, S.R; Gower, G.; Burghen, G. |Pediatric Nursing|Nov.-Dec. 2010 Volume 6 P.293-296|Case Series|81 Adolescents50 female31 male65.5% Caucasian32.5% African American2% Other|Probability of camp having positive influence on adolescents in treating Type I diabetes|No differences detected for gender or mode of insulin delivery for RZ. Significant positive correlations were found for age indicating a developmental process. No differences were detected for gender or mode HgbA1C|Study was done on such a limited basis it was of little value to overall affected population|Adolescent self efficacy and resilience in participants attending a diabetes camp|
Morrison, S.; Dashiff, C.; Hussein, A.; Moreland, E.|Pediatric Nursing|Mar.-Apr. 2012 Volume 38 No.2P.88-95|Pilot Study based on attachment theory|Residents of Alabama, families who had resided together at least 12 months and had adolescents who were diagnosed with TID for longer than 1 year, 16-18 years old without other chronic illness. 124 families were enrolled. 80% of those recruited.|The separation anxiety scale (PSAS) and the Anxiety about Adolescent Distancing Scale (AAD) were used. The scale was modified to detect variation in parental separation anxiety among gender specific parent-adolescent dyads|The longer an adolescent has the disease, the harder it is for them to control glycemic control as they transition to later age|The research failed to find a relationship between a parental separation anxiety and adolescent self management and suggests that it has no direct relevance in thos 16-18 yo. It also suggests that adolescents may not fully have the capabilities to manage disease|It appears that adolescents fare better in long term glycemic control if they