Preview

Pechorin And Maxim's Relationship

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
652 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pechorin And Maxim's Relationship
Daniel Hai A Hero of Our Time Relationships 12/4/11
Pechorin and Maxim 1. Pechorin and Maxim’s relationship is dynamic in that it is significant in the novel. Although, they are very different, it is ironic to see how they interact with each other in the novel. Although Maxim is higher in rank and authority, he does not have any confidence like Pechorin. We see this in the Bela chapter, as Maxim tries to give advice about his decision that having trading the horse for Bela was a bad idea. But he “was stumped again” (21) every time he tried arguing with Pechorin. This shows authority of Pechorin. 2. This reveals that Pechorin is far more confident and authoritive in having control over Maxim. Both characters do not understand each
…show more content…
This reveals Maxim’s character as open for manipulation and agreeing with Pechorin. Maxim is never aggressive and always respectful to what Pechorin has to say. He admits to be wrong and is not confidence. We see this as he says “ I agreed again. What else could I do?” (22). This clearly portrays Maxim’s character.
Pechorin and Dr. Werner 1. Pechorin and Dr. Werner’s characters are opposites of each other. The characters are different in every way. Pechorin is killing people, while Dr. Werner is aiding those that need. Pechorin is materialistic and heartless while Dr. Werner’s profession is to help others. Pechorin takes advantage of other people while Dr. Werner gets taken advantage of. The characters are compliments of each other. When they are about to duel, the doctor says “You are an astonishing fellow”(137) insulting Pechorin indirectly. 2. This reveals Pechorin as the opposite of what a good hearted human being should be. Dr.Werner’s charcters reveals everything that Pechorin can never be. Pechorin’s rude behavior that hurts people and takes advantage of people is really brought out through the interactions with Dr. Werner. When the duel is taking place, Dr. Werner informs Pechorin that “you’re a fool. You don’t understand at all” (136) revealing the character of Pechorin as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Almond uses the fact that Alan Ruck has a struggle with his parents and his anxieties. He is torn between…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    ‘A Hero of Our Time’ and ‘All Quiet on the Western Front’ present the decay of the human spirit, as both novelists propose the corrosive effects of war, with Erich Maria Remarque focusing more on the after-effects and Mikhail Lermontov on the process in action. The characters Paul Baumer and Pechorin can, in some ways, be considered products of their time.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Cyrano de Bergerac by Edmond Rostand, many themes are implicated and appear throughout several locations in the story. One of these themes is how characters change over time. In the story, Roxane, Christian, and Comte de Guiche all change dramatically in terms of personality and play a major role in progressing the story. All three of these characters experience life-changing events in which the results of the change of personalities can be easily analyzed.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With a name like ‘Chillingsworth’ one would expect the physician to have an array of unseemly attributes. Hawthorne, being the rather blunt (albeit in a literary pleasing way) casts a series of direct ties between the doctor and Satan himself. Hawthorne’s choice of the Word “distinguished” draws a direct comparison between Chillingworth and the man downstairs. By using distinguished -- as opposed to a synonym like divulged -- Hawthorne makes the allusion that our sinister physician is so alike to Satan that the only distinguishing characteristic that the doctor possesses is a sense of wonder at discovering unholy sin. This makes Chillingsworth a sort of emissary for satan in the way of distinct similarities.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gene’s character as an unusual narrator creates a problem that goes throughout the novel. Because it is Gene’s perspective through which we see the story, Gene is the character that the reader sees the most.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maestro Analysis

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The introductory paragraph of the novel is of great significance and whilst the reader doesn’t realise this at the time, already Goldsworthy is in our heads making us wonder about this character, the Maestro, Eduard Keller. Goldsworthy uses may facets of Keller as a point of intrigue in this novel, straight away Keller is abnormal, he doesn’t belong in Darwin, which is described as a “city of booze, blow, and blasphemy.” (p.9) by Dr Crabbe. Early in the novel, Keller and Paul simply do not get along, and through Paul’s narrating, we (the reader) think of the Maestro in a negative manner as well. Paul’s arrogance blinds him to Keller’s painful history. Paul’s self-absorption is emphasised by categorising Keller as a ‘Nazi’, despite knowing ‘almost nothing about him’. This is the older Paul’s greatest regret, as it inhibited young Paul’s relationship with Keller. On hearing Keller’s accent, Paul immediately characterises Keller as a Nazi– a judgement made easy by Keller’s authoritarian teaching regime. Goldsworthy uses the development of Keller to great effect as his development really shapes the novel and entices the reader. Keller is an isolated figure, we only hear of his interaction with the Crabbe’s, eventually Paul himself starts to wonder what lies beyond the white suit, the missing finger, the collection of newspaper articles, the solitude and this is when the story really starts to turn. Goldsworthy drops hints throughout that novel which can be fully appreciated when re-reading it. Paul asks questions about Vienna due to his…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The characters Douglas Walker and Papa have similar attitudes towards people and life in general. They are both large men and they live in a time where they think they can treat woman however they would like. Douglas Walker has a little boy named josh that he isn’t very kind too physical beats them. Papa also has daughters that he isn’t very kind to either but he does it differently instead of physically he treats those bad and it’s more of an emotional abuse.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    God of Carnage

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When taking the time to examine the characters of Annette Reille, from the play, and Nancy Cowan, from Carnage, it is easy to find their likenesses, but there are also some noticeable differences. One of the main reasons for all of these differences is merely different interpretations of the character by different readers. For example, the tone in which certain lines are said or in the way a certain action is portrayed can change the whole personality of a character. When reading, the reader portrays each of the characters as he/ she believes them to be, but then another reader could have a difference of opinion and change the whole attitude; this was the case if you consider the readers to be myself and Kate Winslet. Although Annette often appears to be conciliatory, her counterpart Nancy seems more invested in ending in the conflict.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    5. Elinor has a lot of sense and in this paragraph the readers start to see a different side to her. She is…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Montana 1948

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The point of view has complicated the way in which we interpret different characters. An example of this is the way David influences my views on Wesley and Frank. He used distinct phrases to position my view on Wesley such as when he says, “My father didn’t fit my idea of what he should be in his occupation”. Disappointment can be felt when reading the phrase, “didn’t fit my idea” and this positions me to feel pity for Wesley. This pity which I felt forced me to like his character more than Franks. We are also persuaded to like Marie more than Frank. Watson does this by introducing Marie before Frank and making David view on her very memorable. “And I love her,” was the most unforgettable quote David says about Marie. Watson has used David’s love for Marie to propagandise the reader to believe everything she says. After I was positioned to love Marie, Frank is introduced into the story in a very distressing situation. “If you’re not feeling better we’ll give Dr. Hayden a call” “NO! I don’t need a doctor”. The way in which Frank has been bought into the story has forced me to dislike the character. I had already deliberately been given a positive view on Marie and this has made me conclude that Frank is not a normal doctor rather than Marie being psychotic. The reason why I think the previous is likely because we are only given David’s…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Powder by Tobias Wolff

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The methods of character development, as applied to the story, further examines the contrasting personalities of father and son:…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This “role reversal” technique also helps further develop not just one character, but both characters. Victor in the novel appears as an intelligent, courageous, and driven man. However, by the end of the novel he is revealed as a sick, obsessed, and…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Roylott's personality is detrimental to the success of his objective, to murder his stepdaughters. Only reading the first few chapters of the story, the author wrote him as a person with an intimidating, violent, and an enclosed persona.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good Vs Evil

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In both stories the authors focus on the main characters to interpret the theme of good vs. evil. Both of the main characters are seen in a positive light and come from strong family backgrounds. Although these two characters may share similarities, they also have their differences. The major difference is how they carry themselves once evil is presented. Although the two stories share similarities in what it means to be good, the differences between how evil is presented is…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The main characters are alike and different in many ways. In the story “The Southpaw”, Janet is the protagonist and Richard is the antagonist. Richard is the antagonist because he is working against Janet. Janet wants to be the pitcher on the baseball team. In the short story “Concha” , Concha is the protagonist…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays