Preview

Peace Shall Destroy Many

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3613 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Peace Shall Destroy Many
Thom Wiens and Pete Block Rudy Wiebe's novel, Peace Shall Destroy Many, tells of a story that takes place in the heart of Saskatchewan and describes the problems of a Mennonite community. There are many contrasting beliefs in this Mennonite community. Beliefs about traditions, the
Métis, and war going on around them. These beliefs come up within two characters in this novel, Thom Wiens, and Pete Block. These two friends have many things in common, yet throughout the novel, their differences start to shine through. Their beliefs start to change and their friendship starts to dwindle, although in the end they both discover flaws within the community. Thom and Pete share a few similarities, some key differences, and they both change their ways as the story progresses.

Thom and Pete show a few similarities, but they don't agree on everything. Thom and Pete, both brought up in a Mennonite community, have been taught the traditions of the fathers. Knowing eachother all their lives, they are good friends. They first both accept the traditions without question because the traditions are the only answer, they are simply "right"(5). Also, Pete and Thom both agree that war is evil, but for different reasons. Neither of them want to be in the army, because they believe in non-resistance (6
& 213). Both Thom and Pete also look up to Pete's father, Deacon Block. Although this also changes for both of them, especially Thom, as the story continues.

We are shown many differences between Thom and Pete in how they live their lives, and in what they believe and fallow. The two boys agree that war is evil, but they have two different reasons for this. Pete believes he should not join the army because he is a Mennonite, and Mennonites taught their children not to resist their enemies(213). He also has a lot of work to do on the farm and he can freely say that it would be against his conscience to go in the army (7). Thom's reason for not going to war was that he is a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    4. Merlyn believes that Might doesn’t make you Right. He thinks that because so many people fight without valid enough reason to and soldiers die all the time because of it. Having power doesn’t justify what they do.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bartle's Powers Summary

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page

    Powers gives the perfect example of veteran guilt and split second decisions made by young adults in the book when Bartle makes a promise he cannot guarantee to Murphy’s mom (39) and later the disposing of Murphy’s body (chapter 10). Civilians may only identify or understand part of what Bartle feels. They can identify that Bartle feels guilty for what ends up being the wrong decision. This decision was made in a high stress situation surrounded by potential danger made by young men that thought that was best at the time. The consequences for making that wrong decision for Bartle ends up being prison time and Sgt. Sterling commits suicide from guilt. What civilians may not understand is Bartle has a chance to get away with it after Sterling’s…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tom Brady Research Paper

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    catholic family, his uncle was a priest and his father also considered being a priest. Tom is one of four children, he is the only boy, he has three sisters. Tom was a family type of guy, he went to church and after played golf with his father every week.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In John Knowles book A Separate Peace he communicates how the war in him was taking its toll on him. He uses the characters in a complicated plot to show the destructive forces of war. The characters, Gene and Finny, are the opposing forces in a struggle between the reality of war (World War II) and a separate peace. A peace away from the real war and the awful things that come from it. Through their relationship, which is a struggle on both sides, Knowles establishes the reality of war through a relationship.…

    • 2399 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Principle, Sam? You may know principle, Sam, but I know war.” (Collier and Collier 21). In the book My Brother Sam is Dead Mr. Meeker is Sam Meeker's father. They disagree on whether war is beneficial or just simply awful. The authors have Sam join the war and his father against the war. Mr. Meeker knows about the terrible things war does to people. First, war turns families against each other. If one is stuck in the middle of sides, like Tim, it can become a nasty place to be. Secondly, families from generations to generations fight and argue against each other. Also, when people get killed for no reason, it becomes shameful for people, and is gruesome. In My Brother Sam Is Dead, although both sides of war are shown, authors James Lincoln Collier and Christopher Collier ultimately argue that war is futile.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    [They became] convinced that people were not good; [that] people were bad” (Deng 180). War is considered a horrific time that separated people from everything they once knew. From their perspective war means selfishness, and “that is what war was doing to people. They only cared for themselves” (Deng 206).…

    • 1835 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John’s Involvement in the army started during the Vietnam war, when he was drafted at the age of 20. He went into the army branch and was trained at Fort Lender Wood in Missouri. “The hardest thing for me, was always doing exactly what our sergeant told us. We didn’t have any say in what we did, we just did it”. (Smith, John). John was originally supposed to go to Vietnam and fight, but his orders were…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Cay

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Phillip and Timothy realise each other’s difference and then they treat each other nicely and get along,…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “At night, when I couldn’t sleep, I’d sometimes carry on fierce arguments with those people…” (O’brien). Tom describes the people as blind, thoughtless and simple minded. He felt the people who were sending him off to war should go, not force him to go. Tom’s thoughts were to put your own flesh and blood on the line before you put someone else. These people did not understand his perspective on the subject, his civil rights or the governments postcolonial effect.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All things truly wicked start from innocence. A moral truth that finds its place among today’s society. Innocence is such a frail, yet valuable quality. The loss of innocence can lead to such disastrous consequences. The theme of the loss of innocence is a prevalent one found throughout the novel The Wars by Timothy Findley. It is noted particularly in regards to the protagonist, Robert Ross. Early on in the novel, he encounters such miserable situations that dramatically mature his character emotionally and mentally in such a short period of time. Such events include the sudden loss of a loved one, sexual encounters, and the murder of the innocent.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    visual pictures we would see would be in our minds; but since we went to…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    a separate peace

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    T.E Apter once said, "Fantasy must be understood not as an escape from reality, but as an investigation of it." This means that one's imagination is not an escape from reality, but rather a better way to understand it. In A Separate Peace, this idea is refuted, as the two main characters try avoiding a crude and cruel reality that follows them. In one instance, Finny and Gene prepare for the Olympics of 1944, an imaginary event which would only take place in their minds. These Olympics become part of an even bigger fantasy that the war is only a charade. Meanwhile the fantasy that their friendship is so strong negates the painful possibility that Gene is responsible for Finny's tragedy. These two teenage boys are not trying to interpret reality, but instead creating a new one as they desperately want and need one just for them.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    troubled thinking

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Montresor and Sammy act on impulse when they are encountered with their discordances, but strongly feel that they each have a compelling reason to serve…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Long Way Gone

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages

    War is a devastating event which tears nations apart, and causes death and pain in the hearts of the inhabitants. Whether it is the countries strong males being sent off into the battle zones, or the young children, war scars people. Soldiers are dehumanized, and lose all morals and sense of right and wrong. In the book Long Way Gone, Ishmael and his friends are dehumanized through the war because of the traumatic events they endure, and their time spent in solitude away from civilization; luckily, they were able to regain humanity through the love and hope provided from others.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay Paper

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this essay, the articles ‘Listen to the north’ by John Ralston Saul and ‘Which ‘Native’ History? By Whom? For Whom?’ by J.R. Miller will be analyzed, specifically looking at each authors argument and his appeal to ethos, logos and pathos. In the first article, ‘Listen to the North’, author John Ralston Saul argues that current Canadian policy when it comes to our north, and the people that reside there, is out of date and based on southern ideals that hold little bearing on the realities that face northern populations. He suggests instead that the policies and regulations should be shaped by people who know the territory and it’s needs, namely people who live there. In the second article, ‘Which ‘Native’ History? By Whom? For Whom?, Author Jim Miller discuses conventions in recording native history, focusing on an area he refers to as native-newcomer history. He discusses topics such as who should be recording said history, and for whom it should be intended, as evidence in the title. Both of these articles provide arguments that appeal to ethos, logos and pathos, but it is my opinion that John Ralston Saul makes a more convincing argument to his audience in ‘Listen to the north’ than Jim Miller makes in ‘Which ‘Native’ History? By Whom? For Whom?’.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays