Pastizzi Cafe Pty Ltd Vs Hossain Case Study
Case study on Pastizzi café Pty Ltd v Hossain (No 4) NSWSC 808 (28 July 2011)
There are some Certain legal issues which are critically involved in this case the decision regarding this case usually came from the supreme court of new south wales.
1. It has been observed that there has been contravention of non observance by the offender by discarding the prosecutor out from the building regarding the profit and loss account and goodwill of the company.
2. It has been observed that the case corporation act sec(232) has been applied in this case or not.
3. Does the loss regarding the goodwill of the company can be granted.
There are certain laws which are applied by the judge regarding this case in order to take decision:The regulations …show more content…
It depend upon the approach of the legal duties of the administrators which were framework in the Corporation Act. The court has noticed that the appellant provide the legal duties approaching the suer and the duties which were performed was not for the benefit of himself although it was not for the benefit of other partner too. It was only for the benefit of the company. It was noticed by the court that there has been contravention of legal duties performed by the offender discarding the prosecutor out of the building for profit and loss account and also regarding the goodwill of the company.The court held that the offender has to paid a premium for the losses which has been incurred. Although the court told them that in order for compensation they can buy shares from offender for their losses incurred. The Final decision of the court regarding this case are as follows: (i) The prosecutor is designate to reasonable compensation for the loss incurred which he was failed to acquire on account of being privilege from the rent out building for running of his coffee shop
There are some Certain legal issues which are critically involved in this case the decision regarding this case usually came from the supreme court of new south wales.
1. It has been observed that there has been contravention of non observance by the offender by discarding the prosecutor out from the building regarding the profit and loss account and goodwill of the company.
2. It has been observed that the case corporation act sec(232) has been applied in this case or not.
3. Does the loss regarding the goodwill of the company can be granted.
There are certain laws which are applied by the judge regarding this case in order to take decision:The regulations …show more content…
It depend upon the approach of the legal duties of the administrators which were framework in the Corporation Act. The court has noticed that the appellant provide the legal duties approaching the suer and the duties which were performed was not for the benefit of himself although it was not for the benefit of other partner too. It was only for the benefit of the company. It was noticed by the court that there has been contravention of legal duties performed by the offender discarding the prosecutor out of the building for profit and loss account and also regarding the goodwill of the company.The court held that the offender has to paid a premium for the losses which has been incurred. Although the court told them that in order for compensation they can buy shares from offender for their losses incurred. The Final decision of the court regarding this case are as follows: (i) The prosecutor is designate to reasonable compensation for the loss incurred which he was failed to acquire on account of being privilege from the rent out building for running of his coffee shop