Partnership Working in the British Nhs
A review by Dr. Ignatius Gwanmesia on how inter-professional partnership working impacts on service delivery (NHS) (2007)
Introduction
In a utopian scenario, inter-professionalism should reciprocate efficiency in service delivery for service users. However in practice, inherent constraints left unresolved can construe to hinder rather enhance the safeguarding of clients welfare. Service users are experts on their own needs, Smale et al (1993), and they expect and judge the quality of health and social care services they receive in terms of whether they “help them achieve the outcome they aspire to, and whether these services are delivered in ways which empower rather than disempower them.” Davies et al (2005, 195). Realising these expectations is a factor not only of the user-staff ideologies and value bases but of the model (medical or social) and theories developed by service users Oliver, (1996, p. 31-33). While service users expect staff in joined up working to assist them to address both their medical and social needs, due to multifaceted constraints, partnership working is not readily able to deliver since it can be “tense and conflictual; a place of strife where members compete for territory and vie for recognition. Davies et al (2005, p. 158). Experience show that holistically the result can be compromised service delivery.
To critically evaluate how inter-professional partnership impacts on service delivery, this discourse will start with an attempt to resolve the polarisation in its conceptualisation. The background will trace the evolution of the ideology from a theoretical, policy and practice perspective. The body of the discourse will first analyse those factors that impact on effective partnership; power relationship, empowerment, communication, power relationship and value differentials. Next, will be a critical examination on how the social, legal and political structures in Britain have been
Introduction
In a utopian scenario, inter-professionalism should reciprocate efficiency in service delivery for service users. However in practice, inherent constraints left unresolved can construe to hinder rather enhance the safeguarding of clients welfare. Service users are experts on their own needs, Smale et al (1993), and they expect and judge the quality of health and social care services they receive in terms of whether they “help them achieve the outcome they aspire to, and whether these services are delivered in ways which empower rather than disempower them.” Davies et al (2005, 195). Realising these expectations is a factor not only of the user-staff ideologies and value bases but of the model (medical or social) and theories developed by service users Oliver, (1996, p. 31-33). While service users expect staff in joined up working to assist them to address both their medical and social needs, due to multifaceted constraints, partnership working is not readily able to deliver since it can be “tense and conflictual; a place of strife where members compete for territory and vie for recognition. Davies et al (2005, p. 158). Experience show that holistically the result can be compromised service delivery.
To critically evaluate how inter-professional partnership impacts on service delivery, this discourse will start with an attempt to resolve the polarisation in its conceptualisation. The background will trace the evolution of the ideology from a theoretical, policy and practice perspective. The body of the discourse will first analyse those factors that impact on effective partnership; power relationship, empowerment, communication, power relationship and value differentials. Next, will be a critical examination on how the social, legal and political structures in Britain have been
Bibliography: Audit Commission (1998) A fruitful partnership: Effectively partnership working. London: Audit Commission. Balloch, S. and Taylor, M. (eds) (2001a) Partnership working: Policy and Practice. Bristol: The Policy Press. BCC (Birmingham City Council) (2001a) A partnership for governance: The Birchall, E and Hallette, C, (1995) Working Together in Child protection: Studies in Child Protection Blair, T. (1998) Leading the Way: A New Vision for Local Government. IPPR. Brechin, A. Brown, H. and Eby, M. (Eds) (2000) Critical Practice in Health and Social Care. London: Sage Cabinet Office, (1999) Modernising Government Callaghan, G., Exworthy, M., Hudson, B., and Peckham, S. (2000) Prospects for collaboration in primary care: relationships between social service and the new PCGs’, Journal of Inter-professional Care, vol 14, no 1, p. 19-26 Clark, C Cook, A. (1996) Effective Clinical Leadership in A&E. Emergency Nurse, 4(3), 54-55. Dalley, G. (1998) Professional ideology or organisational tribalism?, in Taylor, R. and Ford, J. (eds) Social work and health care, research highlights 19. London: Jessica Kingsley. Davies, C., Finlay , L. and Bullman, A. (2005) Changing Practice in Health and Social care. London: Sage Publication Ltd. Dean, D. (19950 Leadership: the hidden dangers. Nursing Standards. 10(13), 54-55. DETR(Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions) (2000) Joining it up locally. The evidence base. London: DETR. DOH (1991) The Patients Charter. London: HMSO DoH (1997) the New NHS London: The Stationery Office DoH (1998a) Our Healthier Nation. London: The Stationery Office DoH (1998b) Partnership in Action DOH (1999b) Working Together to Safeguard the Children. A Guide to Inter-Agency Working to Safeguard and Promote the Welfare of Children. London: The Stationery Office. DOH (2004) National Health Service Knowledge and Skill Framework (NHS KSF) and the Development Review Process. London: Stationery Office. DOH, (2006) Our health, our care, our say: making it happen. London: HMSO Dolan , B Geddes, M. (1998) Achieving best value through partnership, Warwick/DETR. Best value series paper no. 7, The University of Warwick. Glendinning, C., Powell, M., and Rummery, K. (2002) Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare. Bristol: The Policy Press. Hage, J. and Alter, C. (1997) A typology of inter-organisational relationships and networks, in J. R. Hollingsworth and R. Boer (eds) Contemporary capitalism p. 94-126. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Harrison, R., Mann, G., Murphy, M., Taylor, A., and Thompson, N... (2003) Partnership made Painless: A joint-up guide to working together. Oxford: Alden Group. Hodgson, C. R. (1997) It’s all good practice: Evaluating practice-based care management in Greenwich. London: South East Institute of Public Health. Hudson, B., Handy, B. Henwood, M. and Wistow, G. (1999). In pursuit of inter-agency collaboration in public sector. Public Management, vol 1, no 2 p. 253-60 Hutchison, J Huxham, C. (2000) The Challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management, vol 2, no 3 p. 337-53 Kirkpatrick, I Klein, R. (1998) Why Britain is re-organising the National Health Service-yet again. Labour Party, (2000) Democracy and Citizenship: Second year consultation paper. London: Labour Party. Limbery, M. (1998) Social work in general practice: dilemmas and solutions. Journal of Inter-professional Care, vol 12, no 2,p.199-208. Ling, T. (2000) Unpacking Partnership: the case of health care, in Clarke, J. Gerirtz, S. and McLaughlin, E., (eds) New Managerialism, new welfare? London: Sage Publication. Lowndes, V. and Skelchers, C. (1998). The dynamics of multi-organizational partnerships. Public Administration, vol 76, p. 313-33. Martin, S., Davis, H. Board, T., Downer, J., Geddes, M. Hartley, J. Lewis, M., Sanderson, I. and Sap well, p. (2001) Improving local public services: Interim evaluation of the best value pilot programme. London: DETR. North, N. Lupton, C. and Kahn, P. (1999) General practitioners and the new NHS. Health and Social Care in the Community. vol 7, no6, p. 408-16 Paton, C Payne, M. (1995) Social Work and Community Care. Basingstoke, Hampshire: PALGRAVE Pithouse A Powell, M. (1999a) New Labour and the third way in the British NHS. International Journal of Health Services, vol 29, no 2, p. 353-70. Powell, M. Exworthy, M. and Berney, L. (2001) Playing the Game of Partnership, in Sykes, R. et al (2001) Quinney, A Ross, F. and Tissier, J. (1997) The Care Management interface with general practice: a case study in success? Health and Social Care in the Community. vol 5, no 3, p. 153-61. Senoir, K. (1999) ENP Scheme: Highlighting the barriers. Emergency Nurse. 6(9), 28-32. SEU, (2000) March. A Report of Policy Action Team 12. Young People SEU Stannard, J Stevenson, O. and Parsloe, P. (1993) Community Care and Empowerment. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Sullivan, H. and Skelcher, C. (2002) Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Service. Palgrave Macmillan. Sykes, R., Bochel, C. and Ellison, N. (Eds) (2001) Social Policy Review 13: P Development and Debates: 2000-2001. The Policy Press. Tennyson, R. (1998) Managing Partnerships: Tools for Mobilising the Public Sector, Business and Civil Society as Partners in Development. Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum. Thompson, N. (1997) Anti-discrimination in M. Davies (ed) The Blackwell Companion to Social Work. Oxford Blackwell.