Preview

Parliamentary Sovereignty

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1929 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Parliamentary Sovereignty
"It remains a first principle of our constitutional law that Parliament in enacting primary legislation is sovereign. Parliamentary sovereignty has been qualified though not departed from in different ways by our adoption of the law of the European Union through the European Communities Act 1972 and by the Human Rights Act 1998.”

Per Lord Justice Laws, R (MISICK) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2010] EWCA Civ 1549

Evaluate this statement with reference to appropriate legal authorities.

In order to evaluate this statement it is important to understand what Parliamentary sovereignty is and how it relates to European Union law with the enactment of the European Communities Act 1972 and the Human Rights Act 1998.

The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty means that Parliament is the supreme Law maker of the UK, hence Parliament is free to make or unmake any law it wishes with the exception that it cannot limit its own power or bind itself when it comes to future legislation. This dictates that all courts must uphold legislation laid down by Parliament. “ The principle, therefore, of parliamentary sovereignty means neither more nor less than this, namely that "Parliament" has "the right to make or unmake any law whatever; and further, that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament”

The principle of Parliamentary sovereignty was derived from the fundamental doctrines of the Magna Carta, Petition of Rights and the Bill of Rights. Unlike many other countries the UK has no written constitution meaning that it is flexible to be interpreted in the courts however the judge sees fit. The doctrine of Parliamentary supremacy is clearly in conflict with the full recognition of the community law in the UK. However, many things act so as to make parliamentary supremacy delusive, since international treaty obligations mean that certain legislation would



References: Wagner, A. (2011). Does parliamentary sovereignty still reign supreme?. Available: http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2011/jan/27/supreme-court-parliamentary-sovereignty. Last accessed 1st March 2012. [ 1 ]. Dicey, A.V. 1982 [1914]. INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF THE LAW OF THE CONSTITUTION. 8th ed. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund [ 2 ]

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another strength of the UK constitution is that there is sovereignty of Parliament. This is a strength as its elected body is accountable to the people. For example, MP’s are elected by the people whop stand in Parliament, which therefore means that the people in power have the general publics support to make decisions. But the nature of our constitution means that the location of sovereignty is a bit of a muddle.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliament is the national representative body which has supreme legislative powers within its jurisdiction. While it oversees the completion of a number of other tasks parliaments’ main role is undoubtedly to make and pass laws and it has to be said that it achieves this role efficiently. Parliament and the members of parliament are elected solely by the people and are therefore responsible to the voting public. When passing laws parliament has the ability to, as part of its law making process obtain expert opinion with regards to tough and controversial issues. This process of law making is a completely structured procedure which follows a routine series of stages whenever a piece of legislation is proposed. These factors amongst others all contribute to the effective and efficient law making system that parliament is. While like any other structured organisation parliament has a number of weaknesses and faults these are minor and have very little effect on parliament as a law-making institution.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Parliamentary gives Parliament superior and legal authority as they can make or unmake any Act of Parliament they wish and although the House of Commonsâ has most of the dominance they always need the support of the House of Lords to pass an Act. Parliamentary sovereignty refers to this joint power. The Human Rights Act 1998 is a law passed by Parliament that has limited the application of parliamentary sovereignty as it is made unlawful for any public body to act in a way which is incompatible with the Convention although the courts can only make a declaration.…

    • 525 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is an element of truth in the given statement and this essay will seek to explain UK’s Parliament today does, to a certain degree, lack democratic accountability, and this can be shown in dominance of the (i) Executive, (ii) Unrepresentative, and its (iii) Detachment from citizens.…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The parliament makes laws in future. Which means they think ahead of what the world’s developing to and thinks of what new laws will be needed for society once this is done it allows society to know what the law is and how it will apply to them.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliament is designed to hold the executive accountable; therefore it goes about this by various means of government scrutiny, such as Prime Minister’s Question Time. In addition, Parliament is expected to perform a legislative function, creating the process of a bill becoming a law after undergoing many stages between the House of Commons and the House of Lords. Finally, Parliament is also required to be representative of the nation, with constituencies creating a strong local link between the electorate and their MP.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Poop

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In a parliamentary Democracy their core principle is parliamentary sovereignty, which means that parliamentary actions can not be over turned by any other branch...…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Second way is that a lot of acts which are created in Westminster Parliament are passed because of government members majority and therefore coalition government members which also vote in parliament have the majority sits in parliament and therefore can affect acts and laws which can be passed. So parliament has lost sovereignty because government can affect parliament and they are not separate (like in USA where they have Congress and government and they are not bind together in any way) whereas in our system government is bind with parliament. A good example of coalition government affecting act passing in parliament are 37 acts, which has been passed because of majority of government members in parliament.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One factor which can be argued to of had the biggest effect in terms of changing where parliamentary sovereignty resides in recent years is the EU. The UK initially joined the EC in 1973 since then the EC has become the EU and has also become increasingly more powerful over the UK as time has passed, the EU could even be argued to be supreme over UK statues and the UK parliament. This is shown in the factortame case in which EU law took precedent over UK wishes, allowing Spanish fishing boats to fish in UK waters, this was the first time UK law was scrutinized and removed by courts due to EU law contradicting these laws. Furthermore, being part of the EU ultimately is a way of binding the UK governments successors partly due to the fact that if the UK left the EU there could be major…

    • 1577 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, Parliamentary sovereignty is not a constitutional relic. It may seem to be the, as part of the UK constitution continues to rely on extremely early Acts such as The Magna Carta or the Bill of Rights Act , however, these statutes continue to remain as they set out important constitutional principles. Even since 1215, it has been recognised that it is important to limit the power of the monarch, and transfer powers to parliament, in interest of balance, and the separation of powers. Up until present day, supporting Dicey’s summary above, UK courts cannot strike down an Act of Parliament, this is unlike many Supreme Courts in other countries, for example the USA, who are bound to reject legislation which contradicts the written constitutional rights. For example in the case of Mortensen v. Peters , it notes that in the event of a contradiction between international…

    • 793 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Challenging the Parliamentary Sovereignty was not the purpose for which the HRA was designed. In Hansard Lord Irvine stated: ‘The sovereignty of Parliament should not be disturbed.’ As such, from a technical point of view in appears that the terms in which the HRA is drafted does not conflict with the parliamentary sovereignty. But does that mean that the qualification of parliamentary sovereignty is like what Dicey explained in reality? Does the Parliamentary Sovereignty integrate the HRA as an inferior agreement?…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The big legal debate of modern times is whether Parliamentary sovereignty’s what it used to be, now that we’re in the EU. Laws made by the EU institutions don’t have effect in this country in their own right, but they take legal effect here because of section 2(1) of the European Communities Act 1972. Not only that: the EU law rule that EU law is supreme over national laws is also imported into our legal system by the notoriously obscure section 2(4), part of which…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is the most important source of the principles and rules making up the British constitution because parliament is the sovereign body, for example, the Human Rights Act (1988).…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Royal Pregatives

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. This note seeks to describe as fully as possible the extent of the prerogative. However, as will become clear, the exact limits of the prerogative cannot be categorically defined. The note goes on to describe the way in which the exercise of prerogative power is controlled by Parliament and the Courts.…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays