Preview

Pa250 Unit 1

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
783 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pa250 Unit 1
One of the basic rights we hold sacred in this country is the freedom to marry whomever we choose. While that seems like a given in the US, because we don’t have the strict class hierarchy of Europe, or the arranged unions found in certain Eastern and African cultures that define who marries whom. We have had, and still do for that matter, rigid restrictions on marriage, when they seem counter-intuitive to social mores. When social feelings begin to shift towards a more progressive outlook, challenges to the status quo are bound to occur, especially when the emotionally charged aspect of marriage is involved. Two perfect examples are the cases of Loving v. Virginia 388 US 1, 87 S Ct1817(1967), and Goodridge v. Department of Public Health 440 Mass 309, 798 NE 2d 941(Mass.2003).
Loving v. Virginia (388 US 1, 1967) was a landmark case, dealing with inter-racial marriage, which went all the way to the US Supreme Court. The plaintiffs, Mildred and Richard Loving, an inter-racial couple, who were residents of Virginia, where at the time it was illegal for people of different races to be married. They went to Washington D.C. in June of 1958 to get married, and returned back to live a married couple in Virginia. Upon their return to Caroline County, Virginia they were charged with violating the law. The couple was charged when police invaded their home in the middle of the night, hoping to witness the Loving’s involved in a sexual act which was also a crime at the time in Virginia. When Mrs. Loving showed the police the marriage certificate, the police charged the couple with violating Virginia § 20-50 which, “prohibited interracial couples from being married out of state and then returning to Virginia.” As well as, Virginia § 20-59 that made “miscegenation” a felony. Black’s Law defines miscegenation as, “A marriage between persons of different races, formally considered illegal in some jurisdictions. In 1967, the US Supreme Court held that laws banning



References: Loving v Virginia 388 US 1, 87 S Ct 1817(1967) 18 L. Ed. 2d 1010 US Lexis 1082 Goodridge v Department of Public Health 440 Mass. 309, 798 NE 2d 941 (Mass. 2003)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pt2520 Unit 6 Lab 1

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    24. What is the difference between the logical design and the physical design of a database?…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1963, the Lovings filed a motion in State Trail court on the grounds on Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment were violated.…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    pt2520 unit 8

    • 287 Words
    • 1 Page

    When a client connects to the MySQL server, the server uses the username provided by the client and the client host to select the appropriate account row from the mysql.user table. It then uses this row to authenticate the client. Before MySQL 5.5.7, the server authenticates the password provided by the client against the Password column of the account row. As of MySQL 5.5.7, the server authenticates clients using plugins. Selection of the proper account row from the mysql.user table is based on the user name and client host, as before, but the server authenticates the client credentials as follows: The server determines from the account row which authentication plugin applies for the client. If the account row specifies no plugin name, the server uses native authentication; that is, authentication against the password stored in the Password column of the account row. This is the same authentication method provided by MySQL servers older than 5.5.7, before pluggable authentication was implemented, but now is implemented using two plugins that are built in and cannot be disabled. If the account row specifies a plugin, the server invokes it to authenticate the user. If the server cannot find the plugin, an error occurs. The plugin returns a status to the server indicating whether the user is permitted to connect.…

    • 287 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Lovings pleaded guilty, and were sentenced to one year in jail. However, the trial judge agreed to suspend their sentence for 25 year if they leave Virginia and don’t come back together for 25 years. So the Lovings left the state. Later, the Lovings appealed to the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals that their…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pt2520 Unit 6

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages

    What is data redundancy, and which characteristics of the file system can lead to it?…

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the case of Garden State Equality vs. Dow unravels into the Supreme Court hearings, there will be an indefinite variety of opinions and disputes of minds. There is room for controversy and disputes will arise. There are miss-interpretations and quotes that government officials and citizens against civil union rights have expressed and demonstrated about same-sex couples and their right to marry. This is an example of an interpretation given to describe differences in marital relationships by one of the Opinions of the Justices to the Senate, 440 Mass. at 1207, it states, “The dissimilitude between the terms “civil marriage” and “civil union” is not innocuous; it is a considered choice of…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Loving Case Summary

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Loving case was based off of Richard and Mildred Loving’s marriage. Richard Perry Loving, a white construction worker, was born on October 29, 1933 in Central Point, Caroline County. Mildred Dolores Jeter, a mixed African American and Indian woman, was born on July 22, 1939 who was also born in Central Point, Caroline County. In the state of Virginia, the location in which they both had lived, there was a law called the Racial Integrity Act (“American...”). The Act restricted anyone of the opposite race to marry one another. According to Phyl Newbeck and Brendan Wolfe, Mildred and Richard when out of state to Washington D.C. to escape the marital restrictions back in Virginia. They were legally married on June 2, 1958. The couple lived…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Plaintiffs in Loving v. Virginia were Richard and Mildred Loving, who were represented by the ACLU in the Supreme Court. The Plaintiff argued the prohibition of interracial marriage was unconstitutional and anti-miscegenation laws violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment explains, “No State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of the law.” As declared by the Constitution and Maynard v. Hill case, marriage is a civil right for citizens of the United States and the decision of whether one decides to marry a colored person or not cannot be infringed by any state. Denying anyone their given right to marry without due process of the…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clash of Cultures

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Act XVI, Laws of Virginia, April 1691 ( Hening 's Statutes at Large, 3: 87). This section of the law with its amendments remained in force until the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the law unconstitutional in Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Rights

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    403 U.S. 217; 91 S. Ct. 1940; 29 L. Ed. 2d 438; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 27…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case 1: Mahe Vs. Alberta

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Summary: Federal appeals court judges questioned lawyers on both sides of Virginia’s potentially landmark fay marriage case. Hundreds of protestors gathered outside the courthouse holding signs and shouting slogans. The three-judge panel questioned the lawyers throughout the case that challenged the state’s same-sex marriage prohibition. A decision is expected in a few weeks on an issue both sides believe will ultimately lead to the decision of the Supreme Court U.S. Impact: This potentially landmark decision will definitely influence the social environment of Virginia.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    democracy in the quest for marriage equality. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law , 19…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage Argument

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page

    ay marriage is a contentious issue in the US today. Currently, only fifteen states have legalized gay marriage, and even then it has been a long and tough fight to get to this point. In California, Proposition 8 won by a majority in 2008 when same sex marriage proponents sought to prevent gay couples from accessing marriage licences. On June 2013, gay couples in California could once again acquire marriage licences after Proposition 8 was deemed unconstitutional (Mears para. 2). This trend has been observed in most of the fifteen states where the constitutional provisions of equality and civil rights have been used to defend gay marriage. The principles that guide the legalization of gay marriage are ingrained in the very heart of the…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gay marriages are a worldwide issue of should it be allowed or not in today’s societies and has been a topic for many years. Gay marriage is a marriage between two people of same sex or gender. There are states and countries that are against just as well as for same sex marriage. It has been a problem about whether same sex couples should be able to marry since 1971. It was later considered it was not legal for same sex marriage and tradition for marriage in the United States has been designed as legal commitment between a man and a woman. However, homosexual relationships are increasingly gaining the interest of acceptance in our country. Vermont was the first state to introduce civil unions in July of 2002, and the first state to legalize same sex marriage without being required to do so by court(Goodnough, A. 2009).Some states have considered a form of commitment called civil union; this is a form of relationship that is somewhat like a marriage (About.com Guide, 2012). Civil unions are legal contracts between partners that are recognized by a state or government as conferring all or some of the rights conferred by marriage, but without the implicit historical and religious meaning associated with the word “marriage”(About.com Guide, 2012). They are not benefited any of the federal benefits of marriage such as social security. This is still a problem for some religious people in the world today who believe God made Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve. Many politicians have said they are against gay marriage but they leave it up to the states to decide whether or not to support it. Several states have granted limited marriage benefits to gays but call them domestic partnerships.…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “They are preserving the sanctity of marriage, so that two gay men who've been together for twenty-five years can't get married, but a guy can still get drunk in Vegas and marry a hooker at the Elvis chapel! The sanctity of marriage is saved!” Lea DeLaria states her views on gay marriage. Some although, view this topic very differently, it is seen as a dirty abomination to many that heterosexual marriage is being corrupted by the possibility of homosexual marriage. The year is 2010, yet America has seemed to take a step back in giving everyone and anyone equal rights in today’s society, leading back when America thought it was not a good idea to give African Americans their rights. Is that situation so different from today’s argument of giving homosexuals their rights? Although heterosexual marriages are more acceptable in America today, homosexual relationships as well as marriages need to be respected, not restrained so homosexuals can live freely as they please.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics