Preview

PEG Tube Case Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
568 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
PEG Tube Case Summary
Sara, a 28 years old female, was admitted to the intensive care unit post suicidal attempt. She has been considered as being in a persistent vegetative state for the past 2 years. Although her brain stem was severely effected, her heart was beating regularly and she can breathe spontaneously. Sara was completely dependent on the PEG tube for feeding. The doctors responsible for Sara’s case decided that the life was with no value for Sara and the PEG tube should be withdrawn. Sara’s husband and her family reject this decision and they have approached the Sharia court to prevent doctor from withdrawing the PEG tube.

The ethics of this case was turned on why the physician is recommending withdrawal, and why the husband (SDM) wants the feeding

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It troubled him that the Judge Teel described Nancy’s condition as “unresponsive and hopeless” with “no cognitive purpose for her except sound and perhaps pain.” If Nancy feels pain then she is not in a persistent vegetative state (PVS). We did not know what was going on behind the scenes, but later it would all come to light. Our case bypassed the appellate court of Missouri and headed straight to the Missouri Supreme Court, with a little assistance. Our case was scheduled for review in September, along with a case that has opposite opinions as ours. In other words, the parents of a young man named Phillip Radar, that was diagnosed as being brain dead, did not want to let their child go, but the hospital caring for him did. Phillip’s heart was beating even though he was brain dead. Both of the cases were scheduled to be heard on the same morning in September, but on August 31st Phillip’s heart stopped and the effort to revive him was unsuccessful. His death left our case as the only one to be…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Associate Ltd (2005) article show that in 1971 a Gp Practitioner murdered 250 patients over a 27 year period in practice. The author believes that the event that occurred in the article contradicts the legal law of rights to life because the Gp deprived 250 patients of unlawful violence and death (Libadmin 2010). It could be argued life is sacred; every individual has a right to preserve their own life and therefore is wrong to end another’s regardless of ethnic or cultural differences (rsrevision 2015). Homicide act (1957) questions the rights of life as it creates a double effect whether it is ethical right if a patient complies with ending their life. For example, patient wanting death through overdose or pain relief, we are unable to know…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The removal of Terri Schiavo’s PEG tube went against the non-malfeasance principle. The ethical principle of non-malfeasance is the avoidance of harm on a patient (ANA, n.d.). “Judges who would not halt the removal of Schiavo’s PEG tube were ‘guilty not only of judicial malfeasance — but of the cold-blooded, cold-hearted extermination of an innocent human life’” (Bishop, 2008). The same could be said about the healthcare provider that removed the PEG tube. Physicians and nurses take oaths and pledges that state they will do no harm to patients in their care. When the PEG tube was removed it took away her means of hydration. The symptoms of extreme dehydration are extremely painful. The other side of the ethical dilemma could be that the family wanted to end her suffering. Although by doing so wouldn’t that open the doors to ending people’s lives in the future that are cognitively disabled being euthanized in the same…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although it was said she could live many more years with machine support, the doctors stated there was no chance of recovery. (Gaudin) The family also had been paying expensive medical bills because of her need for machine support, and they were struggling financially. Nancy was not the only child of her parents, so expenses were piling high. (LLP) Her family believed that they had clear evidence that Nancy would not want to be in the state she was in. Many of Nancy's friends, including Nancy's housemate, had verbal proof that a year earlier, she had stated she would not want to live in a vegetative unresponsive state unless 'she was half normal'. (Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Tech 1) However, to the court this was not enough convincing proof. Justice Sandra O' Conner stated that this could be considered assisted suicide. It was said that because a competent person cannot refuse food or water in a hospital setting, an irrational person should not be allowed to either. (LLP) However, if a patient had the want to die due to incredible pain, deformity, etc., they could refuse a feeding tube. The question in term is how we decide if a person is irrational or not. Do specific people decide the severity of the pain or the quality of life? (Gaudin…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    HSM 542 Week 5 You Decide

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are two laws that can be taken into account for this situation, the New York Health Care Proxy Law and the New York’s Family Health Care Decision Making Act (FHCDA). Under the New York Health Care Proxy Law, Lydia’s husband, Mr. Bevins, who is her legal guardian, which also makes him the surrogate decision maker under the New York Health Care Proxy Law, has the legal right to make the decisions on her health care in her behalf. Being respectful of his wife’s wishes, Mr. Bevins is asking that the life sustaining support be withdrawn. However, Lydia’s mom, Eileen Redfield, believes that her daughter has a chance to recover and does not support Mr. Bevins’ decision.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1990 Terri Schiavo suffered cardiac arrest at age 27, due to hypokalemia secondary to an eating disorder. Terri suffered severe brain damage due to lack of oxygen into her brain. Terri fell into coma and was placed on a feeding tube to provide hydration and nutrition. Terri was diagnosed to be in a Persistent Vegetative State (P.V.S), which is “a permanent and irreversible state of unconsciousness in which there is an absence of voluntary or cognitive behavior and an inability to interact purposefully with one’s environment” (reallove.net). Michael Schiavo, Terri’s husband, was appointed as her legal guardian. Four years after Terri’s cardiac arrest, Michael Schiavo informed Terri’s physician that Terri would not have wanted to live like this, with that in mind he decided the best thing for Terri would be to remove the feeding tube. When Terri’s parents found out, they were upset and disagreed with Michael’s decision. Michael Schiavo and Terri’s parents fought in court extensively and hard; suffering a great deal of emotional pain and distress. They were battling in court for over 10 years. Eventually in 2003 the court ordered the tubes be removed. They were indeed removed, but not for long. The…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Terri Schiavo Case

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Regarding the other case of the pregnant women, I feel this is entirely a different situation in many ways. She was not able to breathe on her own. Being in a vegetative state and not being capable of breathing…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terri Schiavo Case

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Recent cases have drawn attention to the issue of individual autonomy, and what is sometimes referred to as ‘the right to die’. Adult patients who are mentally competent have the right to refuse medical treatment even when that refusal can lead to worsening ill health and even death. This refusal of treatment may only be ignored when statutory law provides for treatment without consent, or a judge makes an order that overrides the patient’s consent. While this is largely accepted when patients are physically and mentally competent, it becomes a complex issue when a person is mentally competent, but due to physical incapacity are in care because they are unable to care for themselves. A person may be mentally competent but due to being a quadriplegic…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bi.The difficulties in this dilemma are upholding Mrs Ahmed’s right to choose and exercising my duty of care, in this case they will conflict as my duty of care would be to ensure she wasn’t putting herself in any harm which she would be doing if she were able to eat the food she wants which isn’t recommended for someone with her medical condition.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to these tragic events Nicklinson’s fight for the ‘right to die’ is argued by the high court. Although, it may be his wish; but the court see his it as he is using euthanasia is taking advantage of his vulnerability.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Because there are so many complicated situations, there will always be a varying factor in the matter. The Uniform Declaration of Death Act makes a generally acceptable definition for death in which the medical system strictly abides. However, because of advances in medical technology, patients in a vegetable state can be kept alive by the use of ventilation and feeding tubes. The legal system is constantly challenged by the definition of death because they must still pay for medical treatments even though the individual has permanent termination of all functions of the entire brain, including the brain stem. Lia’s situation perfectly highlights this battle between legal and medical systems. The issue on describing a perceptible definition for death will continuously exist as long as new advances in medicine…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Paul Brophy Case

    • 752 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Paul Brophy was a 46 year-old firefighter and EMTwho had a brain aneurysm that left him in a persistive vegitative state (PVS) with no hope of recovery. He was admitted to New England Sinai Hospital and during the course of treatment a gastrostomy tude was placed in his stomach to provide him with food and water. When x-rays revealed that Mr. Brophy had irresiversable brain damage, his wife and family requested the tube removed and he be allowed to die, as was his verbal request to his family. However, the hospital refused, indicating that the deprivation of basic needs is unethical and the case was taken to court. In this paper I will discuss the ways that the principles of beneficence and justice are relevant in this case, how the Jewish religion would approach the right to die, and what I would do in this situation.…

    • 752 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Advanced Directives

    • 3334 Words
    • 14 Pages

    University of Minnesota, (1997, July). Withdrawing or Withholding Artficial Nutrition and Hydration. Center for Bioethics, Retrieved June 2006, from http://www.med.umn.edu/bioethics/publications/RP2.pdf…

    • 3334 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethics

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    An ethical dilemma exists when the right thing to do is not clear or when members of the health care team cannot agree on the right thing to do (Potter, Perry, Stockert, & Hall, 2011). S.Z. is a 65-year-old Hispanic man who was admitted to the hospital for the third time in 6 months, for hyperglycemia. He is now scheduled to be discharged but his daughter pleads with the nurse that she does not want her father discharged because he is non-complaint with his medications and diet at home. She says she has small children at home and can’t be responsible for him, too. She is worried sick that he is doing this on purpose because he has been so depressed since her mother, who did everything for him, passed away. She says that her father has been seeing a curanderos, who treats him with traditional methods and that he refuses to take his medicine and only follows what the curanderos tells him to do. She does not agree with this and confides that she hopes to find a way to prevent her father from seeing this person and wants to know if the nurse can have her father’s discharge canceled and to ask the doctor to admit him to a nursing home where they can ensure he eats right and takes his medicine and not the herbs he has been using. Then she pleads, “Please just tell the doctor he won’t take his medicine.” Many years ago he was diagnosed with Diabetes Mellitus Type II and has been on insulin for two years. His blood sugar on admission was 589. He is retired and was widowed one year ago. He’s active in his church, gardens, and likes to work on small projects around the house. His medical history includes Diabetes Mellitus Type II, insulin dependent, Hyperlipidemia, and Osteoarthritis.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dr. Self-Annihilation

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A woman stopped intake twenty five days to her death. Additionally to the intolerable pain and tormented from her essential ill health, she was in pain for twenty five days of dehydration and starvation, simply because Dr. self-annihilation isn't permissible in European nation. her relatives were deeply stone-broke down to see their beloved mother and partner troubled within the verge of death, however they cannot do something concerning it, with the exception of beggary the medics to administer her some medicine to unharness the brutal…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays