Overconsumption or Overpopulation: Which Is the Bigger of Two Vices to the Progress of Sustainability Today?
Global and Regional Sustainability
Over-population or Overconsumption: Which is the bigger of two vices to the progress of sustainability today?
In the age, where the collective value of goods and commodities, the strength of economic markets and the accumulated wealth of individuals dictate the ease of life and the standards of living within society; it is imperative that we as a species reiterate to ourselves that the natural resources that enable us to fulfil all our basic needs, fashion all our desirable wants; and provisions the framework on which we build our cities, economies and daily lives remains limited and finite (McMahon, 2001 ; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Board, 2005). The finality of such finite resources demands the attention for them to be sustainably managed so as to ensure their prolonged availability for the future. Similarly, the natural processes that support our existence and facilitates the conditions for us to provision for our needs; demand mindful care so as to prevent the impairment of such natural functions and services for future generations (United Nations, 2008). Whilst resource availability as well as ecosystem services and turnover remain finite and paced; the goods and services demanded by a growing affluent yet wasteful global population can be seen to rise steadily (United Nations Environmental Programme, 2002; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Board, 2005). As such, over-population versus over-consumption and which poses a bigger threat to the idea and practice of sustainability has been and remains a highly contested issue amongst sustainability proponents. This essay therefore seeks to examine and distinguish the intrinsic components that define the terms overpopulation and over-consumption, whilst attempting to shed light on which poses a more significant threat to the development and practice of global sustainability by examining the effects of both within arenas of food production and ecosystem function. I believe
Over-population or Overconsumption: Which is the bigger of two vices to the progress of sustainability today?
In the age, where the collective value of goods and commodities, the strength of economic markets and the accumulated wealth of individuals dictate the ease of life and the standards of living within society; it is imperative that we as a species reiterate to ourselves that the natural resources that enable us to fulfil all our basic needs, fashion all our desirable wants; and provisions the framework on which we build our cities, economies and daily lives remains limited and finite (McMahon, 2001 ; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Board, 2005). The finality of such finite resources demands the attention for them to be sustainably managed so as to ensure their prolonged availability for the future. Similarly, the natural processes that support our existence and facilitates the conditions for us to provision for our needs; demand mindful care so as to prevent the impairment of such natural functions and services for future generations (United Nations, 2008). Whilst resource availability as well as ecosystem services and turnover remain finite and paced; the goods and services demanded by a growing affluent yet wasteful global population can be seen to rise steadily (United Nations Environmental Programme, 2002; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Board, 2005). As such, over-population versus over-consumption and which poses a bigger threat to the idea and practice of sustainability has been and remains a highly contested issue amongst sustainability proponents. This essay therefore seeks to examine and distinguish the intrinsic components that define the terms overpopulation and over-consumption, whilst attempting to shed light on which poses a more significant threat to the development and practice of global sustainability by examining the effects of both within arenas of food production and ecosystem function. I believe
References: * Bartlett, A.A. (1994). Reflections on sustainability, population growth, and the environment. Population and Environment 16(1): 5-35. * Brown, L.R. (2009). Chapter 7: Eradicating poverty and Stabilizing Population. In Plan B 3.0 Mobilizing to Save Civilization (1st. Ed). New York, W.W. Norton and Company. * Brown, L.R * Brown, P.M.; & L.D. Cameron. (2000). What can be done to reduce overconsumption. Ecological Economics 32(1): 27- 41. * Butler, C.D. (1994). Overpopulation, Overconsumption and Economics. The Lancet 343. 582-584. * Defries, R.S.; Foley, J.A.; & G.P. Asner. (2004). Land use choices: Balancing Human Needs and Ecosystem Function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2: 249 – 257. * Deutsch, L. (2004). Global Trade, Food Production and Ecosystem Support: Making Interactions Visible. Stockholm, Department of Systems Ecology – Stockholm University. * Dixon, T.H. (1995). The Ingenuity Gap: Can Poor Countries Adapt to Resource Scarcity?. Population and Development Review 21(3): 587 – 612. * Engelman, R. (1998). Chapter 3: Human Population Prospects. In Population and Global Security. Ed, P.Nicolas. Pgs 47-78. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. * Fine, B * Fowler, C.; Smale, M. & S. Gaiji. (2001). Unequal exchange? Recent Transfers in Agricultural Resources and their Implications for Developing Countries. Development Policy Review 19(2): 181-204. * Gerbens-Leenes, P.W; Nonhebel, S. & M.S. Krol. (2010). Food Consumption Patterns and Economic Growth. Increasing affluence and use of natural resources. Appetite 55(3): 597-608. * Gonzalez, C.G. (2002). Institutionalizing Inequality: The WTO Agreement on Agriculture, Food Security, and Developing Countries. Columbia Journal of Law 27: 433-489. * McMahon, P. (2001). Technology and Globalisation: An Overview. Prometheus 19(3): 211-222. * Menza, V; & J.R. Lupien. (1998). World Population and Nutritional Wellbeing. In Population and Global Security. Ed, P.Nicolas. Pgs 157 - 172. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. * Millennium Ecosystems Assessment Board * Myers, N. (1998). Chapter 2: Global Population and Emergent Pressure. In Population and Global Security. Ed, P.Nicolas. Pgs 17-46. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. * Patniak, U * Price, D. (1999). Carrying Capacity Reconsidered. Population and Environment 21 (1): 5 – 26. * Princen, T. (1999). Consumption and Environment: some conceptual issues. Ecological Economics 31(3): 347-363. * Timmer, C.P. (2008). Staving off the global food crisis. Nature 453: 722-723 * Tisdell, C * United Nations. (2008). Millennium Development Goals progress report for 2008. http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mdg/Resources/Static/Products/Progress2008/MDG_Report_2008_En.pdf. (Accessed 16/08/2011). * United Nations. (2009). World Population Prospects: The 2008 Revision – Highlights. New York, UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. * United Nations Environmental Programme. (2002). Integrating Environment and Development 1972-2002 - Global Environmental Outlook 3: Past, Present and Future Perspectives. Pgs 2-27. London, Earthscan. * United Nations Environmental Programme. (2007). Global Environmental Outlook – Chapter 1: Environment for Development Nairobi.UNEP. http://www.unep.org/geo/gco4/report/01_Environment_for_Development.pdf. (Accessed 22/08/11). * Vogel, S.J. (1994). Structural Changes in Agriculture: Production linkages and Agricultural demand led Industrialization. Oxford Economic Papers 46: 136 -156.