Outsider In Othello
Othello: The Outsider (Acts 1 and 2)
It is without a doubt that Shakespeare chooses to expound on the concept of the outsider in the first two acts of the play because this concept or theme will be of paramount importance especially in the later parts of the play. Shakespeare seeks to craft this concept of the outsider in a dramatically effective manner by giving definition to what constitutes being an outsider and what are the implications of being an outsider. This essay ultimately argues that Shakespeare does an excellent job in setting the stage for dramatic tension and conflict in the later acts. However, the inherent flaw in Shakespeare’s dramatic presentation of the outsider remains the extremeness and sheer implausibility of the …show more content…
Shakespeare specifically constructs a scene whereby issues of hierarchy and power gets thrown about in Iago and Roderigo’s conversation. Here, Shakespeare highlights the differences between an ensign and a lieutenant. In act one, scene one, Iago’s cries of society being unfair to him, in “And I, God bless the mark, his Moorship’s ancient” and “preferment goes by letter and affection And not by old gradation” can be seen. Shakespeare took this opportunity to show how positions in hierarchy brought prestige and advantages. Hence, the “insiders” possess things that distinguish themselves from the “outsiders”. In this case, the senators and powerful Venetian folk were on the inside and the ordinary citizens were on the outside. Iago’s perception that he was on the outside would eventually lead him to struggle for recognition and acceptance through manipulating others. Therefore, Shakespeare effectively sets the stage for dramatic tension in the later acts by capitalising on Iago’s discontent in being an …show more content…
Othello’s fight for recognition as the best soldier in Venice as well as Iago’s constant efforts to undermine others for his personal gain all accentuate this point. However, Shakespeare seems to have oversimplified certain aspects of the play, especially with regards to the concept of the outsider. An example would be the Duke’s answer to Othello and the calm nature in which he assessed the case. “To vouch this is no proof, Without more certain and more overt test.” The Duke seems to be calm and certain that Othello cannot be accused simply because of his race. Even after Desdemona’s admittance and confession, the Duke stood firmly with Othello, and instead advises Brabantio, “What cannot be preserved when fortune takes, Patience her injury a mockery makes.” The implausibility of such judgement by the duke stems from the fact that Othello was still an outsider, no matter how successful he was on the battlefield. What basis did the Duke have to conclude that Othello was not going to turn his back on Venice and its daughters? The inhabitants of 17th century Elizabethan England would have had this very same question in their
It is without a doubt that Shakespeare chooses to expound on the concept of the outsider in the first two acts of the play because this concept or theme will be of paramount importance especially in the later parts of the play. Shakespeare seeks to craft this concept of the outsider in a dramatically effective manner by giving definition to what constitutes being an outsider and what are the implications of being an outsider. This essay ultimately argues that Shakespeare does an excellent job in setting the stage for dramatic tension and conflict in the later acts. However, the inherent flaw in Shakespeare’s dramatic presentation of the outsider remains the extremeness and sheer implausibility of the …show more content…
Shakespeare specifically constructs a scene whereby issues of hierarchy and power gets thrown about in Iago and Roderigo’s conversation. Here, Shakespeare highlights the differences between an ensign and a lieutenant. In act one, scene one, Iago’s cries of society being unfair to him, in “And I, God bless the mark, his Moorship’s ancient” and “preferment goes by letter and affection And not by old gradation” can be seen. Shakespeare took this opportunity to show how positions in hierarchy brought prestige and advantages. Hence, the “insiders” possess things that distinguish themselves from the “outsiders”. In this case, the senators and powerful Venetian folk were on the inside and the ordinary citizens were on the outside. Iago’s perception that he was on the outside would eventually lead him to struggle for recognition and acceptance through manipulating others. Therefore, Shakespeare effectively sets the stage for dramatic tension in the later acts by capitalising on Iago’s discontent in being an …show more content…
Othello’s fight for recognition as the best soldier in Venice as well as Iago’s constant efforts to undermine others for his personal gain all accentuate this point. However, Shakespeare seems to have oversimplified certain aspects of the play, especially with regards to the concept of the outsider. An example would be the Duke’s answer to Othello and the calm nature in which he assessed the case. “To vouch this is no proof, Without more certain and more overt test.” The Duke seems to be calm and certain that Othello cannot be accused simply because of his race. Even after Desdemona’s admittance and confession, the Duke stood firmly with Othello, and instead advises Brabantio, “What cannot be preserved when fortune takes, Patience her injury a mockery makes.” The implausibility of such judgement by the duke stems from the fact that Othello was still an outsider, no matter how successful he was on the battlefield. What basis did the Duke have to conclude that Othello was not going to turn his back on Venice and its daughters? The inhabitants of 17th century Elizabethan England would have had this very same question in their