Outline the main pillars of the Bretton Woods System and discuss how its architecture led to both post-war stability and prosperity in the developed world throughout the 'long-boom'.
After the First World War many countries were left in unstable conditions. Infrastructures were in flux, economies were in isolation, and exchange rates were volatile especially in the 1930 's. Alongside these prevailing conditions, an increasing number of governments enforced restrictive trade policies. As a result, the United States in conjunction with Great Britain in the 1940 's created proposals for the design of a new financial institution that would control exchange rates and strengthen international trade. It was also hoped that such action would aid in the recovery of the Europe and curb the effects of the WW1 (Carbaugh, 2002).
During the year 1944, representatives of 45 countries gathered at the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire. Throughout this meeting, they discussed a variety of financial issues including exchange rates and protectionist trade, along with the European recovery from the war.
The culmination of this meeting resulted in the Bretton Woods Agreement. Its function was to create an international monetary system of convertible currencies, fixed exchange rates along with free trade. As a catalyst to these functions, the agreement created two international institutions: the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (the World Bank). The goal was to provide economic aid for reconstruction of postwar Europe (Hawtrey, 1946).
While the International Trade Organization that was proposed in the Bretton Woods Agreement was not endorsed by the United States, it was later backed in 1947 but in the form of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). This new agreement was also ratified by 23 other countries, and would grow to become the World Trade Organization that we are familiar with today. In recent decades the World Bank and IMF have been responsible in aiding numerous countries regain stable economies.
The Bretton Woods Agreement was also
During the year 1944, representatives of 45 countries gathered at the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire. Throughout this meeting, they discussed a variety of financial issues including exchange rates and protectionist trade, along with the European recovery from the war.
The culmination of this meeting resulted in the Bretton Woods Agreement. Its function was to create an international monetary system of convertible currencies, fixed exchange rates along with free trade. As a catalyst to these functions, the agreement created two international institutions: the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (the World Bank). The goal was to provide economic aid for reconstruction of postwar Europe (Hawtrey, 1946).
While the International Trade Organization that was proposed in the Bretton Woods Agreement was not endorsed by the United States, it was later backed in 1947 but in the form of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). This new agreement was also ratified by 23 other countries, and would grow to become the World Trade Organization that we are familiar with today. In recent decades the World Bank and IMF have been responsible in aiding numerous countries regain stable economies.
The Bretton Woods Agreement was also
Bibliography: cheson, A.L.K., Chant, J.F. & Prachowny, M.F.J. 1969, Bretton Woods revisited : evaluations of the International Monetary Fund and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development , Queens Univeristy Press, Kingston, p. 34-42Ashworth, W. 1987, A Short History of the International Economy Since 1850. Longman, London, p. 45-48Baylis, J. & Smith, S. 2001, The Globalization of World Politics; An Introduction to International Relations, 2nd edn., Oxford University Press, New York, p. 278-280, 293, 533, 563Bordo, M.D. 1992, The Bretton Woods International Monetary System; An Historical Overview, Cambridge University Press, Massuchusettes, p. 55-62Carbaugh, R.J. 2002, International Economics, 8th edn., South Western, Ohio, p. 484Clemens, M. & Williamson, J. 2001, "A Tariff-Growth Paradox? Protection 's Impact the World Around 1875-1997," NBER Working Paper 8459, p. 124Dormael, A. 1978, Bretton Woods; A Birth of a Monetary System, Macmillan, London, p. 210-220Hawtrey, R.G. 1946, Bretton Woods; For Better of Worse, Longmans, London, p. 122-128Hummels, D. 1999, "Have International Transportation Costs Declined?" unpublished manuscript, Purdue University Press, Purdue, p. 63Irwin, D. 1995, "The GATT 's Contribution to Economic Recovery in Post-War Western Europe," in Barry Eichengreen (ed.), Europe 's Postwar Recovery, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 5, 12, 17Kenen, P.B. 1994, Ways to Reform Exchange-Rate Arrangements, Princeton, New Jersey, p. 112-114Kenwood, G. & Lougheed, A. 1992, The Growth of the International Economy, 1820-2000. 4th edn., Routledge, London, p. 135, 139Krugman, P. 1995, "Growing World Trade: Causes and Consequences," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1: 327-362. Mercado, S., Welford, R. & Prescott, K. 2001, European Business, 4th edn., Prentice Hall, London, p. 80, 85, 155Rose, Andrew K. (1991). "Why Has Trade Grown Faster Than Income?" The Canadian Journal of Economics, 24: 417-427. Mikesell, R.F. 1994, The Bretton Woods debates; A Memoir, Princeton, New Jersey, p. 66-68World Bank Publications, 1984, Bretton Woods at forty, 1944-84, World Bank Press, Washington DC, p. 23-38