Outcomes of Prosthodontic Management and Speech Therapy in Person with Submucous Cleft
OUTCOMES OF PROSTHODONTIC MANAGEMENT AND SPEECH THERAPY IN PERSON WITH SUBMUCOUS CLEFT
1 Navya. A, 2 Pushpavathi. M, 3 Sreedevi. N, 4 Dakshaini. M. R.
1Junior Research Fellow, 2 Professor, 3Lecturer, 4Professor.
123Department of Speech Language Pathology, AIISH
4Dept of Prosthodontics, JSS Dental College, Mysore.
Email: 1navyaaslp@gmail.com, 2pushpa19@yahoo.co.in, 3srij01@yahoo.co.in 4m.r.dakshayini123@gmail.com.
INTRODUCTION
Speech is the coordinated function of the vocal tract includes respiratory, phonatory, resonatory and articulatory systems. Hindrance to any of these systems results in speech disorders. Cleft lip and palate (CLP) is one such congenital disorder leading to speech disorder. The abnormal speech of these individuals with cleft lip and palate can be analyzed interms of acoustical, perceptual and physiological measurements.
The speech of individuals with cleft palate is primarily characterized by abnormalities in nasal resonance. This is a direct result of unoperated cleft / fistula and or velopharyngeal dysfunction. The individuals with velopharyngeal dysfunction cannot either adequately or consistently close the velopharyngeal port during speech leading to nasal escape of sound energy. In addition, there may be articulatory errors, including compensatory articulations and reduced voice quality resulting in poor speech intelligibility (McWilliams, Morris & Shelton, 1990; Kuehn & Moller, 2000; Kummer, 2001; Peterson-Falzone, Hardin-Jones & Karnell, 2001; Bzoch, 2004). Nasal resonance increases and is perceived as hypernasality if the durations of the velopharyngeal opening and closing movements in relation to the opening and closing of the oral cavity become prolonged. Many investigators have showed that certain timing measures reflecting the movements of speech articulators are related to the degree of oral-nasal resonance imbalance in individuals with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (Warren et al., 1985;
1 Navya. A, 2 Pushpavathi. M, 3 Sreedevi. N, 4 Dakshaini. M. R.
1Junior Research Fellow, 2 Professor, 3Lecturer, 4Professor.
123Department of Speech Language Pathology, AIISH
4Dept of Prosthodontics, JSS Dental College, Mysore.
Email: 1navyaaslp@gmail.com, 2pushpa19@yahoo.co.in, 3srij01@yahoo.co.in 4m.r.dakshayini123@gmail.com.
INTRODUCTION
Speech is the coordinated function of the vocal tract includes respiratory, phonatory, resonatory and articulatory systems. Hindrance to any of these systems results in speech disorders. Cleft lip and palate (CLP) is one such congenital disorder leading to speech disorder. The abnormal speech of these individuals with cleft lip and palate can be analyzed interms of acoustical, perceptual and physiological measurements.
The speech of individuals with cleft palate is primarily characterized by abnormalities in nasal resonance. This is a direct result of unoperated cleft / fistula and or velopharyngeal dysfunction. The individuals with velopharyngeal dysfunction cannot either adequately or consistently close the velopharyngeal port during speech leading to nasal escape of sound energy. In addition, there may be articulatory errors, including compensatory articulations and reduced voice quality resulting in poor speech intelligibility (McWilliams, Morris & Shelton, 1990; Kuehn & Moller, 2000; Kummer, 2001; Peterson-Falzone, Hardin-Jones & Karnell, 2001; Bzoch, 2004). Nasal resonance increases and is perceived as hypernasality if the durations of the velopharyngeal opening and closing movements in relation to the opening and closing of the oral cavity become prolonged. Many investigators have showed that certain timing measures reflecting the movements of speech articulators are related to the degree of oral-nasal resonance imbalance in individuals with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (Warren et al., 1985;
References: Dorf, D. S. & Curtin, J. W. (1982). Early cleft palate repair and speech outcome. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery,70: 74–79. Dotevall, H., Ejnell, H., & Bake B. (2001). Nasal airflow patterns during the velopharyngeal closing phase in speech in children with and without cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 38: 358–373. Forner L. (1983). Speech segment durations produced by five- and six-year-old speakers with and without cleft palates. Cleft Palate Journal. 20:185–198. Ha, S., David, P., & Kuehn, D. P. (2011). Temporal characteristics of nasalization in speakers with and without cleft palate. Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Journal, 48 (2): 134-144. Ha, S., Sim, H., Zhi, M. & Kuehn, D. P. (2004). An Acoustic Study of the Temporal Characteristics of Nasalization in Children With and Without Cleft Palate. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 41 ( 5): 535-543. Hoopes, J. E., Dellon, A. L., Fabrikant, J. I., Edgerton, M. T. & Jr, Soliman. A. H. (1970). Cineradiographic definition of the functional anatomy and pathophysiology of the velopharynx. Cleft Palate Journal, 7: 443–454. Jian, S., Ningyi, L., & Guilan, S. (2002). Application of obturator to treat velopharyngeal incompetence. China Medical Journal, 115:842–845. Jones, D. L. (2000). The relationship between temporal aspects of oral-nasal balance and classification of velopharyngeal status with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 37: 363–369. Shelton, R. L., Lindquist, A. F., Arndt, W. B., Elbert, M. A. & Youngstrom, K. A. (1971a). Effect of speech bulb reduction on movement of the posterior wall of the pharynx and posture of the tongue. Cleft Palate Journal. 8: 10–17. Tachimura, T. T., Kotani, Y., & Wada, T. (2004) Nasalance scores in wearers of a palatal Lift Prosthesis in Comparison with Normative Data for Japanese. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 41(3): 315–319 Warren, D