Preview

Otto Von Bismarck's Government: Was It A New Conservatism?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
68 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Otto Von Bismarck's Government: Was It A New Conservatism?
Brandon Chau
Mr. Ruddell
AP European History
4 April 2017
Otto von Bismarck’s Government: Was it a new conservatism?
Otto von Bismarck’s government policies represented a new kind of conservatism where Bismarck valued traditional ways but also advocated for idealistic reforms aligned with socialism. However, he was still criticized by both conservatives and socialists, arguing that Bismarck was too much of a socialist but still not liberal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The political establishment in Germany succeeded in maintaining the political status quo through more than just the policy of moderate reform, I would argue. Certainly the policy of moderate reform helped placate and divide socialists and liberals, the groups demanding social and constitutional change, to an extent. However, it is clear that the inflexible constitution itself that kept the ultimate power always in the Kaiser’s hands succeeded in maintaining the political status quo to a much further extent. The nationalism and patriotism upholding the Kaiser’s constitutional powers were very significant, as the vast majority of the German population and the breadth of the political nation valued the Kaiser, so he did not face any serious challenges in this period. This nationalism and patriotism was particularly felt by the traditional elites, who the constitution favoured, and pressed for nationalist foreign policy to unite against threats to the status quo, which did soak up a lot of the tensions of the period. It should also be noted despite this attempt to present a united front against threats to the status quo, parties looking after sectional interests meant that a disunity of the parties in the Reichstag did little for the cause of significant political modernisation, unable to work together to make any coherent challenges.…

    • 2396 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He had the King's approval, Bismarck would rule without the consent of parliament and without legal budget, it was a direct violation of the constitution. He'd twisted his speeches and told lies to achieve his goals. He could look like a modest spokesman or a devious and crafty politician who abused his power. He stirred up conflicts to start…

    • 60 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The description of a set of beliefs as "liberal" or "conservative" is a task that, in history, has changed in its requirements and protocol. We would now consider beliefs to be conservative that were at the onset of the American experiment considered liberal. Free markets, limited government, and federalism were ideas that were ridiculed throughout most of the civilized countries of the west up until recent history. On the other hand, what we would now consider to be modern liberalism can’t well be described in a similar fashion: Hobbes’ style of conservatism and its antidemocratic and autocratic impulses, while always the end result of collectivist tendencies such as modern liberalism, don’t translate completely into FDR’s style of governance and the Left’s penchant for social democracy (though Hobbes would appreciate the control that central planning entails). Modern liberalism, like modern conservatism, can be traced to a form of liberal thought. In modern liberalism’s case, though, it is rooted in continental European thought such as French Revolution radicalism and subsequent collectivist ideologies (devoted more to equality and a concept of "change") than in conservatism’s bedrock, more individualist Anglo Saxon thought. Thus, when referring to "conservative" and "liberal", the reference will be to the modern manifestations of such.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book “Imperial Germany 1871-1918” by Volker R. Berghahn has the under title Economy, Society, Culture and Politics and was first published in 1994 by Berghahn books. The used edition is the revised and expanded edition published in 2005 and summarizes the events in the ‘Kaiserreich’ (1871-1918). Furthermore, the book has 388 pages and is divided in five parts which are Economy, Society, Culture, the Realm of Politics, and World War I. Each part has numerous under parts giving the reader detailed information about each part. In addition, the author did tremendous research on the German Empire, founded by Otto von Bismarck in 1871 and lasting until the end of World War I, to clarify the broader outlines of the development between 1871 and 1918 and to explain why Germany went to war in 1914 and lost that conflict four years later.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    New Liberalism believed in interventionism for those who are ‘deserving’ and aimed to close the gap for those in poverty. Furthermore, New Liberalism supported taxation in order to fund social reforms. This new ideology also supported the movement away from a ‘laissez-faire’ economy, proposing that the state had an obligation to intervene. New Liberalism continued to build the legacy of Joseph Chamberlain (former Liberal who left over the issues of Home Rule and reforms), a politician that sought after the implementation of reforms such as old age pensions, and the provision of loans to the working class for the purchase of houses. Additionally, David Lloyd George believed that social reform would alleviate the threat of socialism – a view shared by Winston Churchill, who had defected from the Conservatives. Another Liberal thinker, J.A. Hobson spoke of “the sovereignty of social welfare”, crucially illustrating that social welfare was the paramount concern for the…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The "very roots of human life" were being neglected by Germany's imperialistic government which portrayed acts of aggression and tyranny toward their people and neighboring countries which posed a threat for world peace and democracy. Germany's imperialistic government overlooked the well-being of their people and put them in hardships without their approval.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The delineations of the words "liberal" and "conservative" shifted at the start of the Great Depression. Although laissez-faire policy was thought to be liberal in the Roaring 20 's, the year 1929 quickly changed America 's idea of liberalism entirely. The hardnosed Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the saavy Herbert Hoover both believed they alone could improve America 's economic depression. Their political standings have been wholly analyzed, and although the two men did express ideas which were contradictory to their original political standpoints, one possessed more liberal ideas by wanting to change the government, versus more conservative ideas; wanting to keep the government as it was.…

    • 869 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His ideological perspective is closely linked to modern liberalism because they both encourage and endorse social programs and have government control some aspects of the economy. If classic liberalism was left alone with no government control, society would go into recession and there is no way that it can come out of it unless government is there to take control. You need social programs to help the recession by creating jobs and express confidence in the economy.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    liberal refroms

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Ever since the Liberal’s implemented social reform 1906-1914, historians have been divided as to why such reform occurred. However, there are some key reasons why the Liberal’s implemented reform:…

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    US History

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many different kinds of Conservatives Core Conservative beliefs Opposition to “Big Government” – Ex., Milton Friedman, Ayn Ran Conservatives believed that the government had no obligation to protect rights except property rights. Believed governments makes people Smooches off the government Does not believe that poverty limits potential If your poor it is because your “stupid” and “lazy” Believed people with ambition and smarts will ALWAYS be wealthy. Milton Friedman, Ayn Rand- key economists Support for “Big Military”…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The delineations of the words "liberal" and "conservative" shifted at the start of the Great Depression. Although laissez-faire policy was thought to be liberal in the Roaring 20's, the year 1929 quickly changed America's idea of liberalism entirely. The hardnosed Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the saavy Herbert Hoover both believed they alone could improve America's economic depression. Their political standings have been wholly analyzed, and although the two men did express ideas which were contradictory to their original political standpoints, one possessed more liberal ideas by wanting to change the government, versus more conservative ideas; wanting to keep the government as it was.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bismarck Sources

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In view of the attitude to France, our national sense of honour compelled us, in my opinion to go to war; and if we did not act according to the demands of this feeling, we should lose... the entire impetus towards our national development won in 1866, while the German national feeling south of the Main, aroused by our military successes in 1866;… would have to grow cold again… Under this conviction I made use of the royal authorization communicated to me... to publish the contents of the telegram…I reduced the telegram by striking out words.. The difference in the effect of the abbreviated text of the Ems telegram… made this announcement appear decisive. After I read out the edition to my two guests, Moltke remarked: ‘Now it has a different ring; it sounded before like a parley; now it Is like a flourish in answer to a challenge’;…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The unification of both Germany and Italy brought great change in these countries. This process resulted in these countries to focus on for their independence, economic growth, and a strong nationalism. Also, there is another role of the unification and it is an occurrence of war, separation and controlling politics. War is a natural force which leads to unite some nations as wells as divide others. In the unification process, it is essential to have a confident and courageous leader. Bismarck was a leader in Germany while Cavour was a leader in Italy. Bismarck’s ideas were based on the pure survival. He insisted to work hard in a forceful way thought it might be brutal, to unify the Germany and therefore he was recognized as “Bloddy Iron”. The leadership of Italy was primarily based on the political issues.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to the “hands off method” used by Herbert Hoover during the Great Depression, the president can be defined strongly as a conservative. By trying to restore the American economy, Hoover had to try profusely to keep the Unites States’ system from being “swept over” by the depression which had already happened to Europe (Doc D). During the depression, he wanted to restore the top of the economic pyramid by helping railroads, banks, and rural credit corporations and through “trickle down” economics, the bottom of the economic pyramid would fix itself as well. Because he applied a more business-oriented approach rather than a government approach, his plans were more conservative that liberal. Because Hoover believed that too much government involvement would destroy American individuality and self-reliance, which were to him important American values, he thought it was in the best interest of the nation to use less government in his policies (Doc A). Hoover drew the line at federal relief to individuals because he didn’t want federal…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck and Metternich

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare and contrast the foreign policy goals and achievements of Metternich (1815-1848) and Bismarck (1862-1890)…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays