Preview

Organ Donation: Claim of Policy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
637 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Organ Donation: Claim of Policy
In the article “Need an Organ. It Helps to be Rich” a claim of policy was being supported. The claim of policy that was being supported was that anyone who is willing to donate an organ should be eligible for a transplant themselves, regardless of the ability to pay. This claim of policy was supported by using sources, evidence, and appeals.
This claim was supported first by sources. When using sources it is important to make sure that the sources are credible. The author of the article “Need an Organ. It Helps to be Rich” is Joy Victory. She is the online health editor at the About.com and has written about health issues for newspapers and for ABC news. Her credentials affect the credibility of the argument because it shows that she knows what she is talking about and she isn’t just an amateur. A journal is not a credible source because journals are usually someone’s opinion and anyone can have an opinion on a topic. I think that all the sources quoted in the article are credible but, I believe that the bioethicist, bioethics fellow, Harvard professor of ethics, and the family law professor at Washington and Lee would be more biased than the cardiologist and the director of transplant center. This is because the profession that they are in requires for them while the cardiologist and the director of transplant center have no reason to be biased.
This claim of policy was also supported by evidence. The evidence that is used has to be convincing and sound. The statistics that are used in this journal are not very credible because for example in the National Study of Family Consent to the Organ Donation Siminoff served only families in Pennsylvania and Ohio. It came to be that 23 percent of organ donors were uninsured. Then it goes on to say that she believes that a national study would have similar results. The problem is that there are so many other states and 23 percent from two states cant represent the other states. Another example is from the article

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    While reading the Organ Sales Will Save Lives article by Joanna MacKay the main claim I felt would have to be in the beginning of the first paragraph where she stated that “governments should not ban the sale of human organs; they should regulate it. Lives should not be wasted; they should be saved”. This part basically explains what the problem is that she is trying to get an answer to which is that more people should be saved from consistently dying because of kidney problems and the government should reconsider the banishment of the sales of human organs. The sub-claim that supports the main claim would be when she refers to the 350,000 people that suffer from the ending stage of the renal disease which causes the organs to stop functioning…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author makes several claims throughout his article and then uses proven facts to support them. On page 10, he claims that more than 90% of Europeans are organ donors. He then explains “The reverse is true in Europe, where you are an organ donor unless you expressly indicate that you don’t want to be” (10).…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Organs For Sale Summary

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Organs for Sale” is an argument written in response to the on-going ethical debate of a market-based incentive program to meet the rising demands of organ transplants. With many on the waiting list for new organs and few organs being offered, the author, Sally Satel, urges for legalization of payment to organ donors. Once in need of a new kidney herself, Sally writes of the anguish she encountered while facing three days a week on dialysis and the long wait on the UNOS list with no prospective willing donors in sight. She goes on to list several saddening researched facts on dialysis patients survival rates, length of time on the UNOS wait list, and registered as well as deceased donor numbers. While Sally is…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first paper appoints the issue of not legalizing the payment of donating organs. The National Kidney Foundation does not believe that the payment for organ donating will increase donations. The foundation wants to remain committed to helping people with donations. They believe that if it is legalized then disadvantaged citizens would take advantage of this opportunity that should only be done for the great feeling of it, and not the money. Sally Satel believes that organ trafficking should be stopped by legalizing some type of donor rewards. Satel believes that if legalized then people would give more kidneys or any other organ to help people on the waiting list. She also believes that certain incentives should be given and not just straight cash. Some of those incentives are; income tax credit, tuition vouchers for ones children, and a contribution to a retirement fund that would not be able to be touched until a certain age.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This change would increase the number of available organs for transplanting. An opt-out organ donation policy is where everyone is an organ donor, unless they have explicitly indicated that they do not want to be an organ donor. On the other hand, an opt-in organ donation policy indicates that no one is an organ donor unless they have put themselves on the organ donation list. Although, the public opinion is divided on the topic due to moral and ethical issues, the Organization of Organ Transplant Nurses, is in favor of changing to an opt-out policy.…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article was written by Gillian Mohney who is a writer in ABC News.com which is a famous article in America. This woman has a large knowledge in many fields including films, fashion social, culture with more than 400 articles, and commentaries in ABC News.com (1). But she still conquers other themes such as health service and “Organ Donor Death Raise Questions about Living Donors” (on April 11, 2012) is that article. Organ donations have both advantage and disadvantage. However, some details in article are subjective evaluation. We should have more multiple perspectives through posts of Gillian Mohney.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, “Buying and Selling Organs Would Create an Economic Class War” (Bramstedt, 2014), the author Katrina claims that people in need of a kidney transplant should not be allowed to pay someone to donate one of theirs. She argues that firstly, health care should not be based on economic structures as she believes that it is unfair that a person gets the organ based on their personal wealth. Secondly, she suggests that it should be equal for all to receive an organ based on the “waiting list” that one has registered for. Lastly, she claims that if the priority list/wait list for organ transplant is overlooked, it could create a “back-door” option where donors will incorporate the idea to sell organs illegally, i.e black market sales…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compensating donors for organ donations is one of the most controversial debates we have today. The shortage of organ donations in America is the one of the main reason there is a sudden drive to supplement the possible sources of organs. It first began with the move from donations of organs from cadaver to donations from living donors, and no the debate is rerisen, to the possibility of building a market for organ donations with a financial incentive.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    resume

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    3.Quotation from the essay w/Parenthetical Reference- Satel says, "If we really want to increase the supply of organs, we need to try incentives- financial and otherwise." (129. Par. 6) Here in this statement Satel uses logic to prove that if people are given something they would enjoy, In return they will become an organ donor. "Many transplant experts recognize this, proposing initiatives that would allow people to give their organs in exchange for tax breaks , guaranteed health insurance, college scholarships for their children, deposits in their retirement accounts, and so on... the Presidents Council on Bloethics and others, have begun discussing the virtues of such incentives." (129. Par.7) This evidence proves that the Auther is not the only person who thinks incentives should be given and if enough people think there should be initiatives, then it may happen.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, Let's Pay For Organs

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As everyone knows, there are millions of people waiting desperately for an organ to save their life's. Now a days there are countries like Singapore that allows the commercialization of organs for a really high amount. Even though; United States prohibited the option to sell organs for money, I believe that having the option to save other people by selling an organ is a very smart idea. In "Yes, let's Pay for Organs" by Charles Krauthammer; a political columnist, writes an essay to demonstrate that maybe selling organs for a low price would and may help to our society in general.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is the incentive for people to donate? Many believe that if the buying and selling of organs becomes legal, that this would be a unique way of not only saving thousands of lives every year, but also allowing many people to be pulled out of poverty and live a life where one’s family is provided for (Shafer and Cunningham, 2011).…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This system argues that we should assume people prefer to donate their organs if they did not leave a clear indication that they do not. Michael Gill states that,” presumed consent with a provision for family veto is still a superior option, at least at the present time, when a significant portion of the American public lacks full information about organ donation and transplantation” (Gill, p.38). Gill argues due to lack of information and knowledge about organ donation, most people do not leave a clear consent. With presumed consent, organ donation will increase because a high number of people do not have a preference of what happens to their organs. Gill also states, “I believe proponents of presumed consent are right in holding that organ procurement policy ought to be based on the fewer mistakes claim” (Gill, p.43). Interestingly, Gill claims that there is no doubt that the current system and a system of presumed consent will make mistakes regarding respecting individual’s autonomy, and a system of presumed consent will have a fewer mistakes than the current system. People who oppose presumed consent believe that mistaken removals are morally worse than non-mistaken removals. In contrast, Gill argues that both are morally equivalent since they are both invading individual's autonomy. This is important because if presumed consent leads to fewer mistakes than my default it is the better options for because as it respects more the autonomy of individuals. Gill’s autonomy based argument is stating that a system of presumed consent would do a better job that the current system when it comes to respecting individuals wished regarding how they want their bodies to be treated after they…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Money and lives can be saved if organ donations were more prominent. With all the treatments need to keep a sick patient alive, the amount of money piles up on the hospital, meaning more taxes for everybody. The families affected have to schedule for appointments constantly, leading to less work. Less work means less income coming in. The family will have other issues to worry about besides their family member dying helplessly. Randolph, an author all for mandatory organ donation, explains what organ donations would help through the view of patients needing kidneys. He…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Organ Donation

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It can help someone else because there are certain organs that you cannot live without, but of course it’s after the donor has passed away and is in good condition…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Matters of Life and Death

    • 2420 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This case surrounds the controversy brought about by the Arizona state legislature defunding life-saving organ transplant operations. In 1987, the Arizona state legislature voted to eliminate funding for most organ transplants for the indigent through the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS). At the same time of this decision, the legislature voted to extend health coverage to pregnant women and children in a “notch group.” The public controversy began when Dianna Brown died after being denied coverage for a liver transplant that would have saved her life. After her death, there was wide spread coverage of the issue that brought the defunding of certain organ transplants into the national spotlight. The decision to move funds for the poor to mothers and children rather than to life-saving transplant services put the legislature under scrutiny. This case presents that scrutiny and the legislature’s reasoning behind their decision.…

    • 2420 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays