Preview

Opinion, Some People Are Rich Because Of They Are Born Rich?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
978 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Opinion, Some People Are Rich Because Of They Are Born Rich?
1. In my opinion, some people are rich because of they are born rich, or they worked hard in life to become rich. For example, Donald Trump’s sons and daughters were born rich and are used to the expensive lifestyle because they have lived it every day since they were born. Some people are poor because of the decisions that they made in life which caused them to be that way, such as not choosing to go to school, or finding a way out of being poor rather than staying stagnant. Also some were born into a poor environment and it becomes hard to get out of that lifestyle because they are used to it.
Person A: In my opinion, this 45 year old man became homeless either because he lost his job due to maybe an injury at work or he was laid off. Therefore,
…show more content…
This exploitation results in the workers alienation – a feeling of powerlessness and estrangement from other people and from oneself. Marx predicted that the working class would become aware of its exploitation, overthrow the capitalists, and establish a free and classless society” (Kendall, 2017). This quote explains the Marxist position on capitalism perfectly because it was his belief that the capitalism controls the poor workers and pays them less, even though that they work hard day to day just to live. To understand Marx’s conflict perspective one must know what conflict perspective means; “ the sociological approach that views groups in society as engaged in a continuous power struggle for control of scarce resources” (Kendall 2017). Marx’s conflict perspective which has three branches: the Neo-Marxist, which says that the struggle between classes is inventible. The second class which is focused on racial and ethnic inequalities. The third class is the feminist view, which focuses on gender issues. These three branches are all reasons why Marx’s argument is put in the conflict perspective because they are all fighting for justice in places where there is a struggle to gain …show more content…
This is like a bath full of water, but the water is represented as God washing away all of our sins or bad things in the past. Not just people of the congregation can get baptized but anyone can come. There is no pattern of dress for my church, even though there are many Pentecostal churches where they are strict with clothing, where you must where long skirts, no jewelry and long sleeves. My church is strictly come as you are and that is one of the things that I love about my church. A motto that we have in my church is one Lord, one faith, and one baptism. This means that we believe that there is one lord, and one faith or belief and one baptism and that is baptizing in Jesus name when being baptized. This motto comes from Ephesians 4:5 in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Sociology Notes

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Karl Marx’s class conflict theory states that the bourgeoisie (or the capitalists) are locked in conflict with the proletariat (the exploited workers). Marx believed that this conflict could only end when the working class united and violently broke free of the “bondage”. Once this happens, society will be classless and people will work according to their abilities, while receiving goods and services according to their needs. Although Marxism does propose revolution, it should not be confused with communism.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism is a useful conflict theory in helping us to understand why there was obedience, particularly in the past in society. Marx was seen as an economic determinist, as he believed that the functioning and running of society was based upon the economy. Because of this, Marx says that is why there was a divide between the proletariat (working class who have only their skills to sell) and the bourgeoisie (the ruling class who own the means of production). The bourgeoisie cannot operate without the proletariat, as they cannot produce products, and similarly the proletariat cannot operate without the bourgeoisie, as they need them so they can be paid a wage and feed their families. Therefore, even though the Bourgeoisie were exploiting the proletariat and the proletariat could have walked away to stop being exploited, they never walked away as they needed the money. On the other hand, this can be viewed from a different perspective. The reason why these people may have not left their jobs is because they could have been in a state of false consciousness, whereby they were unaware of their exploitation by the bourgeoisie. This helps us to understand society as the Marxism theory provides reasoning on how the bourgeoisie were able to exploit the proletariat, which in turn fuelled capitalism and allowed the ruling elite to maintain their profits. It is also relevant to today’s society, as it helps to explain why many people who are in a hard laboured, low paid job (e.g. Factory workers) do not leave, despite hating their job, and this is because they need the money to survive.…

    • 2098 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Karl Marx, the struggle between the upper class, the bourgeoisie and the lower class, the proletariat, has always been a constant conflict throughout history. The bourgeoisie controlled all means of production and continuously oppressed the proletariat, which was unfair because the proletariats were the ones doing hard labor, yet the bourgeoisie gained all of the benefits. Marx believed that in order to end this class struggle, class distinctions would need to be eliminated. In order for everybody in society to be considered equal, there could be no private ownership of materials. If private ownership of materials were allowed, then some people would have more things than other people which would create another class and thus another conflict. Therefore, an equalized society would get rid of all conflict. Marxism has been…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Next we will take a look into the Conflict theory. After witnessing the Industrial revolution, and how peasants left the city to work and were still barely making enough money to eat, Karl Marx, the…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are the Rich Necessary

    • 2480 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Others believe that the rich are essential to our economy. The economy needs rich people because they have wealth. As the economy expand, the rich needs to save profit to invest on capital goods to adjust to the increase in poverty. Why is the poor and middle class living in subsistence and can’t save? They may have money saved up for retirement, and college fund for their children; however they have many immediate needs and desires, in this case will eventually deplete their funds. Unlike the poor, the rich’s income is greater than their expense even they splurge in luxuries therefore forced to save. It is know in history that the…

    • 2480 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first point I would like to make in this paragraph consist of the misconception of the wealthy, regarding the idea of how it is simply handed down from one another. The wealth and income of many many people, both middle class and the rich is a result of hard work and self made prosperity. Not a product of good fortune, greed, and deliberate deprivation of the poor. Many of the people who are wealthy today once started off and average people who faced struggles and hardships as well. Business owners have twelve failures for every one success, doctors endure eight years of college, and many middle management employees once started off as simple assembly line workers. One specific business venture that I myself have eight years experience…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Manifesto of the Communist Party, written by Karl Marx, the author proclaims that the struggles of the poor are caused by the greedy rich members of society taking advantage of the lower class. At the time, there were many workers who were exploited by their employers due to the complete lack of labor laws. Marx’s knowledge of his audience helped him to create an argument that appealed to abused workers; and slowly eased them into his revolutionary ideas for overthrowing the upper class.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rich and wealthy are all based on personal opinions. The average person does not desire to be rich, they just want enough money to live on, and maybe a little more for extras. For the average person, extras include vacations, newer cars, and newer phones. Another question to help answer the big question is, Do people need money to be happy in life?. Many people would say yes and argue that people can buy the things that make them happy. The other side might argue that the things that make people happiest cannot be bought. Such as love, family, and good health. If everyone can find what makes them happy in life, then that should help direct them to their American…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx focuses his theory around the two different social classes within a society; the capitalists (who hold majority of the wealth) and the proletarians (the working class). The social conflict theory though can easily be applied to numerous cases including the differential between male in correspondence to female and the differential in white man to minorities. The conflict theory primarily focuses on how certain social patterns benefit certain people (capitalists) while hindering others (proletarians). Karl Marx exerted the idea that revolution was the only way to reform the social structure; that the proletarians needed to realize their position of weakness and revolt against the…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Karl Marx’s model helps to explain the industrial capitalism by first generalizing history leading up to today’s current society as being created due to the history of class struggles. Rather than the more traditional complex hierarchy system, Marx describes society as being split into two classes, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. He described these two classes in terms of binary oppositions, with one class having the absolute power, and the other being oppressed by that power. The bourgeoisie class was said to be the oppressor, which Marx defined as the social class that owns the means of production and the employers of wage labor in a capitalist society. Marx views the class as emerging from the wealthy urban classes in pre and early capitalist societies. They resulted when the demand for a larger scale and efficient means of production led to the division of labor and the arrival of industrialization. The proletariat class was said to be the class which was being oppressed by the bourgeoisie class. According to Marx they were the workforce of bourgeois enterprise and were a class of laborers which were able to make a living only as long as they…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism is a conflict model, as it suggests that the functionalist theory is not true, and instead that social stratification and class is used as a way of exploiting workers – the hard workers in society are not working towards the greater good of all, but instead they work purely to benefit their employers, as a form of social control by forcing individuals to conform to the norms of society through their need to earn money. It also highlights the problems many people face in society, in terms of social mobility, as it suggests that because of the fact that individuals work for the benefit of the higher classes, they are unable to support themselves in moving up the hierarchy of…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx and Moore

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marx perceives society made up as two classes, the powerful and exploitive higher class known as the bourgeoisie and the industrial wage earners that must earn their living by selling their labor known as the proletariat. The bourgeoisie is known as the private property owners and the proletariat works for the bourgeoisie. There is an inequality between these two classes because the bourgeoisie takes advantage of the proletariat by having them work in order to live. Marx believes that what make us human are our productive and creative abilities and when the proletariat works, they lose individual character because they are working for their lives. This causes the proletariat to be alienated while the bourgeoisie capitalist basically sits back and uses the proletariat’s work to its full advantage.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his study, Marx begins his argument describing a class’ struggles, or equally, the exploitation of one class by another, meaning the instance of one class becoming too powerful in comparison to the rest of society, is the driven force in which all historical developments are based upon. With this, Marx proposes the example of the Proletariat vs. the Bourgeoisie, the working class vs. the materialistic…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marxism Vs Conservatism

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the first sentence of the first chapter of the his work titled the Communist Manifesto, he explains, “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles” (Marx CR 129). Hierarchies have existed in societies for centuries, and capitalism went along with it by establishing a divide between the haves and the have-nots. Owners have control over the means of production, meaning that they not only control factories and business, but economic resources and political power as well. Marx comments that the proletariat class suffers for the benefit of the bourgeois, saying, “Not only are they slaves the the bourgeois class, and of the bourgeois state; they are daily and hourly enslaved by the machine, by the overlooker, and, above all, in the individual bourgeois manufacturer himself” (Marx CR 132). This greatly affects the distribution of wealth as the bourgeois, who only represent one-tenth of the population see an increase in wealth, while the proletarian, nine-tenths of the population, see an increase in poverty.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx would argue that capitalism propelled history by dividing society into two classes, the working class and the bourgeoisie. This division is what contributed to the class struggle and inequality of the working class. The poor were forced to work for the capitalists as a result of not having the capability to own their own resources and the need for survival. Since resources and the means of production were privately owned, labour power was essential to gaining profit. Furthermore, the increased desire for consumption in modern society, meant that capitalism could only exist and be successful by exploiting the working class.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays