Onion to Ocean
FROM “ONION” TO “OCEAN” 71
71
Tony Fang is assistant professor of international business at Stockholm University,
SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden (tel.: +46 8 163063; fax: +46 8 674 74 40; e-mail: tony.fang@fek.su.se). The author thanks Urapa Joy Watanachote (Thailand), Joost
Stel (Netherlands), George Kakhadze (Georgia), Satu Penttinen (Finland), and Gabriel de Mello Pratellesi (Brazil) for personal communications about their respective countries discussed in this paper. The author also thanks Dr. Anton Kriz and many others, including the editor of ISMO and this issue’s guest editors, for their valuable comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Int. Studies of Mgt. & Org., vol. 35, no. 4, Winter 2005–6, pp. 71–90.
© 2006 M.E. Sharpe, Inc. All rights reserved.
ISSN 0020–8825 / 2006 $9.50 + 0.00.
TONY FANG
From “Onion” to “Ocean”
Paradox and Change in National Cultures
Abstract: Differing from the dominant bipolar paradigm of analyzing national cultures, this paper champions a dialectical approach that sees each national culture as having a life of its own full of dynamics and paradoxes. The paper calls for shifting our mindset from the Cold War “onion” way of analyzing culture to a new
“ocean” way of understanding culture to capture the dynamics of national cultures and international cross-cultural management in the age of globalization.
For decades, the field of international cross-cultural management has been dominated by a functionalist bipolar or dimensional paradigm of analyzing national cultures (e.g., Hofstede 1980, 1991, 2001; House et al. 2004; Trompenaars
1994). Two profound perspectives have prevailed in this paradigm. First, national cultures are divided into individualist or collectivist, feminine or masculine, and so forth. As Hofstede stated: “The vast majority of people in our world live in societies in which the interest of the group prevails over the interest of the individual. I will call these societies collectivist.
71
Tony Fang is assistant professor of international business at Stockholm University,
SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden (tel.: +46 8 163063; fax: +46 8 674 74 40; e-mail: tony.fang@fek.su.se). The author thanks Urapa Joy Watanachote (Thailand), Joost
Stel (Netherlands), George Kakhadze (Georgia), Satu Penttinen (Finland), and Gabriel de Mello Pratellesi (Brazil) for personal communications about their respective countries discussed in this paper. The author also thanks Dr. Anton Kriz and many others, including the editor of ISMO and this issue’s guest editors, for their valuable comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Int. Studies of Mgt. & Org., vol. 35, no. 4, Winter 2005–6, pp. 71–90.
© 2006 M.E. Sharpe, Inc. All rights reserved.
ISSN 0020–8825 / 2006 $9.50 + 0.00.
TONY FANG
From “Onion” to “Ocean”
Paradox and Change in National Cultures
Abstract: Differing from the dominant bipolar paradigm of analyzing national cultures, this paper champions a dialectical approach that sees each national culture as having a life of its own full of dynamics and paradoxes. The paper calls for shifting our mindset from the Cold War “onion” way of analyzing culture to a new
“ocean” way of understanding culture to capture the dynamics of national cultures and international cross-cultural management in the age of globalization.
For decades, the field of international cross-cultural management has been dominated by a functionalist bipolar or dimensional paradigm of analyzing national cultures (e.g., Hofstede 1980, 1991, 2001; House et al. 2004; Trompenaars
1994). Two profound perspectives have prevailed in this paradigm. First, national cultures are divided into individualist or collectivist, feminine or masculine, and so forth. As Hofstede stated: “The vast majority of people in our world live in societies in which the interest of the group prevails over the interest of the individual. I will call these societies collectivist.
References: Bem, D.J. 1970. Beliefs, Attitudes, and Human Affairs. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole. Berry, M., D. Carbaugh, and M. Nurmikari-Berry. 2004. “Communicating Finnish Quietude: A Pedagogical Process for Discovering Implicit Cultural meanings in Bird, A., and M.J. Stevens. 2003. “Toward an Emergent Global Culture and the Effects of Globalization on Obsolescing National Cultures.” Journal of International Birkinshaw, J. 2002. “The Art of Swedish Management.” Business Strategy Review 13 (2): 11–19. Boyacigiller, N.A., J. Kleinberg, M.E. Phillips, and S.A. Sackmann. 2003. “Conceptualizing Culture: Elucidating the Streams of Research in International Brannen, M.Y., and J. Salk. 2000. “Partnering Across Borders.” Human Relations 53 (4): 451–487. Britton, C. 1999. Sweden and the Swedes. Stockholm: Swedish Institute. Burrell, G., and G. Morgan. 1979. Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis Cameron, K.S., and R.E. Quinn. 1988. “Organizational Paradox and Transformation.” In Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in OrganiFROM Chen, M.J. 2001. Inside Chinese Business: A Guide for Managers Worldwide. Chu, C.-N. 1992. Thick Face Black Heart: The Path to Thriving, Winning & Succeeding. Clegg, S.R., ed. 2002. Management and Organization Paradoxes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Cooper, J.C. 1990. Taoism: The Way of the Mystic. Wellingborough, UK: Aquarian Press. Daun, Å. 1991. “Individualism and Collectivity Among Swedes.” Ethnos, nos. 3/4: 165–172. Fang, T. 1999. Chinese Business Negotiating Style. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. ———. 2003. “A Critique of Hofstede’s Fifth National Culture Dimension.” International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 3 (3): 347–368. Flynn, E. 2004. “Altruism and Opportunism.” Newsweek, July 26, p. 32. Friedman, T.L. 1999. The Lexus and the Olive Tree. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux. Gannon, M.J. 2004. Understanding Global Cultures: Metaphorical Journeys Through 28 Countries, 3d ed Gannon, M.J., ed. 2001. Cultural Metaphors: Readings, Research Translations, and Commentary Hall, E.T. 1976. Beyond Culture. Garden City, NY: Anchor. Hatch, M.J. 1993. “The Dynamics of Organizational Culture.” Academy of Management Review 18 (4): 657–693. Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values ———. 1991. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill. ———. 1993. “Cultural Constraints in Management Theories.” Academy of Management Executive 7 (1): 81–94. ———. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, 2d ed Hofstede, G., and G.J. Hofstede. 2005. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind House, R.J., P.J. Hanges, M., Javidan, and P.W. Dorfman, ed. 2004. Leadership, Culture and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies Ji, L.-J., R.E. Nisbett, and Y. Su. 2001. “Culture, Change, and Prediction.” Psychological Science 12 (6): 450–456. Kagitcibasi, C. 1997. “Individualism and Collectivism.” In Handbook of Cross- Cultural Psychology, Vol Kao, J. 1997. Jamming: The Art and Discipline of Business Creativity. London: Harper Collins Business. Kluckhohn, F.R., and F.L. Strodtbeck. 1961. Variations in Value Orientations. Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Leung, K., R.S. Bhagat, N.R. Buchan, M. Erez, and C.B. Gibson. 2005. “Culture and International Business: Recent Advances and Their Implications for Future Levitt, T. 1983. “The Globalization of Markets.” Harvard Business Review 61 (3): 92–102. Lewis, M.W. 2000. “Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide.” Academy of Management Review 25 (4): 760–776. Maslow, A.H. 1954. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Brothers. McSweeney, B. 2002. “Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Differences and Their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith—A Failure of Analysis.” Human Morgan, G. 1986. Images of Organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Naylor, L.L. 1996. Culture and Change: An Introduction. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey. Ortony, A. 1975. “Why Metaphors Are Necessary and Not Just Nice.” Educational Theory 25 (winter): 45–53. Osland, J.S., and A. Bird. 2000. “Beyond Sophisticated Stereotyping: Cultural Sensemaking in Context.” Academy of Management Executive 14 (1): 65–79. Popper, K.R. 2002. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge. Punnett, B.J., and O. Shenkar. 2003. “International Management Research at the Dawn of the Twenty-first Century.” In Punnett and Shenkar, Handbook for Quantrill, M., and B.C. Webb, ed. 1998. The Culture of Silence: Architecture’s Fifth Dimension Redding, S.G. 1994. “Comparative Management Theory: Jungle, Zoo or Fossil Bed?” Organization Studies 15 (3): 323–359.